scholarly journals Retrospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Anlotinib Combined With Dose-Dense Temozolomide in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei She ◽  
Lin Su ◽  
Liangfang Shen ◽  
Chao Liu
Keyword(s):  
Survival Curve ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Rano Criteria ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Dose Dense

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the safety and clinical efficacy of anlotinib combined with dose-dense temozolomide (TMZ) as the first-line therapy in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM).Patients and MethodsWe collected the clinical data of 20 patients with rGBM. All patients received anlotinib (12 mg daily, orally for 2 weeks, discontinued for 1 week, repeated every 3 weeks) combined with dose-dense TMZ (100 mg/m2, 7 days on with 7 days off) until the disease progressed (PD) or adverse effects (AEs) above grade 4 appeared. Grade 3 AEs need to be restored to grade 2 before continuing treatment, and the daily dose of anlotinib is reduced to 10 mg. The patients were reexamined by head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 1 to 3 months. The therapeutic effect was evaluated according to Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. The survival rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis. The baseline of all survival index statistics was the start of anlotinib combined with dose-dense of TMZ. National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE 4.0) was used to evaluate AEs.ResultsTwenty cases of rGBM were evaluated according to the RANO criteria after treatment with anlotinib and dose-dense TMZ, including five cases of stable disease (SD), thirteen cases of partial response (PR), one case of complete response (CR), and one case of PD. The median follow-up time was 13.4 (95% CI, 10.5–16.3) months. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 47.7%. The 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 55%. In the IDH wild type group, the median PFS and median OS were 6.1 and 11.9 months, respectively. We observed that AEs associated with treatment were tolerable. One patient stopped taking the drug because of cerebral infarction. There were no treatment-related deaths.ConclusionAnlotinib combined with dose-dense TMZ for the first-line therapy showed good efficacy in OS, PFS, ORR, and DCR in the treatment of rGBM, and the AEs were tolerant. Randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the treatment of rGBM with anlotinib are necessary.

Efficacy and toxicities of gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20007-e20007
Author(s):  
Jian Fang ◽  
Yang Wang
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Thymic Carcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Gemcitabine And Cisplatin

e20007 Background: Thymoma and thymic carcinoma are rare thymic epithelial tumours. This study investigated the efficacy of first-line gemcitabine and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced thymoma and thymic carcinoma Methods: Retrospective review of patients with histologically-confirmed invasive, metastatic thymoma or thymic carcinoma treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin as a first-line therapy between August 2008 and February 2016 at the Department of Respiratory Medicine II Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute. The objective response rate was the primary end point. Results: Forty patients, 13 with thymoma and 27 with thymic carcinoma, were identified. Nine received gemcitabine and cisplatin combined with Endostar (injectable recombinant human Endostatin); 31 received gemcitabine and cisplatin only. Of the 13 patients with thymoma, four (30.8%) achieved a partial response (PR) and nine (69.2%) had stable disease (SD); no patients had a complete response (CR) or progressive disease (PD). Among the 27 patients with thymic carcinoma, 13 (48.1%) achieved a PR, 12 (44.4%) had SD and two (7.4%) had PD; no patients had a CR. In thymic carcinoma, progression free survival (PFS) was 25 months and median survival (OS) was 41 months; in thymoma, median PFS was 29 months and median OS was 77 months. As no patients achieved a complete response, objective response was defined as partial response in this study. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates gemcitabine plus cisplatin has moderate efficacy and could represent a suitable first-line therapy for thymic carcinoma and thymoma, especially for patents who cannot tolerate anthracyclines. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as first-line therapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4079-4079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Park ◽  
J. Lee ◽  
B. Ryoo ◽  
M. Ryu ◽  
S. Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Carcinoma ◽  
Line Therapy

4079 Background: The combination chemotherapy of capecitabine and cisplatin showed considerable activity and good feasibility in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Oxaliplatin has a more favorable toxicity profile compared to cisplatin. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. Methods: Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 over 2 hours on day 1 plus oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until progression of disease or intolerable toxicities with a maximum of 8 cycles. All the measurability and response evaluations were reviewed and confirmed by one investigator. Results: Total 54 patients were enrolled (37 men, 17 women). The median age was 57 years (range 29–70). Among these 54 patients, fifty-two patients were evaluable. A total 311 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered. The overall response rate was 63% (95% CI, 50–76%), with complete response in 2 patient and partial responses in 32 patients. After a median follow-up of 13 months, median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% CI, 4.4–7.2 months); median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI, 8.8–15.1 months). The treatment was generally well tolerated. The most common haematological adverse event was anaemia (70% of patients). Grade 3- 4 neutropenia was observed in 4 patients and neutropenic fever was experienced in only 1 patient. Four patients had G3 thrombocytopenia, which was accompanied by G3 gastrointestinal bleeding. The most common non-haematological toxicities were neuropathy (70%), vomiting (50%), diarrohea (33%), and hand-foot syndrome (39%). But, G3–4 toxicities were rare. There was one treatment related death which was associated with grade IV neutropenic sepsis. Conclusion: XELOX was active and well tolerated as a first-line therapy for advanced gastric carcinoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Modeling sequential systemic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of immunotherapy: What comes next?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
Ciro Celsa ◽  
Giuseppe Cabibbo ◽  
Marco Enea ◽  
Salvatore Battaglia ◽  
Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Survival Curve ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sequential Strategy

