scholarly journals Dosimetric Characterization of Small Radiotherapy Electron Beams Collimated by Circular Applicators with the New Microsilicon Detector

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 600
Author(s):  
Serenella Russo ◽  
Silvia Bettarini ◽  
Barbara Grilli Leonulli ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Paolo Alpi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Field Size ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Linear Accelerators ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Output Factors ◽  
Dose Measurements

High-energy small electron beams, generated by linear accelerators, are used for radiotherapy of localized superficial tumours. The aim of the present study is to assess the dosimetric performance under small radiation therapy electron beams of the novel PTW microSilicon detector compared to other available dosimeters. Relative dose measurements of circular fields with 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm aperture diameters were performed for electron beams generated by an Elekta Synergy linac, with energy between 4 and 12 MeV. Percentage depth dose, transverse profiles, and output factors, normalized to the 10 × 10 cm2 reference field, were measured. All dosimetric data were collected in a PTW MP3 motorized water phantom, at SSD of 100 cm, by using the novel PTW microSilicon detector. The PTW diode E and the PTW microDiamond were also used in all beam apertures for benchmarking. Data for the biggest field size were also measured by the PTW Advanced Markus ionization chamber. Measurements performed by the microSilicon are in good agreement with the reference values for all the tubular applicators and beam energies within the stated uncertainties. This confirms the reliability of the microSilicon detector for relative dosimetry of small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by circular applicators.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Characterization of Small Radiation Therapy Electron Beams Collimated by Tubular Applicators With the New Micro-Silicon Detector

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serenella Russo ◽  
Silvia Bettarini ◽  
Barbara Grilli Leonulli ◽  
Marco Esposito ◽  
Paolo Alpi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Silicon Detector ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Field Size ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Linear Accelerators ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Output Factors

High-energy small electron beams generated by linear accelerators are used for radiotherapy of localized superficial tumors. The aim of the present study is to assess the dosimetric performance under small radiation therapy electron beams of the novel PTW microSilicon detector by comparison with commercially available dosimeters. Relative dose measurements of circular fields with 20, 30, 40 and 50 mm aperture diameters were performed for 4 to 12 MeV energy range of electron beams generated by an Elekta Synergy linac. Percentage depth dose, transverse profiles and output factors normalized to the 10 × 10 cm2 reference field were measured. All dosimetric data were collected in a PTW MP3 motorized water phantom at SSD of 100cm by using the novel PTW microSilicon detector. The PTW diode E and the PTW microDiamond were also used in all beam aperture for benchmarking. Data for the biggest field size were also measured by the PTW Advanced Markus ionization chamber.Measurements performed by the microSilicon are in good agreement with the reference values for all the tubular applicators and beam energies, within the stated uncertainties. This confirms the reliability of the microSilicon detector for relative dosimetry of small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by tubular applicators.

scholarly journals Improving Clinical dosimetric Accuracy of cancer treatment using a special quality of Electron and Photon Beam

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayesha Ikhlaq ◽  
Saeed Ahmad Buzdar ◽  
Muhammad Usman Mustafa ◽  
Sana Salahuddin ◽  
Mehr-Un-Nisa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Photon Beam ◽  
Field Size ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Photon Beams ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Electron And Photon

In external beam radiation therapy, electron and photon beams have extraordinary characteristics in the treatment of cancer. The electron and photon beam characteristic are essential to study before calibration of machine. This study focused on the dosimetric characteristics of different energies of electron beams for different field size. The basic objective of this work is, to calculate dosimetric parameters and characteristics of electron beam, specially depth dose characteristics along central axis. In this work, 6 MeV, 9 MeV, 12 MeV, 15 MeV and 18 MeV of electron beam and 6 MV and 15 MV of photon beam with different field size is used. Characteristics of depth dose of electron and photon beam in water have analyzed to provide better quality of radiation therapy treatment planning. The different beam characteristics are due to different interactions that occurs between electron beams giving them a definite range whereas photon beams are attenuated leading to dose deposition and much larger range with no definite end. Depth dose characteristics of electron and photon beams do not show same characteristics as interaction of beam with matter depends on the quality of beam. Attenuation and penetration factors change with changing dosimetric parameters. Complete analysis of dosimetric characteristics of electron and photon beam help to choose more accurate beam for the treatment of cancer. This work will help to increase accuracy in treatment of cancer with radiotherapy.

