scholarly journals A Spring Search Algorithm Applied to Engineering Optimization Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 6173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Dehghani ◽  
Zeinab Montazeri ◽  
Gaurav Dhiman ◽  
O. P. Malik ◽  
Ruben Morales-Menendez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Engineering Optimization ◽  
Hooke’S Law ◽  
Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Hooke's Law ◽  
Engineering Optimization Problems

At present, optimization algorithms are used extensively. One particular type of such algorithms includes random-based heuristic population optimization algorithms, which may be created by modeling scientific phenomena, like, for example, physical processes. The present article proposes a novel optimization algorithm based on Hooke’s law, called the spring search algorithm (SSA), which aims to solve single-objective constrained optimization problems. In the SSA, search agents are weights joined through springs, which, as Hooke’s law states, possess a force that corresponds to its length. The mathematics behind the algorithm are presented in the text. In order to test its functionality, it is executed on 38 established benchmark test functions and weighed against eight other optimization algorithms: a genetic algorithm (GA), a gravitational search algorithm (GSA), a grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO), a grey wolf optimizer (GWO), a spotted hyena optimizer (SHO), as well as an emperor penguin optimizer (EPO). To test the SSA’s usability, it is employed on five engineering optimization problems. The SSA delivered better fitting results than the other algorithms in unimodal objective function, multimodal objective functions, CEC 2015, in addition to the optimization problems in engineering.

scholarly journals Binary Spring Search Algorithm for Solving Various Optimization Problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Dehghani ◽  
Zeinab Montazeri ◽  
Ali Dehghani ◽  
Om P. Malik ◽  
Ruben Morales-Menendez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Bat Algorithm ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Binary Particle Swarm Optimization ◽  
Dragonfly Algorithm ◽  
Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm

One of the most powerful tools for solving optimization problems is optimization algorithms (inspired by nature) based on populations. These algorithms provide a solution to a problem by randomly searching in the search space. The design’s central idea is derived from various natural phenomena, the behavior and living conditions of living organisms, laws of physics, etc. A new population-based optimization algorithm called the Binary Spring Search Algorithm (BSSA) is introduced to solve optimization problems. BSSA is an algorithm based on a simulation of the famous Hooke’s law (physics) for the traditional weights and springs system. In this proposal, the population comprises weights that are connected by unique springs. The mathematical modeling of the proposed algorithm is presented to be used to achieve solutions to optimization problems. The results were thoroughly validated in different unimodal and multimodal functions; additionally, the BSSA was compared with high-performance algorithms: binary grasshopper optimization algorithm, binary dragonfly algorithm, binary bat algorithm, binary gravitational search algorithm, binary particle swarm optimization, and binary genetic algorithm. The results show the superiority of the BSSA. The results of the Friedman test corroborate that the BSSA is more competitive.

scholarly journals A New “Good and Bad Groups-Based Optimizer” for Solving Various Optimization Problems

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4382
Author(s):  
Ali Sadeghi ◽  
Sajjad Amiri Doumari ◽  
Mohammad Dehghani ◽  
Zeinab Montazeri ◽  
Pavel Trojovský ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Fitness Function ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Gray Wolf ◽  
Good Group ◽  
Good Ability ◽  
Whale Optimization

Optimization is the science that presents a solution among the available solutions considering an optimization problem’s limitations. Optimization algorithms have been introduced as efficient tools for solving optimization problems. These algorithms are designed based on various natural phenomena, behavior, the lifestyle of living beings, physical laws, rules of games, etc. In this paper, a new optimization algorithm called the good and bad groups-based optimizer (GBGBO) is introduced to solve various optimization problems. In GBGBO, population members update under the influence of two groups named the good group and the bad group. The good group consists of a certain number of the population members with better fitness function than other members and the bad group consists of a number of the population members with worse fitness function than other members of the population. GBGBO is mathematically modeled and its performance in solving optimization problems was tested on a set of twenty-three different objective functions. In addition, for further analysis, the results obtained from the proposed algorithm were compared with eight optimization algorithms: genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), gravitational search algorithm (GSA), teaching–learning-based optimization (TLBO), gray wolf optimizer (GWO), and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), tunicate swarm algorithm (TSA), and marine predators algorithm (MPA). The results show that the proposed GBGBO algorithm has a good ability to solve various optimization problems and is more competitive than other similar algorithms.

scholarly journals GMBO: Group Mean-Based Optimizer for Solving Various Optimization Problems

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1190
Author(s):  
Mohammad Dehghani ◽  
Zeinab Montazeri ◽  
Štěpán Hubálovský
Keyword(s):  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Random Search ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Main Idea ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Grey Wolf Optimizer ◽  
Whale Optimization