324 Background: Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab represents the new best performing first-line approach for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC). However, the best sequential strategy after every first-line failure (for progression or intolerance) remains elusive, and options for retreating patients failing Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab with multi-kinase inhibitors (MKI) or immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) are yet undefined. Methods: We developed a Markov model to analyze simulated-Overall Survival (s-OS) of second-line ICIs or MKIs after first-line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab over a lifetime horizon. For first-line therapy, PFS of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab was extracted from Imbrave 150 trial and it was used as endpoint since it is not influenced by post-progression survival. For second-line retreatment, pooled OS of MKIs (Regorafenib and Cabozantinib), or ICIs (Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab) were adopted. Survival estimates for sequential settings considered the proportion of patients who did not receive second-line therapy due to death during first-line therapy. Individual patient survival data were extracted from PFS and OS Kaplan-Meier curves of RESORCE trial for Regorafenib, CELESTIAL trial for Cabozantinib, CheckMate-040 for Nivolumab and Keynote-240 for Pembrolizumab. Each reconstructed survival curve was inspected for accuracy and was compared with originally published curves. Results: First-line Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab followed by second-line ICIs turned on from the model as the best sequential strategy (median s-OS 24 months; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 23-26 months) and extends survival when compared Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab followed by MKIs (median s-OS 20 months; 95% CI 19-21 months). Conclusions: To our knowledge and given the absence of adequately designed sequential RCTs, this is the first model to date which suggests, with a proper methodological approach, an accurate estimate of outcome of patients with u-HCC treated by sequential systemic therapies. In patients with u-HCC failing first-line treatment, modelling estimates of s-OS for each retreatment strategies may assist in choosing the most promising sequences in order to plan appropriate RCTs.

Pan-cancer evaluation of homologous repair deficiency somatic mutations and response to first-line anti-neoplastic therapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10535-10535
Author(s):  
Jessica A Lavery ◽  
Samantha Brown ◽  
Gregory J. Riely ◽  
Philippe L. Bedard ◽  
Ben Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Oncogenic Mutation ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

10535 Background: Homologous recombination is a major mechanism of defective DNA repair, but it remains uncertain whether homologous repair deficient (HRD) tumors have favorable prognosis or are more/less likely to respond to treatment than tumors lacking such mutations. Objective: To determine whether lung (NSCLC) and colorectal (CRC) HRD+ tumors have better survival or response to chemotherapy than HRD- tumors. Methods: Patients with de novo stage IV NSCLC or CRC who had next generation sequencing (NGS) between 2015-2018 from one of four cancer centers were identified. Records were curated using the PRISSMM framework to ascertain treatment, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival based on imaging (PFS-I) and oncologists’ notes (PFS-M). Each NSCLC or CRC tumor was categorized as HRD+ if NGS revealed an oncogenic/likely oncogenic mutation in: ATM, BAP1, BARD1, BLM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, FAM175A, FANCA, FANCC, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51, RAD51C, RTEL1, or MRE11A based on the OncoKB database. The tumor was categorized as HRD- if no oncogenic mutation in any of these genes was evident and HRD indeterminate (HRD?) if no mutation was identified but the panel did not include all genes. OS, PFS-I and PFS-M from start of first line therapy were reported by HRD status. The percentage with a good response to first line therapy (≥2x the median) and exceptional response (≥3x the median) was estimated for each endpoint. Results: For NSCLC 4% were HRD+, 59% HRD- and 37% HRD?. For CRC there were 5% HRD+, 60% HRD- and 35% HRD?. There were no significant differences for any survival endpoint between patients who were HRD+ vs HRD- in univariable analyses. The proportion of good and exceptional responders to first line systemic chemotherapy also did not vary by HRD status, though patients with HRD+ CRC were potentially more likely to be exceptional responders. Similarly, no differences between HRD+ and HRD- tumors were apparent for the subgroup receiving platinum containing therapy. Conclusions: NSCLC and CRC patients with somatic mutations in HRD oncogenic genes did not differ from patients lacking such a mutation with respect to OS or PFS. CRC patients with HRD+ tumors may be more likely to be exceptional responders, but sample sizes are limited. By May, the analysis will include breast and pancreatic cancer cases.[Table: see text]