Dosimetric evaluation of a novel electron–photon mixed beam, produced by a medical linear accelerator

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-331
Author(s):  
Navid Khaledi ◽  
Dariush Sardari ◽  
Mohammad Mohammadi ◽  
Ahmad Ameri ◽  
Nick Reynaert
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beams ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Primary Electron ◽  
Linear Accelerators ◽  
Ion Chamber ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Mixed Beam ◽  
Small Fields ◽  
Lead Layer ◽  
Electron Photon

AbstractAimThis study deals with the characteristics of simultaneous photon and electron beams in homogenous and inhomogeneous phantoms by experimental and Monte Carlo dosimetry, for therapeutic purposes. Materials and methods: Both 16 and 20 MeV high-energy electron beams were used as the original beam to strike perforated lead sheets to produce the mixed beam. The dosimetry results were achieved by measurement in an ion chamber in a water phantom and film dosimetry in a Perspex nasal phantom, and then compared with those calculated through a simulation approach. To evaluate two-dimensional dose distribution in the inhomogeneous medium, the dose–area histogram was obtained.ResultsThe highest percentage of photon contribution in mixed beam was found to be 36% for 2-mm thickness of lead layer with holes diameter of 0·2 cm for a 20 MeV primary electron energy. For small fields, the percentage depth dose parameters variations were found to be similar to pure electron beam within ±2%. The most feasible flatness in beam profile was 11% for pure electron and 7% for the mixed beam. Penumbra changes as function of depth was about ten times better than in pure electron field.ConclusionsThe results present some dosimetric advantages that can make this study a platform for the production of simultaneous mixed beams in future linear accelerators (LINACs), which through redesign of the LINAC head, which could lead to setup error reduction and a decrease of intra-fractional tumour cells repair.

scholarly journals Electron Beam Measurements Employing Electron Montecarlo Algorithm on TrueBeam STx® and Clinac iX® Linear Accelerators

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (B) ◽  
pp. 1730-1738
Author(s):  
Kamal Saidi ◽  
Othmane Kaanouch ◽  
Hanae El Gouach ◽  
Mohamed Reda Mesradi ◽  
Mounir Mkimel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Measured Data ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Linear Accelerators ◽  
Tolerance Intervals ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Large Water ◽  
Good Agreement

Electron beam measurement comparison between TrueBeam STx® and Clinac iX® established. Data evaluation of eMC-calculated and measured for TrueBeam STx® performed. Dosimetric parameters measured including depth dose curves for each applicator, percentage depth dose (PDDs) curves without applicator, the profile in-air for a large field size 40×40 cm2, and the Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) for each applicator using a large water phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany), employing Roos and Markus plane-parallel ionization chambers. The data were examined for five electron beams of Varian’s TrueBeam STx® and Clinac iX® machines. A comparison between measurement PDDs and calculated by the Eclipse electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm was performed to validate Truebeam STx® commissioning. The measured data indicated that electron beam PDDs from the TrueBeam STx® machine are well matched to those from Clinac iX® machine. The quality index R50 for applicator 15×15 cm2 was in the tolerance intervals. However, Surface dose (Ds) increases with increasing energy for both accelerators. Comparisons between the measured and eMC-calculated values revealed that the R100, R90, R80, and R50 values mostly agree within 5 mm. Measured and calculated bremsstrahlung tail Rp correlates well statistically. Ds agrees mostly within 2%. Electron beams were successfully validated for TrueBeam STx®, a good agreement between modeled and measured data was observed.

