scholarly journals Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genomic Prediction of Duroc Boars’ Sperm Morphology Abnormalities

Animals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 710 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunxiang Zhao ◽  
Ning Gao ◽  
Jian Cheng ◽  
Saeed El-Ashram ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Sperm Morphology ◽  
Genetic Parameter ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Swine Production ◽  
Forward Prediction ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
First Time

Artificial insemination (AI) has been used globally as a routine technology in the swine production industry. However, genetic parameters and genomic prediction accuracy of semen traits have seldom been reported. In this study, we estimated genetic parameters and conducted genomic prediction for five types of sperm morphology abnormalities in a large Duroc boar population. The estimated heritability of the studied traits ranged from 0.029 to 0.295. In the random cross-validation scenario, the predictive ability ranged from 0.212 to 0.417 for genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and from 0.249 to 0.565 for single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). In the forward prediction scenario, the predictive ability ranged from 0.069 to 0.389 for GBLUP and from 0.085 to 0.483 for ssGBLUP. In conclusion, the studied sperm morphology abnormalities showed moderate to low heritability. Both GBLUP and ssGBLUP showed comparative predictive abilities of breeding values, and ssGBLUP outperformed GBLUP under many circumstances in respect to predictive ability. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the genetic parameters and genomic predictive ability of these traits were reported in such a large Duroc boar population.

scholarly journals Genomic Prediction Using Alternative Strategies of Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP for Yearling Weight and Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Beef Cattle

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Hossein Mehrban ◽  
Masoumeh Naserkheil ◽  
Deuk Hwan Lee ◽  
Chungil Cho ◽  
Taejeong Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Carcass Traits ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased

The weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) method has been proposed to exploit information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives, allowing the use of weights for single-nucleotide polymorphism in the construction of the genomic relationship matrix. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of genetic prediction using the following single-trait best linear unbiased prediction methods in Hanwoo beef cattle: pedigree-based (PBLUP), un-weighted (ssGBLUP), and weighted (WssGBLUP) single-step genomic methods. We also assessed the impact of alternative single and window weighting methods according to their effects on the traits of interest. The data was comprised of 15,796 phenotypic records for yearling weight (YW) and 5622 records for carcass traits (backfat thickness: BFT, carcass weight: CW, eye muscle area: EMA, and marbling score: MS). Also, the genotypic data included 6616 animals for YW and 5134 for carcass traits on the 43,950 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The ssGBLUP showed significant improvement in genomic prediction accuracy for carcass traits (71%) and yearling weight (99%) compared to the pedigree-based method. The window weighting procedures performed better than single SNP weighting for CW (11%), EMA (11%), MS (3%), and YW (6%), whereas no gain in accuracy was observed for BFT. Besides, the improvement in accuracy between window WssGBLUP and the un-weighted method was low for BFT and MS, while for CW, EMA, and YW resulted in a gain of 22%, 15%, and 20%, respectively, which indicates the presence of relevant quantitative trait loci for these traits. These findings indicate that WssGBLUP is an appropriate method for traits with a large quantitative trait loci effect.

scholarly journals The impact of truncating data on the predictive ability for single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction

2018 ◽  
Vol 135 (4) ◽  
pp. 251-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy T. Howard ◽  
Tom A. Rathje ◽  
Caitlyn E. Bruns ◽  
Danielle F. Wilson-Wells ◽  
Stephen D. Kachman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Unbiased Prediction

scholarly journals Genetic parameters for growth and reproduction in Simmental cattle from pedigree and genomic relationship

2020 ◽  
pp. 1520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adonai Alejandro Amaya-Martínez ◽  
Rodrigo Martínez S. ◽  
Mario Fernando Cerón-Muñoz
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Additive Genetic Variance ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Genomic Relationship ◽  
Genomic Information ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased Predictor ◽  
Phenotypic Data ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
Simmental Cattle