NIMG-54. RADIOMIC FEATURES FROM LESION HABITAT PREDICT RESPONSE TO COMBINATION OF NIVOLUMAB AND BEVACIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi141-vi141
Author(s):  
Ruchika Verma ◽  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Ipsa Yadav ◽  
Volodymyr Statsevych ◽  
Jonathan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Proportional Hazard ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard ◽  
Expert Radiologist ◽  
Mri Scans

Abstract PURPOSE The use of immunotherapy in glioblastoma management is under active investigation. Glioblastomas are “cold” tumors, meaning that they have inactivated or fewer tumor infiltrative lymphocytes in addition to substantial tumor necrosis, attributing to their poor response to immunotherapy. A significant challenge is the apriori identification of Glioblastoma patients who will respond favorably to immunotherapy. In this work, we evaluated the ability of computerized MRI-based quantitative features (radiomics) extracted from the lesion habitat (including enhancing lesion, necrosis, and peritumoral hyperintensities) to predict response and progression-free survival (PFS) in recurrent GBM patients treated with combination of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab. METHODS Immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology (iRANO) criteria along with PFS were used to analyze n=50 patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial where patients received Nivolumab with either standard or low dose Bevacizumab. These patients were assessed to see if they had complete response, partial response, stable disease (i.e. responders, n=31), or disease progression (i.e. non-responders, n=19). Lesion habitat constituting necrotic core, enhancing tumor, and edema were delineated by expert radiologist on Gd-T1w, T2w and FLAIR MRI scans. COLIAGE radiomic features from each of the delineated regions were selected using minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) via cross-validation, to segregate non-responder patients from responders. A multivariable cox proportional hazard model was used to predict survival (PFS). RESULTS CoLlAGe correlation, sum average, and sum variance features (capture local heterogeneity) from the lesion habitat, were found to segregate non-responder patients from responders with an accuracy of 86%, followed by 80% using features from peritumoral hyperintensities and 78% from enhancing tumor. In our survival analysis, C-index of 0.688 was obtained using features from the entire lesion habitat, followed by peritumoral hyperintensities (0.675) and enhancing tumor (0.656). CONCLUSION Radiomic features from the lesion habitat may predict response to combination of Nivolumab and Bevacizumab in recurrent Glioblastomas.

scholarly journals The benefits and risks of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer: a single-arm meta-analysis of noncomparative clinical studies and randomized control trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiangyun Liu ◽  
Yixuan Zhang ◽  
Miaowen Liu ◽  
Ruoxin Xu ◽  
Fengming Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Conventional Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background Although pembrolizumab has shown clinical benefit in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), its actual efficacy in combination with a conventional chemotherapy drug has not been determined. We performed this study to discern the efficacy and risk of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in SCLC patients. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results We identified 2980 articles and included 6 studies (5 were noncomparative open-label studies and 1 was a randomized controlled trial [RCT]) involving 396 patients in our meta-analysis. The pooled median OS (mOS) was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0-11.2), and the pooled median PFS (mPFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.2-6.1). The 1-year overall survival rate (OSR-1y) and 6-month progression-free survival rate (PFSR-6m) were 45.1% (95% CI, 33-57.2%) and 41.6% (95% CI, 24.3-59%), respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 38.8% (95% CI, 11.9-65.67%), disease control rate (DCR) was 69.30% (95% CI, 51.6-87.0%), complete response (CR) was 2.20% (95% CI, 0.8-3.7%), partial response (PR) was 34.70% (95% CI, 7.8-61.5%), and stable disease (SD) was 20.90% (95% CI, 9.1-32.6%). The grade 3-4 adverse effect (AE) rate was 20.88% (95% CI, 1.22-54.85%). The most common AEs were neutropenia (90.16%), anemia (53.21%), dysphagia (41.96%), platelet count decrease (34.87%), and esophagitis (32.89%); severe AEs included neutropenia, respiratory failure, pneumonitis, acute coronary syndrome, and colitis/intestinal ischemia. Conclusions The combination of pembrolizumab with conventional chemotherapy is an effective therapeutic schedule with acceptable and manageable efficacy and toxicity in patients with SCLC. More high-quality and well-designed RCTs with large sample sizes are warranted to further validate our findings.

