scholarly journals The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weiwei Yang ◽  
Xiongbin Cao ◽  
Xiaoyun Zhang ◽  
Xuebing Wang ◽  
Xiaowen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Training Group ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Objective: The primary purpose of our study is to systemically evaluate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on recovery of dysphagia after stroke.Search Methods: We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs published by PubMed, the Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception until April 24, 2021. Language is limited to English. After screening and extracting the data, and evaluating the quality of the selected literature, we carried out the meta-analysis with software RevMan 5.3 and summarized available evidence from non-RCTs.Results: Among 205 potentially relevant articles, 189 participants (from 10 RCTs) were recruited in the meta-analysis, and six non-RCTs were qualitatively described. The random-effects model analysis revealed a pooled effect size of SMD = 0.65 (95% CI = 0.04–1.26, p = 0.04), which indicated that rTMS therapy has a better effect than conventional therapy. However, the subgroup analysis showed that there was no significant difference between low-frequency and high-frequency groups. Even more surprisingly, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups and the conventional training group in the subgroup analysis, but the combined effect was positive.Conclusion: Our study suggests that rTMS might be effective in treating patients with dysphagia after stroke.

scholarly journals Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for peripartum depression: systematic review & meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyune June Lee ◽  
Sung Min Kim ◽  
Ji Yean Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Peripartum Depression

Abstract Background Peripartum depression is a common disorder with very high potential hazards for both the patients and their babies. The typical treatment options include antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy. However, these treatments do not ensure the safety of the fetus. Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has emerged as a promising treatment for neuropathies as well as depression. Nevertheless, many studies excluded pregnant women. This systematic review was conducted to confirm whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was a suitable treatment option for peripartum depression. Methods We performed a systematic review that followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched for studies in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases published until the end of September 2020. Eleven studies were selected for the systematic review, and five studies were selected for quantitative synthesis. Data analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3 software. The effect size was analyzed using the standardized mean difference, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined by the generic inverse variance estimation method. Results The therapeutic effect size of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression was 1.394 (95% CI: 0.944–1.843), and the sensitivity analysis effect size was 1.074 (95% CI: 0.689–1.459), indicating a significant effect. The side effect size of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression was 0.346 (95% CI: 0.214–0.506), a meaningful result. There were no severe side effects to the mothers or fetuses. Conclusions From various perspectives, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can be considered an alternative treatment to treat peripartum depression to avoid exposure of fetuses to drugs and the severe side effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Further research is required to increase confidence in the results.

scholarly journals Blinding integrity in randomized sham-controlled trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1173-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo T. Berlim ◽  
Hannah J. Broadbent ◽  
Frederique Van den Eynde
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Major Depression ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Treatment Allocation ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and effective treatment for major depression (MD). However, the perceived lack of a suitable sham rTMS condition might have compromised the success of blinding procedures in clinical trials. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) on high frequency (HF-), low frequency (LF-) and bilateral rTMS for MD. We searched the literature from January 1995 to July 2012 using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus. The main outcome measure was participants' ability to correctly guess their treatment allocation at study end. We used a random-effects model and risk difference (RD). Overall, data were obtained from seven and two RCTs on HF- and bilateral rTMS, respectively. No RCT on LF-rTMS reporting on blinding success was found. HF- and bilateral rTMS trials enrolled 396 and 93 depressed subjects and offered an average of approximately 13 sessions. At study end, 52 and 59% of subjects receiving HF-rTMS and sham rTMS were able to correctly guess their treatment allocation, a non-significant difference (RD = −0.04; z = −0.51; p = 0.61). Furthermore, 63.3 and 57.5% of subjects receiving bilateral and sham rTMS were able to correctly guess their treatment allocation, also a non-significant difference (RD = 0.05; z = 0.49; p = 0.62). In addition, the use of angulation and sham coil in HF-rTMS trials produced similar results. In summary, existing sham rTMS interventions appear to result in acceptable levels of blinding regarding treatment allocation.

Effects of smoking status and MADRS retardation factor on response to low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 40-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Poulet ◽  
F. Galvao ◽  
E. Haffen ◽  
D. Szekely ◽  
C. Brault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Retardation Factor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Low Frequency Rtms

AbstractBackgroundDespite growing evidence supporting the clinical interest of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), little is known regarding the effects of clinical and sociodemographic factors on the clinical outcome in patients.MethodsWe retrospectively investigated the effects of clinical (using the 3-factor model of the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale [MADRS] encompassing dysphoria, retardation and vegetative symptoms) and sociodemographic characteristics of participants on clinical outcome in a sample of 54 TRD patients receiving low frequency rTMS (1 Hz, 360 pulses) applied over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex combined with sham venlafaxine.ResultsResponders (n= 29) displayed lower retardation baseline scores (13.6 ± 2.9) than non-responders (15.6 ± 2.9;n= 25;P= 0.02). We also observed a significant difference between the numbers of ex-smokers in responders and non-responders groups; all ex-smokers (n= 8) were responders to rTMS (P= 0.005).ConclusionLow MADRS retardation factor and ex-smoker status is highly prevalent in responders to low frequency rTMS. Further studies are needed to investigate the predictive value of these factors.

scholarly journals Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lan Zhang ◽  
Guoqiang Xing ◽  
Shiquan Shuai ◽  
Zhiwei Guo ◽  
Huaping Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Cortical Excitability ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Motor Evoked Potential ◽  
Motor Deficit ◽  
Resting Motor Threshold

