scholarly journals Seismic Acceleration and Displacement Demand Profiles of Non-Structural Elements in Hospital Buildings

Buildings ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Giammaria Gabbianelli ◽  
Daniele Perrone ◽  
Emanuele Brunesi ◽  
Ricardo Monteiro
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Design ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Relative Displacement ◽  
Seismic Demand ◽  
Structural Elements ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Absolute Acceleration ◽  
Floor Response Spectra ◽  
Performance Based Seismic Design ◽  
Definition Of

The importance of non-structural elements in performance-based seismic design of buildings is presently widely recognized. These elements may significantly affect the functionality of buildings even for low seismic intensities, in particular for the case of critical facilities, such as hospital buildings. One of the most important issues to deal with in the seismic performance assessment of non-structural elements is the definition of the seismic demand. This paper investigates the seismic demand to which the non-structural elements of a case-study hospital building located in a medium–high seismicity region in Italy, are prone. The seismic demand is evaluated for two seismic intensities that correspond to the definition of serviceability limit states, according to Italian and European design and assessment guidelines. Peak floor accelerations, interstorey drifts, absolute acceleration, and relative displacement floor response spectra are estimated through nonlinear time–history analyses. The absolute acceleration floor response spectra are then compared with those obtained from simplified code formulations, highlighting the main shortcomings surrounding the practical application of performance-based seismic design of non-structural elements. The absolute acceleration floor response spectra are then compared with those obtained from simplified code formulations. The results, both in terms of absolute acceleration and relative displacement floor response spectra, highlighted the influence of the higher modes of the structure and the inaccuracy of the code provisions, pointing out the need for more accurate simplified methodologies for the practical application of performance-based seismic design of non-structural elements.

Seismic Performance Spectra

2010 ◽  
Vol 163-167 ◽  
pp. 443-453
Author(s):  
Wen Feng Liu ◽  
Xing Pan Fu
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Performance ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Seismic Demand ◽  
Three Dimension ◽  
Seismic Demands ◽  
Performance Objective ◽  
Objective Performance ◽  
Performance Based Seismic Design ◽  
Ground Motion Records

The seismic performance spectrum is a new kind of the response spectra which is formed according to the designated performance objectives. The performance objectives are changed according to the performance objective level and period of structure, and are different in the acceleration sensitive, velocity sensitive and displacement sensitive range in the seismic performance spectrum. The seismic performance spectrum formulas are derived, which demonstrate the mathematic relationship between the seismic demands of the different performance objective levels and the period of structure. The fitted formulas of the seismic performance spectra for seismic design are obtained due to statistical result of 1085 ground motion records. The new seismic performance spectra are shown in visual three-dimension figures which can represent the seismic demand, performance objective and period of structure in this paper. The philosophy of the seismic performance spectrum is analyzed which reveals the rules for estimating seismic demand of structure at the different performance objective levels. So the multi-objective performance-based seismic design is also proposed using the seismic performance spectrum.

Evaluation of floor acceleration demands from the 2017 Mexico City code seismic provisions using a continuous elastic model and records of instrumented buildings

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 213-237
Author(s):  
Miguel A Jaimes ◽  
Adrián D García-Soto
Keyword(s):  
Mexico City ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Elastic Model ◽  
Ground Acceleration ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Floor Response Spectra ◽  
Instrumented Buildings ◽  
Floor Acceleration

This study presents an evaluation of floor acceleration demands for the design of rigid and flexible acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components in buildings, calculated using the most recent Mexico City seismic design provisions, released in 2017. This evaluation includes two approaches: (1) a simplified continuous elastic model and (2) using recordings from 10 instrumented buildings located in Mexico City. The study found that peak floor elastic acceleration demands imposed on rigid nonstructural components into buildings situated in Mexico City might reach values of 4.8 and 6.4 times the peak ground acceleration at rock and soft sites, respectively. The peak elastic acceleration demands imposed on flexible nonstructural components in all floors, estimated using floor response spectra, might be four times larger than the maximum acceleration of the floor at the point of support of the component for buildings located in rock and soft soil. Comparison of results from the two approaches with the current seismic design provisions revealed that the peak acceleration demands and floor response spectra computed with the current 2017 Mexico City seismic design provisions are, in general, adequate.

