scholarly journals Can Risk Stratification Based on Ultrasound Elastography of Background Liver Assist CEUS LI-RADS in the Diagnosis of HCC?

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawu Li ◽  
Wenwu Ling ◽  
Shuang Chen ◽  
Lulu Yang ◽  
Lin Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Ultrasound Elastography ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Liver Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ObjectiveTo explore whether risk stratification based on ultrasound elastography of liver background assists contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS LI-RADS) in diagnosing HCC.Materials and MethodsIn total, 304 patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) confirmed by pathology underwent CEUS and ultrasound elastography were included in this retrospective study. Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB, n=193) and non-CHB (n=111) were stratified by four liver stiffness measurement (LSM) thresholds. A LI-RADS category was assigned to FLLs using CEUS LI-RADS v2017. The diagnostic performance was assessed with the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV.ResultsThe mean background liver stiffness of HCC patients with CHB, HCC patients without CHB and non-HCC patients without CHB were 9.72 kPa, 8.23 kPa and 4.97 kPa, respectively. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity and PPV of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC in CHB patients with LSM ≥ 5.8 kPa, ≥ 6.8 kPa, ≥ 9.1 kPa, and ≥ 10.3 kPa were high, with corresponding values of 0.745 to 0.880, 94.2% to 95.3%, 81.3% to 85.7%, and 98.1% to 98.8%, respectively. Higher AUC and specificity for HCC was observed in non-CHB patients with LSM ≥ 9.1 kPa and ≥ 10.3 kPa compared to non-CHB patients with LSM ≥ 5.8 kPa and ≥ 6.8 kPa, with corresponding values of0.964/1.000 vs 0.590/0.580, and 100%/100% vs 60%/70%, respectively.ConclusionCEUS LI-RADS has a good diagnostic performance in CHB patients regardless of the background liver stiffness. Furthermore, CEUS LI-RADS can be applied for non-CHB patients with a LSM ≥ 9.1 kPa.

Diagnostic performance of intravascular perfusion based contrast-enhanced ultrasound LI-RADS in the evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Dongsheng Zuo ◽  
Kefeng Yang ◽  
Size Wu
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Diagnostic Efficiency ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

BACKGROUND: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) is a relative new algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) assessment. OBJECTIVE: To validate the diagnostic efficiency of the intravascular perfusion based CEUS LI-RADS for HCC. METHODS: Archives of 873 patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) undergoing CEUS were reviewed, and target images were read by two sonologists independently according to the CEUS LI-RADS. The diagnostic performance was calculated and compared. RESULTS: Assessment with reference to CEUS LI-RADS, 87 of 218 FLLs (39.9%) were categorized as LR-5, 131 of 218 FLLs (60.1%) were categorized as non-LR-5, 19 of 99 HCCs were categorized as non-LR-5, and 7 of 119 non-HCCs were categorized as LR-5. The sensitivity, specificity, AUROC, positive and negative predictive values of CEUS LI-RADS for diagnosing HCC were 80.81%(95%CI: 71.7%–88.0%), 94.1%(95%CI: 88.3%–97.6%), 0.87 (95%CI: 0.82–0.92), 91.9%(95%CI: 84.1%–96.7%), and 85.5%(95%CI: 78.3%–91.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic efficiency of the intravascular perfusion based CEUS LI-RADS for the evaluation of HCCs is very good.

scholarly journals Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Sonazoid-Enhanced US: Value of the Kupffer Phase

Diagnostics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Takahashi ◽  
Katsutoshi Sugimoto ◽  
Naohisa Kamiyama ◽  
Kentaro Sakamaki ◽  
Tatsuya Kakegawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Imaging Feature ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Noninvasive Diagnosis ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Hepatic Lesions