Absolute and relative dose measurements with Gafchromic™ EBT film for high energy electron beams with different doses per pulse

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 5463-5470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fiandra ◽  
Riccardo Ragona ◽  
Umberto Ricardi ◽  
Silvia Anglesio ◽  
Francesca Romana Giglioli
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beams ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Energy Electron ◽  
High Energy Electron ◽  
Dose Measurements ◽  
Different Doses

scholarly journals Commissioning Measurements of Electron Beam Using Montecarlo Algorithm on Truebeam STx® and Compariaon with Clinac iX Linear Accelerator

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 01041
Author(s):  
Kamal Saidi ◽  
Redouane El Baydaoui ◽  
Hanae El Gouach ◽  
Othmane Kaanouch ◽  
Mohamed Reda Mesradi
Keyword(s):  
Electron Beam ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Measured Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Water Phantom ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
International University ◽  
The Absolute

TrueBeam STx latest generation linear accelerators (linacs) installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. The aim of this is to present and compare the result of the Electron commissioning measurement on TrueBeam Stx and clinac iX installed at Sheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. A compariaon of eMC calculations and measurements for TrueBeam Stx were evaluated. Dosimetric parameters are systematically measured using a large water phantom 3D scanning system MP3 Water Phantom (PTW, Freiburg, Germany). The data of the electron beams commissioning including depth dose curves for each applicator, depth dose curves without applicator and the profile in air for a large field size 40x 40cm2, and the Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) for each applicator. All the data were examined and compared for five electron beams (E6MeV, E9MeV, E12MeV, E16MeV and E20MeV) of Varian’s TrueBeam STx and Clinac iX machines. A comparison, between measurement PDDs and calculated by the Eclipse electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm were performed to validate Truebeam Stx commissioning. All this measurements were performed with a Roos and Markus plane parallel chamber. Our measured data indicated that electron beam PDDs from the TrueBeam Stx machine are well matched to those from our Varian Clinac iX machine. Significant differences between TrueBeam and Clinac iX were found in in‐air profiles and open field output. Maximum depth dose for the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX for the following energies (6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV) are respectively (1.15; 1.89; 2.6; 3.1; and 2.35) and (1.24; 1.95; 2.70; 2.99 and 2.4cm). For the TrueBeam Stx and Clinac iX the quality index R50 for applicator 15x15 cm2 are in the tolerance intervals. Surface dose increases by increasing energy for both machines. The Absolute Dose (cGy/MU) calibrated for both machine in Dmax at 1cGy/MU for the reference field size cone 15x15 cm2. Bremsstrahlung tail Rp per energy levels as follows for the TrueBeam Stx : 6 MeV – 2.85 cm, 9 MeV – 4.28 cm, 12 MeV – 5.97 cm, 16 MeV – 7.88 cm and 20 MeV – 9.86 cm. and for the Clinac iX : 6 MeV – 2.86 cm, 9 MeV – 4.32 cm, 12 MeV – 5.96 cm, 16 MeV – 7.93 cm and 20 MeV – 10.08 cm. A good agreement between modeled and measured data is observed.

Practical lookup tables for ensuring target coverage in a clinical setup for skin cancer electron therapy

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211
Author(s):  
Yongsook C. Lee ◽  
Yongbok Kim
Keyword(s):  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Maximum Dose ◽  
Electron Beams ◽  
Target Coverage ◽  
Electron Beam Therapy ◽  
Surface Distance ◽  
Depth Dose ◽  
Electron Therapy ◽  
Lookup Tables ◽  
Output Factors

AbstractAimTo create practical lookup tables containing percent depth dose (PDD) and profile parameters of electron beams and to demonstrate clinical application of the lookup tables to skin cancer treatment to ensure target coverage in a clinical setup.Materials and methodsFor 6 and 9 MeV electron energies, PDDs and profiles at clinically relevant depths [i.e., R95 (distal depth of 95% maximum dose), R90, R85 and R80] were measured in water at 100 cm source-to-surface distance for an 10×10 cm2 open field and circular cutouts with diameters of 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 cm. Then PDD parameters along with profile parameters such as width of isodose lines and penumbra at the clinically relevant depths were determined. Output factors for the cutouts were measured at dmax in water and solid water.ResultsWith PDD and profile parameters, dosimetry lookup tables were generated. Based upon the lookup tables, target coverage at prescribed depths was retrospectively reviewed for three skin cancer cases. The lookup tables suggested larger cutouts for adequate target coverage.FindingsDosimetry lookup tables for electron beam therapy should include profile parameters at clinically relevant depths and be provided to clinicians to ensure target coverage in a clinical setup.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document