scholarly journals Experimental Research of Compound Monitoring on Multiple Temporary Blocking Refracturing for Long-Section Horizontal Wells

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingchen Zhang ◽  
Baocheng Wu ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
Shanzhi Shi ◽  
Jinjun Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Microseismic Monitoring ◽  
Fracturing Fluid ◽  
Water Sensitivity ◽  
New Development ◽  
Development Processes ◽  
Electromagnetic Monitoring ◽  
Multiple Clusters ◽  
Temporary Blocking

As an important energy replacement block in China, the tight conglomerate oilfields in the Mahu area are difficult to develop and are characterized by strong heterogeneity, large horizontal stress differences, and undeveloped natural fractures. However, new development processes including temporary blocking diversion and large section-multiple clusters have been implemented on the oilfields in the past few years. In 2020, two adjacent horizontal wells in the MD well area experienced a poor fracturing development effect compared with the earlier wells in this area. Analysis suggests that the main reasons are water sensitivity of the reservoir, insufficient fracturing scale, and/or interference from the adjacent old wells. To ameliorate the problem, this study presents an experimental study of multiple temporary plugging and refracturing technology in long horizontal well sections, in combination with electromagnetic and microseismic monitoring. Results from the study show a great difference between the two monitoring techniques, which is attributed to their different detection principles. Interestingly, the combination of the two approaches provides a greater performance than either approach alone. As the fracturing fluid flow diversion is based on temporary plugging diversion and electromagnetic monitoring of fracturing fluid is advantageous in temporary plugging diversion monitoring, both approaches require further research and development to address complex situations such as multiple temporary plugging and refracturing in long intervals of adjacent older wells.

scholarly journals Ball sealer tracking and seating of temporary plugging fracturing technology in the perforated casing of a horizontal well

2021 ◽  
pp. 014459872110204
Author(s):  
Wan Cheng ◽  
Chunhua Lu ◽  
Guanxiong Feng ◽  
Bo Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Critical Parameter ◽  
Fluid Velocity ◽  
Stable State ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Terminal Velocity ◽  
Injection Rate ◽  
Fracturing Fluid ◽  
Perforation Hole ◽  
Horizontal Wellbore ◽  
Tight Reservoirs

Multistaged temporary plugging fracturing in horizontal wells is an emerging technology to promote uniform fracture propagation in tight reservoirs by injecting ball sealers to plug higher-flux perforations. The seating mechanism and transportation of ball sealers remain poorly understood. In this paper, the sensitivities of the ball sealer density, casing injection rate and perforation angle to the seating behaviors are studied. In a vertical wellbore section, a ball sealer accelerates very fast at the beginning of the dropping and reaches a stable state within a few seconds. The terminal velocity of a non-buoyant ball is greater than the fluid velocity, while the terminal velocity of a buoyant ball is less than the fluid velocity. In the horizontal wellbore section, the terminal velocity of a non-buoyant or buoyant ball is less than the fracturing fluid flowing velocity. The ball sealer density is a more critical parameter than the casing injection rate when a ball sealer diverts to a perforation hole. The casing injection rate is a more critical parameter than the ball sealer density when a ball sealer seats on a perforation hole. A buoyant ball sealer associated with a high injection rate of fracturing fluid is highly recommended to improve the seating efficiency.

Geomechanical Approach in Classification of Borehole Failures in Fractured Carbonates of Boca De Jaruco Field

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Vladimirovna Norkina ◽  
Iaroslav Olegovich Simakov ◽  
Yuriy Anatoljevich Petrakov ◽  
Alexey Evgenjevich Sobolev ◽  
Oleg Vladimirovich Petrashov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress State ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Vertical Wells ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Geophysical Information ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress

