scholarly journals Oral Antidiabetics and Sleep Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients: Data From the UK Biobank

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei Xue ◽  
Jiafei Wu ◽  
Xiangdong Tang ◽  
Xiao Tan ◽  
Christian Benedict

Previous small-scale studies have found that oral antidiabetic therapy is associated with sleep difficulties among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Here, we used data from 11 806 T2D patients from the UK Biobank baseline investigation to examine the association of oral antidiabetic therapy with self-reported difficulty falling and staying asleep and daily sleep duration. As shown by logistic regression adjusted for, e.g., age, T2D duration, and HbA1c, patients on non-metformin therapy (N=815; 86% were treated with sulphonylureas) had a 1.24-fold higher odds ratio of reporting regular difficulty falling and staying asleep at night compared to those without antidiabetic medication use (N=5 366, P<0.05) or those on metformin monotherapy (N=5 625, P<0.05). Non-metformin patients reported about 8 to 10 minutes longer daily sleep duration than the other groups (P<0.05). We did not find significant differences in sleep outcomes between untreated and metformin patients. Our findings suggest that non-metformin therapy may result in sleep initiation and maintenance difficulties, accompanied by a small but significant sleep extension. The results of the present study must be replicated in future studies using objective measures of sleep duration and validated questionnaires for insomnia. Considering that most T2D patients utilize multiple therapies to manage their glycemic control in the long term, it may also be worth investigating possible interactions of antidiabetic drugs on sleep.

Diabetes Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 762-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Vetter ◽  
Hassan S. Dashti ◽  
Jacqueline M. Lane ◽  
Simon G. Anderson ◽  
Eva S. Schernhammer ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 143 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Ochoa-Rosales ◽  
Niels van der Schaft ◽  
Kim V Braun ◽  
Frederick Ho ◽  
Fanny Petermann ◽  
...  

Background: Coffee intake has been linked to lower type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk. We hypothesized this may be mediated by coffee’s effects on inflammation. Methods: Using participants from the UK Biobank (UKB n=145370) and Rotterdam Study (RS n=7172) cohorts, we studied associations of coffee intake with incident T2D; longitudinally measured insulin resistance (HOMA IR); serum levels of inflammation markers; and the mediating role of inflammation. Statistical regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle and health factors. Results: The median follow up was 7 (UKB) and 9 (RS) years. An increase of one coffee cup/day was associated with 4-6% lower T2D risk (RS HR=0.94 [95% CI 0.90; 0.98]; UKB HR=0.96 [0.94; 0.98]); lower HOMA IR (RS β=-0.017 [-0.024; -0.010]); with lower C reactive protein (CRP) and higher adiponectin (Figure1). Consumers of filtered coffee had the lowest T2D risk (UKB HR=0.88 [0.83; 0.93]). CRP levels mediated 9.6% (UKB) and 3.4% (RS) of the total effect of coffee on T2D (Figure 1). Conclusions: We suggest that coffee’s beneficial effects on lower T2D risk are partially mediated by improvements in systemic inflammation.Figure 1. a CRP and a adiponectin refer to the effect of coffee intake on CRP and adiponectin levels. a CRP RS : β=-0.014 (-0.022; -0.005); UKBB a CRP UKB : β=-0.011 (-0.012; -0.009) and RS a adiponectin : β=0.025 (0.007; 0.042). b CRP and b adiponectin refer to the effect of coffee related levels in CRP and adiponectin on incident T2D, independent of coffee. RS b CRP : HR=1.17 (1.04; 1.31); UKB b CRP : HR=1.45 (1.37; 1.54); and b adiponectin : HR=0.58 (0.32; 0.83). c′ refers to coffee’ effect on T2D going directly or via others mediators. UKB c′ independent of CRP : HR=0.96 (0.94; 0.99); RS c′ independent of CRP : HR=0.94 (0.90; 0.99); and RS c′ independent of CRP+adiponectin : HR=0.90 (0.80; 1.01). Coffee related changes in CRP may partially explain the beneficial link between coffee and T2D, mediating a 3.4% (0.6; 4.8, RS) and 9.6% (5.7; 24.4, UKB). Evidence of mediation was also found for adiponectin.


