scholarly journals Dapagliflozin, as Add-on Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients, Is Associated With a Reduction in Albuminuria and Serum Transaminase Levels

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silas Benjamin ◽  
Manjunath Ramanjaneya ◽  
Alexandra E. Butler ◽  
Imran Janjua ◽  
Firjeeth Paramba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Serum Transaminase ◽  
Hypoglycemic Agents ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Creatinine Ratio ◽  
Urine Albumin

IntroductionSGLT-2 inhibitors are shown to be nephroprotective, slowing progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in addition to improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). To date, no real-life clinical data is available on the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) and liver enzymes in a Middle Eastern population. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of dapagliflozin (DAPA) on urine ACR, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) when added to standard therapy for T2D.MethodsThis is an observational study of 40 patients with T2D in whom DAPA was added to their existing anti-diabetic regimen to improve glycemic control. The primary outcomes were changes in serum transaminase level and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR). Secondary outcomes include changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C), body mass index (BMI), oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin dose.ResultsWhole group analysis showed a reduction in ALT (p<0.0001), (AST) (p=0.009), ACR (p=0.009) and BMI (p<0.0001) following DAPA treatment. Further sub-group analysis showed that patients on insulin and DAPA combination had a reduction in ACR (p=0.0090), ALT (p=0.0312), BMI (p=0.0007) and HbA1c (p<0.0001) compared to the sulfonylurea and DAPA combination group. In the sulfonylurea and DAPA combination group, there was a reduction in the sulfonylurea requirement following DAPA therapy (p=0.0116), with reductions in ALT (p=0.0122), AST (p=0.0362), BMI (p=0.0026) and HbA1c (p<0.0001) but with no change in ACR (p=0.814).ConclusionIn routine clinical practice, the addition of DAPA to standard medical therapy is well tolerated and beneficial for T2D patients and is associated with a reduction of ALT and ACR.

Associations of Bone Mineral Density and Bone Metabolism Indices with Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Xiao-Mei Zhang ◽  
Ning Yuan ◽  
Xiao-Feng Yu ◽  
Li-Nong Ji
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Diabetic Nephropathy ◽  
Bone Metabolism ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Creatinine Ratio ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Urine Albumin

Abstract Objective To identify correlations of bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolism indices with the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) as an indicator of nephropathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods In this retrospective analysis, 297 patients with T2D were divided into 3 groups according to the urine ACR. Patients’ data were analyzed to identify associations of general conditions, blood glucose level, lipid levels, and uric acid level with BMD and bone metabolism indices. Results BMD at every location tested (femoral neck, trochanter, inside hip, Ward’s triangle, total hip, and lumbar vertebrae) was negatively correlated with the urine ACR (all p<0.05). Osteocalcin, beta-C-terminal telopeptide (β-CTX), and procollagen type 1 N- peptide (P1NP) were positively correlated with urine ACR (all p<0.05). Finally, 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was negatively correlated with urine ACR (p<0.05). Multiple regression analysis with adjustment for age, body mass index, disease duration, and other clinical measurements revealed no significant correlation between urine ACR and BMD measurements or β-CTX (p>0.05). However, significant correlations remained between urine ACR and osteocalcin, P1NP, and 25(OH)D (p<0.05). The same results were obtained for postmenopausal women specifically, with the exception of a significant correlation between the ACR and β-CTX (p<0.05). Conclusion In the early stage of diabetic nephropathy, BMD changes and bone transformation acceleration may occur, and the acceleration of bone transformation may occur before the change in BMD. Therefore, it is important to monitor bone metabolism indices in the early stage of diabetic nephropathy in T2D patients.

scholarly journals A Randomized Trial of Insulin Glargine plus Oral Hypoglycemic Agents versus Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion to Treat Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Shuo Lin ◽  
Mu Chen ◽  
Wanling Chen ◽  
Keyi Lin ◽  
Panwei Mu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Insulin Glargine ◽  
Basal Insulin ◽  
Insulin Infusion ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Hypoglycemic Agents ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents

