scholarly journals Circulating miRNAs as Potential Biomarkers Distinguishing Relapsing–Remitting from Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 11887
Author(s):  
Sylwia Pietrasik ◽  
Angela Dziedzic ◽  
Elzbieta Miller ◽  
Michal Starosta ◽  
Joanna Saluk-Bijak
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Disease Subtype ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Relative Stabilization ◽  
Inflammatory Processes ◽  
State Of Research

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating neurodegenerative, highly heterogeneous disease with a variable course. The most common MS subtype is relapsing–remitting (RR), having interchanging periods of worsening and relative stabilization. After a decade, in most RR patients, it alters into the secondary progressive (SP) phase, the most debilitating one with no clear remissions, leading to progressive disability deterioration. Among the greatest challenges for clinicians is understanding disease progression molecular mechanisms, since RR is mainly characterized by inflammatory processes, while in SP, the neurodegeneration prevails. This is especially important because distinguishing RR from the SP subtype early will enable faster implementation of appropriate treatment. Currently, the MS course is not well-correlated with the biomarkers routinely used in clinical practice. Despite many studies, there are still no reliable indicators correlating with the disease stage and its activity degree. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) may be considered valuable molecules for the MS diagnosis and, presumably, helpful in predicting disease subtype. MiRNA expression dysregulation is commonly observed in the MS course. Moreover, knowledge of diverse miRNA panel expression between RRMS and SPMS may allow for deterring disability progression through successful treatment. Therefore, in this review, we address the current state of research on differences in miRNA panel expression between the phases.

scholarly journals Kallikreins are associated with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and promote neurodegeneration

2008 ◽  
Vol 389 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isobel A. Scarisbrick ◽  
Rachel Linbo ◽  
Alexander G. Vandell ◽  
Mark Keegan ◽  
Sachiko I. Blaber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Serine Proteases ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Neurite Retraction ◽  
Disability Status ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Potential Activity

Abstract Tissue kallikrein KLK1 and the kallikrein-related peptidases KLK2–15 are a subfamily of serine proteases that have defined or proposed roles in a range of central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS pathologies. To further understand their potential activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), serum levels of KLK1, 6, 7, 8 and 10 were determined in 35 MS patients and 62 controls by quantitative fluorometric ELISA. Serum levels were then correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores determined at the time of serological sampling or at last clinical follow-up. Serum levels of KLK1 and KLK6 were elevated in MS patients (p≤0.027), with highest levels associated with secondary progressive disease. Elevated KLK1 correlated with higher EDSS scores at the time of serum draw and KLK6 with future EDSS worsening in relapsing remitting patients (p≤0.007). Supporting the concept that KLK1 and KLK6 promote degenerative events associated with progressive MS, exposure of murine cortical neurons to either kallikrein promoted rapid neurite retraction and neuron loss. These novel findings suggest that KLK1 and KLK6 may serve as serological markers of progressive MS and contribute directly to the development of neurological disability by promoting axonal injury and neuron cell death.

scholarly journals Onset of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis is not influenced by current relapsing multiple sclerosis therapies

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 205521731878334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Coret ◽  
Francisco C Pérez-Miralles ◽  
Francisco Gascón ◽  
Carmen Alcalá ◽  
Arantxa Navarré ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapies ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Remitting Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background Disease-modifying therapies are thought to reduce the conversion rate to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Objective To explore the rate, chronology, and contributing factors of conversion to the progressive phase in treated relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Methods Our study included 204 patients treated for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis between 1995 and 2002, prospectively followed to date. Kaplan–Meier analysis was applied to estimate the time until secondary progressive multiple sclerosis conversion, and multivariate survival analysis with a Cox regression model was used to analyse prognostic factors. Results Relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients were continuously treated for 13 years (SD 4.5); 36.3% converted to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis at a mean age of 42.6 years (SD 10.6), a mean time of 8.2 years (SD 5.2) and an estimated mean time of 17.2 years (range 17.1–18.1). A multifocal relapse, age older than 34 years at disease onset and treatment failure independently predicted conversion to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis but did not influence the time to reach an Expanded Disability Status Scale of 6.0. Conclusions The favourable influence of disease-modifying therapies on long-term disability in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis is well established. However, the time to progression onset and the subsequent clinical course in treated patients seem similar to those previously reported in natural history studies. More studies are needed to clarify the effect of disease-modifying therapies once the progressive phase has been reached.

Hopelessness Ratings in Relapsing-Remitting and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

2002 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott B. Patten ◽  
Luanne M. Metz
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Exact Probability ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Trial Participants ◽  
Over Time

Objective: Two recent randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trials of interferon beta-1a in multiple sclerosis have obtained hopelessness ratings using the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). One of these studies, the PRISMS trial, evaluated interferon beta-1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Another, the SPECTRIMS trial, evaluated the same medication in secondary progressive (SP) MS. The objective of this analysis was to compare levels of hopelessness in persons with RRMS and SPMS, and to describe changes over time in the clinical trial participants. Method: Raw data from each clinical trial was obtained from the sponsor of the trials (Serono). Median BHS ratings, and the proportions at or above the BHS cut-point of 10 were calculated over a two (PRISMS) or three (SPECTRIMS) year period. Results: The analysis included n = 532 clinical trial participants. Ratings of hopelessness were higher in SPMS clinical trial participants (SPECTRIMS) than in the RRMS group (PRISMS) at baseline (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.0035). Furthermore, ratings of hopelessness were higher during follow-up than at baseline, in the SPMS group (McNemar's exact probability, p = 0.0015), but not in the RRMS group (McNemar's exact probability, p = 0.65). Depression was strongly associated with hopelessness in both RRMS ( z = 4.13, p < 0.001) and SPMS ( z = 5.24, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Hopelessness is associated with SPMS, and may increase over time in this group. Hopelessness may influence suicide risk in people with MS and may potentially have an impact on coping and quality of life. Additional research is necessary to define the clinical implications of hopelessness in persons with this condition.

T1 relaxation maps allow differentiation between pathologic tissue subsets in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 556-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Castriota-Scanderbeg ◽  
F Fasano ◽  
M Filippi ◽  
C Caltagirone
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Relaxation Times ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Group ◽  
Secondary Progressive ◽  
Normal Appearing White Matter ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Normal White Matter

In an attempt to clarify whether T1 relaxation time mapping may assist in characterizing the pathological brain tissue substrate of multiple sclerosis (MS), we compared the T1 relaxation times of lesions, areas of normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) located proximal to lesions, and areas of NAWM located distant from lesions in 12 patients with the relapsing-remitting and 12 with the secondary progressive (SP) subtype of disease. Nine healthy volunteers served as controls. Calculated mean T1 values were averaged across all patients within each clinical group, and comparisons were made by means of the Mann-Whitney U-test. Significant differences were found between all investigated brain regions within each clinical subgroup. Significant differences were also detected for each investigated brain region among clinical subgroups. While T1 values of NAWM were significantly higher in patients with SP disease than in normal white matter (NWM) of controls, no differences were detected when corresponding brain areas of patients with RR MS were compared with NWM of controls. T1 maps identify areas of the brain that are damaged to a different extent in patients with MS, and may be of help in monitoring disease progression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document