Objective. To estimate genetic parameters for weight at eight months of age (W8M), age at first calving (AFC) and first calving interval (FCI) using pedigree and genomic relationship. Materials and methods. Phenotypic data on 481, 3063 and 1098 animals for W8M, AFC and FCI were used, respectively. The genomic information came from a population of 718 genotyped animals with a density chip of 30,106 single nucleotide polymorphism markers (SNP). Univariate and bivariate models were used under the conventional (BLUP) and single step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (ssGBLUP) methodologies. Results. The heritabilities for W8M, AFC and FCI ranged from 0.25 to 0.26, from 0.20 to 0.22 and from 0.04 to 0.08, respectively. The AFC and FCI models under ssGBLUP slightly decreased the error and increased the additive genetic variance, respectively. Conclusions. The inclusion of genomic information slightly increases the accuracy of the genetic estimates in this population. However, a larger amount of genotyped animals and with a higher genetic relationship connectivity would allow breeders to increase the potential of the ssGBLUP methodology in Colombian Simmental cattle.

scholarly journals Estimation of genetic parameters and accuracy of genomic prediction for production traits in Duroc pigs

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (No. 4) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Irvine Lopez ◽  
Vanessa Viterbo ◽  
Choul Won Song ◽  
Kang Seok Seo
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Average Daily Gain ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Production Traits ◽  
Muscle Area ◽  
Genomic Breeding ◽  
Breeding Values ◽  
Heritability Estimates

Abstract: Genetic parameters and accuracy of genomic prediction for production traits in a Duroc population were estimated. Data were on 24 828 purebred Duroc pigs born in 2000–2016. After quality control procedures, 30 263 single nucleotide polymorphism markers and 560 animals remained that were used to predict the genomic breeding values of individuals. Accuracies of predicted breeding values for average daily gain (ADG), backfat thickness (BF), loin muscle area (LMA), lean percentage (LP) and age at 90 kg (D90) between pedigree-based and single-step methods were compared. Analyses were carried out with a multivariate animal model to estimate genetic parameters for production traits while univariate analyses were performed to predict the genomic breeding values of individuals. Heritability estimates from pedigree analysis were moderate to high. Heritability estimates and standard error for ADG, BF, LMA, LP and D90 were 0.35 ± 0.01, 0.35 ± 0.11, 0.24 ± 0.04, 0.42 ± 0.11 and 0.37 ± 0.03, respectively. Genetic correlations of ADG with BF and LP were low and negative. Genetic correlations of LMA with ADG, BF, LP and D90 were –0.37, –0.27, 0.48 and 0.31, respectively. High correlations were observed between ADG and D90 (–0.98), and also between BF and LP (–0.93). Accuracies of genomic breeding values for ADG, BF, LMA, LP and D90 were 0.30, 0.33, 0.38, 0.40 and 0.28, respectively. Corresponding accuracies using pedigree-based method were 0.29, 0.32, 0.38, 0.39 and 0.27, respectively. The results showed that the single-step method did not show significant advantage compared to the pedigree-based method.

scholarly journals Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders1

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 548-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M van Grevenhof ◽  
Jérémie Vandenplas ◽  
Mario P L Calus
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Variance Components ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Convergence Properties ◽  
Genomic Evaluation ◽  
Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Breeding Programs ◽  
Genetic Groups ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Future genomic evaluation models to be used routinely in breeding programs for pigs and poultry need to be able to optimally use information of crossbred (CB) animals to predict breeding values for CB performance of purebred (PB) selection candidates. Important challenges in the commonly used single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) model are the definition of relationships between the different line compositions and the definition of the base generation per line. The use of metafounders (MFs) in ssGBLUP has been proposed to overcome these issues. When relationships between lines are known to be different from 0, the use of MFs generalizes the concept of genetic groups relying on the genotype data. Our objective was to investigate the effect of using MFs in genomic prediction for CB performance on estimated variance components, and accuracy and bias of GEBV. This was studied using stochastic simulation to generate data representing a three-way crossbreeding scheme in pigs, with the parental lines being either closely related or unrelated. Results show that using MFs, the variance components should be scaled appropriately, especially when basing them on estimates obtained with, for example a pedigree-based model. The accuracies of GEBV that were obtained using MFs were similar to accuracies without using MFs, regardless whether the lines involved in the CB were closely related or unrelated. The use of MFs resulted in a model that had similar or somewhat better convergence properties compared to other models. We recommend the use of MFs in ssGBLUP for genomic evaluations in crossbreeding schemes.

scholarly journals Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters

2005 ◽  
Vol 360 (1459) ◽  
pp. 1469-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Thompson ◽  
Sue Brotherstone ◽  
Ian M.S White
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Genetic Parameter ◽  
Direct Methods ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Computationally Efficient ◽  
Likelihood Methods ◽  
Maximum Likelihood Methods ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
Relevant Work ◽  
Quantitative Genetic Parameters

This paper gives a short review of the development of genetic parameter estimation over the last 40 years. This shows the development of more statistically and computationally efficient methods that allow the fitting of more biologically appropriate models. Methods have evolved from direct methods based on covariances between relatives to methods based on individual animal models. Maximum-likelihood methods have a natural interpretation in terms of best linear unbiased predictors. Improvements in iterative schemes to give estimates are discussed. As an example, a recent estimation of genetic parameters for a British population of dairy cattle is discussed. The development makes a connection to relevant work by Bill Hill.