There are many optimization problems in the different disciplines of science that must be solved using the appropriate method. Population-based optimization algorithms are one of the most efficient ways to solve various optimization problems. Population-based optimization algorithms are able to provide appropriate solutions to optimization problems based on a random search of the problem-solving space without the need for gradient and derivative information. In this paper, a new optimization algorithm called the Group Mean-Based Optimizer (GMBO) is presented; it can be applied to solve optimization problems in various fields of science. The main idea in designing the GMBO is to use more effectively the information of different members of the algorithm population based on two selected groups, with the titles of the good group and the bad group. Two new composite members are obtained by averaging each of these groups, which are used to update the population members. The various stages of the GMBO are described and mathematically modeled with the aim of being used to solve optimization problems. The performance of the GMBO in providing a suitable quasi-optimal solution on a set of 23 standard objective functions of different types of unimodal, high-dimensional multimodal, and fixed-dimensional multimodal is evaluated. In addition, the optimization results obtained from the proposed GMBO were compared with eight other widely used optimization algorithms, including the Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA), the Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA), the Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), the Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO), the Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and the Genetic Algorithm (GA). The optimization results indicated the acceptable performance of the proposed GMBO, and, based on the analysis and comparison of the results, it was determined that the GMBO is superior and much more competitive than the other eight algorithms.

Comparison of Meta-heuristic Algorithms on Benchmark Functions

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 508-517
Author(s):  
FerdaNur Arıcı ◽  
Ersin Kaya
Keyword(s):  
Heuristic Algorithms ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Differential Evolution Algorithm ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Bee Colony ◽  
Different Characteristics

Optimization is a process to search the most suitable solution for a problem within an acceptable time interval. The algorithms that solve the optimization problems are called as optimization algorithms. In the literature, there are many optimization algorithms with different characteristics. The optimization algorithms can exhibit different behaviors depending on the size, characteristics and complexity of the optimization problem. In this study, six well-known population based optimization algorithms (artificial algae algorithm - AAA, artificial bee colony algorithm - ABC, differential evolution algorithm - DE, genetic algorithm - GA, gravitational search algorithm - GSA and particle swarm optimization - PSO) were used. These six algorithms were performed on the CEC’17 test functions. According to the experimental results, the algorithms were compared and performances of the algorithms were evaluated.

Automatic Mining of Quantitative Association Rules with Gravitational Search Algorithm

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 343-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umit Can ◽  
Bilal Alatas
Keyword(s):  
Association Rules ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Fitness Function ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Gravitational Search Algorithm ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Search Method ◽  
Quantitative Association Rules ◽  
Gravitational Search

The classical optimization algorithms are not efficient in solving complex search and optimization problems. Thus, some heuristic optimization algorithms have been proposed. In this paper, exploration of association rules within numerical databases with Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) has been firstly performed. GSA has been designed as search method for quantitative association rules from the databases which can be regarded as search space. Furthermore, determining the minimum values of confidence and support for every database which is a hard job has been eliminated by GSA. Apart from this, the fitness function used for GSA is very flexible. According to the interested problem, some parameters can be removed from or added to the fitness function. The range values of the attributes have been automatically adjusted during the time of mining of the rules. That is why there is not any requirements for the pre-processing of the data. Attributes interaction problem has also been eliminated with the designed GSA. GSA has been tested with four real databases and promising results have been obtained. GSA seems an effective search method for complex numerical sequential patterns mining, numerical classification rules mining, and clustering rules mining tasks of data mining.

scholarly journals Disruption-Based Multiobjective Equilibrium Optimization Algorithm

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Hao Chen ◽  
Weikun Li ◽  
Weicheng Cui
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Novel Mutation ◽  
Optimization Algorithms ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Engineering Optimization ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Nature Inspired Computing ◽  
Disruption Method

Nature-inspired computing has attracted huge attention since its origin, especially in the field of multiobjective optimization. This paper proposes a disruption-based multiobjective equilibrium optimization algorithm (DMOEOA). A novel mutation operator named layered disruption method is integrated into the proposed algorithm with the aim of enhancing the exploration and exploitation abilities of DMOEOA. To demonstrate the advantages of the proposed algorithm, various benchmarks have been selected with five different multiobjective optimization algorithms. The test results indicate that DMOEOA does exhibit better performances in these problems with a better balance between convergence and distribution. In addition, the new proposed algorithm is applied to the structural optimization of an elastic truss with the other five existing multiobjective optimization algorithms. The obtained results demonstrate that DMOEOA is not only an algorithm with good performance for benchmark problems but is also expected to have a wide application in real-world engineering optimization problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document