scholarly journals Application of a Cloud Video Conference Method for Recruiting Healthy Subjects Into an Early-Phase Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zejuan Wang ◽  
Aihua Du ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Siqi Zang ◽  
Xiaona Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Video Conference ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Early Phase Clinical Trial ◽  
Appointment Time ◽  
Phase Clinical Trial

Objective: Our objective is to explore the effect of applying cloud video conferencing methods to the informed consent process in an early-phase clinical trial during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: All participants who intended to participate in the trial were informed via a cloud video conference before signing the informed consent forms (ICF). Then, the attitudes of the participants with the cloud video conference and their understanding of the trial were evaluated using a questionnaire when they visited to sign the ICF onsite.Results: A total of 165 subjects participated in the cloud video conference process, and 142 visited the site to sign and date the ICFs at the center during the appointment time. The survey showed that nearly 100% of the subjects evaluated the video-based informed consent process as very good or good and gave correct answers to questions about the trial. Furthermore, 136 (95.8%) subjects believed that the knowledge about the trial derived via the video-based informed consent process was consistent with the onsite reality, and 139 (97.9%) subjects expressed their willingness to participate in an informed consent procedure undertaken through an online video conference.Conclusions: The video-based informed consent process achieved the same effects as an onsite informed consent process. The former saves time and cost of transportation for the subject and exhibits good public acceptance; especially in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, this process is conducive for reducing the risk of subject infection due to travel and would also help avoid crowding on site.

Compliance with dietary guidelines and its relationship with symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer in early-phase oncology clinical trials.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 199-199
Author(s):  
Goldy George ◽  
Alan J Kim ◽  
Melat Gebremeskel ◽  
Meryna Manandhar ◽  
Harsha M Pradeep ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Whole Grains ◽  
Dietary Guidelines ◽  
Early Phase Clinical Trial ◽  
Dietary Guidelines For Americans ◽  
Phase Clinical Trial

199 Background: We examined compliance with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and its association with symptom burden and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer in early-phase clinical trials testing novel immunotherapeutic and targeted agents. Methods: Patients starting an early-phase clinical trial (ECOG-PS = 0-1) were recruited into a prospective, longitudinal design with assessments at baseline and at the end of Cycle 1. Diet and symptom burden were assessed using the validated National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire (NCI-DHQ) and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, respectively. Compliance with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations was measured via the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) (a measure of dietary intake per total energy), computed from NCI-DHQ food group and nutrient scores; higher HEI scores indicate greater compliance with dietary guidance recommendations (possible range = 0–100). Statistical tests included Spearman rank correlations (rho), and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among early-phase clinical trial patients [N = 40; 50% female; 80% Non-Hispanic White; 80% ECOG = 1; 36% on trials including an immunotherapeutic agent and 64% on targeted therapy trials; mean age = 55y; mean BMI = 28], mean HEI was 69, compared to 59 for the US general population. The proportion of phase I clinical trial patients who met adequacy guidelines were 80% for whole fruit, 73% for total protein foods, 55% for seafood and plant proteins, 55% for total fruit, 50% for greens and beans, 28% for total vegetables, 15% for fatty acids [(PUFAs + MUFAs)/SFAs ≥2.5], 13% for dairy, and 0% for whole grains. The proportion of patients who met moderation guidelines were 28% for refined grains, 28% for added sugar, 13% for saturated fat, and 0% for sodium. Female patients had higher HEI scores than male patients (73 vs. 65, P = 0.004). Patients who were normal weight (BMI < 25) had higher scores for meeting the moderation in sugar intake guideline than overweight patients (BMI≥25) (7.7 vs. 5.5, P = 0.031). Higher intakes of cooked lean meat from beef, pork, veal, lamb, and game were linked to prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.5, 95%CI = 0.26, 0.96, P = 0.039). In immunotherapy patients, greater compliance with seafood and plant protein recommendations was associated with less fatigue at end of Cycle 1 (rho = -0.7, P = 0.008); in targeted therapy patients, higher glycemic load was associated with worse pain (rho = 0.7, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Diets of these early-phase clinical trial patients overall were congruent with recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. However, increasing intakes of whole grains and reducing sodium intakes may be useful dietary goals for this population. Also, dietary factors may influence symptoms, such as fatigue and pain, in early-phase clinical trial patients with advanced cancer.

