scholarly journals Analytical Sensitivity and Specificity of Two RT-qPCR Protocols for SARS-CoV-2 Detection Performed in an Automated Workflow

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Barcelos Barra ◽  
Ticiane Henriques Santa Rita ◽  
Pedro Góes Mesquita ◽  
Rafael Henriques Jácomo ◽  
Lídia Freire Abdalla Nery
Keyword(s):  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Amplification Efficiency ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Automated Platform ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Positive Results

WHO declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic on 11 March 2020. The establishment of standardized RT-qPCR protocols for respiratory secretions testing, as well as sharing of specimens, data, and information became critical. Here, we investigate the analytical performance of two interim RT-qPCR protocols (Charité and Centers for Disease Control (CDC)) for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 executed in a fully automated platform. Analytical specificity, PCR amplification efficiency, analytical sensitivity (limit of detection), and cross-reactivity were evaluated using contrived samples. The on-going accuracy was evaluated by retrospective analysis of our test results database (real clinical samples). N1, E, and a modified version of RdRP assays presented adequate analytical specificity, amplification efficiency, and analytical sensitivity using contrived samples. The three assays were applied to all individuals who requested the SARS-CoV-2 molecular test assay in our laboratory and it was observed that N1 gave more positive results than E, and E gave more positive results than RdRP (modified). The RdRP and E were removed from the test and its final version, based on N1 assay only, was applied to 30,699 Brazilian individuals (from 19 February 2020 to 8 May 2020). The aggregated test results available in the database were also presented.

scholarly journals A Saliva-Based RNA Extraction-Free Workflow Integrated With Cas13a for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iqbal Azmi ◽  
Md Imam Faizan ◽  
Rohit Kumar ◽  
Siddharth Raj Yadav ◽  
Nisha Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Storage ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Heat Inactivation ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Extraction Step

A major bottleneck in scaling-up COVID-19 testing is the need for sophisticated instruments and well-trained healthcare professionals, which are already overwhelmed due to the pandemic. Moreover, the high-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics are contingent on an RNA extraction step, which, in turn, is restricted by constraints in the supply chain. Here, we present CASSPIT (Cas13AssistedSaliva-based &SmartphoneIntegratedTesting), which will allow direct use of saliva samples without the need for an extra RNA extraction step for SARS-CoV-2 detection. CASSPIT utilizes CRISPR-Cas13a based SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection, and lateral-flow assay (LFA) readout of the test results. The sample preparation workflow includes an optimized chemical treatment and heat inactivation method, which, when applied to COVID-19 clinical samples, showed a 97% positive agreement with the RNA extraction method. With CASSPIT, LFA based visual limit of detection (LoD) for a given SARS-CoV-2 RNA spiked into the saliva samples was ~200 copies; image analysis-based quantification further improved the analytical sensitivity to ~100 copies. Upon validation of clinical sensitivity on RNA extraction-free saliva samples (n = 76), a 98% agreement between the lateral-flow readout and RT-qPCR data was found (Ct<35). To enable user-friendly test results with provision for data storage and online consultation, we subsequently integrated lateral-flow strips with a smartphone application. We believe CASSPIT will eliminate our reliance on RT-qPCR by providing comparable sensitivity and will be a step toward establishing nucleic acid-based point-of-care (POC) testing for COVID-19.

scholarly journals Development of a highly sensitive magneto-enzyme lateral flow immunoassay for dengue NS1 detection

PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e7779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien V. Tran ◽  
Ba V. Nguyen ◽  
Thao T.P. Nguyen ◽  
Tung T. Tran ◽  
Khanh G. Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Test Performance ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Dengue Infection ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Structural Protein ◽  
Highly Sensitive

Background Dengue infection represents a global health issue of growing importance. Dengue non-structural protein 1 (NS1) plays a central role in the early detection of the disease. The most common method for NS1 detection is testing by lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs) with varying sensitivity. In this study, we present a highly sensitive magneto-enzyme LFIA for prompt diagnosis of dengue. Methods We have demonstrated the development of a magneto-enzyme LFIA combining super-paramagnetic nanoparticles as labels and Biotin–Streptavidin signal amplification strategy to detect dengue NS1. Factors affecting the test performance including antibody pair, super-paramagnetic nanoparticle size, nitrocellulose membrane type, amounts of detection and capture antibodies, and amounts of Streptavidin-polyHRP were optimized. Analytical sensitivity and cross-reactivity were determined. Clinical performance of the novel assay was evaluated using a panel of 120 clinical sera. Results This newly developed assay could detect NS1 of all four serotypes of dengue virus (DENV). The limit of detection (LOD) was found to be as low as 0.25 ng ml−1 for DENV-1 and DENV-3, 0.1 ng ml−1 for DENV-2, and 1.0 ng ml−1 for DENV-4. The LOD for DENV-2 was a 50-fold improvement over the best values previously reported. There was an absence of cross-reactivity with Zika NS1, Hepatitis B virus, Hepatitis C virus, and Japanese encephalitis virus. The sensitivity and specificity of the novel assay were 100% when tested on clinical samples. Conclusions We have successfully developed a magneto-enzyme LFIA, allowing rapid and highly sensitive detection of dengue NS1, which is essential for proper management of patients infected with DENV.

