scholarly journals COMMD1, from the Repair of DNA Double Strand Breaks, to a Novel Anti-Cancer Therapeutic Target

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amila Suraweera ◽  
Pascal H. G. Duijf ◽  
Christian Jekimovs ◽  
Karsten Schrobback ◽  
Cheng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Therapeutic Target ◽  
Bioinformatic Analysis ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Reporter Assays

Lung cancer has the highest incidence and mortality among all cancers, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounting for 85–90% of all lung cancers. Here we investigated the function of COMMD1 in the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and as a prognostic and therapeutic target in NSCLC. COMMD1 function in DSB repair was investigated using reporter assays in COMMD1-siRNA-depleted cells. The role of COMMD1 in NSCLC was investigated using bioinformatic analysis, qRT-PCR and immunoblotting of control and NSCLC cells, tissue microarrays, cell viability and cell cycle experiments. DNA repair assays demonstrated that COMMD1 is required for the efficient repair of DSBs and reporter assays showed that COMMD1 functions in both non-homologous-end-joining and homologous recombination. Bioinformatic analysis showed that COMMD1 is upregulated in NSCLC, with high levels of COMMD1 associated with poor patient prognosis. COMMD1 mRNA and protein were upregulated across a panel of NSCLC cell lines and siRNA-mediated depletion of COMMD1 decreased cell proliferation and reduced cell viability of NSCLC, with enhanced death after exposure to DNA damaging-agents. Bioinformatic analyses demonstrated that COMMD1 levels positively correlate with the gene ontology DNA repair gene set enrichment signature in NSCLC. Taken together, COMMD1 functions in DSB repair, is a prognostic maker in NSCLC and is potentially a novel anti-cancer therapeutic target for NSCLC.

scholarly journals The role of ubiquitin-dependent segregase p97 (VCP or Cdc48) in chromatin dynamics after DNA double strand breaks

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Torrecilla ◽  
Judith Oehler ◽  
Kristijan Ramadan
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Signalling Molecules

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most cytotoxic DNA lesions and, if not repaired, lead to chromosomal rearrangement, genomic instability and cell death. Cells have evolved a complex network of DNA repair and signalling molecules which promptly detect and repair DSBs, commonly known as the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is orchestrated by various post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, methylation, ubiquitination or SUMOylation. As DSBs are located in complex chromatin structures, the repair of DSBs is engineered at two levels: (i) at sites of broken DNA and (ii) at chromatin structures that surround DNA lesions. Thus, DNA repair and chromatin remodelling machineries must work together to efficiently repair DSBs. Here, we summarize the current knowledge of the ubiquitin-dependent molecular unfoldase/segregase p97 (VCP in vertebrates and Cdc48 in worms and lower eukaryotes) in DSB repair. We identify p97 as an essential factor that regulates DSB repair. p97-dependent extraction of ubiquitinated substrates mediates spatio-temporal protein turnover at and around the sites of DSBs, thus orchestrating chromatin remodelling and DSB repair. As p97 is a druggable target, p97 inhibition in the context of DDR has great potential for cancer therapy, as shown for other DDR components such as PARP, ATR and CHK1. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals The Determinant of DNA Repair Pathway Choices in Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Chengyu Bao ◽  
Yuxuan Shang ◽  
Xinye He ◽  
Chiyuan Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ionising Radiation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Repair Pathways

Ionising radiation- (IR-) induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the deleterious DNA lesions that pose a serious threat to genomic stability. The major DNA repair pathways, including classical nonhomologous end joining, homologous recombination, single-strand annealing, and alternative end joining, play critical roles in countering and eliciting IR-induced DSBs to ensure genome integrity. If the IR-induced DNA DSBs are not repaired correctly, the residual or incorrectly repaired DSBs can result in genomic instability that is associated with certain human diseases. Although many efforts have been made in investigating the major mechanisms of IR-induced DNA DSB repair, it is still unclear what determines the choices of IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathways. In this review, we discuss how the mechanisms of IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices can operate in irradiated cells. We first briefly describe the main mechanisms of the major DNA DSB repair pathways and the related key repair proteins. Based on our understanding of the characteristics of IR-induced DNA DSBs and the regulatory mechanisms of DSB repair pathways in irradiated cells and recent advances in this field, We then highlight the main factors and associated challenges to determine the IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices. We conclude that the type and distribution of IR-induced DSBs, chromatin state, DNA-end structure, and DNA-end resection are the main determinants of the choice of the IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathway.

DNA repair after oncological therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy)

2016 ◽  
pp. 82-85
Author(s):  
Ekkehard Dikomey ◽  
Kerstin Borgmann ◽  
Malte Kriegs ◽  
Wael Y. Mansour ◽  
Cordula Petersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Lethal Effect ◽  
Tumour Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

The lethal effect of ionizing irradiation on tumour cells is mostly determined by the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Cells are able to repair most of the DSBs, but 1% to 3 % are either non- or mis-repaired, which will then give rise to lethal chromosomal aberrations. Cells have evolved complex DSB repair mechanisms with a stringent hierarchy to guarantee the genomic stability. However, in tumour cells both mechanisms as well as hierarchy are often disturbed. This knowledge is important for an understanding of the radiation response of tumours, but—most of all—for the establishment of new and specific targets for therapy.

scholarly journals Screen identifies DYRK1B network as mediator of transcription repression on damaged chromatin

