scholarly journals Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness of Injury Prevention Interventions in Soccer—Evidence Why Health Agencies Should Address It

Author(s):  
Monika Grygorowicz ◽  
Martyna Wiernicka ◽  
Marzena Wiernicka

Soccer injuries are a recognized problem worldwide. Several injury prevention programs have been confirmed to reduce the number of injuries in female and male players. Unfortunately, there is a lack of data about their cost, burden, and benefit for the health care system. In this paper we aim to systematically review the literature and critically evaluate the economic quality of injury prevention interventions implemented across different populations of soccer players. Web of Science, Medline, SPORTDiscus, Ovid, and other databases were searched from January 2011 through July 2021. Research articles were only selected for analysis if they focused on the cost-effectiveness of injury prevention, were experimental papers written in English, and were published following the peer-review process. Three cluster RCT and one retrospective study met the criteria. Cost data on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were extracted. The included studies had a good/average quality of economic evaluation. Based on ICERs, injury prevention interventions were cost-effective in three out of the three comparisons. One study did not report the ICER value. However, since economic analyses were reported with varying methodological approaches and results, more data are required to recognize the cost-effectiveness of soccer-specific injury prevention interventions and their benefit for the health care system.

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Congly ◽  
Rhea A. Varughese ◽  
Crystal E. Brown ◽  
Fiona M. Clement ◽  
Lynora Saxinger

AbstractDespite COVID-19’s significant morbidity and mortality, considering cost-effectiveness of pharmacologic treatment strategies for hospitalized patients remains critical to support healthcare resource decisions within budgetary constraints. As such, we calculated the cost-effectiveness of using remdesivir and dexamethasone for moderate to severe COVID-19 respiratory infections using the United States health care system as a representative model. A decision analytic model modelled a base case scenario of a 60-year-old patient admitted to hospital with COVID-19. Patients requiring oxygen were considered moderate severity, and patients with severe COVID-19 required intubation with intensive care. Strategies modelled included giving remdesivir to all patients, remdesivir in only moderate and only severe infections, dexamethasone to all patients, dexamethasone in severe infections, remdesivir in moderate/dexamethasone in severe infections, and best supportive care. Data for the model came from the published literature. The time horizon was 1 year; no discounting was performed due to the short duration. The perspective was of the payer in the United States health care system. Supportive care for moderate/severe COVID-19 cost $11,112.98 with 0.7155 quality adjusted life-year (QALY) obtained. Using dexamethasone for all patients was the most-cost effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $980.84/QALY; all remdesivir strategies were more costly and less effective. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed dexamethasone for all patients was most cost-effective in 98.3% of scenarios. Dexamethasone for moderate-severe COVID-19 infections was the most cost-effective strategy and would have minimal budget impact. Based on current data, remdesivir is unlikely to be a cost-effective treatment for COVID-19.


Author(s):  
T. S. Teptsova ◽  
T. P. Bezdenezhnyh ◽  
V. K. Fedyaeva ◽  
N. Z Musina ◽  
G. R. Hachatryan ◽  
...  

The aim was to develop a methodology for determining the willingness to pay threshold (WTPT) and its upper limit value within the Russian health care system.Materials and methods. WTPT was calculated based on the shadow budget price (i. e. determining the WTPT by the suppling party). This method is an empirical assessment of the cost-effectiveness threshold that reflects the utmost productivity of the health care system, as determined from the relationship between changes in healthcare expenditure and health outcomes achieved. The state’s willingness to pay for improving their citizens’ healthcare was evaluated considering the population of the Russian Federation, mortality and life expectancy in different age and gender groups, as well as the volume of government spending. The cost of disability-adjusted life-year prevented (DALY) and the cost of quality-adjusted life-year saved (QALY) were determined by the suppling party, that is, they reflect the cost the state is willing to pay for improving the health of their population under conditions of limited budget. The described approach considers the performance of the country’s healthcare system over a certain period and the costs incurred in functioning of the system.Results. As part of this study, it was found that the cost of one additionally prevented DALY would be 313,878.21 rubles, and the cost of one additionally saved QALY – 365,060.31 rubles.Conclusion. The WTPT for medical technologies in the Russian Federation, determined by estimating the shadow budget price will amount to 313,878.21 rubles for one prevented DALY and 365 060,31 rubles for one saved QALY. With regard to clinical and economic analysis, medical technologies with the incremental cost-effectiveness indicator not exceeding the one calculated in this study can be seen as cost-effective. The obtained threshold value is a recommendation. A medical technology can be approved even with a WTPT higher than the recommended level, because this specific technology may have additional  advantages other than WTPT when compared with the reference technologies. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 78-79
Author(s):  
Mark Hofmeister ◽  
Robert Sheldon ◽  
Eldon Spackman ◽  
Satish Raj ◽  
Mario Talajic ◽  
...  

