scholarly journals Gastrointestinal Metastases From Primary Renal Cell Cancer: A Single Center Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rony Maelle ◽  
Ratone Jean-Philippe ◽  
Walz Jochen ◽  
Pignot Geraldine ◽  
Caillol Fabrice ◽  
...  

Introduction: Digestive metastases (DMs) from renal cell cancer (RCC) are rare. Over the past decade, the overall survival of metastatic RCC (mRCC) has been improved by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. The main objective of this study was to assess the incidence of metastases of the digestive tract in this new field of treatment. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the clinical characteristics, prognosis, treatments used for DMs, and median time between the diagnosis of RCC or mRCC and DMs.Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected from all patients with mRCC between 2007 (the time of TKI was a standard of care) and 2019 was carried out at the Paoli-Calmettes Institute (Marseille, France). Computer research software using artificial intelligence (ConSoRe®) was used to identify patients and assess their characteristics.Results: Between January 2007 and December 2019, 11 out of 660 (1.6%) mRCC patients had metastases of the gastrointestinal tract. The median age was 62 years. Of the 11 patients, 81.8% experienced digestive bleeding or anemia. Only 2 patients were asymptomatic. The metastases were mainly duodenal (50%) and gastric (41.6%). The median time from cancer diagnosis and from metastatic disease to gastrointestinal metastasis was 4.3 years (3 months−19.2 years) and 2.25 years (0 days−10.2 years), respectively. Local treatment was performed in 38.5% of cases by endoscopy (60%), surgery (20%) and radiotherapy (40%) with success rates of 33, 100, and 50%, respectively. Etiological treatment was modified following the discovery of DM in 84.6% of the cases. The median survival was 1 year from the diagnosis of DM (13 days−9.4 years). Two patients were still alive 2.9 and 9.4 years after the diagnosis of DM.Conclusion: This is the largest monocentric retrospective analysis of DM in patients with RCC. It seems to be a rare and late event in the course of the disease. Local treatment combined with systemic treatment could improve survival. In the context of prolonged survival with the new based immunotherapy treatments in mRCC, we suggest that unexplained anemia or persistent digestive symptoms could be explored by endoscopy.

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 1185-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Schöffski ◽  
H. Dumez ◽  
P. Clement ◽  
A. Hoeben ◽  
H. Prenen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Stagno ◽  
Sabrina Vari ◽  
Alessio Annovazzi ◽  
Vincenzo Anelli ◽  
Michelangelo Russillo ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe combination of BRAF and MEK inhibitors represents the standard of care treatment for patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma, notwithstanding the high frequency of emergent resistance. Moreover, therapeutic options outside clinical trials are scarce when patients have progressed after both targeted therapy and therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this article, we report our experience with targeted therapy rechallenging with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma after progression with kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy.MethodsFour patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma were rechallenged with BRAF and MEK inhibitors after progression with targeted therapy and subsequent immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitors).ResultsTwo patients (one of them was heavily pretreated) had partial response over 36 months (with local treatment on oligoprogression disease) and 10 months, respectively. A third patient with multisite visceral disease and high serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase had a short-lived clinical benefit rapidly followed by massive progression of disease (early progressor). The fourth patient, currently on treatment with BRAF/MEK inhibitors, is showing a clinical benefit and radiological stable disease over 3 months of therapy. Adverse events were manageable, similar to those reported during the first targeted therapy; the treatment was better tolerated at rechallenge compared with the first treatment by two out of four patients.


