scholarly journals Leukocytes Ratios in Feline Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Sepsis: A Retrospective Analysis of 209 Cases

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1644
Author(s):  
Eleonora Gori ◽  
Alessio Pierini ◽  
Ilaria Lippi ◽  
George Lubas ◽  
Veronica Marchetti

Sepsis is a challenging condition in which hematological prognostic and diagnostic markers in cats are limited. The aims of this study were to test if there are any differences in leukocyte ratios (NLR, BLR and BNLR) between healthy, SIRS and septic cats (sick cats), and if, within sick cats, NLR, BLR and BNLR may be prognostic markers. A retrospective medical database study included 76 healthy cats (blood-donors), 54 SIRS and 79 septic cats. SIRS group was defined if cats fulfilled SIRS criteria. Sepsis was confirmed with an infectious focus on cytology or a positive culture for bacterial infection. Leukocyte ratios were compared among the three study groups and between survivors and non-survivors in sick cats. NLR resulted significantly higher in the sick group compared to healthy cats (p < 0.0001), although NLR was not different between SIRS and sepsis. An NLR > 4.53 had a sensitivity of 76% and a specificity of 93.4% to detect SIRS/sepsis (OR 44.8 95%CI 17–107). Only BLR and BNLR were significantly different between SIRS and sepsis. NLR was associated with mortality in the sick group (p = 0.04). Although NLR resulted higher in sick cats than healthy, BLR and BNLR demonstrated as promising tools in differentiating SIRS from sepsis. NLR was associated with mortality in sick cats.

Author(s):  
Anwer Habib ◽  
Razi Ahmad

Background: Despite significant advances in critical care, mortality and morbidity in severe sepsis and septic shock remain high, this may be explained by the fact that in sepsis bacterial infection triggers the innate immune response, setting in motion a cascade of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines leading to what we recognize as the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). It has been thought that this self-propagating cascade drives the progression to severe sepsis and septic shock with increasing degrees of cellular injury and end-organ dysfunction, therefor early initiation of empirical antimicrobial agent is crucial and life-saving atleast in high risk patient. This study aimed to see the outcome (recover or mortality) of patients diagnosed by using SIRS criteria.Methods: Total of 105 patients of suspected sepsis fulfilling SIRS criteria (SIRS ≥2), were included in study. Study population were administered appropriate empirical antimicrobial depending on the source of infection and followed till the final outcome (complete recovery or death).Results: Out of 105 patients included in study based on SIRS criteria, 87 (82.85%) were confirmed to be having septicemia on further evaluation. In majority of patient primary source of infection were respiratory tract (44.76%) and most commonly employed and effective empirical antimicrobial were a combination piperacillin with tazobactum and amikacin (40%). 92.39% patients recovered with empirical antimicrobial, with total in-hospital mortality rate of 7.61%.Conclusions: Early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial by using SIRS as an indicator for the early diagnosis of septicemia is crucial in the management of septicemia and prevention of development of severe sepsis, septic shock.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S114-S114
Author(s):  
Esther Y Bae ◽  
Marguerite Monogue ◽  
Tiffeny T Smith