Abstract This article is a continuation of the work on geomechanically calculations for optimizing the drilling of horizontal wells into the productive reservoir M at the Boca de Haruco field of the Republic of Cuba, presented in the article SPE-196897. As part of the work, an assessment of the stress state and direction was carried out using geological and geophysical information, an analysis of the pressure behavior during steam injections, cross-dipole acoustics, as well as oriented caliper data in vertical wells. After the completion of the first part of the work, the first horizontal wells were successfully drilled into the M formation. According to the recommendations, additional studies were carried out: core sampling and recording of micro-imager logging in the deviated sections. Presence of wellbore failures at the inclined sections allowed to use the method of inverse in-situ stress modeling based on image logs interpretation. The classification of wellbore failures by micro-imager logging: natural origin and violations of technogenic genesis is carried out. The type of breakout is defined. The result of the work was the determination of the stress state and horizontal stresses direction. In addition, the article is supplemented with the calculation of the maximum horizontal stress through the stress regime identifier factor.

The Effect of Well Azimuth or Don't Let Your Landman Plan Your Well Path!

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Yang ◽  
Larry K. Britt ◽  
Shari Dunn-Norman
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Well Performance ◽  
Gas Reservoirs ◽  
Principal Stresses ◽  
Lateral Direction ◽  
Well Completion ◽  
Stimulation Of

Abstract Since the late 1980's when Maersk published their work on multiple fracturing of horizontal wells in the Dan Field, the use of transverse multiple fractured horizontal wells has become the completion of choice and become the “industry standard” for unconventional and tight oil and tight gas reservoirs. Today approximately sixty percent of all wells drilled in the United States are drilled horizontally and nearly all of them are multiple fractured. Because a horizontal well adds additional cost and complexity to the drilling, completion, and stimulation of the well we need to fully understand anything that affects the cost and complexity. In other words, we need to understand the affects of the principal stresses, both direction and magnitude, on the drilling completion, and stimulation of these wells. However, little work has been done to address and understand the relationship between the principal stresses and the lateral direction. This paper has as its goal to fundamentally address the question, in what direction should I drill my lateral? Do I drill it in the direction of the maximum horizontal stress (longitudinal) or do I drill it in the direction of the minimum horizontal stress (transverse)? The answer to this question relates directly back to the title of this paper and please "Don't let your land man drive that decision." This paper focuses on the horizontal well's lateral direction (longitudinal or transverse fracture orientation) and how that direction influences productivity, reserves, and economics of horizontal wells. Optimization studies using a single phase fully three dimensional numeric simulator including convergent non-Darcy flow were used to highlight the importance of lateral direction as a function of reservoir permeability. These studies, conducted for both oil and gas, are used to identify the point on the permeability continuum where longitudinal wells outperform transverse wells. The simulations compare and contrast the transverse multiple fractured horizontal well to longitudinal wells based on the number of fractures and stages. Further, the effects of lateral length, fracture half-length, and fracture conductivity were investigated to see how these parameters affected the decision over lateral direction in both oil and gas reservoirs. Additionally, how does completion style affect the lateral direction? That is, how does an open hole completion compare to a cased hole completion and should the type of completion affect the decision on in what direction the lateral should be drilled? These simulation results will be used to discuss the various horizontal well completion and stimulation metrics (rate, recovery, and economics) and how the choice of metrics affects the choice of lateral direction. This paper will also show a series of field case studies to illustrate actual field comparisons in both oil and gas reservoirs of longitudinal versus transverse horizontal wells and tie these field examples and results to the numeric simulation study. This work benefits the petroleum industry by: Establishing well performance and economic based criteria as a function of permeability for drilling longitudinal or transverse horizontal wells,Integrating the reservoir objectives and geomechanic limitations into a horizontal well completion and stimulation strategy,Developing well performance and economic objectives for horizontal well direction (transverse versus longitudinal) and highlighting the incremental benefits of various completion and stimulation strategies.

scholarly journals Geomechanical Analysis to Avoid Serious Drilling Hazards in Zubair Oilfield, Southern Iraq

2020 ◽  
pp. 1994-2003
Author(s):  
Shaban Dharb Shaban ◽  
Hassan Abdul Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Mechanical Test ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Failure Criteria ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Wellbore Instability ◽  
Geomechanical Analysis ◽  
Safe Mud Window ◽  
Rock Mechanical Properties ◽  
Minimum Horizontal Stress

