scholarly journals Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-Based Aggregation Mechanism for Resilience Measurement: NATO Aggregated Resilience Decision Support Model

Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037
Author(s):  
Jan Hodicky ◽  
Gökhan Özkan ◽  
Hilmi Özdemir ◽  
Petr Stodola ◽  
Jan Drozd ◽  
...  

Resilience is a complex system that represents dynamic behaviours through its complicated structure with various nodes, interrelations, and information flows. Like other international organizations NATO has also been dealing with the measurement of this complex phenomenon in order to have a comprehensive understanding of the civil environment and its impact on military operations. With this ultimate purpose, NATO had developed and executed a prototype model with the system dynamics modelling and simulation paradigm. NATO has created an aggregated resilience model as an upgrade of the prototype one, as discussed within this study. The structure of the model, aggregation mechanism and shock parametrization methodologies used in the development of the model comprise the scope of this study. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is a multi-criteria decision-making technique is the methodology that is used for the development of the aggregation mechanism. The main idea of selecting the AHP methodology is its power and usefulness in mitigating bias in the decision-making process, its capability to increase the number of what-if scenarios to be created, and its contribution to the quality of causal explanations with the granularity it provides. The parametrized strategic shock input page, AHP-based weighted resilience and risk parameters input pages, one more country insertion to the model, and the decision support system page enhance the capacity of the prototype model. As part of the model, the decision support system page stands out as the strategic level cockpit where the colour codes give a clear idea at first about the overall situational picture and country-wise resilience and risk status. At the validation workshop, users not only validated the model but also discussed further development opportunities, such as adding more strategic shocks into the model and introduction of new parameters that will be determined by a big data analysis on relevant open source databases. The developed model has the potential to inspire high-level decision-makers dealing with resilience management in other international organizations, such as the United Nations.

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 088
Author(s):  
Wahyu Joni Kurniawan

This study was conducted to assist in the selection of martial assistant coach, to determine who is right. Its results will didadaptkan by comparing the two methods in the decision support system, by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Simple Additive Weight (SAW) in limiting the problems in producing the desired solution, using multiple criteria (multi-criteria). AHP and SAW has a different way of doing the calculation. This is done to determine which method is looking for help in making decisions. And in this study are the criteria Discipline, Knowledge, Leadership, Attitude, and Level. And there are sub criteria on Level, which Black (AND I) and Red Black II.


Author(s):  
Ilham Pramuja Nasution ◽  
Arjon Samuel Sitio

The budget allocation of a village fund is very important and take big effect to village progress Because the office to distribute the tax result for village development. But, that allocation is not accurately. Therefore there was design a system to support a decision a budget allocation of village funds by using an Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. This research done to the make-easy an office village in budgeting is the allocation of village funds. An method of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of a method known as important as the highest level. An AHP method is look for the best alternative


Author(s):  
Teguh Gundara ◽  
Sita Anggraeni

Abstrak: Untuk mengetahui seberapa besar minat siswa terhadap beberapa pelajaran seni yang ada di SD Al-Fath Cirendeu maka dibutuhkan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) yang dapat membantu memberikan solusi alternatif. Metode yang digunakan dalam SPK pemilihan program penjurusan seni di SD Al-Fath Cirendeu menggunakan Analityc Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pemilihan seni di SD Al-Fath Cirendeu menggunakan metode AHP disajikan dalam bentuk hasil angka perhitungan yang dapat dipertimbangkan lebih lanjut oleh pihak pengambil keputusan. Dengan adanya metode ini dapat mambantu dan memudahkan guru-guru seni dalam pemilihan program penjurusan seni dengan tujuan yang tepat sasaran sehingga kegiatan belajar mengajar lebih terfokuskanKata Kunci: Sistem Penunjang Keputusan, SD Al-Fath, Pelajaran seni, Metode AHPAbstract: To know about the student's intention toward some art program in Al-Fath Cirendeu, it will need the Decision Support System (DSS) to help them in alternative solution. The method that used in DSS in Al-Fath elementary school uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Choices of majors of an art lesson in Al-Fath elementary school Cirendeu is using AHP Method, provide in the term of numbers result in the calculation which can be considered further by teachers. This method can help and make art teachers easily to decide what is the right art lesson, so the teaching and learning activity will be more productive and focus.Keyword: Decision Support System, Al-Fath Elementary School, Art Programme, AHP Method 


Author(s):  
Dedy Hidayat Kusuma ◽  
Moh Nur Shodiq ◽  
Indah Kurnia Fitriani

Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) Banyuwangi using a worksheet which can lead to error occurrences and slow decision making. A system for decision support that can improve the ranking process and quality were developed in this paper. The proposed system implemented the codeigniter framework, MySQL database, and PHP programming language. The system provided three user roles which are teacher, student, and administrator role. These four parameters are used as ranking system input, including academic values, non-academic values, violation scores, and student attendance. The ranking process was conducted by applying the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method. The developed decision support system was tested using two ways: the black box testing method and providing questionnaires. Black box testing result shows that the system has functionally worked, while user’s questionnaire gives 92,29% well accepted by users. The results show that the decision support system can help manage values and determine the parallel ranking list.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raydel Tullous ◽  
Richard Lee Utecht

<span>The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the usefulness of a particular decision support system, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), for developing and implementing integrated procurement systems. The purchasing decision support system (PDSS) proposed in this paper provides each participant involved in the purchasing process with a procedure to communicate their preferences and the reasons for those preferences. All of the participants preferences may be aggregated to determine an overall preference, or in some cases, the results may simply be used to gain a better understanding of the values the individual place on various attributes.</span>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document