Aims. Basal insulin plus oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) has not been investigated for early intensive antihyperglycemic treatment in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. This study is aimed at comparing the short-term (over a period of 12 days) effects of basal insulin glargine plus OHAs and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on glycemic control and beta-cell function in this setting. Methods. An open-label parallel-group study. Newly diagnosed hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥11.1 mmol/L or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥9% (75 mmol/mol) were randomized to CSII or insulin glargine in combination with metformin and gliclazide. The primary outcome measure was the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE), and secondary endpoints included time to reach glycemic control target (FPG < 7 mmol/L and 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose < 10 mmol/L), markers of β-cell function, and hypoglycemia. Results. Subjects in the CSII (n=35) and basal insulin plus OHA (n=33) groups had a similar significant reduction from baseline to end of treatment in glycated albumin (−6.44 ± 3.23% and− 6.42 ± 3.56%, P=0.970). Groups A and B have comparable time to glycemic control (3.6 ± 1.2 days and 4.0 ± 1.4 days), MAGE (3.40 ± 1.40 mmol/L vs. 3.16 ± 1.38 mmol/L; p=0.484), and 24-hour mean blood glucose (7.49 ± 0.96 mmol/L vs. 7.02 ± 1.03 mmol/L). Changes in the C-peptide reactivity index, the secretory unit of islet in transplantation index, and insulin secretion-sensitivity index-2 indicated a greater β-cell function improvement with basal insulin plus OHAs versus CSII. Conclusions. Short-term insulin glargine plus OHAs may be an alternative to CSII for initial intensive therapy in people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

scholarly journals Relationship between Lipid Profiles and Glycemic Control Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Qingdao, China

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 5317
Author(s):  
Shukang Wang ◽  
Xiaokang Ji ◽  
Zhentang Zhang ◽  
Fuzhong Xue
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipid Profiles ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Confounding Factors ◽  
The Relationship

Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was the best indicator of glycemic control, which did not show the dynamic relationship between glycemic control and lipid profiles. In order to guide the health management of Type 2 diabetes (T2D), we assessed the levels of lipid profiles and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and displayed the relationship between FPG control and lipid profiles. We conducted a cross-sectional study that included 5822 participants. Descriptive statistics were conducted according to gender and glycemic status respectively. Comparisons for the control of lipid profiles were conducted according to glycemic control. Four logistic regression models were generated to analyze the relationship between lipid profiles and glycemic control according to different confounding factors. The metabolic control percentage of FPG, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 27.50%, 73.10%, 28.10%, 64.20% and 44.80% respectively. In the fourth model with the most confounding factors, the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of TG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C were 0.989 (0.935, 1.046), 0.862 (0.823, 0.903), 0.987 (0.920, 1.060) and 2.173 (1.761, 2.683). TC and HDL-C were statistically significant, and TG and LDL-C were not statistically significant with adjustment for different confounding factors. In conclusion, FPG was significantly associated with HDL and TC and was not associated with LDL and TG. Our findings suggested that TC and HDL should be focused on in the process of T2D health management.

scholarly journals Comparison of Effectiveness between DPP4 inhibitors combined with Versus Other Oral Hypoglycaemic Agent(s) in Diabetic patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
Md Shameem Haidar
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Glycemic Status ◽  
Good Glycemic Control ◽  
Dpp4 Inhibitor ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Inhibitor Combination

