scholarly journals Impact of Renal Function on Effectiveness and Safety Associated With Low Dose Dabigatran in Non-valve Atrial Fibrillation Patients After Catheter Ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoye Li ◽  
Chengchun Zuo ◽  
Qiuyi Ji ◽  
Zi Wang ◽  
Qianzhou Lv

Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of 110 mg dabigatran in non-valve atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with different eGFRs.Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 110 mg dabigatran for NVAF patients between January 2017 and December 2018 based on the eGFR category.Results: A total of 560 NVAF patients who treated with 110 mg dabigatran were included for analysis. In 12 months, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves indicated that the lower eGFR subgroups were more likely to experience thrombosis, bleeding, and cumulative events earlier (P = 0.021 for thrombosis; P = 0.026 for bleeding; P = 0.001 for cumulative events). Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred more frequently in the moderate group than in other groups (6.94% in the moderate group vs. 1.54% in the mild group vs. 1.22% in the normal group, P = 0.028). By multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease (P = 0.043; OR = 4.273, 95% CI 1.043–17.543) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.023; OR = 2.194, 95% CI 1.114–4.323) were independent predictors of the composite endpoints. A positive linear relationship was observed between eGFR levels and occurrence rate of thrombosis and bleeding under anticoagulation patients with 110 mg dabigatran (R2 = 0.432 and R2 = 0.784, respectively).Conclusions: Impaired renal function was associated with decreased safety and increased thrombosis risks in NVAF patients taking low dose dabigatran.

Cardiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 145 (3) ◽  
pp. 178-186
Author(s):  
Yoav Arnson ◽  
Moshe Hoshen ◽  
Adi Berliner-Sendrey ◽  
Orna Reges ◽  
Ran Balicer ◽  
...  

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are both associated with increased risk of stroke, and CKD carries a higher bleeding risk. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) treatment is used to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF); however, the risk versus benefit of OAC for advanced CKD is continuously debated. We aim to assess the management and outcomes of NVAF patients with impaired renal function within a population-based cohort. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using ICD-9 healthcare coding. Patients with incident NVAF between 2004 and 2015 were identified stratified by CKD stage. We compared treatment strategies and estimated risks of stroke, death, or any major bleeding based on CKD stages and OAC treatment. Results: We identified 85,116 patients with incident NVAF. Patients with impaired renal function were older and had more comorbidities. OAC was most common among stage 2 CKD patients (49%) and least in stages 4–5 CKD patients (27.6%). Higher CKD stages were associated with worse outcomes. Stroke rates increased from 1.04 events per 100 person-years (PY) in stage 1 CKD to 3.72 in stages 4–5 CKD. Mortality increased from 3.42 to 32.95 events/100 PY, and bleeding rates increased from 0.89 to 4.91 events/100 PY. OAC was associated with reduced stroke and intracranial bleeding risk regardless of CKD stage, and with a reduced mortality risk in stages 1–3 CKD. Conclusion: Among NVAF patients, advanced renal failure is associated with higher risk of stroke, death, and bleeding. OAC was associated with reduced stroke and intracranial bleeding risk, and with improved survival in stages 1–3 CKD.


Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1140-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
So-Ryoung Lee ◽  
Eue-Keun Choi ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
Jin-Hyung Jung ◽  
Seil Oh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Montrasio ◽  
M Coslovsky ◽  
A Wiencierz ◽  
C Baumgartner ◽  
N Rodondi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a similar efficacy in terms of stroke and mortality reduction as compared to Vitamin K-Antagonists (VKAs) and improved safety with regards to intracranial haemorrhage in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Dose of DOACs needs to be adjusted according to age, weight, renal function and concomitant medication. Yet, off-label dosages have been reported in 11 - 45% of patients (on average 20%). Purpose To assess the prevalence of inappropriate DOAC-dosing according to the official prescribing information in two large prospective Swiss AF cohorts (Swiss-AF and BEAT-AF) and to evaluate its correlation with adverse clinical outcomes. Methods All 3267 patients taking oral anticoagulants were stratified at baseline as receiving DOACs (adequately dosed, under- or overdosed) or VKAs. Appropriateness of DOAC dosing was assessed based on age (≥80 years), weight (≤60kg) and renal function (serum creatinine ≥133μmol/l [apixaban]; creatinine clearence ≤50ml/min [all other DOACs]). Clinical outcomes were collected during a median follow-up of 2.96 years. Major adverse clinical events (MACE) consisted of a combination of myocardial infarction, cardiac death, ischemic stroke and systemic embolism. Safety was assessed by occurrence of any bleeding event. Results 1902 patients (58%) were on VKAs and 1365 on DOACs (42%). In the DOAC group, 1149 patients received a dose consistent with drug labelling (84%), 133 (10%) received an inappropriately high and 83 (6%) an inappropriately low dose. Overdosed patients were older than those adequately treated and more likely female, had a lower BMI and a higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4 vs. 3 points) (p<0.001 for all). Underdosed patients were more likely to have concomitant antiplatelet therapy (p<0.001). Both off-label groups were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease, heart failure and chronic kidney disease (p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier cumulative incidence rates for the first occurrence of MACE or bleedings are provided in Figure 1. Overdosed patients had an almost two-fold higher risk of bleeding (9.0 vs. 5.0 events per 100 patient-years compared to correctly dosed DOACs and to VKAs) and a higher rate of MACE (5.1 vs. 2.3 events per 100 patient years compared to correctly dosed DOACs and 5.1 vs. 3.4 compared to VKAs). Underdosing did not seem to be associated with a relevant increase in ischemic or bleeding events as compared to correctly dosed DOACs and VKAs (see Figure 1). Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier incidence curves Conclusion Inadequate DOACs dosing was found in 1 in 6 patients and correlated with a higher burden of comorbidities at baseline. Underdosing correlated with concomitant antiplatelet therapy. Overdosing was associated with adverse clinical outcome for ischemic and bleeding events.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2726-2726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul Patel ◽  
Taimur Sher ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Terry Mashtare ◽  
Wei Tan ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Impaired renal function in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with adverse clinical outcome. Historically, the renal status is reported as serum creatinine (SCr) only. Introduction of novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bortezomib and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) in MM therapeutics has improved clinical responses and overall survival. An important question that remains largely unanswered is if these agents deliver equal benefit to patients with impaired renal function. Thus we investigate the overall benefit of novel agents in MM patients with renal impairment. METHODS: All MM patients treated between January 2000 and December 2007 at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (RPCI) where included in this analysis. Extent of disease was assessed based on the Durie-Salmon staging system. We determined glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to asses renal function more accurately. GFR was calculated utilizing the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. Patient cohorts were defined based on severity of renal impairment per the National Kidney Foundation-Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKD-KDOQI) guidelines based on the GFR value into normal &gt;90, mild 60–89, moderate 30–59, severe 15–29 and kidney failure &lt;15 ml/min/1.73m^2. Because there were only few patients in the last two groups (GFR of 15–29 =11 and GFR &lt;15 =13), they were combined into a single cohort of severe renal impairment (GFR &lt;30=24). We also defined patient cohorts based on a previously reported classification in MM wherein patients were divided based on severity of renal impairment into normal &gt;80, mild 50–80, moderate 30–49 and severe &lt;30 ml/min/1.73m^2. Survival curves and median survival were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Survival differences were calculated using a log-rank test. A 0.05 nominal significance level was used in all statistical testing. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients (M=88, F=87) with a median age 60 years (range 34–88) were evaluated. Majority of patients had stage III disease (64%), 57.1% had IgG myeloma and lytic bone disease present in 67.4% of the patients. Median values for SCr, serum calcium, blood urea nitrogen, serum albumin and hemoglobin were 1.1mg/dl (range-0.5–10.3), 9.5 mg/dl (range-7.5- 7.2), 18 mg/dl (range-5–107), 4.0 g/dl (range-2.2–5.5) and 11.5 g/dl (range-6.8–17.1) respectively. SCr &gt;2 mg/dl was seen in only 16% patients and 41.1% patients had GFR in the range of 60–89 ml/min/1.73m^2. Patients received an average of 2 treatments. Use of at least one of the novel agent was seen in 86.3% patients (Immunomodulatory drugs =130, Bortezomib = 97, Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin =65). Median survival for patients with SCr &lt;2.0 and SCr&gt;2.0 was 67.4 months (45.4 – 92.7 months) and 38.4 months (15.3 months – not reached) respectively. Median survival for patients with normal GFR and mild, moderate and severe renal impairment based on the NKD-KDOQI guidelines was 76.1 months (37.5 months – not reached), 55.32 months (34.8 months – not reached), 67.4 months (45.4 months – not reached) and 24.9 months (15.3 months – not reached) respectively. Median survival for patient cohorts defined based on a previously reported classification in MM was similar to that seen with the NKD-KDOQI classification. We noted no significant survival advantage of normal renal function over renally impaired patients (Figure 1 & 2) despite evaluations based either by using the traditional approach of SCr (p=0.15; log rank test) or by more sensitive renal function assessment by GFR (p=0.21; log rank test). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in MM patients the previously reported and commonly perceived adverse prognosis imparted by impaired renal function can no longer be validated and that routine incorporation of novel agents has overcome this adverse prognosis. These findings are consistent with the impact of novel agents reported in context with MM with aggressive molecular profiles. Figure 1: Kaplan-Meier curve for survival by serum creatinine (SCr) Figure 1:. Kaplan-Meier curve for survival by serum creatinine (SCr)