Introduction:For patients with bifascicular block and syncope of unknown origin, different American Heart Association guidelines give Class 2A recommendations for two treatments: the implantable loop recorder (ILR) and empiric pacemaker insertion (PM). Equipoise reflected in guidelines may contribute to uncertainty in management and inefficient resource use. The objective of this analysis is to determine the cost-effectiveness of ILR compared to PM in the management of older adults (age>50 years) with bifascicular block and syncope over two years, from the perspective of a Canadian publicly funded health care system, in the Syncope: Pacing or Recording In ThE Later Years (SPRITELY) trial.Methods:Resource utilization data was collected throughout the trial, and unit costs were assigned (2017 Canadian dollars). Utility was measured at baseline and annually with the EQ-5D-3L. Quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated as area-under-the-curve, and adjusted for baseline imbalances in utility. Confidence intervals for the incremental cost effectiveness ratio were generated with non-parametric bootstrapping.Results:Mean cost in participants randomized to PM was CAD 9,759 (USD 7,400), compared to CAD 13,453 (USD 10,200) in participants randomized to ILR. The ILR strategy resulted in 0.020 QALYs more than the PM strategy. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was CAD 186,553 (95% CI: −831,950–1,191,816) (USD 141,900, 95% CI: −632,740–906,440) per additional QALY. In 1,000 bootstrapped replicates, the cost of the ILR strategy was always greater than that of the PM strategy. At the threshold of CAD 50,000 (USD 38,000) per additional QALY, the probability that the ILR strategy is the cost effective option is 0.504.Conclusions:ILR costs were greater than PM costs, with little difference in QALY outcomes over two-years. Findings are generalizable to patients similar to SPRITELY participants, from the perspective of the Canadian health care system. However, practice pattern variation and payment systems inhibit generalizability to other countries. Future analysis will explore cost and QALY outcomes in countries that participated in the SPRITELY trial.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doug Coyle ◽  
Kathryn Coyle ◽  
Julie A Bettinger ◽  
Scott A Halperin ◽  
Wendy Vaudry ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: Rotavirus is the main cause of gastroenteritis in Canadian children younger than five years of age, resulting in significant morbidity and cost. The present study provides evidence on the cost effectiveness of two alternative rotavirus vaccinations (RotaTeq [Merck Frosst Canada Ltd, Canada] and Rotarix [GlaxoSmithKline, Canada]) available in Canada.METHODS: Analysis was conducted through a Markov model that followed a cohort of children from birth to five years of age. Analysis used pertinent data on the natural history of rotavirus and the effects of vaccination. Estimates of heath care costs for children requiring hospitalizations and emergency department visits were derived from the Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program, Active (IMPACT) surveillance, emergency department studies, as well as other Canadian studies. The model estimated the effect of vaccination on costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).RESULTS: The incremental cost per QALY gained from the health care system perspective was $122,000 for RotaTeq and $108,000 for Rotarix. From the societal perspective, both vaccination strategies were dominant – both cost saving and more effective. The cost-effectiveness of vaccination is dependent on the mode of administration, the perspective adopted and the cost of the vaccine.CONCLUSIONS: From a societal perspective, a universal vaccination program against rotavirus will be both cost saving and more effective than no vaccination. Becasue the majority of rotavirus infections do not require emergency department visits or hospital admission, from a health care system perspective, a program would not be considered cost effective.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2126-2126
Author(s):  
Hishaam Bhimji ◽  
Dean Eurich ◽  
Kerry Mansell ◽  
Holly Mansell

