Global Migrations

From the seventeenth century to the current day, more than 2.5 million Scots have sought new lives elsewhere. This book of essays examines the impact since 1600 of out-migration from Scotland upon the homeland, on the migrants themselves, on the destinations in which they settled, and upon their descendants and ‘affinity’ Scots. It does so through a focus on themes of slavery, cross-cultural encounters, economics, war, tourism, and the modern diaspora since 1945 in diverse destinations encompassing Europe, the USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, South Africa, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), Hong Kong, Guyana and the British World more broadly.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
MTR Editorial Office

The editorial team greatly appreciates the reviewers who have dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal’s rigorous editorial process in 2020, regardless of whether the submissions were finally published or not. In 2020, a total of 45 articles were submitted to the journal, with a median time to first decision of 50 days, and 71 days from submission to publication. The editorial team would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for their generous contribution in 2020: Agnieszka Lazarowska, Poland Akihiko Matsuda, Japan Aldo Chircop, Canada Anand Kumar, Malaysia Anastasia Christodoulou, Sweden Anthony Paul Sison Guerrero, United States Anthony Yaw Karikari, Ghana Arunachalam Ponshanmugakumar, India Asen Asenov, Bulgaria Birgit Pauksztat, Sweden Boris Svilicic, Croatia Carlos Efrén Mora Luis, Spain Chalermpong Senarak, Thailand Chandrashekher Umanath Rivonker, India Che Abd Rahim Mohamed, Malaysia Christiaan Adika Adenya, Kenya Christopher Nolan, United States Dimitrios Dalaklis, Sweden Dong-Taur Su, Taiwan Ergun Demirel, Turkey Fatima Zohra Bouthir, Morocco Florin Rusca, Romania Floris Goerlandt, Canada Fu Ming Tzu, Taiwan Geng-Ruei Chang, Taiwan George H. Kaplan, United States Giulio Dubbioso, Italy Hao Long, China Hong Oanh Owen Nguyen, Australia Jacopo Aguzzi, Spain Jagan Jeevan, Malaysia Jerónimo Esteve-Perez, Spain Jiangang Jin, China Jianjun Wu, China Jianmin Li, China Jiao Jialong, China Juan Carlos Astudillo, Hong Kong Jun Ando, Japan Kantapon Tanakitkorn, Thailand Kwan Ouyang  Taiwan Laura Piñeiro, Spain Li Ye, China Lidong Fan, Australia M. P. R Prasad, India Maciej Reichel, Poland Mahinda Bandara, Sri Lanka María-Araceli Losey-Leon, Spain Marta Mańkowska, Poland Maruj Limpawattana, Thailand Masayoshi Doi, Japan Mate J. Csorb, Norway Ming-Cheng Tsou, Taiwan Mohammed Russtam Suhrab Ismail, Malaysia Mohd Hazmi Bin Mohd Rusli, Malaysia Moses Kopong Tokan, Indonesia Mumini Dzoga, Kenya Neil J. Douglas, New Zealand Nucharee Nuchkoom Smith, Thailand Oghenetejiri Digun-Aweto, South Africa Olabisi Michael Olapoju, Nigeria Olaf Chresten Jensen, Denmark Om Prakash Sha, India Paul Tae-Woo Lee, China Pengfei Zhang, United Kindom Peter RANERI, Sweden Peter Ralph Galicia, Philippines Phansak Iamraksa, Thailand Phatchara Sriphrabu, Thailand Proshanto Mukherjee, China Saikat Banerjee, India Sarinya Sanitwong Na Ayutthaya, Thailand Seonho Cho, Korea Sheree-Ann Adams, Grenada Supawat Chaikasem, Thailand Surasak Phoemsapthawee, Thailand Suresh Bhardwaj, India Thee Chowwanonthapunya, Thailand Vasilios D. Tsoukalas, Greece Wirachaya Chanpuypetch, Thailand Yodchai Tiaple, Thailand Yottana Khunatorn, Thailand


Author(s):  
P. M. Kirk

Abstract A description is provided for Gongronella butleri. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: From soil. DISEASE: None as a primary pathogen of plants; encountered as a secondary invader or as a saprobe. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, Ghana, Honduras, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Malaysia, Mauritius, New Caledonia, New Zealand, Nigeria, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Trinidad, Uganda, Uraguay, UK, USA (Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Wisconsin), former USSR, Zambia. TRANSMISSION: Movement of soil, or water-borne dispersal of sporangiospores.


Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Mycosphaerella gibsonii H. C. Evans. Hosts: Pine (Pinus spp.). Information is given on the geographical distribution in Africa, Kenya, Madagascar, Malawi, South Africa, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Asia, Bangladesh, China, Anhui, Fujian, Guangdong, Guangxi, Hunan, Jiangsu, Jiangxi, Hong Kong, India, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Japan, Korea, Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah, Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam, Australasia & Oceania, Papua New Guinea, Central America & West Indies, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Nicaragua.


Author(s):  
A. Sivanesan

Abstract A description is provided for Cochliobolus eragrostidis. Information is included on the disease caused by the organism, its transmission, geographical distribution, and hosts. HOSTS: Acacia, Agave, Allium, Alysicarpus, Amorphophallus, Anacardium, Arachis, Areca, Billbergia, Calamus, Callitris, Calotropis, Camellia, Cananga, Capsicum, Citrullus, Citrus, Clerodendron, Cocos, Coffea, Colocasia, Cymbopogon, Dendrobium, Digitaria, Dioscorea, Dracaena, Durio, Elaeis, Eragrostis, Eucalyptus, Euphorbia, Furcraea, Gladiolus, Glycine, Gossypium, Heliconia, Hevea, Hystrix, Ipomoea, Kaempferia, Lycopersicon, Mangifera, Manihot, Mystroxylon, Musa, Neyraudia, Oldenlandia, Opuntia, Oryza, Panicum, Pennisetum, Pentas, Phalaenopsis, Phaseolus, Pinus, Polygala, Pueraria, Raphia, Raphanus, Rhodomyrtus, Rhoeo, Rottboellia, Saccharum, Sesamum, Sorghum, Spinacia, Sporobolus, Stylosanthes, Theobroma, Thrasya, Tradescantia, Trichosanthes, Triplochiton, Triticum, Vanda, Vigna, Zea, Zingiber and soil. DISEASE: Leaf spots. GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION: Australia, Bangladesh, Belize, Brazil, Brunei, Burma, Colombia, Cuba, Fiji, Ghana, Guinea, Honduras, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kenya, Kuwait, Malaysia, New Zealand, Nigeria, Papua New Guinea, Puerto Rico, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Solomon Islands, Sri Lanka, Trinidad, USA, Zambia, Zaire. TRANSMISSION: By wind-borne conidia.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 473-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Ling-hsing Chang ◽  
Jim Q. Chen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the impact of Chinese culture on the information ethics perception gaps between Chinese and American students. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative approach, this study utilizes Kohlberg’s Cognitive Moral Development model and an open-ended questionnaire to measure and analyze the gaps among information ethics perceptions of students from Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong, and the USA, and to assess the extent to which the gaps are influenced by Chinese culture. Findings Students’ perceptions of intellectual property, information accuracy, privacy, and accessibility (PAPA) are deeply influenced by national culture. Sub-cultures have significant impact on the perceptions. Political systems, history, and legal environment may also play a role in the differences of PAPA perceptions among the three Chinese societies. The study also revealed that accuracy and intellectual property are the most deficient areas of moral developments in both Chinese and American samples. Research limitations/implications The sample sizes from Hong Kong and the USA were relatively small due to resource and time constraints. In addition, the subjects from Hong Kong and the USA were a little bit older than the subjects from Taiwan and Mainland China due to the fact that universities in HK and USA tend to have more non-traditional students than in universities in Mainland China and Taiwan. Second, the questionnaire is a limited means of studying moral reasoning because the results are likely to reflect espoused theory rather than theory-in-use. Practical implications The educational implication of this study calls for a renewed approach to educate students on the importance of information ethics for the sake of sustained economic development. Originality/value The novelty of this research lies in its interpretation of students’ PAPA perceptions and fresh insights from a Chinese guanxi perspective.