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of Contrast-Enhanced US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) version 2017, which includes portal- and late-phase washout as a major imaging feature, with that of modified CEUS LI-RADS, which includes Kupffer-phase findings as a major imaging feature. Participants at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with treatment-naïve hepatic lesions (≥1 cm) were recruited and underwent Sonazoid-enhanced US. Arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), washout time, and echogenicity in the Kupffer phase were evaluated using both criteria. The diagnostic performance of both criteria was analyzed using the McNemar test. The evaluation was performed on 102 participants with 102 lesions (HCCs (n = 52), non-HCC malignancies (n = 36), and benign (n = 14)). Among 52 HCCs, non-rim APHE was observed in 92.3% (48 of 52). By 5 min, 73.1% (38 of 52) of HCCs showed mild washout, while by 10 min or in the Kupffer phase, 90.4% (47 of 52) of HCCs showed hypoenhancement. The sensitivity (67.3%; 35 of 52; 95% CI: 52.9%, 79.7%) of modified CEUS LI-RADS criteria was higher than that of CEUS LI-RADS criteria (51.9%; 27 of 52; 95% CI: 37.6%, 66.0%) (p = 0.0047). In conclusion, non-rim APHE with hypoenhancement in the Kupffer phase on Sonazoid-enhanced US is a feasible criterion for diagnosing HCC.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Diagnosing Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Diagnostic Performance and Interobserver Agreement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hang Zhou ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Linyao Du ◽  
Jiapeng Jiang ◽  
Qing Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Data System ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Sensitivity Range ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Objectives To determine the diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound liver imaging reporting and data system (CEUS-LI-RADS) for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients. Methods In this prospective study, CEUS-LI-RADS categories (LR-5 for predicting HCC) were assigned by six blinded readers and compared to the definitive HCC diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis per the 2017 China Liver Cancer Guidelines (CLCG). CEUS features were recorded in 96 patients with 96 histology-proven lesions. The diagnostic performance of LR-5 was described by the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Multi-reader agreement was assessed by using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results In cirrhotic patients, the specificity of LR-5 (range: 92.7–100.0 %) was statistically higher than that of CLCG for each reader (range: 28.6–64.3 %). However, the sensitivity (range: 38.6–63.6 %) and accuracy (range: 53.4–70.7 %) were statistically lower in CEUS-LIRADS than in CLCG (sensitivity range: 88.6–100.0 %; accuracy range: 77.6–86.2 %). Only fair to moderate inter-reader agreement was achieved for the CEUS-LI-RADS category (ICC = 0.595) and washout appearance (ICC range: 0.338 to 0.555). Neither nodule-in-nodule nor mosaic architecture was observed more often in HCC (all P > 0.05), with poor inter-reader consistency for both (both ICC < 0.20). Conclusion CEUS-LI-RADS category 5 has a high specificity but a low accuracy for identifying HCC in high-risk patients. Inter-reader agreement is not satisfactory concerning CEUS-LIRADS category and washout appearance. Moreover, the clinical value of ancillary features favoring HCC is quite limited.

scholarly journals Current NAFLD guidelines for risk stratification in diabetic patients have poor diagnostic discrimination

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentin Blank ◽  
David Petroff ◽  
Sebastian Beer ◽  
Albrecht Böhlig ◽  
Maria Heni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Specialist Referral ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Referral Strategy ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Pathways

Abstract Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) are at risk for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and associated complications. This study evaluated the performance of international (EASL-EASD-EASO) and national (DGVS) guidelines for NAFLD risk stratification. Patients with T2D prospectively underwent ultrasound, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and serum-based fibrosis markers. Guideline-based risk classification and referral rates for different screening approaches were compared and the diagnostic properties of simplified algorithms, genetic markers and a new NASH surrogate (FAST score) were evaluated. NAFLD risk was present in 184 of 204 screened patients (age 64.2 ± 10.7 years; BMI 32.6 ± 7.6 kg/m2). EASL-EASD-EASO recommended specialist referral for 60–77% depending on the fibrosis score used, only 6% were classified as low risk. The DGVS algorithm required LSM for 76%; 25% were referred for specialised care. The sensitivities of the diagnostic pathways were 47–96%. A simplified referral strategy revealed a sensitivity/specificity of 46/88% for fibrosis risk. Application of the FAST score reduced the referral rate to 35%. This study (a) underlines the high prevalence of fibrosis risk in T2D, (b) demonstrates very high referral rates for in-depth hepatological work-up, and (c) indicates that simpler referral algorithms may produce comparably good results and could facilitate NAFLD screening.

