scholarly journals Predictive and Prognostic Value of Microsatellite Instability in Gynecologic Cancer (Endometrial and Ovarian)

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2434
Author(s):  
Camille Evrard ◽  
Jérôme Alexandre
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Detection Techniques ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Predictive And Prognostic Value ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

For endometrial cancer, a new classification is now available from ESMO, ESGO, and ESTRO based on clinical and molecular characteristics to determine adjuvant therapy. The contribution of molecular biology is major for this pathology mainly by the intermediary of deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability. Detection techniques for this phenotype have many peculiarities in gynecologic cancers (endometrial and ovarian) because it has been initially validated in colorectal cancer only. Endometrial cancer is the most common tumor with deficient mismatch repair, which is an important prognostic factor and a predictor of the benefit of adjuvant treatments. Concerning advanced stages, this phenotype is a theragnostic marker for using immunotherapy. Among ovarian cancer, microsatellite instability is less described in literature but exists, particularly in endometrioid type ovarian cancer. This review aims to provide an overview of the publications concerning deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability in endometrial and ovarian cancers, detection techniques, and clinical implications of these molecular characteristics.

Microsatellite frameshift variants in SGO1 of gastric cancer are not always associated with MSI status

2020 ◽  
pp. jclinpath-2020-206934
Author(s):  
Tomohiro Sugiyama ◽  
Moriya Iwaizumi ◽  
Terumi Taniguchi ◽  
Satoshi Suzuki ◽  
Shinya Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Cancer Resection ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair ◽  
Gastric Cancer Resection ◽  
Genemapper Software

AimsAlthough frameshift variants in the microsatellite area of shugoshin 1 (SGO1) have been reported in the context of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair gastrointestinal cancer, most have been evaluated only in early stage I–III patients, and only two of its five microsatellite regions have been evaluated. Therefore, we investigated the frequency and MSI status of microsatellite frameshift variants in gastric cancer cases, including stage IV.MethodsIn a total of 55 cases, 30 gastric cancer resection and 25 non-resection cases, DNA was extracted from both tumour and normal parts and PCR was performed. The variant was confirmed by TA cloning, and MSI was evaluated using GeneMapper software.ResultsA frameshift variant of c.973delA was observed in 16 of the 45 evaluable cases. Its frequency was 35.6%. Of the 25 cases that could be assessed for MSI status, two cases of MSI-H were associated with the c.973delA SGO1 variant. However, c.973delA SGO1 variant was also observed in four cases of microsatellite stable.ConclusionOur study shows that SGO1 frameshift variants are not always associated with MSI status.

scholarly journals Understanding Inherited Risk in Unselected Newly Diagnosed Patients With Endometrial Cancer

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Karen A. Cadoo ◽  
Diana L. Mandelker ◽  
Semanti Mukherjee ◽  
Carolyn Stewart ◽  
Deborah DeLair ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Cancer Predisposition ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Germline Variants ◽  
Predisposition Genes ◽  
Generation Sequencing

PURPOSE Mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes and PTEN, diagnostic of Lynch and Cowden syndromes, respectively, represent the only established inherited predisposition genes in endometrial cancer to date. The prevalence of other cancer predisposition genes remains unclear. We determined the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in unselected patients with endometrial cancer scheduled for surgical consultation. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients prospectively consented (April 2016 to May 2017) to an institutional review board–approved protocol of tumor-normal sequencing via a custom next-generation sequencing panel—the Memorial Sloan Kettering–Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets—that yielded germline results for more than 75 cancer predisposition genes. Tumors were assessed for microsatellite instability. Per institutional standards, all tumors underwent Lynch syndrome screening via immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair proteins. RESULTS Of 156 patients who consented to germline genetic testing, 118 (76%) had stage I disease. In 104 patients (67%), tumors were endometrioid, and 60 (58%) of those tumors were grade 1. Twenty-four pathogenic germline variants were identified in 22 patients (14%): seven (4.5%) had highly penetrant cancer syndromes and 15 (9.6%) had variants in low-penetrance, moderate-penetrance, or recessive genes. Of these, five (21%) were in Lynch syndrome genes (two MSH6, two PMS2, and one MLH1). All five tumors had concordant IHC staining; two (40%) were definitively microsatellite instability–high by next-generation sequencing. One patient had a known BRCA1 mutation, and one had an SMARCA4 deletion. The remaining 17 variants (71%) were incremental findings in low- and moderate-penetrance variants or genes associated with recessive disease. CONCLUSION In unselected patients with predominantly low-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer, germline multigene panel testing identified cancer predisposition gene variants in 14%. This finding may have implications for future cancer screening and risk-reduction recommendations. Universal IHC screening for Lynch syndrome successfully identifies the majority (71%) of high-penetrance germline mutations.