Author(s):  

Abstract A new distribution map is provided for Puccinia horiana P. Henn. Hosts: Chrysanthemum spp. Information is given on the geographical distribution in AFRICA, South Africa, ASIA, China (Kiangsu, Kwangtung), Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Peninsular Malaysia, AUSTRALASIA & OCEANIA, New Zealand, EUROPE, Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, SOUTH AMERICA, Argentina (Buenos Aires), Brazil (Sao Paulo).


Author(s):  
Laetitia-Ann Greeff

This article compares the law reform methods employed by South Africa and New Zealand to eliminate the defence of ‘moderate and reasonable chastisement’ to a charge of common assault, to determine the best possible law reform strategy for Australian jurisdictions, within the context of its federal system of governance. South Africa and New Zealand banned corporal punishment on a national level, with South Africa prohibiting the use of corporal punishment by way of the judicial condemnation of the Constitutional Court in 2019, and New Zealand’s legislation to ban corporal punishment through Parliamentary processes in 2007. Corporal punishment in the home is still legal in Australia if administered by parents or those in loco parentis. This article focuses on the three Australian States that have enacted human rights legislation—Victoria, the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) and Queensland—and the impact of this legislation on judicial law reform. In this regard, the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is discussed in terms of its ability to limit public interest litigation’s viability to strike down inconsistent legislation. The article suggests that all three countries can learn from one another concerning the successes and/or failures of law reform. Furthermore, the article concludes by acknowledging that even though formal abolition is the norm in South Africa and New Zealand, corporal punishment remains widespread. Parents and those in loco parentis must be supported by continual education initiatives to bring about requisite social and cultural change.


The philosophies behind design codes with particular reference to the use of modern limit state design are presented in this chapter. Comments are made on the design life of temporary structures which vary considerably between different countries. Design codes of the USA, Europe and Australia/New Zealand for temporary structures are compared with particular reference to the loads combinations and the partial factors applied. It is noted that whilst the European design codes do not specify how construction, use and disassembly of the temporary structures are to be executed the USA code for scaffolding includes such specification. The Hong Kong code for bamboo scaffolds is described showing the similarities and differences between bamboo and metal scaffolds. The chapter concludes with design examples for selected temporary structures based on design codes.


Author(s):  
Bao-Linh Tran ◽  
Chi-Chung Chen ◽  
Wei-Chun Tseng ◽  
Shu-Yi Liao

This study examines how experience of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) influences the impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on international tourism demand for four Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) economies, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Thailand, and New Zealand, over the 1 January–30 April 2020 period. To proceed, panel regression models are first applied with a time-lag effect to estimate the general effects of COVID-19 on daily tourist arrivals. In turn, the data set is decomposed into two nation groups and fixed effects models are employed for addressing the comparison of the pandemic-tourism relationship between economies with and without experiences of the SARS epidemic. Specifically, Taiwan and Hong Kong are grouped as economies with SARS experiences, while Thailand and New Zealand are grouped as countries without experiences of SARS. The estimation result indicates that the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases has a significant negative impact on tourism demand, in which a 1% COVID-19 case increase causes a 0.075% decline in tourist arrivals, which is a decline of approximately 110 arrivals for every additional person infected by the coronavirus. The negative impact of COVID-19 on tourist arrivals for Thailand and New Zealand is found much stronger than for Taiwan and Hong Kong. In particular, the number of tourist arrivals to Taiwan and Hong Kong decreased by 0.034% in response to a 1% increase in COVID-19 confirmed cases, while in Thailand and New Zealand, a 1% national confirmed cases increase caused a 0.103% reduction in tourism demand. Moreover, the effect of the number of domestic cases on international tourism is found lower than the effect caused by global COVID-19 mortality for the economies with SARS experiences. In contrast, tourist arrivals are majorly affected by the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases in Thailand and New Zealand. Finally, travel restriction in all cases is found to be the most influencing factor for the number of tourist arrivals. Besides contributing to the existing literature focusing on the knowledge regarding the nexus between tourism and COVID-19, the paper’s findings also highlight the importance of risk perception and the need of transmission prevention and control of the epidemic for the tourism sector.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document