1993 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1119-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Palmieri ◽  
A. Morabito ◽  
R. Lauria ◽  
V. Montesarchio ◽  
E. Matano ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 5393-5393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
Hien K. Duong ◽  
Claudia Kasserra ◽  
Min Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pomalidomide (POM) is indicated for patients (pts) with multiple myeloma who have received at least 2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy. Renal impairment (RI) is a common comorbidity in multiple myeloma (MM), occurring in > 40% of pts. POM is extensively metabolized, with < 5% eliminated renally as the parent drug. Thus, renal function may not substantively affect exposure of the active parent compound. POM + low-dose dexamethasone (LoDEX) has shown efficacy in pts with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) with moderate RI in phase 2 and phase 3 trials. However, pts with severe RI were excluded from these trials. MM-008 is an active multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study designed to prospectively assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with RRMM and normal or severely impaired renal function. Methods Pts with RRMM and ≥ 1 prior therapy were eligible for enrollment. Pts in Cohort A (creatinine clearance [CrCL] ≥ 60 mL/min) served as the control population and received POM 4 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. Pts in Cohort B (CrCL < 30 mL/min but not requiring dialysis) followed a standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, receiving POM 2 mg on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle and based on results, escalating to 4 mg. Dosing for Cohort C (CrCL < 30 mL/min and requiring dialysis) was informed by the results from Cohort B. All cohorts received dexamethasone 40 mg (20 mg for pts aged > 75 years) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Pts were not permitted to enroll in more than 1 cohort. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for management of neutropenia was not permitted in cycle 1, but could be started on day 1 of the next cycle at the physician’s discretion. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (V 4.0). PK samples were obtained pre- and post-POM dose on days 1, 2, and 3 (after single doses) and days 21, 22, and 23 (after multiple doses) of cycle 1 for cohorts A and B. PK data were dose-normalized for comparison across cohorts by dividing the measured exposure by the POM dose in milligrams. Results As of April 1, 2013, 11 pts have been treated (8 in Cohort A; 3 in Cohort B at 2 mg). At screening, median age (range) was 68 years (46-71 years) and 64 years (57-64 years) while median CrCL (range) was 85 mL/min (53.1- 114.8 mL/min) and 18.4 mL/min (12.5-25.7 mL/min) in cohorts A and B, respectively. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (Cohort A: 4 pts; Cohort B: 1 pt), infections (Cohort A: 2 pts; Cohort B: 2 pts), and anemia (Cohort A: 2 pts; Cohort B: 1 pt). No dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 have been reported. Median duration of treatment and relative dose intensity were similar between cohorts A and B, 4.1 months (range, 1.8-5.1 months) vs 3.9 months (range, 1.8-8.5 months) and 1.0 (range, 0.5-1.1) and 1.1 (range, 1.0-1.1), respectively. Only 1 pt (Cohort A) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Five pts remain on study (Cohort A: 3 pts; Cohort B: 2 pts). Initial PK analyses showed that mean dose-normalized AUC024 in Cohort B was approximately 20% lower than in Cohort A. Mean dose-normalized Cmax in Cohort B was approximately 30% lower than that in Cohort A after a single dose but comparable after multiple doses. Based on these results, additional pts in Cohort B and pts in Cohort C will receive POM 4 mg. Updated PK and adverse event data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion MM-008 is an ongoing trial prospectively evaluating the PK and safety of POM + LoDEX in pts with severe RI. Preliminary data suggest that dose-normalized exposure in pts with RRMM with severe RI is similar to that in pts with normal to mildly impaired renal function. No dose-limiting toxicities have been reported, and early tolerability data are encouraging. Disclosures: Matous: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Approved in the US but not in Europe. Siegel:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Duong:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Kasserra:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chen:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Doerr:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sternas:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaki:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jacques:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (22) ◽  
pp. 2821-2830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan H Hohnloser ◽  
Ziad Hijazi ◽  
Laine Thomas ◽  
John H Alexander ◽  
John Amerena ◽  
...  

AbstractAimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with impaired renal function. Apixaban, a novel oral anticoagulant with partial renal excretion, was compared with warfarin and reduced the rate stroke, death and bleeding in the ARISTOTLE trial. We evaluated these outcomes in relation to renal function.Methods and resultsBaseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the Cockcroft–Gault and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations as well as cystatin C measurements. According to baseline Cockcroft–Gault, there were 7518 patients (42%) with an estimated GFR (eGFR) of >80 mL/min, 7587 (42%) between >50 and 80 mL/min, and 3017 (15%) with an eGFR of ≤50 mL/min. The rate of cardiovascular events and bleeding was higher at impaired renal function (≤80 mL/min). Apixaban was more effective than warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism and reducing mortality irrespective of renal function. These results were consistent, regardless of methods for GFR estimation. Apixaban was associated with less major bleeding events across all ranges of eGFRs. The relative risk reduction in major bleeding was greater in patients with an eGFR of ≤50 mL/min using Cockcroft–Gault {hazard ratio (HR) 0.50 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.66], interaction P = 0.005} or CKD-EPI equations [HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.37–0.64), interaction P = 0.003].ConclusionIn patients with AF, renal impairment was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding. When compared with warfarin, apixaban treatment reduced the rate of stroke, death, and major bleeding, regardless of renal function. Patients with impaired renal function seemed to have the greatest reduction in major bleeding with apixaban.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1225-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva-Maria Sauer ◽  
Roland Sauer ◽  
Bernd Kallmünzer ◽  
Christian Blinzler ◽  
Lorenz Breuer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document