Prevalence and molecular characteristics of DNA mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer in a Japanese hospital-based population

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azusa Yamamoto ◽  
Tatsuro Yamaguchi ◽  
Okihide Suzuki ◽  
Tetsuya Ito ◽  
Noriyasu Chika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Dna Mismatch Repair ◽  
Molecular Characteristics ◽  
Variant Of Uncertain Significance ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Germline Variant ◽  
Uncertain Significance ◽  
Repair Genes

Abstract Background The prevalence and molecular characteristics of defective DNA mismatch repair endometrial cancers in the Japanese population have been underexplored. Data supporting clinical management of patients with Lynch-like syndrome and germline variant of uncertain significance of mismatch repair genes are still lacking. Methods Immunohistochemistry of mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections prepared from resected primary endometrial cancers in 395 women with a median age of 59 years. Genetic and/or epigenetic alterations of the mismatch repair genes were also investigated. Results Loss of expression of one or more mismatch repair proteins was observed in 68 patients (17.2%). A total of 17 out of 68 patients (25%, 4.3% of all cases) were identified as candidates for genetic testing for Lynch syndrome after excluding 51 patients with MLH1 hypermethylated cancer. Fourteen of these 17 patients subjected to genetic testing were found to have Lynch syndrome (n = 5), germline variant of uncertain significance (n = 2) or Lynch-like syndrome (n = 7). Compared with patients with Lynch syndrome, those with germline variant of uncertain significance and Lynch-like syndrome tended to demonstrate an older age at the time of endometrial cancer diagnosis (P = 0.07), less fulfillment of the revised Bethesda guidelines (P = 0.09) and lower prevalence of Lynch syndrome-associated tumors in their first-degree relatives (P = 0.01). Conclusions This study provides useful information for management in patients with DNA mismatch repair endometrial cancer. Specifically, cancer surveillance as recommended in patients with Lynch syndrome might not be necessary in patients with germline variant of uncertain significance and Lynch-like syndrome and their relatives.

scholarly journals Risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in female heterozygotes of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: a Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mev Dominguez-Valentin ◽  
Emma J. Crosbie ◽  
Christoph Engel ◽  
Stefan Aretz ◽  
Finlay Macrae ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Different Ages ◽  
Aid Decision ◽  
Risk Reducing

Abstract Purpose To determine impact of risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) on gynecological cancer incidence and death in heterozygotes of pathogenic MMR (path_MMR) variants. Methods The Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database was used to investigate the effects of gynecological risk-reducing surgery (RRS) at different ages. Results Risk-reducing hysterectomy at 25 years of age prevents endometrial cancer before 50 years in 15%, 18%, 13%, and 0% of path_MLH1, path_MSH2, path_MSH6, and path_PMS2 heterozygotes and death in 2%, 2%, 1%, and 0%, respectively. Risk-reducing BSO at 25 years of age prevents ovarian cancer before 50 years in 6%, 11%, 2%, and 0% and death in 1%, 2%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Risk-reducing hysterectomy at 40 years prevents endometrial cancer by 50 years in 13%, 16%, 11%, and 0% and death in 1%, 2%, 1%, and 0%, respectively. BSO at 40 years prevents ovarian cancer before 50 years in 4%, 8%, 0%, and 0%, and death in 1%, 1%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusion Little benefit is gained by performing RRS before 40 years of age and premenopausal BSO in path_MSH6 and path_PMS2 heterozygotes has no measurable benefit for mortality. These findings may aid decision making for women with LS who are considering RRS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document