Telephone-based nursing intervention improves the effectiveness of the informed consent process in cancer clinical trials.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 984-996 ◽  
Author(s):  
N K Aaronson ◽  
E Visser-Pol ◽  
G H Leenhouts ◽  
M J Muller ◽  
A C van der Schot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Nursing Intervention ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Oncology Nurse

PURPOSE Here we report the results of a randomized study undertaken to test the efficacy of a supplementary, telephone-based nursing intervention in increasing patients' awareness and understanding of the clinical trials in which they are asked to participate. METHODS During a 12-month period, 180 cancer patients who were approached to participate in a phase II or III clinical trial were randomized to undergo either of the following: (1) standard informed consent procedures based on verbal explanations from the treating physician plus written information (controls); or (2) standard informed consent procedures plus a supplementary, telephone-based contact with an oncology nurse (intervention). For purposes of evaluation, face-to-face interviews were conducted with all patients approximately 1 week after the informed consent process had been completed. RESULTS The two groups were comparable with regard to sociodemographic and clinical variables. Both groups had a high level of awareness of the diagnosis and of the nature and objectives of the proposed treatments. The intervention group was significantly (P < .01) better informed about the following: (1) the risks and side effects of treatment; (2) the clinical trial context of the treatment; (3) the objectives of the clinical trial; (4) where relevant, the use of randomization in allocating treatment; (5) the availability of alternative treatments; (6) the voluntary nature of participation; and (7) the right to withdraw from the clinical trial. The intervention did not have any significant effect on patients' anxiety levels or on rates of clinical trial participation. Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. CONCLUSION The use of a supplementary, telephone-based nursing intervention is a feasible and effective means to increase cancer patients' awareness and understanding of the salient issues that surround the clinical trials in which they are asked to participate.

scholarly journals Molecular profiling of metastatic bladder cancer early-phase clinical trial participants predicts patient outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. molcanres.0751.2020
Author(s):  
Omar Alhalabi ◽  
Andrew W Hahn ◽  
Pavlos Msaouel ◽  
Alexander Y Andreev-Drakhlin ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Molecular Profiling ◽  
Early Phase Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Bladder Cancer ◽  
Phase Clinical Trial ◽  
Trial Participants

Entering a Clinical Trial: Is It Right For You?–A randomized study of the Clinical Trials Video and its impact on the informed consent process

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9072-9072
Author(s):  
S. Hitchcock-Bryan ◽  
B. Hoffner ◽  
S. Joffe ◽  
M. Powell ◽  
C. Parker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Provider Communication ◽  
Patient Provider Communication ◽  
Source Of Information

9072 Background: In an effort to improve the informed consent process for subjects considering participation in a clinical trial, we created an educational video: “Entering a Clinical Trial: Is it Right for You?” In this randomized study, we assessed the effect of the video on patients’ understanding and perceptions of clinical trials. We also assessed patient satisfaction with the video and how the video impacted decision-making and patient-provider communication. Methods: We recruited 90 adults considering cancer clinical trials of whom 77 participated. After discussing the trial with the physician and reading the trial consent form, patients were randomized to receive (n=38) or not receive (n=39) the study video. Using a validated questionnaire, we interviewed subjects to assess objective understanding of the trial, our primary endpoint, and self-reported understanding of clinical trials. All subjects completed a second interview assessing secondary endpoints, including patient-provider communication, satisfaction with video, and decision-making. We used linear regression (two-sided tests) to conduct the primary analysis and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and descriptive statistics to analyze the secondary aims. Results: Neither objective nor self-reported understanding of clinical trials differed between the two groups (Mean 86.5 vs. 87, p=0.75). 85% (61/72) indicated the video was an important source of information about clinical trials; 89% of those who watched the video with their family/friends (n=37) said the video helped loved ones better understand clinical trials; 73% indicated it helped their family accept their decision about participation. 81% (58/72) felt better prepared to discuss the trial with their physician after watching the video. Of those who found the video helpful with decision- making, 80% (21/26) were considering a trial for the first time compared with 19% (5/26) veterans who had previously participated in a clinical trial. Conclusions: The video did not measurably improve subjects’ understanding of their clinical trials. However, subjects reported that the video was an important source of information, helped them educate their families, and enhanced patient-provider communication. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Understanding and retention of trial-related information among participants in a clinical trial after completing the informed consent process

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernanda Mexas ◽  
Anne Efron ◽  
Ronir Raggio Luiz ◽  
Michelle Cailleaux-Cezar ◽  
Richard E Chaisson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Related Information

