scholarly journals Predictive Value of Preoperative Positive Urine Cytology for Development of Bladder Cancer After Nephroureterectomy in Patients With Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Prognostic Nomogram Based on a Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study and Systematic Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Fan ◽  
Yuanbin Huang ◽  
Shuang Wen ◽  
Qiliang Teng ◽  
Xinrui Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Urine Cytology ◽  
Biological Behavior ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Positive Urine ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

BackgroundUpper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is a rare and severe urinary malignancy. Several studies have explored the relationship between preoperative urine cytology and intravesical recurrence (IVR) in patients with UUT-UC. However, the results of these studies are controversial or even contradictory, and investigations with UUT-UC patients in northeast China are rare.MethodsWe first estimated the prognostic significance of preoperative urine cytology in the outcomes of intravesical recurrence in 231 UUT-UC patients (training cohort = 142, validation cohort = 89) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) by the nomogram model. Subsequently, we quantitatively combined our results with the published data after searching several databases to assess whether preoperative positive urine cytology was associated with poor intravesical recurrence-free survival and a high risk of tumor malignant biological behavior.ResultsFirstly, the multicenter retrospective cohort study demonstrated that preoperative positive urine cytology correlated with poor intravesical recurrence-free survival and can serve as significant independent predictors of IVR by Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression analysis. The construction of the nomogram demonstrated that predictive efficacy and accuracy were significantly improved when preoperative urine cytology was combined. Meanwhile, meta-analysis showed that preoperative positive urine cytology was associated with a 49% increased risk of IVR. In the subgroup analysis by region, study type, and sample size, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were statistically significant for the Japan subgroup (HR 1.32), China subgroup (HR 1.88), cohort study subgroup (HR 1.45), and the single-arm study subgroup (HR 1.63).ConclusionsPreoperative urine cytology was validated as a potential predictor of intravesical recurrence in patients with UUT-UC after RNU, although these results need to be generalized with caution. Large, prospective trials are required to further confirm its significance in prognosis and tumor malignant biological behavior.

scholarly journals Does Xylinas’ nomogram accurately predict intravesical recurrence risk after radical nephroureterectomy for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma when applied to Asian populations?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shicong Lai ◽  
Pengjie Wu ◽  
Tongxiang Diao ◽  
Samuel Seery ◽  
Jianyong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Full Model ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Asian Populations ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Abstract Objective To validate a prognostic nomogram (Xylinas’ nomogram) for intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients of Asian descent. Methods Clinicopathological and survival data from 243 primary urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision between January 2004 and May 2017 were collated. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors associated with intravesical recurrence-free survival. External validation was determined using regression coefficients abstracted from previously published data. Performance was then quantified through calibration and discrimination, according to concordance indexes (c-index) in receiver operating characteristic curves. Results 163 patients met our eligibility criteria and were finally included in this study. At a median follow-up of 60 months, intravesical recurrence occurred in 29.4% (n = 48). Multivariable analysis revealed that being male, ureteral tumor location, tumor multifocality and previous bladder cancer were independent prognostic factors of intravesical recurrence-free survival. When Xylinas’ nomogram was applied to our cohort, the discriminatory power was found to be roughly equivalent with a c-index of 68.3% for the reduced model and 68.4% for the full model. Calibration plots also revealed intravesical recurrence predictions at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months had relative concordance. Contrasting the respective performances of the reduced and full model suggests there is no significant difference between the two (all P > 0.05). Conclusions This nomogram appears accurate at predicting intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for primary urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Asian populations. However, it remains necessary to data mine for unknown prognostic factors for optimization. Further external validation is required across larger, ethically diverse populations before applying this nomogram in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Heon Kim ◽  
Chung Un Lee ◽  
Minyong Kang ◽  
Hwang Gyun Jeon ◽  
Byong Chang Jeong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Radical Nephroureterectomy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Segmental Ureterectomy ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

AbstractThis study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.

N49 RECURRENCE-FREE SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH UROTHELIAL UPPER URINARY TRACT TUMORS (UUT) IN UKRAINE

2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 546
Author(s):  
A.F. Vozianov ◽  
P.G. Yakovlev ◽  
V.S. Sakalo ◽  
V.V. Mrachkovskiy ◽  
G.P. Olijnichenko
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

scholarly journals Open Nephroureterectomy Compared to Laparoscopic in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guihong Liu ◽  
Zeqin Yao ◽  
Guoqiang Chen ◽  
Yalang Li ◽  
Bing Liang
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Upper Urinary Tract ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Lower Blood ◽  
Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy

Background: In this meta-analysis, we will focus on evaluating the effects of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy on postoperative results in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma subjects.Methods: A systematic literature search up to January 2021 was performed, and 36 studies included 23,013 subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma at the start of the study; of them, 8,178 were laparoscopic nephroureterectomy, and 14,835 of them were open nephroureterectomy. They were reporting relationships between the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of open nephroureterectomy compared with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model.Results: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma was significantly related to longer operation time (MD, 43.90; 95% CI, 20.91–66.90, p &lt; 0.001), shorter hospital stay (MD, −1.71; 95% CI, −2.42 to −1.00, p &lt; 0.001), lower blood loss (MD, −133.82; 95% CI, −220.92 to −46.73, p = 0.003), lower transfusion need (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47–0.67, p &lt; 0.001), and lower overall complication (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70–0.90, p &lt; 0.001) compared with open nephroureterectomy.However, no significant difference was found between laparoscopic nephroureterectomy and open nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in 2–5 years recurrence-free survival (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69–1.18, p = 0.46), 2–5 years cancer-specific survival (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69–1.28, p = 0.68), and 2–5 years overall survival (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.91–1.87, p = 0.15).Conclusion: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in subjects with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma may have a longer operation time, shorter hospital stay, and lower blood loss, transfusion need, and overall complication compared to open nephroureterectomy. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document