Background: Filgrastim was first introduced to the Canadian marketplace as Neupogen® in 1992 to treat neutropenia caused by chemotherapy regimens. In 2009, the first biosimilar drug was approved for use in Canada, and in March 2016, a biosimilar for filgrastim (Grastofil®) became available. Biosimilars represent safe, effective, and cost effective alternatives to originator biologic medications. However, although biosimilar medications present opportunities for significant cost savings to the health care system, overall uptake and use of biosimilar medications in North America has been low. The aim of this study was to describe the overall use of the filgrastim products Grastofil® and Neupogen® in Canada. Methods: A retrospective analysis of Canadian drug purchases between July 2016 and June 2018 was performed for the drug filgrastim (Neupogen®, Grastofil®). The data used to estimate drug purchases were obtained from IQVIA™, a multi-national healthcare analytics company. Samples from the IQVIA™ Canadian Drugstore and Hospital Purchases (CDH) audit covered greater than 88% of the hospital market and one-third of the retail market. Samples were stratified by region, market size, and type of outlet (e.g. cancer centers, long-term care). For each drug, the total purchase dollar amounts were provided by province on a month by month basis. Potential cost-savings were calculated as a product between the units of each product purchased and the cost difference between Neupogen® and the biosimilar Grastofil® on a quarterly basis for each province. Results: Between July 1st, 2016 and June 30th, 2018, Grastofil® accounted for 27.0% (382,254/1,415,762 units) of filgrastim purchases. During this time period, $62,061,576 was spent on Grastofil® purchases and $204,152,590 was spent on Neupogen® purchases. Through use of the biosimilar Grastofil®, $13,443,873 (37.0%) in savings were realized. Had there been 100% use of the biosimilar Grastofil®, it would have resulted in $36,348,476 in cost savings. In the first quarter (July to September 2016) Grastofil® accounted for 1.5% of filgrastim purchases, whereas in the April to June 2018 quarter it increased to 43.6% of filgrastim purchases. The overall percentage of filgrastim units purchased by Canadian province varied substantially. The market share captured by Grastofil® ranged from a low of 0.08% ($4007/$5,189,623) in the province of Nova Scotia, to a high of 81.62% ($932,864/$1,142,905) in the province of Saskatchewan. Canada's largest province, Ontario, saw Grastofil® account for 44.7% ($9,047,489/$20,229,421) of purchases during this time period. Discussion: Although the biosimilar Grastofil® only accounted for 27% of filgrastim purchases between 2016 and 2018, there was substantial growth over this time period. By the end of June 2018, Grastofil® accounted for approximately 44% of filgrastim purchases, which is substantially higher than other biosimilar medications currently available in Canada. There are also stark differences between each province, whereas some had little to no use of the biosimilar, whereby in other provinces the purchases of Grastofil® outnumbered the purchases of Neupogen®. Had there been exclusive use of the biosimilar, an additional $23 million dollars in savings could have been realized. Conclusions: The use of biosimilars represents an opportunity for cost savings to be realized in an over-extended health care system. Although there appears to be acceptance for the use of Grastofil® as the overall purchases trended up from 2016 to 2018, there are still significant cost savings that could be realized by greater use of biosimilar drugs. Disclosures Mansell: Apobiologix: Research Funding.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Constance Hilory Tomberlin

There are a multitude of reasons that a teletinnitus program can be beneficial, not only to the patients, but also within the hospital and audiology department. The ability to use technology for the purpose of tinnitus management allows for improved appointment access for all patients, especially those who live at a distance, has been shown to be more cost effective when the patients travel is otherwise monetarily compensated, and allows for multiple patient's to be seen in the same time slots, allowing for greater access to the clinic for the patients wishing to be seen in-house. There is also the patient's excitement in being part of a new technology-based program. The Gulf Coast Veterans Health Care System (GCVHCS) saw the potential benefits of incorporating a teletinnitus program and began implementation in 2013. There were a few hurdles to work through during the beginning organizational process and the initial execution of the program. Since the establishment of the Teletinnitus program, the GCVHCS has seen an enhancement in patient care, reduction in travel compensation, improvement in clinic utilization, clinic availability, the genuine excitement of the use of a new healthcare media amongst staff and patients, and overall patient satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document