Doctor-Patient Relationship: The Difficult Balance between Patient Psychology and Community Sociology

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-50
Author(s):  
Jose Luis Turabian

Psychology and sociology share a common object of study, human behaviour, but from different perspectives. Sociologists have focused on macro variables, such as social structure, education, gender, age, race, etc., while psychology has focused on micro variables such as individual personality and behaviours, beliefs, empathy, listening, etc. Despite the importance of interpersonal relationship skills, they depend on the community or social context in which communication takes place, and by themselves may have little relevance in the consultation. The purely psychological analysis of the doctor-patient relationship often leads to an idyllic vision, with the patient-centred consultation as the greatest exponent, which rarely occurs in real life. The purely sociological or community / social analysis of the doctor-patient relationship leads to a negative view of the consultation, which is always shown as problematic. But, the psychological system in the doctor-patient relationship cannot be neglected, and its study is of importance, at least as an intermediate mechanism that is created through socio-community relations. Although the same social causes are behind the doctor-patient relationship, when acting on psychological factors in the consultation, they act as an optical prism scattering socio-community relations that affect the doctor and the patient, giving rise to a beam of different colors of doctor-patient relationship. In doctor-patient relationship there is a modality of psychotherapy, where attitudes, thoughts and behaviour of the patient, can be change, as well as it can be extended on the way of understanding and therefore changing, his social context. Because of the distance between socio-community relations and the form of doctor-patient relations is growing in complex societies, under these conditions, the sociological factor gives the important place to the psychological factor. Given these difficulties of the doctor-patient relationship one may ask how general medical practice can persist with the usual model of doctor-patient relationship. Pain and the desire to relieve them are the basic reasons for the patient and the doctor, and they do not disappear due to the contradictions of the doctor-patient relationship. In this way, the confrontation between sociological and psychological vision is replaced by an alliance of both currents, and each of them takes on meaning only in the general vision.

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kirshner

A high-value doctor-patient relationship is based on a set of parameters which include the interpersonal relationship between the patient and the doctor. Based on the Primary Care Assessment Survey model, measures of the interpersonal relationship are associated with communication, interpersonal care, contextual knowledge of the patient, and trust. Despite the proven value of the doctor-patient relationship, current trends indicate that the quality of these relationships is on the decline. The advent of communication and information technologies has greatly affected the way in which health care is delivered and the relationship between doctors and patients. The convergence of communication and information technology with biomedical informatics offers an opportunity to affect the character of the doctor-patient relationship positively. This paper examines the intersection of the key features of the doctor-patient relationship and a variety of Internet-based, clinical, and administrative applications used in dental practice. This paper discusses the role of dental informatics research vis-à-vis the doctor-patient relationship and explores how it may inform the next generation of information technologies used in dental practice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  

The doctor patient relationship is an important and the most difficult interpersonal relationship in health care and throughout the history it has been scrutinized. It was aimed to look into the status of available literatures on doctor patient relationship in context of Bangladesh and to see the current pattern of the relationship existing in Bangladesh. Search was done in PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar & BanlaJOL with searching key words till to date and unfortunately only one article was found on the topic in Bangladesh context. Fortunately the article validated the relationship measuring instrument which opens the sector to use that and to create benchmark data bases as well as to move further. There is extreme paucity of literatures on doctor patient relationship in Bangladesh context and to create a benchmark data as well as to establish and improve the professional relationship between the doctor and patients the sector demands adequate research on immediate basis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s774-s774
Author(s):  
S. Darbeda ◽  
M. Etchevers

Introduction..The doctor-patient relationship has an increasingly important place in medical studies. Empathy is one of the quality criteria of the relationship. The development of mindfulness in medical schools is booming.ObjectivesTo investigate the relation between empathy and mindfulness among residents and doctors.Methods.Doctors and residents were asked to complete a demographic questionnaire – questions on their personal development practices – and two scales. The Mindful Awareness Warning Scale (MAAS) is a unidimensional scale measuring attention and mindfulness and Jefferson Physician Empathy Scale (JSPE) is a scale measuring the clinical empathy across 3 dimensions: “perspective taking”, “compassionate care” and “in the patient's shoes”. Multivariate linear regressions were performed to analyse the correlation between each score of JSPE and explanatory variables.Results.One hundred ninety-three questionnaires were analyzed: 87% were general practitioners, the average age was 34 years old (SD 11) and 69% were women. Regarding personal development practices, 18% practised mindfulness meditation regularly or occasionally (23% for yoga and 31% for relaxation). No correlation between the scores of JSPE and the MAAS score was found. However, doctors who practiced mindfulness had a highest score of “compassionate care” (95% CI [1.26; 4.91], P = 0.0012).Conclusions.The mindfulness would be an effective tool for the development of the welfare of the doctors, and improving the quality of empathy and therapeutic efficacy. To support these data, it would be interesting to conduct an interventional study by offering French doctors and interns the possibility of following courses of mindfulness.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Yaffe ◽  
Richard B. Hovey ◽  
Charo Rodriguez

Abstract Background Positive doctor-patient relationship have been linked to some good patient outcomes. Different modalities have been used to study communication and behaviors within such encounters. Unsolicited writings from patients to doctors has rarely been reported on in this context; therefore this paper aimed to explore the content of such correspondence sent to a single family physician over a 4 decade period. Methods 107 of 140 pieces of correspondence contained content necessary to permit studying three research questions: (1) using univariate analyses, which patients or family members wrote personalized notes to the family doctor, when, and in what fashion; (2) using Hermeneutic exploration of each note, what words or sentiments were used to describe encounters with, and care received, from the doctor; (3) with similar Hermeneutic exploration, what words or phrases provided insight into the apparent motivations underlying the writing of the notes. Results The notes were mostly handwritten, predominantly by women, and frequently around personally relevant life span events. An iterative process generated six themes which summarized appreciated physician or relational attributes: (1) quality care; and physician (2) competence; (3) physical presence; (4) positive personal traits; (5) provision of emotional support; and (6) spiritual impact. A similar process identified six motivations for writing, which were to: (1) express appreciation for an established relationship; (2) acknowledge value / benefit experienced from continuity of care; (3) seek catharsis, emotional relief or closure; (4) reflect on termination of care; (5) validate care that extended beyond the Hippocratic tradition into that of Asklepian healing [17] ; and (6) share personal reflection, experience, or impact. Conclusions Unsolicited writings to a doctor provide a personalized, direct link from patient to physician that seems to allow for expression of thoughts difficult to convey face to face. They provide unique, real life testimonials that offer potential as a teaching tool on doctor-patient relationships. These particular patients seemed to value considerate, competent, quality care that was given in continuity fashion, with support for emotional and spiritual needs. In some communities this suggests that good care needs to go beyond rapid accessibility.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A735-A735
Author(s):  
C STREETS ◽  
J PETERS ◽  
D BRUCE ◽  
P TSAI ◽  
N BALAJI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document