scholarly journals The Role of Prostate Combination Biopsy Consisting of Targeted and Additional Systematic Biopsy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4804
Author(s):  
Chung Un Lee ◽  
Joongwon Choi ◽  
Si Hyun Sung ◽  
Jae Hoon Chung ◽  
Wan Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Repeat Biopsy ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Imaging ◽  
Initial Biopsy ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Background: To identify the role of combination biopsy, which consists of both targeted and additional systematic cores, in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with PSA levels 2.5–15 ng/mL who have a suspicious prostate lesion (with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥ 3) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) between January 2016 and December 2018. We analyzed biopsy results by PI-RADS score and biopsy methods (systematic, targeted, and combination biopsy). Results: Of the 711 total patients, an average of 4.0 ± 1.8 targeted and 8.6 ± 3.1 additional systematic biopsies were performed. The additional systematic biopsies were sampled outside the targeted biopsy area. The combination biopsies detected more csPCa (201 patients, 28.3%) than did the targeted (175 patients, 24.6%) or systematic (124 patients, 17.4%) biopsies alone (p < 0.001). In the initial biopsy samples, there was a 7% increase in the detection of csPCa than in targeted biopsy (62% to 69%). It increased by 11% in repeat biopsy (46% to 57%). There was no statistical significance in both groups (p = 0.3174). Conclusions: Combination biopsy has the benefit of detecting csPCa in both initial and repeat biopsy when there is a suspicious lesion on mpMRI.

scholarly journals Evaluating the efficacy of a low-cost, minimally-invasive cognitive MRI targeted biopsy protocol in the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 era.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Takeshima ◽  
Yoshinori Tanaka ◽  
Kotaro Takemura ◽  
Shusaku Nakazono ◽  
Eiko Yamashita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Data System ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Imaging ◽  
Biopsy Protocol ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Abstract Background: New MRI-guided targeting biopsy methods have increased cancer yield of prostate biopsies. However, cost and time constraints have made it difficult for many institutions to implement these newer methods. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of a low-cost, minimally-invasive, cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy protocol based on 1.5T multiparametric MRI graded with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 that is easily implemented in any low- to intermediate- volume center. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 255 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between December 2016 and March 2019 at a single facility. Indication for biopsy was based on clinical parameters including 1.5T multiparametric MRI. In addition to 10-core systematic biopsy, targeted cores were obtained with cognitive recognition under ultrasound. A control group of 198 patients biopsied without prior MRI from January to December 2015 was also analyzed. Results: Prostate biopsy preceded by MRI had a significantly higher probability of detecting both prostate cancer (68.1% vs. 43.6%) and clinically significant cancer (56.2% vs. 29.4%) (p values< 0.01). Combination of systematic biopsy and targeted biopsy outperformed either regimen alone for detection of prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis showed PSA density and prostate imaging reporting and data system score were independent risk factors of prostate cancer. A proposed diagnostic model showed sensitivity of 88.6%, specificity of 55%, PPV of 81.2%, NPV of 68.8%, and accuracy of 78%. Prostate imaging reporting and data system score was correlated with a higher presence of prostate cancer, clinically significant prostate cancer, and a higher pathological grade. Conclusions: Incorporation of pre-biopsy MRI imaging, scoring, and targeted biopsy improved cancer yield and achieved diagnostic performance comparable to newer methods of higher cost. Future alterations of possible benefit included increasing the number of target cores per lesion, and combining prostate imaging reporting and data system score and PSA density as indicators for biopsy.

MRI-US fusion targeted biopsy results in patients with a history of a prior negative biopsy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
Cayce Nawaf ◽  
Amanda Lu ◽  
James Rosoff ◽  
Jeffrey Weinreb ◽  
Peter Schulam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
History Of ◽  
Biopsy Methods ◽  
Clinically Significant