Accuracies of direct genomic breeding values for birth and weaning weights of registered Charolais cattle in Mexico

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 772
Author(s):  
Francisco J. Jahuey-Martínez ◽  
Gaspar M. Parra-Bracamonte ◽  
Dorian J. Garrick ◽  
Nicolás López-Villalobos ◽  
Juan C. Martínez-González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Reference Population ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Bayesian Regression ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Genomic Breeding ◽  
Breeding Values ◽  
Charolais Cattle ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased

Context Genomic prediction is now routinely used in many livestock species to rank individuals based on genomic breeding values (GEBV). Aims This study reports the first assessment aimed to evaluate the accuracy of direct GEBV for birth (BW) and weaning (WW) weights of registered Charolais cattle in Mexico. Methods The population assessed included 823 animals genotyped with an array of 77000 single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genomic prediction used genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), Bayes C (BC), and single-step Bayesian regression (SSBR) methods in comparison with a pedigree-based BLUP method. Key results Our results show that the genomic prediction methods provided low and similar accuracies to BLUP. The prediction accuracy of GBLUP and BC were identical at 0.31 for BW and 0.29 for WW, similar to BLUP. Prediction accuracies of SSBR for BW and WW were up to 4% higher than those by BLUP. Conclusions Genomic prediction is feasible under current conditions, and provides a slight improvement using SSBR. Implications Some limitations on reference population size and structure were identified and need to be addressed to obtain more accurate predictions in liveweight traits under the prevalent cattle breeding conditions of Mexico.

scholarly journals Genomic selection in American mink (Neovison vison) using a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction model for size and quality traits graded on live mink

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trine M Villumsen ◽  
Guosheng Su ◽  
Bernt Guldbrandtsen ◽  
Torben Asp ◽  
Mogens S Lund
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Genomic Selection ◽  
Genomic Prediction ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
Linear Unbiased Prediction ◽  
Best Linear Unbiased ◽  
Regression Slopes ◽  
Unbiased Prediction

Abstract Genomic selection relies on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are often collected using medium-density SNP arrays. In mink, no such array is available; instead, genotyping by sequencing (GBS) can be used to generate marker information. Here, we evaluated the effect of genomic selection for mink using GBS. We compared the estimated breeding values (EBVs) from single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (SSGBLUP) models to the EBV from ordinary pedigree-based BLUP models. We analyzed seven size and quality traits from the live grading of brown mink. The phenotype data consisted of ~20,600 records for the seven traits from the mink born between 2013 and 2016. Genotype data included 2,103 mink born between 2010 and 2014, mostly breeding animals. In total, 28,336 SNP markers from 391 scaffolds were available for genomic prediction. The pedigree file included 29,212 mink. The predictive ability was assessed by the correlation (r) between progeny trait deviation (PTD) and EBV, and the regression of PTD on EBV, using 5-fold cross-validation. For each fold, one-fifth of animals born in 2014 formed the validation set. For all traits, the SSGBLUP model resulted in higher accuracies than the BLUP model. The average increase in accuracy was 15% (between 3% for fur clarity and 28% for body weight). For three traits (body weight, silky appearance of the under wool, and guard hair thickness), the difference in r between the two models was significant (P < 0.05). For all traits, the regression slopes of PTD on EBV from SSGBLUP models were closer to 1 than regression slopes from BLUP models, indicating SSGBLUP models resulted in less bias of EBV for selection candidates than the BLUP models. However, the regression coefficients did not differ significantly. In conclusion, the SSGBLUP model is superior to conventional BLUP model in the accurate selection of superior animals, and, thus, it would increase genetic gain in a selective breeding program. In addition, this study shows that GBS data work well in genomic prediction in mink, demonstrating the potential of GBS for genomic selection in livestock species.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document