Zubair oilfield is an efficient contributor to the total Iraqi produced hydrocarbon. Drilling vertical wells as well as deviated and horizontal wells have been experiencing intractable challenges. Investigation of well data showed that the wellbore instability issues were the major challenges to drill in Zubair oilfield. These experienced borehole instability problems are attributed to the increase in the nonproductive time (NPT). This study can assist in managing an investment-drilling plan with less nonproductive time and more efficient well designing.       To achieve the study objectives, a one dimension geomechanical model (1D MEM) was constructed based on open hole log measurements, including Gamma-ray (GR), Caliper (CALI), Density (RHOZ), sonic compression (DTCO) and shear (DTSM) wave velocities , and Micro imager log (FMI). The determined 1D MEM components, i.e., pore pressure, rock mechanical properties, in-situ principal stress magnitudes and orientations, were calibrated using the data acquired from repeated formation test (RFT), hydraulic fracturing test (Mini-frac), and laboratory rock core mechanical test (triaxial test). Then, a validation model coupled with three failure criteria, i.e., Mohr-Coulomb, Mogi-Coulomb, and Modified lade, was conducted using the Caliper and Micro-imager logs. Finally, sensitivity and forecasting stability analyses were implemented to predict the most stable wellbore trajectory concerning the safe mud window for the planned wells.    The implemented wellbore instability analysis utilizing Mogi-Coulomb criterion demonstrated that the azimuth of 140o paralleling to the minimum horizontal stress is preferable to orient deviated and horizontal wells. The vertical and slightly deviated boreholes (1ess than 30o) are the most stable wellbores, and they are recommended to be drilled with 11.6 -12 ppg mud weight. The highly deviated and horizontal wells are recommended to be drilled with a mud weight of 12-12.6 ppg.

scholarly journals Production Decline Analysis and Hydraulic Fracture Network Interpretation Method for Shale Gas with Consideration of Fracturing Fluid Flowback Data

Geofluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Xiao ◽  
Xianzhe Ke ◽  
Hongxuan Wu
Keyword(s):  
Shale Gas ◽  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
Early Time ◽  
Fracture Network ◽  
Microseismic Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Data ◽  
Fracturing Fluid ◽  
Fracture Conductivity ◽  
Fracture Length ◽  
Interpretation Method

After multistage hydraulic fracturing of shale gas reservoir, a complex fracture network is formed near the horizontal wellbore. In postfracturing flowback and early-time production period, gas and water two-phase flow usually occurs in the hydraulic fracture due to the retention of a large amount of fracturing fluid in the fracture. In order to accurately interpret the key parameters of hydraulic fracture network, it is necessary to establish a production decline analysis method considering fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoirs. On this basis, an uncertain fracture network model was established by integrating geological, fracturing treatment, flowback, and early-time production data. By identifying typical flow-regimes and correcting the fracture network model with history matching, a set of production decline analysis and fracture network interpretation method with consideration of fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoir was formed. Derived from the case analysis of a typical fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoirs, the interpretation results show that the total length of hydraulic fractures is 4887.6 m, the average half-length of hydraulic fracture in each stage is 93.4 m, the average fracture conductivity is 69.7 mD·m, the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) is 418 × 10 4   m 3 , and the permeability of SRV is 5.2 × 10 − 4   mD . Compared with the interpretation results from microseismic monitoring data, the effective hydraulic fracture length obtained by integrated fracture network interpretation method proposed in this paper is 59% of that obtained from the microseismic monitoring data, and the effective SRV is 83% of that from the microseismic monitoring data. The results show that the fracture length is smaller and the fracture conductivity is larger without considering the influence of fracturing fluid.

