scholarly journals Gut Microbiota Profiling in Patients With HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Metronomic Chemotherapy of Capecitabine Compared to Those Under Conventional Dosage

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuwen Guan ◽  
Fei Ma ◽  
Xiaoying Sun ◽  
Chunxiao Li ◽  
Lixi Li ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Slavomir Krajnak ◽  
Marco J. Battista ◽  
Annette Hasenburg ◽  
Marcus Schmidt

Background: As disease control and quality of life play a leading role in metastatic breast cancer (MBC), metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is gaining popularity alongside conventional chemotherapy (CCT) and targeted therapies. Summary: MCT, defined as continuous administration of low-dose chemotherapeutic agents, is accepted as a therapy that exerts its effects via immunomodulation, anti-angiogenesis and direct cytotoxic effects. Oral administration of MCT is safe, easy to handle, and allows for flexible drug dosing. Dose accumulations associated with non-tolerable side effects are rare, so the medication can be administered for longer periods of time. Patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic disease resistant to endocrine-based therapy and not requiring rapid tumor response are generally suitable for MCT. However, MCT may also be promising in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive tumors without aggressive disease who prefer a lower toxicity profile compared to CCT. The most commonly used agents are cyclophosphamide (CTX), methotrexate (MTX), capecitabine (CAPE), and vinorelbine (VRL), whereby a combination of agents is frequently applied. Key Messages: Based on the growing body of evidence, MCT can be considered as a suitable treatment option in selected MBC patients. Nevertheless, there is an urgent need for randomized controlled trials comparing MCT with CCT, but also with best supportive care. Due to the multimodal mechanisms of action, the combination with targeted and immunological therapies may represent a new promising approach for the treatment of MBC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 618-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marwa Mahmoud Hussein ◽  
Rabab Mohamed Gaafar ◽  
Ahmed Mostafa Abdel-Warith ◽  
Wafaa Abdallah Ahmed ◽  
Nasr Mohamed Ali Allahloubi ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 961-967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Orlando ◽  
Anna Cardillo ◽  
Andrea Rocca ◽  
Alessandra Balduzzi ◽  
Raffaella Ghisini ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1233-1242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herman A Perroud ◽  
Carlos M Alasino ◽  
Maria J Rico ◽  
Francisco Queralt ◽  
Stella M Pezzotto ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11071-e11071
Author(s):  
Katia Cagossi ◽  
Maria Grazia Lazzaretti ◽  
Alessia Ferrari ◽  
Giorgia Razzini ◽  
Meri Leporati ◽  
...  

e11071 Background: Current therapeutic goals for MBC, as an incurable disease, are symptoms and prolonged disease control together with good quality of life. Metronomic chemotherapy has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of anti-angiogenetic activity of metronomic chemotherapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as lapatinib in heavily pre-treated MBC HER-2 positive patients. Methods: Metastatic breast cancer patients HER-2 positive with CEA or Ca15.3 elevated, measurable disease, prior systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy) for advanced disease, ECOG performance status < 1 and life expectancy longer than 3 months. MBC patients were treated with metronomic oral capecitabine (1500 mg daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) plus lapatinib (1250 mg daily). The treatment was given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary objective was time to progression (TTP) and safety. Results: Tenpatients were included. Median age was 56 years old (range 46-76). Median number of previous chemotherapy lines was 5 (range 2-10). Median time to tumor progression was 4 months (2-7). No complete response was observed. Six out of ten patients (60%) with pre-existing only bone metastases achieved a stable disease and/or partial response and are still on treatment after 6 month of therapy. At the same time 100% of these patients exhibited reduction of serum marker concentrations to normal range. No grade 3-4 toxicity was reported. There was no decline in cardiac function. Hematological and gastro-intestinal toxicity was well tolerated (G1-2). No reduction of dose was needed. Conclusions: The treatment appears to be an effective and less toxic option in heavily pretreated MBC patients. Of note is the observed activity in patients with exclusive bone metastases. Monitoring of CEA and Ca15.3 during the first two months of treatment appears to provide a sensitive and economical means of identifying those patients who are responding to the therapy. Therefore, the combination of lapatinib with metronomic chemotherapy should be explored in advance for osseous MBC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document