scholarly journals Liver stiffness measurement predicts the difficulty of Kasai procedure in biliary atresia: a single center retrospective analysis of 199 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiulong Shen ◽  
Yajun Chen ◽  
Chunhui Peng ◽  
Wenbo Pang ◽  
Zengmeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Biliary Atresia ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Porta Hepatis ◽  
Liver Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Stiffness Measurement ◽  
Kasai Procedure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Kasai procedure is the standard initial treatment of infants with biliary atresia. The key to perform a successful surgery is to accurately remove the fibrous portal plate near the liver hilum. Yet how to estimate surgical difficulty pre-operatively remains unclear. This study aims to design an algorithm that predicts the difficulty of Kasai procedure using liver stiffness measurement (LSM). Methods One hundred ninety-nine patients were included from April 2012 to December 2016. The patients were all surgically diagnosed with biliary atresia. Group A comprised of patients with porta hepatis retraction (the angle between the plane of the fibrous porta plate and the plane of the medial liver closest to the plate was equal to or smaller than 90°), group B comprised of patients without porta hepatis retraction (the angle between the plane of the fibrous porta plate and the plane of the medial liver closest to the plate was greater than 90°). Liver function measurements and LSM were measured for all patients within three days before surgery. Results Our study included 19 cases in group A (9 males, 10 females) and 180 cases in group B (87 males, 93 females). LSM had statistical differences between the two groups, 28.10(14.90) kPa VS 10.89(7.10) kPa, P = 0.000. There was a significant relationship between LSM and operative age, TBA, AST, GGT (P = 0.000, 0.003, 0.003, 0.012, correlation coefficient = 0.323, 0.213, 0.207, 0.179). The AUROC of LSM was 0.919. When the cutoff value was 15.15 kPa(OR = 3.989; P = 0.000), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 0.947, 0.750, 0.285, 0.992 and 0.768, respectively. When the value was 23.75 kPa(OR = 3.483; P = 0.000), the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were 0.631, 0.950, 0.571, 0.960 and 0.919, respectively. Conclusions LSM can be used to predict the difficulty in dissecting fibrous portal plate, and in turn, the difficulty of Kasai procedure. LSM > 23.75 kPa suggests a more complicated surgery.

scholarly journals Usefulness of Modified CEUS LI-RADS for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Sonazoid

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 828
Author(s):  
Katsutoshi Sugimoto ◽  
Tatsuya Kakegawa ◽  
Hiroshi Takahashi ◽  
Yusuke Tomita ◽  
Masakazu Abe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Arterial Phase ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Adrenal Rest Tumor ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Rim Enhancement ◽  
Diagnostic Usefulness ◽  
Adrenal Rest ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

The Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) was introduced for classifying suspected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it cannot be applied to Sonazoid. We assessed the diagnostic usefulness of a modified CEUS LI-RADS for HCC and non-HCC malignancies based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Patients with chronic liver disease at risk for HCC were evaluated retrospectively. Nodules ≥1 cm with arterial phase hyperenhancement, no early washout (within 60 s), and contrast defects in the Kupffer phase were classified as LR-5. Nodules showing early washout, contrast defects in the Kupffer phase, and/or rim enhancement were classified as LR-M. A total of 104 nodules in 104 patients (median age: 70.0 years; interquartile range: 54.5–78.0 years; 74 men) were evaluated. The 48 (46.2%) LR-5 lesions included 45 HCCs, 2 high-flow hemangiomas, and 1 adrenal rest tumor. The PPV of LR-5 for HCC was 93.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 82.8–98.7%). The 22 (21.2%) LR-M lesions included 16 non-HCC malignancies and 6 HCCs. The PPV of LR-M for non-HCC malignancies, including six intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, was 100% (95% CI: 69.8–100%). In conclusion, in the modified CEUS LI-RADS for Sonazoid, LR-5 and LR-M are good predictors of HCC and non-HCC malignancies, respectively.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for complex cystic focal liver lesions: blinded reader study