THE OTWAY BASIN: EARLY CRETACEOUS RIFTING TO NEOGENE INVERSION

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 494 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Buffin ◽  
A.J. Sutherland ◽  
J.A. Gorski
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Normal Fault ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Natural Fracture ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Vertical Wells ◽  
Minimum Horizontal Stress ◽  
Maximum Horizontal Stress

Borehole breakouts and hydraulic fractures in­ferred from dipmeter and formation microscanner logs indicate that the minimum horizontal stress (σh) is oriented 035°N in the South Australian sector of the Otway Basin. Density and sonic check-shot log data indicate that vertical stress (σv) increases from approximately 20 MPa at a depth of one km to 44 MPa at two km and 68 MPa at three km. Assum­ing a normal fault condition (i.e. σy > σH > σh), the magnitude of σh is 75 per cent of the magnitude of the maximum horizontal stress (σH), and the magni­tude of σH is close to that of av. Sonic velocity compaction trends for shales suggest that pore pressure is generally near hydrostatic in the Otway Basin.Knowledge of the contemporary stress field has a number of implications for hydrocarbon produc­tion and exploration in the basin. Wellbore quality in vertical wells may be improved (breakouts sup­pressed) by increasing the mud weight to a level below that which induces hydraulic fracture, or other drilling problems related to excessive mud weight. Horizontal wells drilled in the σh direction (035°N/215°N) should be more stable than those drilled in the σH direction, and indeed than vertical wells. In any EOR operations where water flooding promotes hydraulic fracturing, injectors should be aligned in the aH (125°N/305°N) direction, and off­set from producers in the orthogonal σh direction. Any deviated/horizontal wells targeting the frac­tured basement play should be oriented in the σh (035°N/215°N) direction to maximise intersection with this open, natural fracture trend. Hydrocar­bon recovery in wells deviated towards 035°N/215°N may also be enhanced by inducing multiple hydrau­lic fractures along the wellbore.Considering exploration-related issues, faults following the dominant structural trend, sub-paral­lel to σH orientation, are the most prone to be non-sealing during any episodic build-up of pore pres­sure. Pre-existing vertical faults striking 080-095°N and 155-170°N are the most prone to at least a component of strike-slip reactivation within the contemporary stress field.

Impediments to Refracturing Success in Shale Reservoirs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clay Kurison
Keyword(s):  
Hyperbolic Equation ◽  
Reservoir Simulation ◽  
Analytical Techniques ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
B Value ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Fracturing Fluid ◽  
Minimal Impact ◽  
Wellhead Pressure ◽  
The Matrix

Abstract Stimulations in early horizontal wells in most shale plays are characterized by few and widely spaced perforation clusters, and low amounts of injected fracturing fluid and proppant. Low recovery from these wells has motivated refracturing although outcomes have been interpreted to range from successful to minimal impact based on operator specific evaluations. To tailor available technologies and improve quantification of upsides, there is need for mapping the spatial distribution of remaining resources and developing simpler but reliable analytical techniques. In this study, hydraulic fractures were assumed to be planar in a matrix with low porosity and ultra-low permeability. Consideration of natural fractures and their interaction with stimulation fluids led to addition of distributed fracture networks adjacent to the planar hydraulic fractures to define the composite fracture corridors. A sector model with the aforementioned architecture was used in reservoir simulation to investigate induced temporal and spatial drainage. These findings were used to explain the efficacy of widely used refracturing techniques and how post-refracturing reservoir response can be analyzed. Results from reservoir simulation showed remaining reserves were in the matrix between earlier placed hydraulic fractures aligned along initial perforation clusters, and beyond tips of hydraulic fractures. Upside from refracs could come from creation of new fractures in the matrix between earlier placed fractures and extension of tips of early fractures into virgin matrix. Assessment of these scenarios found the former to be optimal although depletion and existing perforations would limit the stimulation efficiency of new perforations. The second scenario would require large volumes of fracturing fluid to re-initiate fracture propagation. Yet this could trigger interference with offsets or affect drilling and stimulation of planned wells in adjacent acreage. For treatment efficiency, re-casing horizontal wells with competent liners and use of coiled tubing with straddle packers appears a better solution for bypassing old perforations. For the near wellbore and far field, re-stimulating new perforations at low injection rates could allow extension of fractures in virgin matrix surrounded by depleted strata. Real-time surveillance would be essential for mapping flow paths of refracturing fluid. For assessment of refracturing, actual and simulated flow exhibited persistent linear flow (PLF) that could be matched by Arps hyperbolic equation with a b value of 2. Incorporation of a novel fracture geometry factor (FGF) yielded an Arps-based equation that was tested on North American shale refracturing cases that often use post-treatment peak rate and wellhead pressure as measures of success. This study identified factors hindering the success of refracturing and proposed a modified Arps hyperbolic equation to analyze refracturing production data.