Background: Diabetes is global health burden of disease that requires life-long pharmacological and non-pharmacological management to prevent complications such as cardiovascular disease, retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Treatment of type 2 diabetes is based on an interplay of patient characteristics, severity of hyperglycemia and available therapeutic options. Metformin, sulfonylureas (SU) and DPP IV inhibitor are the most studied of the oral medications used worldwide. They play a prominent initial role in the type 2 diabetes treatment algorithm recommended by the several guideline. The growing evidence on new technologies and therapeutic interventions is rapidly expanding our knowledge and ability to manage diabetes and its complications; at the same time, however, it is challenge for physicians to select appropriate medication in appropriate dose for optimal patients care. Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors combination with other oral hypoglycaemic agent(s) in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control. Materials & method: Study was conducted among 600 patients over a period of 24 months. All the patients were adult male and female type 2 diabetic patients who received regular oral anti-diabetic drug(s) and duration of T2DM for one year or more were enrolled for study. Total 150 cases were selected. Patients with Type 1 DM, pregnant women with DM and who was receiving injectable antidiabetic medications were excluded from this study. Detail demographic data were collected from the informant and recorded in structured case report form. Clinical examination and relevant investigations were done. Main outcome variable was Glycemic status (HbA1C, FBG, 2HABF). Effectiveness of drugs was evaluated by glycaemic status of the patients. Result: Maximum number of patients (38.5%) was between 31-40 years age group with mean age 37.8±9.5 years. Present study shows that, for good glycemic control, all three results (FBS, 2H ABF and HbA1c) were within targeted level in majority patients of DPP4 Inhibitor combination group. Although FBS was best result in metformin group. About 51.9% of SUs group achieved the glycemic control targets level. In case of metformin group it was in 59.8% of patients, and in combined therapy 67.1% patients shows good glycemic target. So DPP4 Inhibitor combination is better medication than other to maintain good glycemic status in type 2 DM patient, due to maximum number of patients reached all three components of result within target range. Conclusion: Diabetes is chronic illness. Good glycemic control with choosing appropriate anti-diabetic medication is pivotal for DM management. In this study it is observed that DPP4 Inhibitor combination group of drug is better than other anti-diabetic medication to maintain good glycemic status in type 2 DM patients. Bangladesh J Medicine July 2019; 30(2) : 63-70

Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes by Pharmacists in Primary Care Clinics

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 636-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A Coast-Senior ◽  
Beverly A Kroner ◽  
Catherine L Kelley ◽  
Lauren E Trilli
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Fasting Blood Glucose ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Blood Glucose Concentrations

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of clinical pharmacists involved in direct patient care on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Eligible patients included those with type 2 diabetes who received insulin or were initiated on insulin therapy by the pharmacists and were willing to perform self-monitoring of blood glucose. The pharmacists provided diabetes education, medication counseling, monitoring, and insulin initiation and/or adjustments. All initial patient interactions with the pharmacists were face-to-face. Thereafter, patient–pharmacist interactions were either face-to-face or telephone contacts. SETTING: Two primary care clinics in a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: Study subjects were patients with type 2 diabetes who were referred to the pharmacists by their primary care providers for better glycemic control. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome variables were changes from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, and random blood glucose measurements. Secondary outcomes were the number and severity of symptomatic episodes of hypoglycemia, and the number of emergency room visits or hospitalizations related to diabetes. Twenty-three veterans aged 65 ± 9.4 years completed the study. Fifteen (65%) patients were initiated on insulin by the pharmacists; 8 (35%) were already using insulin. Patients were followed for a mean ± SD of 27 ± 10 weeks. Glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose concentrations, and random blood glucose concentrations significantly decreased from baseline by 2.2% (p = 0.00004), 65 mg/dL (p < 0.01), and 82 mg/dL (p = 0.00001), respectively. Symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes occurred in 35% of patients. None of these episodes required physician intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pharmacists working as members of interdisciplinary primary care teams can positively impact glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin.

Clinical Efficacy of Colesevelam in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luigi Brunetti ◽  
R. Keith Campbell
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Glycemic Control ◽  
Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Lipoprotein Cholesterol ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Diet And Exercise

Purpose: The clinical experience and role in therapy of colesevelam in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is discussed. Summary: Colesevelam HCl is a bile acid sequestrant (BAS) with proven efficacy in reducing elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with primary hyperlipidemia. Colesevelam HCl gained food and drug administration (FDA) approval in 2008 as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM. In randomized controlled studies, colesevelam (add-on therapy with metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin) has shown significant percentage reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ranging from 0.5% to 0.54%. Reductions in LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) ranging from –12.8% to –16.7% and –4.0% to –10.3%, respectively, were also observed. Although no direct comparisons have been made, the safety and tolerability profile of this agent appears to be better than other BAS, with the most common side effects being gastrointestinal related. Conclusion: Colesevelam is effective as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM. Due to its effects upon LDL-C and glycemic parameters and favorable safety profile, colesevelam can play a role in an array of T2DM patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document