Prognostic impact of prior local therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikifumi Koura ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Shohei Ueda ◽  
Takashi Matsumoto ◽  
Satoshi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Objective This study aimed to reveal the prognostic values of prior local therapy in first-line therapy using androgen receptor-axis targeting agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) or docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Methods The study included 303 patients treated with first-line therapy for non-metastatic and metastatic CRPC. The association between prior local therapy and therapeutic outcome including progression-free survival and overall survival was investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses as well as propensity score-matched analysis. Results In univariate analysis, local prior therapy was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.56, 95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.79; P = 0.0009). Overall survival, but not progression-free survival, was better among patients with prior local therapy compared with patients without prior local therapy even after multivariate analysis and propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions This study robustly indicated that prior local treatment was prognostic for overall survival among patients with CRPC. This finding is useful to predict patient prognosis in CRPC.

scholarly journals Protocol of the EFFORT study: a prospective study of FOLFIRI plus aflibercept as second-line treatment after progression on FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab or during maintenance treatment in patients with unresectable/metastatic colorectal cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironaga Satake ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
Eiji Oki ◽  
Mototsugu Shimokawa ◽  
Akitaka Makiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Abstract Background FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab is used as a first-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. However, there are no clear recommendations for second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab combination. Here, we describe our planning for the EFFORT study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Methods EFFORT is an open-label, multicenter, single arm phase II study to evaluate whether a FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for mCRC. Patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer who received FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line therapy will receive aflibercept and FOLFIRI (aflibercept 4 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV over 90 min, with levofolinate 200 mg/m2 IV over 2 h, followed by fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 h) every 2 weeks on day 1 of each cycle. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). To achieve 80% power to show a significant response benefit with a one-sided alpha level of 0.10, assuming a threshold progression-free survival of 3 months and an expected value of at least 5.4 months, we estimated that 32 patients are necessary. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, safety, and exploratory biomarker analysis for differentiating anti-VEGF drug in 2nd-line chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Discussion This is the first study to investigate whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept has efficacy following FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab for unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer. Switching to a different type of anti-VEGF drug in second-line therapy after FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab appears to be an attractive treatment strategy when considering survival benefit. It is expected that this phase II study will prove the efficacy of this strategy and that a biomarker for drug selection will be discovered. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs071190003. Registered April 18, 2019.

scholarly journals CEPP(B): an effective and well-tolerated regimen in poor-risk, aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Blood ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 1293-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
NJ Chao ◽  
SA Rosenberg ◽  
SJ Horning
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Palliative Therapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract Eighty-three patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated with CEPP(B) (cyclophosphamide, etoposide [VP- 16], procarbazine, and prednisone with or without bleomycin) chemotherapy at Stanford University Medical Center (Stanford, CA) from January 1982 through June 1989. Sixty-nine received CEPP(B) as second- line or subsequent therapy after relapse from previous combination chemotherapy, and 14 patients received CEPP(B) as first-line therapy. Of 75 patients evaluable for response, 30 patients (40%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 24 patients (32%) achieved a partial response (PR), providing an overall response rate of 72%. Complete responses were recorded on 21 of 61 (34%) patients with recurrent disease and 9 of the 14 patients who received CEPP(B) as first line therapy (64%). Myelosuppression was the major side effect of treatment, resulting in eight neutropenic-febrile episodes from a total of 253 courses. A single fatal toxic event occurred on a patient who developed adult respiratory distress syndrome. Overall, CEPP(B) was well- tolerated and proved to be effective palliative therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after relapse. As such, CEPP(B) may be considered for cytoreduction before ablative therapy and bone marrow transplantation. CEPP(B) may also be considered for initial therapy in selected patients who cannot tolerate doxorubicin-containing regimens.

scholarly journals Favorable Outcome in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achyut Ram Vyakaranam ◽  
Joakim Crona ◽  
Olov Norlén ◽  
Dan Granberg ◽  
Ulrike Garske-Román ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
First Line ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Radiological Response ◽  
Low Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3

Peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) with 177Lu-DOTATATE has emerged as a promising therapy for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the outcome of PRRT for 22 patients with histopathologically confirmed pheochromocytoma (PCC) and paraganglioma (PGL), of which two were localized and 20 metastatic. Radiological response utilized response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 and toxicity was graded according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4. Median 4 (range 3–11) 7.4 GBq cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE were administered as first-line therapy (n = 13) or because of progressive disease (n = 9). Partial response (PR) was achieved in two and stable disease (SD) in 20 patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 49.6 (range 8.2–139) months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6 (range 6.7–138) months. Scintigraphic response >50% was achieved in 9/19 (47%) patients. Biochemical response (>50% decrease) of chromogranin A was found in 6/15 (40%) patients and of catecholamines in 3/12 (25%) patients. Subgroup analysis showed Ki-67 <15% associated with longer OS (p = 0.013) and PFS (p = 0.005). PRRT as first-line therapy was associated with increased OS (p = 0.041). No hematological or kidney toxicity grade 3–4 was registered. 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was associated with favorable outcome and low toxicity. High Ki-67 (≥15%) and PRRT received because of progression on previous therapy could constitute negative predictive factors for OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document