Comparing two methods for delivering clinical trial informed consent information to older adults: singular versus stepped approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-615
Author(s):  
Fleur O’Hare ◽  
Zachary Flanagan ◽  
Mark Nelson ◽  
Andrea Curtis ◽  
Stephane Heritier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Trial Participation ◽  
Delivery Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Baseline Screening

Background Adapting the informed consent process to the needs of older adults may enhance engagement and willingness to participate in a clinical trial. A key aspect of the process is being provided with written clinical trial information and consent documents and having an opportunity to discuss the information with the researcher. However, there are no guidelines on the most appropriate method for delivering this information to older adults and it is not known whether the delivery method is a facilitator or barrier towards clinical trial participation. Aims To compare two delivery methods of informed consent on recruitment, refusal to continue and randomisation rates in a general practice-based clinical trial involving older adults. Methods In a matched cohort sub-study as part of the STAtins in Reducing Events in the Elderly clinical trial, 520 participants were allocated into two groups by age, gender and attending general practice location, to receive the trial information and consent form in the mail (Method 1) prior to the first baseline visit or in person (Method 2) at the visit where a comprehensive informed consent process took place. Results Compared with Method 1, potential participants assigned to Method 2 were more likely to agree to attend the first baseline screening visit (refusal rate 20% vs 13.5%, respectively, p = 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of participants recruited into the trial by providing written informed consent at the first baseline screening visit. For each informed consent delivery method, similar proportions of participants refused to take part in the trial by the end of the screening phase. Randomisation rates in the two groups were also similar. Time to conduct the informed consent procedure took significantly longer with Method 2 compared with Method 1 (median time 20 vs 15 min, respectively, p < 0.01). Interest in the research trial topic was the main reason cited (33.4%) for considering trial participation. Conclusion Later delivery of informed consent documents to potential participants in this trial was associated with a small increase in attendance at the first, in person, screening visit. However, the randomisation rate of participants into the trial was not affected by the method and timing of delivery of informed consent information. Similar randomisation rates occurred whether potential participants were mailed informed consent documents prior to the first in person screening visit or were given the information at the screening visit.

Effective targeted antitumor activity of the antimicrobial agent taurolidine against relapsed/refractory neuroblastoma: Cytotoxicity, target modulation and tumor xenograft studies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21502-e21502
Author(s):  
Lucy Swift ◽  
Chunfen Zhang ◽  
Antony Pfaffle ◽  
Paul Chew ◽  
Olga Kovalchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Phase Contrast ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Early Phase Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Clinical Trial ◽  
Time Lapse Video

e21502 Background: Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor and one of the most complex and difficult to treat diseases in pediatrics. Currently, even with highly aggressive treatment protocols, the prognosis for patients with high-risk and relapsed NB remains poor. Hence, there is a clear need to identify new agents and novel therapeutic strategies for the treatment of these children. Taurolidine (TRD) is derived from the aminosulfoacid taurine and has known anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory properties. TRD has demonstrated anti-neoplastic activity against a range of aggressive human tumors. We present mechanistic evidence and supportive preclinical data from in vitro and animal models of refractory NB for the development of an early phase clinical trial incorporating TRD. Methods: For in vitro activity studies, a panel of cell lines derived from patients with relapsed NB (n = 6) and normal control cells were treated with increasing concentrations of TRD and cell viability was measured by alamar blue assay. Phase-contrast light microscopy, western blotting, time-lapse video microscopy and analysis of global gene expression by RNA-Seq were used to evaluate target modulation and induction of cell death pathways. Bioluminescence imaging of mice bearing NB xenografts treated with TRD was used to investigate the efficacy of TRD in vivo. Results: Cell survival data showed that TRD is cytotoxic against NB cell lines in vitro (mean IC50 value 100 µM, range 65-135 µM). Phase-contrast and time-lapse video microscopy confirmed the antitumor effects of TRD. Western blot analyses identified that TRD induced target modulation and an effective apoptotic cascade, resulting in PARP cleavage. Gene expression analyses and signaling pathway activation scores indicated alterations in the Notch, MAPK and IL-10 signaling pathways. Xenograft studies further validated the in vivo activity of TRD with decreased tumor burden in treated mice and a measurable improvement in survival. Conclusions: Our study provides key pre-clinical data on the activity and mechanism of action of TRD against NB. The findings support the rationale for further evaluation of TRD for the treatment of relapsed/refractory NB patients in an early phase clinical trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document