Use of RVT for Computation of In-Structure Response Spectra and Peak Responses and Comparison to Time History and Response Spectrum Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1913-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irmela Zentner
Keyword(s):  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Structural Response ◽  
Time History ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Combination Rules ◽  
Floor Response Spectra ◽  
Power Spectral ◽  
Time Histories ◽  
Definition Of

The random vibration theory offers a framework for the conversion of response spectra into power spectral densities (PSDs) and vice versa. The PSD is a mathematically more suitable quantity for structural dynamics analysis and can be straightforwardly used to compute structural response in the frequency domain. This allows for the computation of in-structure floor response spectra and peak responses by conducting only one structural analysis. In particular, there is no need to select or generate spectrum-compatible time histories to conduct the analysis. Peak response quantities and confidence intervals can be computed without any further simplifications such as currently used in the response spectrum method, where modal combination rules have to be derived. In contrast to many former studies, the Arias intensity-based definition of strong-motion duration is adopted here. This paper shows that, if the same definitions of strong-motion duration and modeling assumptions are used for time history and RVT computations, then the same result can be expected. This is illustrated by application to a simplified model of a reactor building.

Study on Piping Response Under Multiple Excitation: Part 2 — Validation for Multiple Excitation Analysis of Piping

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Kai ◽  
Tomoyoshi Watakabe ◽  
Naoaki Kaneko ◽  
Kunihiro Tochiki ◽  
Makoto Moriizumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Time History ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Response Analysis ◽  
Multiple Time ◽  
Floor Response Spectra

The piping in a nuclear power plant is laid across multiple floors of a single building or two buildings, which are supported at many points. As the piping is excited by multiple-inputs from the supporting points during an earthquake, seismic response analysis by multiple excitations is needed to obtain the exact seismic response of the piping. However, few experiments involving such multiple excitation have been performed to verify the validity of multiple excitation analysis. Therefore, analysis of the seismic design of piping in Japan is performed by the enveloped Floor Response Spectrum (FRS), which covers all floor response spectra at all supporting points. The piping response estimated by enveloped FRS is conservative in most cases compared with the actual seismic response by multiple excitations. To perform rational seismic design and evaluation, it is important to investigate the seismic response by multiple excitations and to verify the validity of the analytical method by multiple excitation test. This paper reports the validation results of the multiple-excitation analysis of piping compared with the results of the multiple excitations shaking test using triple uni-axial shaking table and a 3-dimensional piping model (89.1mm diameter and 5.5mm thickness). Three directional moments from the analysis and the shaking test were compared on the validation. As the result, it is confirmed that the analysis by multiple time history excitation corresponds with the test result.

Performance-based seismic design of steel frames using constraint control method

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2648-2661
Author(s):  
Seyed Fazlolah Mansouri ◽  
Mahmoud R Maheri
Keyword(s):  
Optimum Design ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Control Method ◽  
Steel Frames ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Relative Displacement ◽  
Benchmark Problems ◽  
Optimum Performance ◽  
Constraint Control ◽  
Performance Based Seismic Design

In this article, the optimum performance-based seismic design of steel frames is performed using the novel constraint control method. This method is based on a simple concept generally used by the engineers in structural design. In this method, the most conservative member sections are initially selected and by gradually reducing the size of the sections through controlling the problem constraints, the solution tends to an optimum design. The capacity curve of the structure is evaluated through static nonlinear analysis and used for the seismic assessment, and the structural weight is optimized by controlling relative displacement constraints at performance levels of operational, immediate occupancy, life safety and collapse prevention. The performance and efficiency of the proposed algorithm in solving for optimum performance-based seismic design are assessed through solving three benchmark problems. The results show that using constraint control method drastically reduces the number of structural analyses required to reach a solution, compared to the more commonly used metaheuristic optimization methods, while producing comparable optimum solutions. For this reason, the constraint control method is found to be particularly suitable as an optimizer for solving solution-extensive problems, such as performance-based optimum design of structures.

