scholarly journals Impact of BCR-ABL1 Transcript Type on Response, Treatment-Free Remission Rate and Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated with Imatinib

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3146
Author(s):  
Sílvia Marcé ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
Olga García ◽  
Marta Cabezón ◽  
Natalia Estrada ◽  
...  

The most frequent BCR-ABL1-p210 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are e14a2 and e13a2. Imatinib (IM) is the most common first-line tyrosine–kinase inhibitor (TKI) used to treat CML. Some studies suggest that BCR-ABL1 transcript types confer different responses to IM. The objective of this study was to correlate the expression of e14a2 or e13a2 to clinical characteristics, cumulative cytogenetic and molecular responses to IM, acquisition of deep molecular response (DMR) and its duration (sDMR), progression rate (CIP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-free remission (TFR) rate. We studied 202 CML patients, 76 expressing the e13a2 and 126 the e14a2, and correlated the differential transcript expression with the above-mentioned parameters. There were no differences in the cumulative incidence of cytogenetic responses nor in the acquisition of DMR and sDMR between the two groups, but the e14a2 transcript had a positive impact on molecular response during the first 6 months, whereas the e13a2 was associated with improved long-term OS. No correlation was observed between the transcript type and TFR rate.

Leukemia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Timothy P. Hughes ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Dong-Wook Kim ◽  
Surapol Issaragrisil ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the ENESTnd study, with ≥10 years follow-up in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase, nilotinib demonstrated higher cumulative molecular response rates, lower rates of disease progression and CML-related death, and increased eligibility for treatment-free remission (TFR). Cumulative 10-year rates of MMR and MR4.5 were higher with nilotinib (300 mg twice daily [BID], 77.7% and 61.0%, respectively; 400 mg BID, 79.7% and 61.2%, respectively) than with imatinib (400 mg once daily [QD], 62.5% and 39.2%, respectively). Cumulative rates of TFR eligibility at 10 years were higher with nilotinib (300 mg BID, 48.6%; 400 mg BID, 47.3%) vs imatinib (29.7%). Estimated 10-year overall survival rates in nilotinib and imatinib arms were 87.6%, 90.3%, and 88.3%, respectively. Overall frequency of adverse events was similar with nilotinib and imatinib. By 10 years, higher cumulative rates of cardiovascular events were reported with nilotinib (300 mg BID, 16.5%; 400 mg BID, 23.5%) vs imatinib (3.6%), including in Framingham low-risk patients. Overall efficacy and safety results support the use of nilotinib 300 mg BID as frontline therapy for optimal long-term outcomes, especially in patients aiming for TFR. The benefit-risk profile in context of individual treatment goals should be carefully assessed.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4102
Author(s):  
Frédéric Millot ◽  
Meinolf Suttorp ◽  
Stéphanie Ragot ◽  
Guy Leverger ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
...  

Within the International Registry of Childhood Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML), we identified 18 patients less than 18 years old at diagnosis of CML who were in the chronic phase and exhibiting a sustained deep molecular response (DMR) to imatinib defined as BCR-ABL1/ABL1 < 0.01% (MR4) for at least two years followed by discontinuation of imatinib. Before discontinuation, the median duration of imatinib was 73.2 months (range, 32–109) and the median duration of MR4 was 46.2 months (range, 23.9–98.6). Seven patients experienced loss of major molecular response (MMR) 4.1 months (range, 1.9–6.4) after stopping and so restarted imatinib. The median molecular follow-up after discontinuation was 51 months (range, 6–100) for the nine patients without molecular relapse. The molecular free remission rate was 61% (95% CI, 38–83%), 56% (95% CI, 33–79%) and 56% (95% CI, 33–79%) at 6, 12 and 36 months, respectively. Six of the seven children who experienced molecular relapse after discontinuation regained DMR (median, 4.7 months; range, 2.5–18) after restarting imatinib. No withdrawal syndrome was observed. In univariate analysis, age, sex, Sokal and ELTS scores, imatinib treatment and DMR durations before discontinuation had no influence on treatment free remission. These data suggest that imatinib can be safely discontinued in children with sustained MR4 for at least two years.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3099-3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Glauche ◽  
Hendrik Liebscher ◽  
Christoph Baldow ◽  
Matthias Kuhn ◽  
Philipp Schulze ◽  
...  