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17019-17030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Dong ◽  
Kirk L. West ◽  
Xin Yi Tan ◽  
Junshi Li ◽  
Toyotaka Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Gene Silencing ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Active Chromatin ◽  
Chemical Library ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger transient pausing of nearby transcription, an emerging ATM-dependent response that suppresses chromosomal instability. We screened a chemical library designed to target the human kinome for new activities that mediate gene silencing on DSB-flanking chromatin, and have uncovered the DYRK1B kinase as an early respondent to DNA damage. We showed that DYRK1B is swiftly and transiently recruited to laser-microirradiated sites, and that genetic inactivation of DYRK1B or its kinase activity attenuated DSB-induced gene silencing and led to compromised DNA repair. Notably, global transcription shutdown alleviated DNA repair defects associated with DYRK1B loss, suggesting that DYRK1B is strictly required for DSB repair on active chromatin. We also found that DYRK1B mediates transcription silencing in part via phosphorylating and enforcing DSB accumulation of the histone methyltransferase EHMT2. Together, our findings unveil the DYRK1B signaling network as a key branch of mammalian DNA damage response circuitries, and establish the DYRK1B–EHMT2 axis as an effector that coordinates DSB repair on transcribed chromatin.

DNA repair after oncological therapy (radiotherapy and chemotherapy)

2016 ◽  
pp. 82-85
Author(s):  
Ekkehard Dikomey ◽  
Kerstin Borgmann ◽  
Malte Kriegs ◽  
Wael Y. Mansour ◽  
Cordula Petersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Lethal Effect ◽  
Tumour Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Mechanisms

The lethal effect of ionizing irradiation on tumour cells is mostly determined by the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Cells are able to repair most of the DSBs, but 1% to 3 % are either non- or mis-repaired, which will then give rise to lethal chromosomal aberrations. Cells have evolved complex DSB repair mechanisms with a stringent hierarchy to guarantee the genomic stability. However, in tumour cells both mechanisms as well as hierarchy are often disturbed. This knowledge is important for an understanding of the radiation response of tumours, but—most of all—for the establishment of new and specific targets for therapy.

scholarly journals Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoya Uematsu ◽  
Eric Weterings ◽  
Ken-ichi Yano ◽  
Keiko Morotomi-Yano ◽  
Burkhard Jakob ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Laser System ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ends

The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKCS) plays an important role during the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). It is recruited to DNA ends in the early stages of the nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) process, which mediates DSB repair. To study DNA-PKCS recruitment in vivo, we used a laser system to introduce DSBs in a specified region of the cell nucleus. We show that DNA-PKCS accumulates at DSB sites in a Ku80-dependent manner, and that neither the kinase activity nor the phosphorylation status of DNA-PKCS influences its initial accumulation. However, impairment of both of these functions results in deficient DSB repair and the maintained presence of DNA-PKCS at unrepaired DSBs. The use of photobleaching techniques allowed us to determine that the kinase activity and phosphorylation status of DNA-PKCS influence the stability of its binding to DNA ends. We suggest a model in which DNA-PKCS phosphorylation/autophosphorylation facilitates NHEJ by destabilizing the interaction of DNA-PKCS with the DNA ends.

scholarly journals End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 314-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Blackwood ◽  
Neil J. Rzechorzek ◽  
Sian M. Bray ◽  
Joseph D. Maman ◽  
Luca Pellegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Strand Invasion ◽  
End Resection

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5′–3′ end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

scholarly journals RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DNA double-strand break repair

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takaaki Yasuhara ◽  
Reona Kato ◽  
Motohiro Yamauchi ◽  
Yuki Uchihara ◽  
Lee Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Regions ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Critical Component ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Chromosome Translocations ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break

AbstractR-loops, consisting of ssDNA and DNA-RNA hybrids, are potentially vulnerable unless they are appropriately processed. Recent evidence suggests that R-loops can form in the proximity of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within transcriptionally active regions. Yet, how the vulnerability of R-loops is overcome during DSB repair remains unclear. Here, we identify RAP80 as a factor suppressing the vulnerability of ssDNA in R-loops and chromosome translocations and deletions during DSB repair. Mechanistically, RAP80 prevents unscheduled nucleolytic processing of ssDNA in R-loops by CtIP. This mechanism promotes efficient DSB repair via transcription-associated end-joining dependent on BRCA1, Polθ, and LIG1/3. Thus, RAP80 suppresses the vulnerability of R-loops during DSB repair, thereby precluding genomic abnormalities in a critical component of the genome caused by deleterious R-loop processing.

scholarly journals ATM’s Role in the Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1370
Author(s):  
Atsushi Shibata ◽  
Penny A. Jeggo
Keyword(s):  
Stress Responses ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Multiple Roles ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is a central kinase that activates an extensive network of responses to cellular stress via a signaling role. ATM is activated by DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and by oxidative stress, subsequently phosphorylating a plethora of target proteins. In the last several decades, newly developed molecular biological techniques have uncovered multiple roles of ATM in response to DNA damage—e.g., DSB repair, cell cycle checkpoint arrest, apoptosis, and transcription arrest. Combinational dysfunction of these stress responses impairs the accuracy of repair, consequently leading to dramatic sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) in ataxia telangiectasia (A-T) cells. In this review, we summarize the roles of ATM that focus on DSB repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document