scholarly journals A saliva-based RNA extraction-free workflow integrated with Cas13a for SARS-CoV-2 detection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iqbal Azmi ◽  
Md Imam Faizan ◽  
Rohit Kumar ◽  
Siddharth Raj Yadav ◽  
Nisha Chaudhary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Storage ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Rna Extraction ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Lateral Flow ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Heat Inactivation ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity

A major bottleneck in scaling-up COVID-19 testing is the need for sophisticated instruments and well-trained healthcare professionals, which are already overwhelmed due to the pandemic. Moreover, the high-sensitive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics are contingent on an RNA extraction step, which, in turn, is restricted by constraints in the supply chain. Here, we present CASSPIT (Cas13 Assisted Saliva-based & Smartphone Integrated Testing), which will allow direct use of saliva samples without the need for RNA extraction for SARS-CoV-2 detection. CASSPIT utilizes CRISPR-Cas13a based SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection, and lateral-flow assay (LFA) readout of the test results. The sample preparation workflow includes an optimized chemical treatment and heat inactivation method, which, when applied to 94 COVID-19 clinical samples, showed a 97% positive agreement with the RNA extraction method. With CASSPIT, LFA based visual limit of detection (LoD) for a given SARS-CoV-2 RNA spiked into the saliva samples was ∼200 copies; image analysis-based quantification further improved the analytical sensitivity to ∼100 copies. Upon validation of clinical sensitivity on RNA extraction-free saliva samples (n=76), a 98% agreement between the lateral-flow readout and RT-qPCR data was found. To enable user-friendly test results with provision for data storage and online consultation, we subsequently integrated lateral-flow strips with a smartphone application. We believe CASSPIT will eliminate our reliance on RT-qPCR by providing comparable sensitivity and will be a step toward establishing nucleic acid-based point-of-care (POC) testing for COVID-19.

scholarly journals Selection and Identification of Novel Aptamers Specific for Clenbuterol Based on ssDNA Library Immobilized SELEX and Gold Nanoparticles Biosensor

Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xixia Liu ◽  
Qi Lu ◽  
Sirui Chen ◽  
Fang Wang ◽  
Jianjun Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gold Nanoparticles ◽  
High Throughput ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Retention Rate ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Enriched Library ◽  
Amplification Curve ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity

We describe a multiple combined strategy to discover novel aptamers specific for clenbuterol (CBL). An immobilized ssDNA library was used for the selection of specific aptamers using the systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). Progress was monitored using real-time quantitative PCR (Q-PCR), and the enriched library was sequenced by high-throughput sequencing. Candidate aptamers were picked and preliminarily identified using a gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) biosensor. Bioactive aptamers were characterized for affinity, circular dichroism (CD), specificity and sensitivity. The Q-PCR amplification curve increased and the retention rate was about 1% at the eighth round. Use of the AuNPs biosensor and CD analyses determined that six aptamers had binding activity. Affinity analysis showed that aptamer 47 had the highest affinity (Kd = 42.17 ± 8.98 nM) with no cross reactivity to CBL analogs. Indirect competitive enzyme linked aptamer assay (IC-ELAA) based on a 5′-biotin aptamer 47 indicated the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.18 ± 0.02 ng/L (n = 3), and it was used to detect pork samples with a mean recovery of 83.33–97.03%. This is the first report of a universal strategy including library fixation, Q-PCR monitoring, high-throughput sequencing, and AuNPs biosensor identification to select aptamers specific for small molecules.

scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of 2019-nCov-Infected Cases in Dongyang, Southeastern China

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
G. G. Li ◽  
Z. Lv ◽  
Y. S. Wang ◽  
J. F. Li ◽  
L. F. Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Nucleic Acids ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Infected People ◽  
Sporadic Cases ◽  
Asymptomatic Individuals ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Acid Test ◽  
Negative Conversion