1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Ovalle, MD ◽  
David S. H. Bell, MB, FACE, FACP

SLEEP ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. A377-A377
Author(s):  
C Vetter ◽  
HS Dashti ◽  
JM Lane ◽  
SG Anderson ◽  
ES Schernhammer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Diabetes Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1878-1886 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Jenkins ◽  
Jack Bowden ◽  
Heather A. Robinson ◽  
Naveed Sattar ◽  
Ruth J.F. Loos ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ada Admin ◽  
Yann C. Klimentidis ◽  
Amit Arora ◽  
Michelle Newell ◽  
Jin Zhou ◽  
...  

Although hyperlipidemia is traditionally considered a risk factor for type-2 diabetes (T2D), evidence has emerged from statin trials and candidate gene investigations suggesting that lower LDL-C increases T2D risk. We thus sought to more comprehensively examine the phenotypic and genotypic relationships of LDL-C with T2D. Using data from the UK Biobank, we found that levels of circulating LDL-C were negatively associated with T2D prevalence (OR=0.41[0.39, 0.43] per mmol/L unit of LDL-C), despite positive associations of circulating LDL-C with HbA1c and BMI. We then performed the first genome-wide exploration of variants simultaneously associated with lower circulating LDL-C and increased T2D risk, using data on LDL-C from the UK Biobank (n=431,167) and the GLGC consortium (n=188,577), and T2D from the DIAGRAM consortium (n=898,130). We identified 31 loci associated with lower circulating LDL-C and increased T2D, capturing several potential mechanisms. Seven of these loci have previously been identified for this dual phenotype, and 9 have previously been implicated in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. These findings extend our current understanding of the higher T2D risk among individuals with low circulating LDL-C, and of the underlying mechanisms, including those responsible for the diabetogenic effect of LDL-C-lowering medications.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Lankester ◽  
Daniela Zanetti ◽  
Erik Ingelsson ◽  
Themistocles L. Assimes

AbstractObservational studies suggest alcohol use promotes the development of some adverse cardiometabolic traits but protects against others including outcomes related to coronary artery disease. We used Mendelian randomization to explore causal relationships between the degree of alcohol consumption and several cardiometabolic traits in the UK Biobank. We found carriers of the ADH1B Arg47His variant (rs1229984) reported a 26% lower amount of alcohol consumption compared to non-carriers. In our one-sample, two-stage least squares analyses of the UK Biobank using rs1229984 as an instrument, one additional drink/day was associated with statistically significant elevated level of systolic blood pressure (3.0 mmHg), body mass index (0.87 kg/m^2), waist circumference (1.3 cm), body fat percentage (1.7%), low-density lipoprotein levels in blood (0.16 mmol/L), and the risk of myocardial infarction (OR=1.50), stroke (OR=1.52), any cardiovascular disease (OR=1.43), and all-cause mortality (OR=1.41). Conversely, increasing use of alcohol was associated with reduced levels of triglycerides (−0.059 mmol/L) and HbA1C (−0.42 mmol/mol) in the blood, the latter possibly a consequence of a statistically elevated mean corpuscular volume among ADH1B Arg47His carriers. Stratifications by sex and smoking revealed a pattern of more harm of alcohol use among men compared to women, but no consistent difference by smoking status. Men had an increased risk of heart failure (OR = 1.76), atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.35), and type 2 diabetes (OR = 1.31) per additional drink/day. Using summary statistics from external datasets in 2-sample analyses for replication, we found causal associations between alcohol and obesity, stroke, ischemic stroke, and type 2 diabetes. Our results are consistent with an overall harmful effect of alcohol on cardiometabolic health at all levels of use and suggest that even moderate alcohol use should not be promoted as a part of a healthy diet and lifestyle.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e1002982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wainberg ◽  
Anubha Mahajan ◽  
Anshul Kundaje ◽  
Mark I. McCarthy ◽  
Erik Ingelsson ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1563-P
Author(s):  
JASON I. CHIANG ◽  
PETER HANLON ◽  
BHAUTESH D. JANI ◽  
JO-ANNE E. MANSKI-NANKERVIS ◽  
JOHN FURLER ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document