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 358-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man-Xia Lin ◽  
Hui-Xiong Xu ◽  
Ming-De Lu ◽  
Xiao-Yan Xie ◽  
Li-Da Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Lesions ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Blinded Reader

scholarly journals Role of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Using LI-RADS and Ancillary Features: A Single Tertiary Centre Experience

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2232
Author(s):  
Adriana Ciocalteu ◽  
Sevastita Iordache ◽  
Sergiu Marian Cazacu ◽  
Cristiana Marinela Urhut ◽  
Sarmis Marian Sandulescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Focal Liver Lesions ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography ◽  
Ancillary Features

Clinical utility of ancillary features (AFs) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS®) is yet to be established. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic yield of CEUS LI-RADS and AFs in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We retrospectively included patients with risk factors for HCC and newly diagnosed focal liver lesions (FLL). All lesions have been categorized according to the CEUS LI-RADS v2017 by an experienced sonographer blinded to clinical data and to the final diagnosis. From a total of 143 patients with 191 FLL, AFs favoring HCC were observed in 19.8% cases as hypoechoic rim and in 16.7% cases as nodule-in nodule architecture. From the total of 141 HCC cases, 83.6% were correctly classified: 57.4%- LR-5 and 26.2%- LR-4. In 9.21% cases, CEUS indicated LR-M; 2.12% cases- LR-3. The LR-5 category was 96.2% predictive (PPV) of HCC. LR-5 had 60.4% sensitivity and 93.6% specificity. PPV for primitive malignancy (LR-4 + LR-5) was 95.7%, with 88% sensitivity, 89.3% specificity and 88.4% accuracy for HCC. LR-4 category had 94.8% PPV and 26.2% sensitivity. CEUS LR4 + LR5 had 81,8% sensitivity for HCCs over 2 cm and 78.57% sensitivity for smaller HCCs. CEUS LR-5 remains an excellent diagnostic tool for HCC, despite the size of the lesion. The use of AFs might improve the overarching goal of LR-5 + LR-4 diagnosis of high specificity for HCC and exclusion of non-HCC malignancy.

scholarly journals Value of liver iron concentration in healthy volunteers assessed by MRI

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marzanna Obrzut ◽  
Vitaliy Atamaniuk ◽  
Kevin J. Glaser ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Richard L. Ehman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Hereditary Hemochromatosis ◽  
Iron Concentration ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Liver Fat ◽  
Liver Imaging ◽  
Liver Iron Concentration ◽  
Liver Iron ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Iron overload is a relatively common clinical condition resulting from disorders such as hereditary hemochromatosis, thalassemia, sickle cell disease, and myelodysplasia that can lead to progressive fibrosis and eventually cirrhosis of the liver. Therefore, it is essential to recognize the disease process at the earliest stage. Liver biopsy is the reference test for the assessment of liver fibrosis. It also allows for quantifying liver iron concentration (LIC) in patients. However, this is an invasive method with significant limitations and possible risks. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluation of the R2* relaxation rate can be an alternative to biopsy for assessing LIC. However, it causes a need for accurate R2* data corresponding to standard value for further comparison with examined patients. This study aimed to assess the normative values of liver R2* in healthy individuals. A total of 100 volunteers that met established criteria were enrolled in the study: 36 (36%) men and 64 (64%) women. The mean age was 22.9 years (range 20 to 32 years). R2* was estimated by an MRI exam with a 1.5 T clinical magnetic resonance scanner. Images for measuring the LIC and liver fat concentration were obtained using the IDEAL-IQ technique for liver imaging. The Mean (SD) liver R2* was 28.34 (2.25) s−1 (95% CI, 27.78–28.90, range 23.67–33.00 s−1) in females, 29.57 (3.20) s−1 (95% CI, 28.49–30.66, range 23.93–37.77 s−1) in males, and 28.72 (2.69) s−1 (range 23.67–37.77 s−1) in the whole group. R2* value in this particular population with a high proportion of young women did not exceed 38 s−1. In the absence of fibrosis or steatosis, liver stiffness and fat fraction did not show any relationship with R2*.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document