scholarly journals Rank-Based Comparative Research Flow Benchmarking the Effectiveness of AHP–GTMA on Aiding Decisions of Shredder Selection by Reference to AHP–TOPSIS

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Yun Zhuang ◽  
Chang-Ching Lin ◽  
Chih-Yung Chen ◽  
Chia-Rong Su
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Research ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Purchase Order ◽  
Commercial Practice ◽  
Recent Approach ◽  
Selection Decision ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The AHP–GTMA (analytic hierarchy process and graph theory and matrix approach) has been applied to select the best paper shredder before a company was making a bulk purchase order. However, there is a question as to whether one such relatively recent approach is effective to aid the selection decision problems in industrial/commercial practice. In this paper, a novel multi-measure, rank-based comparative research flow is proposed. The real decision problem case mentioned above is solved using the AHP–GTMA and the AHP–TOPSIS methods, respectively, with relevant datasets sourced. Several measures in the proposed flow, i.e., the arithmetical, geometrical, or even statistical ones, are multiplexed and used to validate the similarity between the rank order vectors (ROVs) (and thus between the final preferential orders determined over the alternatives) that are obtained using these two different methods. While AHP–TOPSIS is a confident multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approach which has been successfully applied to many other fields, the similarity validated between these individual results using the proposed method is used to confirm the efficacy of the AHP–GTMA approach and to determine its applicability in practice. In addition, along with this study, some contributable points are also rendered for implementing the decision models, e.g., the optimized recursive implementation in R to compute the permanent value of a square ASAM (alternative selection attribute matrix, which is the computational basis required by AHP–GTMA) of any dimension. The proposed methodological flow to confirm the similarity based on the ordinal rank information is not only convenient in operational practice with ubiquitous tool supports (e.g., the vector-based R statistical platform), but also generalizable (to verify between another pair of results obtained using any other MADM methods). This gives options for future research.

scholarly journals An Empirical Investigation into Physician Preferences in Drug Prescription: An Integrated Methodology of AHP and QFD

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Farzana Elahi ◽  
Shamsad Ahmed ◽  
Mahbubul Haque ◽  
Nazreen Chowdhury
Keyword(s):  
Quality Function Deployment ◽  
Drug Prescription ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Relationship Matrix ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Expert Choice ◽  
Integrated Methodology ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
The Relationship

<p class="Default">In order to sustain in a competitive market like pharmaceutical in Bangladesh, it is important to get an insight into physicians’ preferences in prescribing the drugs. The aim of this work is to investigate and address the physician requirements through an integrated methodology of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Quality Function Deployment (QFD). In this research, an expert panel has been interviewed to recognize the criteria affecting physicians’ decisions. The results from AHP derived through Expert Choice software demonstrate that from the viewpoint of physicians, out of the five criteria, quality of product offering is ranked highest in prescribing the drugs followed by the reputation of the company, relationship enjoyed with the company, etc. As for the technical aspects, derived from the relationship matrix of AHP and QFD, out of the sixteen, brand image is ranked first followed by the quality of raw and packaging materials, skilled production personnel etc. The contribution of this research is expected to enable the managers in the pharmaceutical companies to recognize the factors that influence physicians in prescribing drugs for the patients and help them find out challenging items with preeminent alternatives. Few suggestions for future research are also put forward. <strong></strong></p>

Material Selection Decision-Making Method for Multi-material Lightweight Automotive Body Driven by Performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 146442072110556
Author(s):  
Dengfeng Wang ◽  
Shenhua Li
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Material Selection ◽  
The Body ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Weighting Method ◽  
Lightweight Material ◽  
Automotive Body ◽  
Selection Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

This work proposes a material selection decision-making method for multi-material lightweight body driven by performance to achieve that the right materials are used for the correct positions of the automotive body. The internal relationship between performance and mass, cross-sectional shape, wall thickness parameters, and material properties of a thin-walled structure is studied. The lightweight material indices driven by performance are then established. The lightweight material indices and material price are taken as the decision-making criteria for the material selection of automotive body components. A hybrid weighting method integrated with the analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, and quality function deployment is proposed. The difficulty of quantitatively evaluating the performance requirements of different components of the body is solved using the proposed weighting method combined with the numerical analytical results of the component performance under multiple operating conditions of the automotive body. Then, the weight of the decision-making criteria for material selection is calculated. Grey relational analysis is used to make multicriteria decision-making on a variety of candidate materials to select the best material for body components. After the lightweight material selection of the front longitudinal beam of the automotive body, the frontal collision safety performance of the body is effectively improved, and the mass of the front longitudinal beam is reduced by 45%. Material selection result of the front longitudinal beam indicates that the proposed material selection decision-making method can effectively achieve the fast material selection of components in different positions of the body.