Abstract Predicting minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients is of major clinical relevance. The reason is that residual leukemic (stem) cells are the source for both, potential relapses of the leukemicclone but also for its clonal evolution and, therefore, for the occurrence of resistance. The state-of-the art method for monitoring MRD in TKI-treated CML is the quantification of BCR-ABL levels in the peripheral blood (PB) by PCR. However, the question is whether BCR-ABL levels in the PB can be used as a reliable estimate for residual leukemic cells at the level of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow (BM). Moreover, once the BCR-ABL levels have been reduced to undetectable levels, information on treatment kinetics is censored by the PCR detection limit. Clearly, BCR-ABL negativity in the PB suggests very low levels of residual disease also in the BM, but whether the MRD level remains at a constant level or decreases further cannot be read from the BCR-ABL negativity itself. Thus, also the prediction of a suitable time point for treatment cessation based on residual disease levels cannot be obtained from PCR monitoring in the PB and currently remains a heuristic decision. To overcome the current lack of a suitable biomarker for residual disease levels in the BM, we propose the application of a computational approach to quantitatively describe and predict long-term BCR-ABL levels. The underlying mathematical model has previously been validated by the comparison to more than 500 long-term BCR-ABL kinetics in the PB from different clinical trials under continuous TKI-treatment [1,2,3]. Here, we present results that show how this computational approach can be used to estimate MRD levels in the BM based on the measurements in the PB. Our results demonstrate that the mathematical model can quantitatively reproduce the cumulative incidence of the loss of deep and major molecular response in a population of patients, as published by Mahon et al. [4] and Rousselot et al. [5]. Furthermore, to demonstrate how the model can be used to predict the BCR-ABL levels and to estimate the molecular relapse probability of individual patients, we compare simulation results with more than 70 individual BCR-ABL-kinetics. For this analysis we use patient data from different clinical studies (e.g. EURO-SKI: NCT01596114, STIM(s): NCT00478985, NCT01343173) where TKI-treatment had been stopped after prolonged deep molecular response periods. Specifically, we propose to combine statistical (non-linear regression) and mechanistic (agent-based) modelling techniques, which allows us to quantify the reliability of model predictions by confidence regions based on the quality (i.e. number and variance) of the clinical measurements and on the particular kinetic response characteristics of individual patients. The proposed approach has the potential to support clinical decision making because it provides quantitative, patient-specific predictions of the treatment response together with a confidence measure, which allows to judge the amount of information that is provided by the theoretical prediction. References [1] Roeder et al. (2006) Dynamic modeling of imatinib-treated chronic myeloid leukemia: functional insights and clinical implications, Nat Med 12(10):1181-4 [2] Horn et al. (2013) Model-based decision rules reduce the risk of molecular relapse after cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia, Blood 121(2):378-84. [3] Glauche et al. (2014) Model-Based Characterization of the Molecular Response Dynamics of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI)-Treated CML Patients a Comparison of Imatinib and Dasatinib First-Line Therapy, Blood 124:4562 [4] Mahon et al. (2010) Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 11(11):1029-35 [5] Rousselot 
et al. (2014) Loss of major molecular response as a trigger for restarting TKI therapy in patients with CP- CML who have stopped Imatinib after durable undetectable disease, JCO 32(5):424-431 Disclosures Glauche: Bristol Meyer Squib: Research Funding. von Bubnoff:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Saussele:ARIAD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants; BMS: Honoraria, Other: Travel grants, Research Funding. Mustjoki:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Guilhot:CELEGENE: Consultancy. Mahon:NOVARTIS PHARMA: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; PFIZER: Honoraria; ARIAD: Honoraria. Roeder:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jew Win Kuan ◽  
Kian Meng Chang ◽  
Chin Lee Phan ◽  
Shu Ping Wong ◽  
Soo Min Lim ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundInterferon (IFN) is a logical possibility to increase treatment free remission (TFR) rate in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We conducted the first randomized controlled trial comparing the use of pegIFN versus observation in CML patients attempting TFR.MethodsAdult CML patients with stable deep molecular response for ≥ 2 years with ≥ 2 readings of MR4.5 were randomized into two arms -- subcutaneous pegIFN-α-2a starting at 180 µg weekly for a year, followed by observation, or observation.ResultsA total of 30 patients were recruited (pegIFN n = 15, observation n = 15). Median follow-up was 38.1 months (range 15.9–49.4) and 23.8 (1.5–51.0) in pegIFN and observation arm, respectively. A total of 11 patients relapsed (pegIFN n = 4, observation n = 7). The median time of relapse was 13.1 months (range 9.2 to 25.5) and 4.4 (1.2 to 13.6) in pegIFN and observation arm, respectively. Only 8 out of 15 (53%) patients completed 52 doses of pegIFN with mean dose of 43 out of 52 doses (range 20 to 52). Dose of tolerable pegIFN was age dependent.ConclusionPegIFN is a potential consolidative therapy to increase TFR.Trial registration:(1) Malaysia National Medical Research Register (NMRR): NMRR-13-1186-15491. Approved 23rd September 2014, https://www.nmrr.gov.my/fwbLoginPage.jsp(2) ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02381379. Registered on 24th Feb 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT02381379&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5913-5913
Author(s):  
Tara Rajendran ◽  
Prasad Pramod Rane ◽  
Krishna Prasad