90 Background: Patients with an elevated PSA but negative prostate biopsy present a diagnostic and management dilemma. We evaluated the capability of multi-parametric (MP) MRI and MRI-USG Fusion prostate biopsy to detect clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer in men who have had a prior negative 12-core standard biopsy. Methods: Between 12/2012 and 06/2015, 374 men with an indication for prostate biopsy underwent pre-biopsy mpMRI followed by 12-core standard trans-rectal mapping biopsy (Mbx) and MRI-Ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (Tbx) of lesions identified on mpMRI. The combination of Mbx and Tbx, when both occurred, constitutes a fusion biopsy (Fbx). Men who underwent both Mbx with or without Tbx using the Artemis/Pro-Fuse system with a previous biopsy but no diagnosis of prostate cancer were included. Patients without a lesion on MRI underwent Mbx only. Maximum Gleason scores (GS) was assigned on a per patient basis with Mbx GS available for all patients in the cohort and Tbx GS available only for patients with a lesion visible on MP-MRI. CS cancer was defined as GS ≥ 3+4. GS per patient was compared by chi-square and McNemar’s test. Results: 138 men (mean age = 64.0, mean psa = 11.6) met inclusion criteria. Fbx cancer detection rate in this population was 42%. 17 men (12%) were missed by Mbx but picked up on Tbx. Of these 17 men, 13 had Gleason ≥ 7.In comparison, 15 men were missed by Tbx, but only 2 were Gleason ≥ 7. Tbx had a higher rate of detection of CS cancer than Mbx, but this did not reach statistical significance (86% vs 68%, p = 0.09). MRI suspicion level correlated with the detection of CS cancer (p = 0.012). None of the 20 men with a negative MRI had GS ≥ 7 cancer detected on Mbx. The number of prior negative biopsies was not related to the likelihood of finding CS cancer on Fbx (p = 0.47). Conclusions: MRI suspicion score predicts detection of CS prostate cancer when paired with MRI-USG Fbx of the prostate, with a negative MRI correlating with no evidence of CS cancer on biopsy. MRI is a biomarker in this population that may, with more corroborative data, allow for men with a negative MRI to avoid repeat biopsies. [Table: see text]

Does PSA level affect the choice of prostate puncture methods among MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy, transrectal ultrasound systematic biopsy or the combination of both?

2021 ◽  
pp. 20210312
Author(s):  
Yunyun Liu ◽  
Lin Dong ◽  
Lihua Xiang ◽  
Boyang Zhou ◽  
Hanxiang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Detection Approach ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Histopathological Results ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Objectives: To explore whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) affects the choice of prostate puncture methods by comparing MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) with transrectal ultrasound systematic biopsy (TRUS-SBx) in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa), clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and non-clinically significant prostate cancer (nsPCa) in different PSA groups (<10.0,10.0–20.0 and>20.0 ng ml−1). Methods: A total of 190 patients with 215 lesions who underwent both MRI-TBx and TRUS-SBx were included in this retrospective study. PSA was measured pre-operatively and stratified to three levels. The detection rates of PCa, csPCa and nsPCa through different methods (MRI-TBx, TRUS-SBx, or MRI-TBx +TRUS SBx) were compared with stratification by PSA. Results: Among the 190 patients, the histopathological results revealed PCa in 126 cases, including 119 csPCa. In PSA <10.0 ng ml−1 group, although the detection rates of PCa and csPCa by MRI-TBx were higher than those of TRUS-SBx, no significant differences were observed (p = 0.741; p = 0.400). In PSA 10.0–20.0 ng ml−1 group, difference between the detection rate of csPCa with TRUS-SBx and the combined method was statistically significant (p = 0.044). As for PSA >20.0 ng ml−1, MRI-TBx had a higher csPCa rate than TRUS-SBx with no statistical significance noted (p = 0.600). Conclusion: MRI-TBx combined with TRUS-SBx could be suitable as a standard detection approach for csPCa in patients with PSA 10.0–20.0 ng ml−1. As for PSA >20.0 and <10.0 ng ml−1, both MRI-TBx and TRUS-SBx might provide effective solutions for tumor detection. Advances in knowledge: This study gives an account of choosing appropriate prostate puncture methods through PSA level.

scholarly journals Study protocol for a single-centre non-inferior randomised controlled trial on a novel three-dimensional matrix positioning-based cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy and software-based fusion-targeted biopsy for the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in men without a prior biopsy

