scholarly journals Egg Consumption and Incidence of Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owais Khawaja ◽  
Hemindermeet Singh ◽  
Faraz Luni ◽  
Ameer Kabour ◽  
Syed S. Ali ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azadeh Aminianfar ◽  
Roohallah Fallah-Moshkani ◽  
Asma Salari-Moghaddam ◽  
Parvane Saneei ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Limited data are available that summarize the relation between egg intake and the risk of upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancers. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the association between egg intake and the risk of UADT cancers. Medline/PubMed, ISI web of knowledge, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched using relevant keywords. Observational studies conducted on humans investigating the association between egg consumption and the risk of UADT cancers were included. Overall, 38 studies with a total of 164,241 subjects (27, 025 cases) were included. Based on 40 effect sizes from 32 case-control studies, we found a 42% increased risk of UADT cancers among those with the highest egg consumption (ranging from ≥1 meal/d to ≥1 time/mo among studies) compared to those with the lowest intake (ranging from 0–20 g/d to never consumed among studies) (overall OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.68; P < 0.001). However, this association was only evident in hospital-based case-control (HCC) studies (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.34, 1.68; P < 0.001 for ‘oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer’ and OR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.08, 1.50; P = 0.004 for esophageal cancer) and not in population-based case-control (PCC) studies (OR = 1.25; 95% CI: 0.59, 2.67; P = 0.56 for ‘oropharyngeal and laryngeal cancer’ and OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.92, 1.81; P = 0.13 for esophageal cancer). In addition, the association was not significant in prospective cohort studies (overall OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.71, 1.04; P = 0.11). Considering individual cancers, a positive association was observed between the highest egg consumption, compared with the lowest, and risk of oropharyngeal (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.61, 2.20; P < 0.001), laryngeal (OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.45, 2.32; P < 0.001), oral & pharyngeal & laryngeal (OR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.67; P < 0.001), and esophageal cancers (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.10,1.48; P = 0.001). We also found an inverse association between egg intake and the risk of oral cancer (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.99; P = 0.04). In conclusion, high egg consumption (ranging from ≥1 meal/d to ≥1 time/mo among studies) was associated with increased risk of UADT cancers only in HCC studies but not in PCC or prospective cohort studies. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018102619.


BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier ◽  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Yanping Li ◽  
Amanda L Schwab ◽  
Meir J Stampfer ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate the association between egg intake and cardiovascular disease risk among women and men in the United States, and to conduct a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Design Prospective cohort study, and a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Setting Nurses’ Health Study (NHS, 1980-2012), NHS II (1991-2013), Health Professionals’ Follow-Up Study (HPFS, 1986-2012). Participants Cohort analyses included 83 349 women from NHS, 90 214 women from NHS II, and 42 055 men from HPFS who were free of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer at baseline. Main outcome measures Incident cardiovascular disease, which included non-fatal myocardial infarction, fatal coronary heart disease, and stroke. Results Over up to 32 years of follow-up (>5.54 million person years), 14 806 participants with incident cardiovascular disease were identified in the three cohorts. Participants with a higher egg intake had a higher body mass index, were less likely to be treated with statins, and consumed more red meats. Most people consumed between one and less than five eggs per week. In the pooled multivariable analysis, consumption of at least one egg per day was not associated with incident cardiovascular disease risk after adjustment for updated lifestyle and dietary factors associated with egg intake (hazard ratio for at least one egg per day v less than one egg per month 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.05). In the updated meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies (33 risk estimates, 1 720 108 participants, 139 195 cardiovascular disease events), an increase of one egg per day was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (pooled relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.03, I 2 =62.3%). Results were similar for coronary heart disease (21 risk estimates, 1 411 261 participants, 59 713 coronary heart disease events; 0.96, 0.91 to 1.03, I 2 =38.2%), and stroke (22 risk estimates, 1 059 315 participants, 53 617 stroke events; 0.99, 0.91 to 1.07, I 2 =71.5%). In analyses stratified by geographical location (P for interaction=0.07), no association was found between egg consumption and cardiovascular disease risk among US cohorts (1.01, 0.96 to 1.06, I 2 =30.8%) or European cohorts (1.05, 0.92 to 1.19, I 2 =64.7%), but an inverse association was seen in Asian cohorts (0.92, 0.85 to 0.99, I 2 =44.8%). Conclusions Results from the three cohorts and from the updated meta-analysis show that moderate egg consumption (up to one egg per day) is not associated with cardiovascular disease risk overall, and is associated with potentially lower cardiovascular disease risk in Asian populations. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019129650.


2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
LI-NA HOU ◽  
FEI LI ◽  
YOU ZHOU ◽  
SHI-HUAI NIE ◽  
LIANG SU ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hassan Khan ◽  
Setor Kunutsor ◽  
Andreas P. Kalogeropoulos ◽  
Vasiliki V. Georgiopoulou ◽  
Anne B. Newman ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 346 (jan07 2) ◽  
pp. e8539-e8539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Rong ◽  
L. Chen ◽  
T. Zhu ◽  
Y. Song ◽  
M. Yu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Krittanawong ◽  
A Tunhasiriwet ◽  
M Rodriguez ◽  
B Yue ◽  
H U Hassan Virk ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 619-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier ◽  
Amanda L Schwab ◽  
Siyu Chen ◽  
Yanping Li ◽  
Frank M Sacks ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background Whether egg consumption is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unsettled. Objectives We evaluated the association between egg consumption and T2D risk in 3 large US prospective cohorts, and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Methods We followed 82,750 women from the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS; 1980–2012), 89,636 women from the NHS II (1991–2017), and 41,412 men from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; 1986–2016) who were free of T2D, cardiovascular disease, and cancer at baseline. Egg consumption was assessed every 2–4 y using a validated FFQ. We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate HRs and 95% CIs. Results During a total of 5,529,959 person-years of follow-up, we documented 20,514 incident cases of T2D in the NHS, NHS II, and HPFS. In the pooled multivariable model adjusted for updated BMI, lifestyle, and dietary confounders, a 1-egg/d increase was associated with a 14% (95% CI: 7%, 20%) higher T2D risk. In random-effects meta-analysis of 16 prospective cohort studies (589,559 participants; 41,248 incident T2D cases), for each 1 egg/d, the pooled RR of T2D was 1.07 (95% CI: 0.99, 1.15; I2 = 69.8%). There were, however, significant differences by geographic region (P for interaction = 0.01). Each 1 egg/d was associated with higher T2D risk among US studies (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.27; I2 = 51.3%), but not among European (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.85, 1.15; I2 = 73.5%) or Asian (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.09; I2 = 59.1%) studies. Conclusions Results from the updated meta-analysis show no overall association between moderate egg consumption and risk of T2D. Whether the heterogeneity of the associations among US, European, and Asian cohorts reflects differences in egg consumption habits warrants further investigation. This systematic review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero as CRD42019127860.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document