A Spectrum-to-Spectrum Method for Calculating Uniform Hazard Floor Response Spectra

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Lucchini ◽  
Paolo Franchin ◽  
Fabrizio Mollaioli
Keyword(s):  
Ground Motion ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Seismic Demand ◽  
Spectral Acceleration ◽  
Demand Model ◽  
Nonstructural Components ◽  
Floor Response Spectra ◽  
Annual Frequency ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Annual Frequency

In codes’ provisions and design procedures for acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components, seismic demand is commonly defined by means of floor response spectra expressed in terms of pseudo-acceleration. Depending on the considered analysis method, floor response spectra may be derived from floors’ acceleration histories, based on structural response-history analysis, or calculated using a predictive equation from a given input ground motion spectrum. Methods for estimating floor response spectra that are based on the second alternative are commonly called spectrum-to-spectrum methods. The objective of this paper is to briefly review these methods, and to discuss the main assumptions they are based on. Both predictive equations from selected seismic codes and proposals from the literature are included in the review. A new probability-based method, recently developed by the Authors for generating uniform hazard floor response spectra, namely, floor response spectra whose ordinates are characterized by a given target value of the mean annual frequency of being exceeded, is also described. By using this method floor spectra are determined through closed-form equations, given the mean annual frequency of interest, the damping ratio of the spectra, the modal properties of the structure, and three uniform hazard ground spectra. The method is built on a proposal for a probabilistic seismic demand model that relates the ground spectral acceleration with the floor spectral acceleration, and is able to explicitly account for the ground motion variability of the nonstructural response. Results for a case study consisting of a service frame of a visbreaking unit in an oil refinery are presented to show the good predictive accuracy of the method with respect to exact uniform hazard floor response spectra obtained through a standard probabilistic analysis.

EFFECT OF GRAVITY LOADING ON INELASTIC SEISMIC DEMAND OF STRUCTURES

2012 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 1250022 ◽  
Author(s):  
SEKHAR CHANDRA DUTTA ◽  
RAJIB CHOWDHURY
Keyword(s):  
Axial Force ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Concrete Structures ◽  
Seismic Demand ◽  
Hysteresis Behavior ◽  
Performance Based Seismic Design ◽  
Yield Capacity ◽  
The Impact

Performance based seismic design requires precise assessments of inelastic seismic demand. Often, the studies to assess such demands are made without due cognizance to the impact of axial load caused by gravity. In this paper, the effect of gravity-induced axial force on load resisting members on such demand quantities is examined. To encompass the behavior of steel as well concrete structures with various types of degrading features, four different hysteresis models are used in the study. The results show that the effect of axial force on inelastic seismic demand become more significant for systems with short periods having degrading hysteresis behavior. Neglecting the effect of axial force may lead to an underestimation of yield capacity resulting in an overestimation of demand implying a safer design.

scholarly journals Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 812-819
Author(s):  
S. H. C. Santos ◽  
S. S. Lima ◽  
A. Arai
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Design ◽  
Response Spectra ◽  
Soil Liquefaction ◽  
Eurocode 8 ◽  
South American ◽  
The South ◽  
Seismic Zonation ◽  
Seismic Force ◽  
Western Border ◽  
Definition Of

A general evaluation of some points of the South American seismic codes is presented herein, comparing them among themselves and with the American Standard ASCE/SEI 7/10 and with the European Standard Eurocode 8. The study is focused in design criteria for buildings. The Western border of South America is one of the most seismically active regions of the World. It corresponds to the confluence of the South American and Nazca plates. This region corresponds roughly to the vicinity of the Andes Mountains. This seismicity diminishes in the direction of the comparatively seismically quieter Eastern South American areas. The South American countries located in its Western Border possess standards for seismic design since some decades ago, being the Brazilian Standard for seismic design only recently published. This study is focused in some critical topics: definition of the recurrence periods for establishing the seismic input; definition of the seismic zonation and design ground motion values; definition of the shape of the design response spectra; consideration of soil amplification, soil liquefaction and soil-structure interaction; classification of the structures in different importance levels; definition of the seismic force-resisting systems and respective response modification coefficients; consideration of structural irregularities and definition of the allowable procedures for the seismic analyses. A simple building structure is analyzed considering the criteria of the several standards and obtained results are compared.

scholarly journals Floor response spectra for beyond design basis seismic demand

2017 ◽  
Vol 323 ◽  
pp. 259-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somnath Jha ◽  
A.D. Roshan ◽  
L.R. Bishnoi
Keyword(s):  
Response Spectra ◽  
Seismic Demand ◽  
Floor Response Spectra ◽  
Design Basis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document