Background and Purpose. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over the contralesional hemisphere on upper limb motor recovery and cortex plasticity after stroke.Methods. Databases of PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials published before Jun 31, 2017. The effect size was evaluated by using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and a 95% confidence interval (CI). Resting motor threshold (rMT) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) were also examined.Results. Twenty-two studies of 1 Hz LF-rTMS over the contralesional hemisphere were included. Significant efficacy was found on finger flexibility (SMD = 0.75), hand strength (SMD = 0.49), and activity dexterity (SMD = 0.32), but not on body function (SMD = 0.29). The positive changes of rMT (SMD = 0.38 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = −0.83 for the unaffected hemisphere) and MEP (SMD = −1.00 for the affected hemisphere and SMD = 0.57 for the unaffected hemisphere) were also significant.Conclusions. LF-rTMS as an add-on therapy significantly improved upper limb functional recovery especially the hand after stroke, probably through rebalanced cortical excitability of both hemispheres. Future studies should determine if LF-rTMS alone or in conjunction with practice/training would be more effective.Clinical Trial Registration Information. This trial is registered with unique identifierCRD42016042181.

Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on Parkinson motor function: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
HongCan Zhu ◽  
ZhaoMing Lu ◽  
YiTing Jin ◽  
XiaoJia Duan ◽  
JunFang Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trials ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Low Frequency Rtms ◽  
Updrs Part

ObjectivesPrevious studies have demonstrated inconsistent findings regarding the efficacy of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of low-frequency rTMS.MethodsA comprehensive literature search (including PubMed, CCTR, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM-disc, NTIS,EAGLE, Clinical Trials, Current Controlled Trials, International Clinical Trials Registry) was conducted dating until June 2014. The key search terms (‘Parkinson’, ‘PD’, ‘transcranial magnetic stimulation’, ‘TMS’, ‘RTMS’ and ‘noninvasive brain stimulation’) produced eight high-quality randomised controlled trials (RCT) of low-frequency rTMS versus sham stimulation.ResultsThese eight studies, composed of 319 patients, were meta-analysed through assessment of the decreased Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS part III) score. Pooling of the results from these RCTs yielded an effect size of −0.40 (95%CI=−0.73 to −0.06,p<0.05) in UPDRS part III, which indicated that low-frequency rTMS could have 5.05 (95%CI=−1.73 to −8.37) point decrease in UPDRS part III score than sham stimulation.DiscussionLow-frequency rTMS had a significant effect on motor signs in PD. As the number of RCTs and PD patients included here was limited, further large-scale multi-center RCTs were required to validate our conclusions.

scholarly journals The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 737-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-C. Yang ◽  
N. Khalifa ◽  
B. Völlm
Keyword(s):  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Effect Sizes ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Clinical Populations

Empathy is a multi-dimensional concept with affective and cognitive components, the latter often referred to as Theory of Mind (ToM). Impaired empathy is prevalent in people with neuropsychiatric disorders, such as personality disorder, psychopathy, and schizophrenia, highlighting the need to develop therapeutic interventions to address this. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a non-invasive therapeutic technique that has been effective in treating various neuropsychiatric conditions, can be potentially used to modulate empathy. To our knowledge, no systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this field have been conducted. The aim of the current study was to review the literature on the use of rTMS to modulate empathy in adults. Seven electronic databases (AMED, Cochrane library, EMBASE, Medline, Pubmed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science) were searched using appropriate search terms. Twenty-two studies were identified, all bar one study involved interventions in healthy rather than clinical populations, and 18 of them, providing results for 24 trials, were included in the meta-analyses. Results showed an overall small, but statistically significant, effect in favour of active rTMS in healthy individuals. Differential effects across cognitive and affective ToM were evident. Subgroup analyses for cognitive ToM revealed significant effect sizes on excitatory rTMS, offline paradigms, and non-randomised design trials. Subgroup analyses for affective ToM revealed significant effect sizes on excitatory rTMS, offline paradigms, and non-randomised design trials. Meta-regression revealed no significant sources of heterogeneity. In conclusion, rTMS may have discernible effects on different components of empathy. Further research is required to examine the effects of rTMS on empathy in clinical and non-clinical populations, using appropriate empathy tasks and rTMS protocols.

scholarly journals Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Peripartum Depression: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunejune Lee ◽  
Sungmin Kim ◽  
Ji Yean Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Electroconvulsive Therapy ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Peripartum Depression

Abstract BackgroundPeripartum depression is a common disorder with very high potential hazards for both the patients and their babies. The typical treatment options include antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy. However, these treatments do not ensure the safety of the fetus. Recently, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation has emerged as a promising treatment for neuropathies as well as depression. Nevertheless, many studies excluded pregnant women. This systematic review was conducted to confirm whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was a suitable treatment option for peripartum depression. MethodsWe performed a systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched studies in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases published until the end of September 2020. Eleven studies were selected for the systematic review, and five studies were selected for quantitative synthesis. Data analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3 software. The effect size was analyzed using the standardized mean difference and the 95% confidence interval (CI) was determined by the generic inverse variance estimation method.ResultsThe therapeutic effect size of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression was 1.394 (95% CI: 0.920 – 1.843), and the sensitivity analysis effect size was 1.074 (95% CI: 0.777 – 1.233), indicating a significant effect. The side effect size of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for peripartum depression was 0.346, (95% CI: 0.214 – 0.506), which was a meaningful result. There were no serious side effects to the mothers or fetuses.ConclusionsFrom a variety of perspectives, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation can be considered an alternative treatment to treat peripartum depression to avoid the exposure of fetuses to drugs and the severe side effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Further research is required to increase confidence in the results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document