INTRODUCTION There has been a quantum leap in the research of inhibitor drugs following the discovery of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKIs), Imatinib in the early 1990s. The development of Imatinib, the first BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor revolutionized the long term outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients. CML is one of the most common hematological malignancies diagnosed in India. The breathtaking success due to effectiveness and financial viability of Imatinib among Indian population even led to its sale in its generic formulations by pharmaceutical companies in India around early 2000s. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective observational study conducted among 232 CML patients diagnosed and followed up over 12 years from 2003 until 2015 at Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Mangalore, Manipal University, Karnataka, India. We closely analyzed the handwritten files and the electronic medical records of each of 232 CML patients for their demographic details, symptoms, date of diagnosis, blood counts, bone marrow reports, spleen size at diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular reports, date - dosage - change in dose - resistance - side-effects of Imatinib and outcome. Patients were followed up closely. Results Median age was 44 years (range, 10 -78 years). In the year of 2008-2012, 46.1% of patients diagnosed with CML. 66.4% were male and 33.6% were female. During the first evaluation of patients at the time of diagnosis, 90.9% of patients were in the chronic phase, 4.7% in accelerated phase and 4.3% in blast phase. 97.8% were started on Imatinib orally as first line. 176 (75.9) patients received 400 mg orally. Five patients chose not to be treated. The most common side effect of Imatinib among patients were as follows: abdominal pain (13.3%), fever (10.8%), general weakness (4.7%), blurred vision (4.7%), abdominal distention (3.4%) and joint pain (2.2%). Response to treatment with Imatinib was evaluated in terms of molecular response as measured by real-time RT Q-PCR. The 3.4% who failed to respond to Imatinib, 3.4% patients were started with second-generation TKI's (dasatinib, nilotinib, hyper CVAD cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Adriamycin and dexamethasone). The first choice for switching TKI therapy in 4 (1.7%) patients were dasatinib, in (3.1%) was nilotinib and only one patient had to use Hyper CVAD chemotherapy. Table has summarized the use of second-generation TKI's. One patient expired and 4 has progression. 181(78.0%) patients came throughout the year of 2015. Among all patients 200 (86.2%) are still alive with disease, 18 (7.8%) are alive without disease and 14 (6.0%) were expired. Overall survival (OAS) is 218 (96%) Progression free survival (86.78%). The median BCR ABL/ABL value at the end of the six months was 11% and at the end of the one year was 3.38%. Conclusion The introduction of Imatinib mesylate had phenomenal changes in the management of CML. Molecular response evaluation after six months can predict the subsequent molecular response and can also be used as a surrogate monitor of the marrow cytogenetic response to imatinib therapy in CML. We report a high overall (OAS) and progress free survival (PFR) rates with very less side effects. Table Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Mireille Crampe ◽  
Claire Andrews ◽  
Anne Fortune ◽  
Stephen E. Langabeer

The introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib has revolutionised the outlook of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML); however, a significant proportion of patients develop resistance through several mechanisms, of which acquisition of ABL1 kinase domain mutations is prevalent. In chronic-phase patients, these mutations become evident early in the disease course. A case is described of a chronic-phase CML patient who achieved a sustained, deep molecular response but who developed an Y253H ABL1 kinase domain mutation nearly nine years after commencing imatinib. Switching therapy to bosutinib resulted in a rapid reachievement of a major molecular response. Long-term TKI treatment impacts on quality of life and late losses of responses are usually due to lack of adherence. This case highlights the requirement for ABL1 kinase domain mutation analysis in those CML patients on long-term imatinib who lost their molecular response, regardless of whether nonadherence is suspected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1214-1222
Author(s):  
Georg Greiner ◽  
Franz Ratzinger ◽  
Michael Gurbisz ◽  
Nadine Witzeneder ◽  
Hossein Taghizadeh ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundMonitoring of molecular response (MR) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BCR-ABL1 is a pivotal tool for guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and the long-term follow-up of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Results of MR monitoring are standardized according to the International Scale (IS), and specific time-dependent molecular milestones for definition of optimal response and treatment failure have been included in treatment recommendations. The common practice to use peripheral blood (PB) instead of bone marrow (BM) aspirate to monitor the MR monitoring in CML has been questioned. Some studies described differences between BCR-ABL1 levels in paired PB and BM specimens.MethodsWe examined 631 paired PB and BM samples from 283 CML patients in a retrospective single-center study using an IS normalized quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR assay for quantification of BCR-ABL1IS.ResultsA good overall concordance of BCR-ABL1IS results was found, a systematic tendency towards higher BCR-ABL1IS levels in PB was observed in samples of CML patients in a major MR. This difference was most pronounced in patients treated with imatinib for at least 1 year. Importantly, the difference resulted in a significantly lower rate of deep MR when BCR-ABL1IS was assessed in the PB compared to BM aspirates.ConclusionsIn summary, our data suggest that the classification of deep MR in patients with CML is more stringent in PB than in BM. Our study supports the current practice to primarily use PB for long-term molecular follow-up monitoring in CML.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Langabeer ◽  
Rehman Faryal ◽  
Michael O’Dwyer ◽  
Sorcha Ní Loingsigh

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) has revolutionised the management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) over the last twenty years, but despite significant improvements in survival, patients exhibit long-term side effects that impact on quality of life. A major advance in CML management has been the ability to discontinue TKI therapy achieving a treatment-free remission (TFR), yet this option is only available to eligible patients who present with low-risk disease and who subsequently attain deep and sustained molecular responses. A case is described of a patient with CML who self-initiated stopping of TKI therapy when in a less than optimal molecular remission. Despite this action, the patient continues to experience a TFR with prospective close molecular monitoring performed. It is emphasized that this approach may lead to ineffective treatment discontinuation, molecular relapse, and increased patient anxiety. As TFR for patients with CML moves from clinical trials into routine clinical practice, emphasis is placed on adherence to (evolving) guidelines critical to ensure optimal counselling, selection, monitoring, and continued management of patients whether TFR is successful or not.


Haematologica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 2730-2737
Author(s):  
Susan Branford

The primary goal of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is survival, which is achieved by the vast majority of patients. The initial response to therapy provides a sensitive measure of future clinical outcome. Measurement of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction standardized to the international reporting scale is now the principal recommended monitoring strategy. The method is used to assess early milestone responses and provides a guide for therapeutic intervention. When patients successfully traverse the critical first 12 months of TKI therapy, most will head towards another milestone response, deep molecular response (DMR, BCR-ABL1 ≤0.01%). DMR is essential for patients aiming to achieve treatment-free remission and a prerequisite for a trial of TKI discontinuation. The success of discontinuation trials has led to new treatment strategies in order for more patients to reach this milestone response. DMR has been incorporated into endpoints of clinical trials and is considered by some expert groups as the optimal treatment response. But is DMR a stable response and does it provide the ultimate protection against TKI resistance and death? Do we need to increase the sensitivity of detection of BCR-ABL1 to better identify the patients who would likely remain in treatment-free remission after TKI discontinuation? Is it necessary to switch current TKI therapy to a more potent inhibitor if the goal is to achieve DMR? These are issues that I will explore in this review.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document