scholarly journals Implementation of Cancer Plans in the United States: A Review

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 291
Author(s):  
Michael W. Bacchus ◽  
Bobbie McKee ◽  
Clement K. Gwede ◽  
Christopher R. Cogle

State cancer plans facilitate prioritization and stakeholder engagement in preventing and controlling cancer. Implementation plans further help stakeholders prioritize efforts, reduce redundancy, and find opportunities for work synergies. A review of cancer plan implementations plans was performed in the development of an implementation plan for the Florida Cancer Plan. This review sought to identify, characterize, and summarize the use of implementation plans that support comprehensive cancer control activities. Although 100% of states and territories published a cancer plan and 78% of states provided funding for implementing their state cancer plans, only 32% published an implementation plan. Commonalities and unique features of state cancer plan implementations are presented and discussed. An example implementation plan is provided for states without a plan to model.

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1965-1965 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie S. Given ◽  
Karin Hohman ◽  
Madeline La Porta ◽  
Lori Belle-Isle ◽  
Phyllis Rochester

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathryn Murphy ◽  
Sydney Evans ◽  
Natoshia Askelson ◽  
Jan M. Eberth ◽  
Whitney E. Zahnd

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1718-1723 ◽  
Author(s):  
R W Frelick

PURPOSE To review the growth of community physicians' involvement in National Cancer Institute (NCI) clinical research trials as a significant contribution to cancer control, and to show their impact, not yet fully realized, on cancer morbidity and mortality in the United States. DESIGN Background information, based on the personal experience of participants, as well as a review of pertinent literature, portrays the evolution of the clinical research component of community oncology in the United States over the last 25 years. RESULTS Data from Community Clinical Oncology Programs (CCOPs) I and II have been used to outline some of the results of this far-reaching program. CONCLUSION The CCOP was introduced at an appropriate time to expand the clinical trial resources of the NCI, while at the same time helping community oncologists practice state-of-the-art cancer management found in the research protocols. This in turn provided improved resources to manage cancer patients, as most of them are treated in their own communities. CCOPs have also indirectly had a positive impact on the trial processes of the NCI cooperative groups and comprehensive cancer centers, and have helped to widen the scope and hasten progress in cancer-control research and practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document