The 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) has caused increasing number of infected cases globally. This study was performed to analyze information regarding the transmission route and presence of viral nucleic acids on several clinical samples. Confirmed 2019-nCov-infected cases were identified in Dongyang and were treated according to guidelines for the diagnosis of 2019-nCov infection released by the National Health Commission. Information regarding the contacts that the infected people had was collected to determine whether it caused clustered cases. A series of successive nucleic acid examination of feces, oropharyngeal swabs, and sputum was also performed, and the results were analyzed. A total of 19 confirmed cases of 2019-nCov infection were identified in Dongyang, Zhejiang Province, China. Five cases showed severe symptoms, and the remaining ones showed mild manifestations. Ten cases infected from two asymptomatic individuals were clustered into two groups. Among 14 cases with consecutive nucleic acid test results, four patients showed positive results in feces after their negative conversion in oropharyngeal swabs. Asymptomatic individuals with the virus could cause 2019-nCov clustered cases, and the clustered cases may differ from sporadic cases on age and length of hospitalization. In addition, nucleic acids in feces last longer than those in oropharyngeal swabs.

scholarly journals Comparison of commercial RT-PCR diagnostic kits for COVID-19

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puck B. van Kasteren ◽  
Bas van der Veer ◽  
Sharon van den Brink ◽  
Lisa Wijsman ◽  
Jørgen de Jonge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Specific Method ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Accurate Identification ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity ◽  
Pcr Efficiency

ABSTRACTThe final months of 2019 witnessed the emergence of a novel coronavirus in the human population. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has since spread across the globe and is posing a major burden on society. Measures taken to reduce its spread critically depend on timely and accurate identification of virus-infected individuals by the most sensitive and specific method available, i.e. real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR). Many commercial kits have recently become available, but their performance has not yet been independently assessed.The aim of this study was to compare basic analytical and clinical performance of selected RT-PCR kits from seven different manufacturers (Altona Diagnostics, BGI, CerTest Biotec, KH Medical, PrimerDesign, R-Biopharm AG, and Seegene).We used serial dilutions of viral RNA to establish PCR efficiency and estimate the 95% limit of detection (LOD95%). Furthermore, we ran a panel of SARS-CoV-2-positive clinical samples (n=16) for a preliminary evaluation of clinical sensitivity. Finally, we used clinical samples positive for non-coronavirus respiratory viral infections (n=6) and a panel of RNA from related human coronaviruses to evaluate assay specificity.PCR efficiency was ≥96% for all assays and the estimated LOD95% varied within a 6-fold range. Using clinical samples, we observed some variations in detection rate between kits. Importantly, none of the assays showed cross-reactivity with other respiratory (corona)viruses, except as expected for the SARS-CoV-1 E-gene.We conclude that all RT-PCR kits assessed in this study may be used for routine diagnostics of COVID-19 in patients by experienced molecular diagnostic laboratories.

scholarly journals Performance evaluation of the point-of-care SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test for detection of SARS-CoV-2

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonny M Assennato ◽  
Allyson V Ritchie ◽  
Cesar Nadala ◽  
Neha Goel ◽  
Hongyi Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Patient Management ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Point Of Care Testing ◽  
Clinical Sensitivity

AbstractNucleic acid amplification for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory samples is the standard method for diagnosis. These tests are centralised and therefore turnaround times can be 2-5 days. Point-of-care testing with rapid turnaround times would allow more effective triage in settings where patient management and infection control decisions need to be made rapidly.Inclusivity and specificity of the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 assay was determined by in silico analyses of the primers and probes. Analytical and clinical sensitivity and specificity of the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test was evaluated for analytical sensitivity and specificity. Clinical performance was evaluated in residual clinical samples compared to the Public Health England reference tests.The limit of detection of the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test is 250 cp/mL and is specific for detection of 2 regions of the SARS-CoV-2 genome. The clinical sensitivity was evaluated in 172 clinical samples provided by the Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge (CMPHL), which showed a sensitivity of 98.9% (95% CI 94.03-99.97%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 95.55-100%), PPV of 100% and NPV of 98.78% (92.02-99.82%) compared to testing by CMPHLSAMBA detected 3 positive samples that were initially negative by PHE Test. The data shows that the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test performs equivalently to the centralised testing methods with a much quicker turnaround time. Point of care testing, such as SAMBA, should enable rapid patient management and effective implementation of infection control measures.

scholarly journals Evaluation of an Antigen Detection Rapid Diagnostic Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Clinical Samples