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application to E-Marketplace Selection

2013 ◽  
pp. 26-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beyza Ahlatcioglu Ozkok ◽  
Elisa Pappalardo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Linguistic Variables ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Electronic Parts ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Making decisions is a part of daily life. The nature of decision-making includes multiple and usually conflicting criteria. Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) problems are handled under two main headings: Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) and Multi Objective Decision Making (MODM). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a widely used multi-criteria decision making approach and has successfully been applied to many practical problems. Traditional AHP requires exact or crisp judgments (numbers). However, due to the complexity and uncertainty involved in real world decision problems, decision makers might be more reluctant to provide crisp judgments than fuzzy ones. Furthermore, even when people use the same words, individual judgments of events are invariably subjective, and the interpretations that they attach to the same words may differ. This is why fuzzy numbers and fuzzy sets have been introduced to characterize linguistic variables. Here, the authors overview the most known fuzzy AHP approaches and their application, and they present a case study to select an e-marketplace for a firm, which produces and sells electronic parts of computers in Turkey.

scholarly journals A New Evaluation Methodology for Quality Goals Extended by D Number Theory and FAHP

Information ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 206
Author(s):  
Hongming Mo
Keyword(s):  
Number Theory ◽  
Process Management ◽  
Evidence Theory ◽  
Evaluation Methodology ◽  
Uncertain Information ◽  
Mathematical Tool ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Evaluation Information

Evaluation of quality goals is an important issue in process management, which essentially is a multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) problem. The process of assessment inevitably involves uncertain information. The two crucial points in an MADM problem are to obtain weight of attributes and to handle uncertain information. D number theory is a new mathematical tool to deal with uncertain information, which is an extension of evidence theory. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) provides a hierarchical way to model MADM problems, and the comparison analysis among attributes is applied to obtain the weight of attributes. FAHP uses a triangle fuzzy number rather than a crisp number to represent the evaluation information, which fully considers the hesitation to give a evaluation. Inspired by the features of D number theory and FAHP, a D-FAHP method is proposed to evaluate quality goals in this paper. Within the proposed method, FAHP is used to obtain the weight of each attribute, and the integration property of D number theory is carried out to fuse information. A numerical example is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Some necessary discussions are provided to illustrate the advantages of the proposed method.

scholarly journals A GIS-Based Multicriteria Analysis in Modeling Optimum Sites for Rainwater Harvesting

Hydrology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khamis Sayl ◽  
Ammar Adham ◽  
Coen J. Ritsema
Keyword(s):  
Decision Problem ◽  
Rainwater Harvesting ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Systematic Methodology ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Different Levels

In order to select suitable rainwater harvesting sites within the study area, rainwater harvesting criteria needed to be determined, defined, and structured. Several criteria played an important role in selecting the most suitable rainwater harvesting sites. A multicriteria analysis (MCA) approach, which is widely used to classify potential rainwater harvesting sites, was chosen to help select potential sites in the Wadi Horan region of Iraq. An MCA approach offered a systematic methodology focused on mathematics as well as professional expertise to organize and evaluate complex decisions. Unfortunately, there is no method for choosing among them the most appropriate for a given decision problem, as the choice remains a subjective task. This study used a geographic information system (GIS)-based approach with remote sensing to identify the optimal sites for rainwater harvesting. Four indices: evaporation, cost–benefit, sediment, and hydrology were selected in order to compare the potential sites. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy AHP, and rank order method (ROM) were used to assign weight to the study criteria. The results were then compared using a statistical (variance inverse (VI)) method. A sensitivity analysis was done to test the uncertainties and robustness of the results for each method. The results showed that the ROM and VI methods affected the ranking priority and considered all of the criteria that were sensitive to impact in the ranking process at the different levels compared to the methods of AHP and fuzzy AHP.

scholarly journals A Method for Group Decision Making Involving Subjective Perceptions of Experts’ Judgement: A Case of Art Student Placement Process

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
V. Alpagut YAVUZ Ph.D.
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rank Order ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Admission Process ◽  
Art Programs ◽  
Student Placement ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pencil Drawings

Evaluation of artistry mostly depends on subjective perceptions of experts. As a decision-making process, it involves imprecision and fuzziness, and it is difficult to justify the process. Most art programs’ admission process involves evaluation of the candidates’ pencil drawings and selecting students among competing candidates. Using a justifiable process is essential for the administrators of art programs. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods provide convincing results for real-world problems involving imprecise and fuzzy data. In this study, a modified version of the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS methods are proposed for the art student placement process. Delphi technique is used for identifying the evaluation criteria and the FAHP method is used in obtaining the importance of criteria. Rankings of the candidate students are determined using the TOPSIS method. The resulting rank order of drawings is evaluated by the committee members for validating the performance of the proposed method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document