Author(s):  
Tim Eisen

Renal cancer is the commonest malignancy of the kidney and worldwide, accounts for between 2% and 3% of the total cancer burden. The mainstay of curative treatment remains surgery. There have been significant advances in surgical technique, the most important ones being nephron-sparing surgery and laparoscopic nephrectomy. The medical treatment of advanced renal cell cancer has only improved markedly in the last decade with the development of antiangiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin, and a diminished role for immunotherapy.Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy results in reduction of tumour volume in around three-quarters of patients and doubles progression-free survival, but treatment is not curative. The management of side effects in patients on maintenance tyrosine-kinase inhibitors has improved in the last 3 years, although still presents difficulties which have to be actively considered.The molecular biology of renal cell carcinoma is better understood than for the majority of solid tumours. The commonest form of renal cancer, clear-cell carcinoma of the kidney, is strongly associated with mutations in the von Hippel–Lindau gene and more recently with chromatin-remodelling genes such as PBRM1. These genetic abnormalities lead to a loss of control of angiogenesis and uncontrolled proliferation of tumour cells. There is a very wide spectrum of tumour behaviour from the extremely indolent to the terribly aggressive. It is not currently known what accounts for this disparity in tumour behaviour.A number of outstanding questions are being addressed in scientific and clinical studies such as a clearer understanding of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers, the role of adjuvant therapy, the role of surgery in the presence of metastatic disease, how best to use our existing agents, and investigation of novel targets and therapeutic agents, especially novel immunotherapies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 634-634
Author(s):  
Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal ◽  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
Hesham Yasin ◽  
Kenneth Gerard Nepple ◽  
Mollie R. De Shazo ◽  
...  

634 Background: Response to checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) for renal cell cancer (RCC) remains variable, with markers like PDL1 proving unreliable. Preclinical models suggest that obesity could affect CPI outcomes. We conducted a retrospective study on the effect of obesity on outcomes in RCC patients treated with CPIs. Methods: RCC patients treated with nivolumab +/- Ipilimumab at university of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) and University of Iowa (UIOWA) from 2015 - 2018 were classified according to WHO standard definition of BMI as non-obese (NOB-<30kg/m2) or obese (OB->30Kg/m2). Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the first CPI dose to date of death or to last follow up date if patients were still alive. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the interval from the first dose of CPI to date of progression or date of death and censored at last follow-up date if patients were still alive without progression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to evaluate the association between OS/PFS and obesity status, controlling for age, sex, race and number of prior therapies. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.4. Results: 84 patients with at least 6 months follow-up received a median of 9 doses of CPI with median follow of 72 weeks. 48 patients were NOB while 36 patients were OB, with 40 patients deceased at time of analysis. The most common response was stable disease in 45%, with CR in 5% and PR in 10% for a disease control rate of 63%. The median OS was 30 months in NOB patients and 20 months in the OB group. The 2 yr survival was 59% in the NOB group vs 28 % in the OB group with a HR of 0.60 (0.32-1.14; p=0.12). Median PFS was 13 months in the NOB group vs 7.3 months in the OB group with 2 yr PFS of 28% in the NOB group vs 5.5% in the OB group (HR 0.58 {0.35-0.98}; p=0.04). Conclusions: In this analysis of RCC patients treated with CPI, BMI < 30 predicts better OS and PFS. Further studies are required to better understand the effect of BMI on CPI outcomes in RCC.[Table: see text]


Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 261 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky Goh ◽  
Balaji Ganeshan ◽  
Paul Nathan ◽  
Jaspal K. Juttla ◽  
Anup Vinayan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Amato ◽  
Youxin Xiong ◽  
Hui Peng ◽  
Virginia Mohlere

Aims We developed an outcomes model to select patients for renal cell cancer vaccine immunotherapy. Materials and methods We examined clinical data from 2 phase II studies of modified vaccinia Ankara as vector to express 5T4 (MVA-5T4), calculated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and created risk groups based on the number of factors involved. Results Median OS was 12.4 months; median PFS was 3.6 months. Significant factors (p<0.05) included neutrophils (both), bone metastases (OS), ECOG performance status (OS), lactate dehydrogenase levels (both), prior therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus immunotherapy (OS), Fuhrman grade (OS), and 5T4-specific ELISPOT response (PFS). By group, median OS was not reached in patients with favorable risk (censored at cutoff), was 13.7 months in those with intermediate risk and 4.0 months in those with poor risk. Conclusions Further validation of this model will identify the patients most likely to respond to MVA-5T4 and provide a framework for outcomes models for other vaccine therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document