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e041427
Author(s):  
Biming He ◽  
Rongbing Li ◽  
Dongyang Li ◽  
Liqun Huang ◽  
Xiaofei Wen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Multiparametric Mri ◽  
Fusion Method ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Cognitive Fusion ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionThe classical pathway for diagnosing prostate cancer is systematic 12-core biopsy under the guidance of transrectal ultrasound, which tends to underdiagnose the clinically significant tumour and overdiagnose the insignificant disease. Another pathway named targeted biopsy is using multiparametric MRI to localise the tumour precisely and then obtain the samples from the suspicious lesions. Targeted biopsy, which is mainly divided into cognitive fusion method and software-based fusion method, is getting prevalent for its good performance in detecting significant cancer. However, the preferred targeted biopsy technique in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer between cognitive fusion and software-based fusion is still beyond consensus.Methods and analysisThis trial is a prospective, single-centre, randomised controlled and non-inferiority study in which all men suspicious to have clinically significant prostate cancer are included. This study aims to determine whether a novel three-dimensional matrix positioning cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy is non-inferior to software-based fusion-targeted biopsy in the detection rate of clinically significant cancer in men without a prior biopsy. The main inclusion criteria are men with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen above 4–20 ng/mL or with an abnormal digital rectal examination and have never had a biopsy before. A sample size of 602 participants allowing for a 10% loss will be recruited. All patients will undergo a multiparametric MRI examination, and those who fail to be found with a suspicious lesion, with the anticipation of half of the total number, will be dropped. The remaining participants will be randomly allocated to cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy (n=137) and software-based fusion-targeted biopsy (n=137). The primary outcome is the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for cognitive fusion-targeted biopsy and software-based fusion-targeted biopsy in men without a prior biopsy. The clinically significant prostate cancer will be defined as the International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 or higher.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. The results of the study will be disseminated and published in international peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04271527).

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Ginsburg Scheme: Where Is Significant Prostate Cancer Missed?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2502
Author(s):  
August Sigle ◽  
Cordula A. Jilg ◽  
Timur H. Kuru ◽  
Nadine Binder ◽  
Jakob Michaelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Anterior Region ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Background: Systematic biopsy (SB) according to the Ginsburg scheme (GBS) is widely used to complement MRI-targeted biopsy (MR-TB) for optimizing the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (sPCa). Knowledge of the GBS’s blind sectors where sPCa is missed is crucial to improve biopsy strategies. Methods: We analyzed cancer detection rates in 1084 patients that underwent MR-TB and SB. Cancerous lesions that were missed or underestimated by GBS were re-localized onto a prostate map encompassing Ginsburg sectors and blind-sectors (anterior, central, basodorsal and basoventral). Logistic regression analysis (LRA) and prostatic configuration analysis were applied to identify predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Results: GBS missed sPCa in 39 patients (39/1084, 3.6%). In 27 cases (27/39, 69.2%), sPCa was missed within a blind sector, with 17/39 lesions localized in the anterior region (43.6%). Neither LRA nor prostatic configuration analysis identified predictors for missing sPCa with the GBS. Conclusions: This is the first study to analyze the distribution of sPCa missed by the GBS. GBS misses sPCa in few men only, with the majority localized in the anterior region. Adding blind sectors to GBS defined a new sector map of the prostate suited for reporting histopathological biopsy results.

mpMRI-targeted biopsy versus systematic biopsy for clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Baccaglini ◽  
Felipe P.A. Glina ◽  
Cristiano L. Pazeto ◽  
Wanderley M. Bernardo ◽  
Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Targeted Biopsy ◽  
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Systematic Biopsy

Comparison of Improvacuter™ tubes with BD Vacutainer™ tubes for various hormones in the aspects of stability and influence of gel separators

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cevdet Zungun ◽  
Fatma MeriÇ Yılmaz ◽  
Elif Guney Boru ◽  
Canan Topcuoglu
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Blood Collection ◽  
Laboratory Results ◽  
Analytical Range ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Lower Limits ◽  
Blood Collection Tubes ◽  
Clot Activator

AbstractValidation of blood collection tubes are important to determine the role of different collection tubes which influence the assurance of laboratory results. We compared two different tubes (ImprovacuterWe compared the results of nine immunoassays performed on UniCelEstradiol and testosterone concentrations obtained from Improvacuter Gel and Clot Activator tubes and BD Vacutainer SST II Advance tubes remained below the lower limits of analytical range for the same analytes while they were within the limits in BD Vacutainer Clot Activator tubes and Improvacuter tubes. Statistical significance of stability was not clinically significant for the hormone parameters we tested in all four tubes.Gel containing tubes (both BD and Improve) gave comparable results with the tubes which do not contain gel except for estradiol and testosterone. The use of gel containing tubes for estradiol and testosterone are not recommended on UniCel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document