Abstract Background Recognition of sepsis frequently occurs in the ED. To demonstrate the need to optimize antibiotic use for suspected sepsis and evaluate the reliability of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria in predicting bacterial infection, we quantified the rate of unnecessary intravenous (IV) broad-spectrum antibiotic use for suspected sepsis in the ED at an academic medical center. Methods Adult patients who were admitted to the ED between January 2018 and June 2018 with suspected sepsis (≥ 2 SIRS) and received ≥ 1 dose of IV broad-spectrum antibiotic were included in this retrospective study. The presence of bacterial infection was determined using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions, microbiologic, radiographic, and laboratory findings. Suspected infections lacked microbiologic data. The primary outcome was the percentage of confirmed and suspected infections. Secondary outcomes included 90-day Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and 90-day drug-resistant organism (DRO) infections. Results A total of 218 patients were included. The percentages of confirmed/suspected and absence of bacterial infections were 63.8% and 36.2%, respectively. Elevated SIRS (≥ 2) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA; ≥ 2) scores were not associated with the presence of bacterial infections. 82% of patients were discharged from the ED. Antibiotic exposure in days of therapy in the ED and/or hospital admission did not significantly vary between patients with confirmed/suspected bacterial infection and those with absence of bacterial infections. Among patients who lacked evidence of bacterial infections, 44% were prescribed outpatient antibiotics after being discharged from the ED. 90-day CDI and DRO infections were identified in 7 and 6 patients, respectively, regardless of the presence of bacterial infections. Table 1. Baseline demographics of patients admitted to the ED with suspected sepsis Conclusion A third of the patients with suspected sepsis received IV broad-spectrum antibiotics in the ED but ultimately lacked bacterial infection. Our findings suggest that identification of bacterial infection and patients with sepsis using SIRS or qSOFA lack specificity and can lead to the overuse of unnecessary antibiotics in the ED. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S153-S154
Author(s):  
Marissa Valentine-King ◽  
John Van ◽  
Casey E Hines-Munson ◽  
Laura Dillon ◽  
Christopher J Graber ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inappropriate treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a major driver of antibiotic overuse. Demographic and laboratory factors associated with inappropriate antibiotic treatment include older age, pyuria, leukocytosis and dementia. To gain a deeper understanding of inappropriate ASB treatment, we performed an in-depth review of provider documentation capturing a broader range of misleading factors associated with ASB treatment. Methods We reviewed a random sample of 10 positive urine cultures per month per facility from acute or long-term care wards at eight Veteran’s Administration (VA) facilities from 2017-2019 (n=960). Trained chart reviewers classified cultures as UTI or ASB and as treated or untreated. Charts were searched specifically for mention of 8 categories of potentially misleading symptoms that often lead to overtreatment of ASB (e.g. “prior history of UTI”) (Figure legend). We also created a ‘suspected systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)’ category that included any mention of leukocytosis, tachycardia, tachypnea, subjective or low-grade fever, or hypothermia. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression was used for analysis. Results Our study included 575 cultures from patients that were primarily white (71%) males (94%) from acute medicine units (75.7%) with a mean age of 76. Twenty-eight percent (n=159) of ASB cases received antibiotics. In addition to the usual known predictors, multiple new misleading symptoms were found to be associated with ASB treatment (Table). Novel, independent predictors of ASB treatment included behavioral issues, such as falls or fatigue (odds ratio (OR): 1.8; 95% CI: 1.05-3.07), urine characteristics, such as cloudy or odorous urine (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.13-1.75), voiding issues (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.43-2.41), and a single, free text mention of a SIRS criteria (OR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.16-2.3). P-values extracted from multivariate regression model (ASB-asymptomatic bacteriuria; NS-not significant; SIRS- systemic inflammatory response syndrome). The following signs or symptoms compose each category: abnormal laboratory findings: acute kidney injury, abnormal creatinine, leukocytosis, pyuria/positive urinalysis, hyperglycemia; abnormal vital sign: bradycardia, tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, hypotension, hypertension, hypoxia, tachypnea, subjective fever or low-grade fever, syncope; behavior issues: falls, confusion lethargy, fatigue, weakness; nonspecific signs or symptoms: nonspecific gastrointestinal, genitourinary, neurological symptoms; voiding issues: decreased urine output, urinary retention, urinary incontinence; urine characteristics: change in color, foul smell, cloudy urine, sediment; SIRS: ordinal variable characterizing if 1 or ≥ 2 of the following were documented by the provider: leukocytosis, tachycardia, tachypnea, subjective or low-grade fever, hypothermia. Conclusion Our in-depth chart review, with attention to misleading symptoms and any documentation of the provider thought process, highlights new factors associated with inappropriate ASB treatment. Patients with even a single SIRS criteria are at risk for unnecessary treatment of ASB; this finding can help design antibiotic stewardship interventions. Disclosures Barbara Trautner, MD, PhD, Genentech (Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document