Geomechanical analysis of horizontal wells in terms of stability for drilling — A case study from the Peri-Baltic Syneclise

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 805-814
Author(s):  
Michał Kępiński ◽  
Pramit Basu ◽  
David Wiprut ◽  
Marek Koprianiuk
Keyword(s):  
Horizontal Well ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Microseismic Monitoring ◽  
Earth Model ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Horizontal Section ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Geomechanical Analysis

This paper presents a shale gas field geomechanics case study in the Peri-Baltic Syneclise (northern Poland). Polish Oil and Gas Company drilled a vertical well, W-1, and stimulated the Silurian target. Next, a horizontal well, W-2H, drilled the Ordovician target and partially collapsed. The remaining interval was stimulated, and microseismic monitoring was performed. A second horizontal well, W-3H, was drilled at the same azimuth as W-2H, but the well collapsed in the upper horizontal section (Silurian). A geomechanical earth model was constructed that matches the drilling experiences and well failure observations found in wells W-1, W-2H, and W-3H. The field was found to be in a strike-slip faulting stress regime, heavily fractured, with weak bedding contributing to the observed drilling problems. An analysis of safe mud weights, optimal casing setting depths, and optimal drilling directions was carried out for a planned well, W-4H. Specific recommendations are made to further enhance the model in any future studies. These recommendations include data acquisition and best practices for the planned well.

Lithology-controlled stress variations and pad-scale faults: A case study of hydraulic fracturing in the Woodford Shale, Oklahoma

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. ID35-ID44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Ma ◽  
Mark D. Zoback
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Horizontal Stress ◽  
Strike Slip ◽  
Woodford Shale ◽  
Stress Regime ◽  
Component Content ◽  
Microseismic Events ◽  
Minimum Horizontal Stress ◽  
Stress Variations

We have conducted an integrated study to investigate the petrophysical and geomechanical factors controlling the effectiveness of hydraulic fracturing (HF) in four subparallel horizontal wells in the Mississippi Limestone-Woodford Shale (MSSP-WDFD) play in Oklahoma. In two MSSP wells, the minimum horizontal stress [Formula: see text] indicated by the instantaneous shut-in pressures of the HF stages are significantly less than the vertical stress [Formula: see text]. This, combined with observations of drilling-induced tensile fractures in the MSSP in a vertical well at the site, indicates that this formation is in a normal/strike-slip faulting stress regime, consistent with earthquake focal mechanisms and other stress indicators in the area. However, the [Formula: see text] values are systematically higher and vary significantly from stage to stage in two WDFD wells. The stages associated with the abnormally high [Formula: see text] values (close to [Formula: see text]) were associated with little to no proppant placement and a limited number of microseismic events. We used compositional logs to determine the content of compliant components (clay and kerogen). Due to small variations in the trajectories of the horizontal wells, they penetrated three thin, but compositionally distinct WDFD lithofacies. We found that [Formula: see text] along the WDFD horizontals increases when the stage occurred in a zone with high clay and kerogen content. These variations of [Formula: see text] can be explained by various degrees of viscous stress relaxation, which results in the increase in [Formula: see text] (less stress anisotropy), as the compliant component content increases. The distribution of microseismic events was also affected by normal and strike-slip faults cutting across the wells. The locations of these faults were consistent with unusual lineations of microseismic events and were confirmed by 3D seismic data. Thus, the overall effectiveness of HF stimulation in the WDFD wells at this site was strongly affected the abnormally high HF gradients in clay-rich lithofacies and the presence of preexisting, pad-scale faults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document