COVID ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 775-783
Author(s):  
Hoi-Ying Lam ◽  
Ka-Yi Leung ◽  
Ruiqi Zhang ◽  
Danlei Liu ◽  
Yujing Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Rapid Diagnostic Test ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Antigen Detection ◽  
Youden Index ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Large Scale Screening

Antigen detection rapid diagnostic tests have been developed for first-line large-scale screening given their rapidity, simplicity, and accuracy. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of an antigen detection rapid diagnostic test (BLOK BioScience, London, UK) detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein. Serially diluted SARS-CoV-2 isolate and 110 NPS from COVID-19 patients were tested to determine the test’s sensitivity, and other viral isolates and 20 NPS from non-infected individuals were, for specificity, also tested. Ten clinical samples from COVID-19 patients with SARS-CoV-2 variants, including alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and eta variants, were collected to evaluate the test’s potential application in detecting emerging variants. Overall sensitivity was 92%, and stratifying into viral loads yielded 100% for Ct < 25 samples including SARS-CoV-2 variants, but 11.11% for Ct ≥ 30 samples. The analytical sensitivity of log10 TCID50/mL 2.0 was identified for SARS-CoV-2. Ninety-seven percent specificity with only SARS-CoV cross-reactivity lead to the Youden index of 0.89. The rapid diagnostic test has a high sensitivity for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in high viral load samples, possibly including emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants, but reduced sensitivity in low viral load samples suggests its optimized usage as a complementary testing method to other tests, including RT-PCR or a point-of-care test for large-scale screening, particularly for pandemic areas or airport border infection control.

scholarly journals Polymethacrylate Sphere-Based Assay for Ultrasensitive miRNA Detection

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Samira Hosseini ◽  
Patricia Vázquez-Villegas ◽  
Richard C. Willson ◽  
Marco Rito-Palomares ◽  
Margarita Sanchez-Dominguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Breast Cancer Incidence ◽  
High Specific Surface Area ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Important Target ◽  
Target Analytes ◽  
High Sequence Homology ◽  
Mirna Detection ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Although microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as increasingly important target analytes, their biorecognition remains challenging due to their small size, high sequence homology, and low abundance in clinical samples. Nanospheres and microspheres have also gained increasing attention in biosensor applications due to their high specific surface area and the wide variety of compositions available. In this study, chemically designed and synthesized microspheres with active functional groups were used to promote effective miRNA immobilization resulting in better biorecognition. Upon conjugation with fluorescence-labeled complimentary probes, acylate-based spheres have indirectly detected MiR159, offering significantly enhanced analytical sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy while yielding a considerably low limit of detection (LOD) of 40 picomolar. Furthermore, MiR159 presence, which is known to be inversely correlated to breast cancer incidence and progression, was successfully detected in a competitive assay, which is promising for upgrading the current assay to clinical use.

scholarly journals Semi-Quantitative, Duplexed qPCR Assay for the Detection of Leishmania spp. Using Bisulphite Conversion Technology

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ineka Gow ◽  
Douglas Millar ◽  
John Ellis ◽  
John Melki ◽  
Damien Stark
Keyword(s):  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
World Health ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Acid Extraction ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Internal Transcribed Spacer Region ◽  
Leishmania Spp ◽  
Sensitivity Data ◽  
Conversion Technology

Leishmaniasis is caused by the flagellated protozoan Leishmania, and is a neglected tropical disease (NTD), as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Bisulphite conversion technology converts all genomic material to a simplified form during the lysis step of the nucleic acid extraction process, and increases the efficiency of multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) reactions. Through utilization of qPCR real-time probes, in conjunction with bisulphite conversion, a new duplex assay targeting the 18S rDNA gene region was designed to detect all Leishmania species. The assay was validated against previously extracted DNA, from seven quantitated DNA and cell standards for pan-Leishmania analytical sensitivity data, and 67 cutaneous clinical samples for cutaneous clinical sensitivity data. Specificity was evaluated by testing 76 negative clinical samples and 43 bacterial, viral, protozoan and fungal species. The assay was also trialed in a side-by-side experiment against a conventional PCR (cPCR), based on the Internal transcribed spacer region 1 (ITS1 region). Ninety-seven percent of specimens from patients that previously tested positive for Leishmania were positive for Leishmania spp. with the bisulphite conversion assay, and a limit of detection (LOD) of 10 copies per PCR was achieved, while the LOD of the ITS1 methodology was 10 cells/1000 genomic copies per PCR. This method of rapid, accurate and simple detection of Leishmania can lead to improved diagnosis, treatment and public health outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document