scholarly journals Six-Month Predictive Value of Diuretic Resistance Formulas in Discharged Heart Failure Patients after an Acute Decompensation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2932
Author(s):  
Mauro Feola ◽  
Arianna Rossi ◽  
Marzia Testa ◽  
Cinzia Ferreri ◽  
Alberto Palazzuoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Acute Decompensation ◽  
Diuretic Response

Background. The diuretic response has been shown to be a robust independent marker of cardiovascular outcomes in acute heart failure patients. The objectives of this clinical research are to analyze two different formulas (diuretic response (DR) or response to diuretic (R-to-D)) in predicting 6-month clinical outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients discharged alive after an acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) were enrolled. All patients underwent N-terminal-pro hormone BNP (NT-proBNP) and an echocardiogram together with DR and R-to-D calculation during diuretic administration. Death by any cause, cardiac transplantation and worsening heart failure (HF) requiring readmission to hospital were considered cardiovascular events. Results: 263 patients (62% male, age 78 years) were analyzed at 6-month follow-up. During the follow-up 58 (22.05%) events were scheduled. Patients who experienced CV-event had a worse renal function (p = 0.001), a higher NT-proBNP (p = 0.001), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01), DR (p = 0.02) and R-to-D (p = 0.03). Spearman rho’s correlation coefficient showed a strong direct correlation between DR and R to D in all patients (r = 0.93; p < 0.001) and both in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) and HF preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (r = 0.91; p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, a value of R-to-D <1.69 kg/40 mg, but only <0.67 kg/40 mg for DR were significantly related to poor 6-month outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses demonstrated that DR and R-to-D are equivalent in predicting prognosis (area under curve (AUC): 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). Only R-to-D was inversely related to in-hospital stay (r = −0.23; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Adding diuresis to DR seemed to provide a better risk assessment in alive HF patients discharged after an acute decompensation.

scholarly journals Study protocol for the PURSUIT-HFpEF study: a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e038294
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Suna ◽  
Shungo Hikoso ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Masaaki Uematsu ◽  
Yoshio Yasumura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

IntroductionNeither the pathophysiology nor an effective treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been elucidated to date. The purpose of this ongoing study is to elucidate the pathophysiology and prognostic factors for patients with HFpEF admitted to participating institutes. We also aim to obtain insights into the development of new diagnostic and treatment methods by analysing patient background factors, clinical data and follow-up information.Methods and analysisThis study is a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients aged ≥20 years admitted due to acute decompensated heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) and elevated N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (≥400 pg/mL). The study began in June 2016, with the participation of Osaka University Hospital and 31 affiliated facilities. We will collect data on history in detail, accompanying diseases, quality of life, frailty score, medication history, and laboratory and echocardiographic data. We will follow-up each patient for 5 years, and collect outcome data on mortality, cause of death, and the number and cause of hospitalisation. The target number of registered cases is 1500 cases in 5 years.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Osaka University Hospital on 24 February 2016 (ID: 15471), and by the IRBs of the all participating facilities. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

P1167Effect of diabetes on all-cause mortality in CRT patients

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E D Merkel ◽  
A Behon ◽  
W R Schwertner ◽  
A Pinter ◽  
I Osztheimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Impaired Left Ventricular Function ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Heart failure patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a higher risk for all-cause mortality and also for sudden cardiac death. We lack data on the effect of adding an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on all-cause mortality in diabetic heart failure patients. Purpose We aimed to investigate the risk of DM on all-cause mortality in CRT patients, and to examine the beneficial effect of adding an ICD on all-cause mortality by left ventricular ejection fraction in CRT patients with or without DM. Methods We examined retrospectively 2525 patients who underwent CRT implantation based on the current guidelines at our clinic between June 2000 and September 2018, of which 928 (36%) had diabetes. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, also expressed as events per 100 person-year by quintiles of ejection fraction (EF) with or without an ICD or DM. Time to event data was investigated by Kaplan Meier and multivariate Cox regressional analysis. Results During our mean follow-up time of 4.6 years, 1432 (56%) patients reached the primary endpoint, of which 553 (38%) had DM. In the DM group, hypertension (82% vs. 66%; p‹0.01), ischemic etiology (56% vs. 44%; p‹0.01), myocardial infarction (43% vs. 36%; p‹0.01) was more frequent compared to non-DM group. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the implantation of an ICD (54% vs. 53%; p = 0,84). Those with DM showed a 25% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.12-1.40; p‹0.01), also observable after adjusting for relevant clinical covariates such as age, gender, atrial fibrillation and the addition of an ICD (HR 1.17; 95% CI 1.06-1.31; p‹0.01). Examined as all-cause mortality per 100 person-year follow up, patients with EF›30% and DM (13,7 events/ 100 person-year follow-up for an EF 30-35%) showed similar risk as those without DM and a severely impaired left ventricular function with EF‹25% (14 events/100 person-year follow-up for an EF &lt;25%). Investigating the composite end-point of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, those with DM showed a 21% higher risk than non-DM CRT patients (HR 1.21; CI 1.09-1.34; p = 0 &lt; 0.001). Adding an ICD for CRT patients with DM reduces the risk of all-cause mortality significantly by 32% (HR 0,68; CI 0,56 to 0,82; p &lt; 0.001) during the first six years but diminished on longer follow-up time. Conclusions Diabetes was found as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in CRT patients. Those with a left ventricular ejection fraction above 30% have comparable risk of mortality as non-diabetic patients with a severely impaired left ventricular function. In diabetic CRT patients the addition of an ICD reduces the risk of all-cause mortality mostly seen in the first six years. These findings might implicate the relevance of adding an ICD to CRT even at a higher ejection fraction in those with severe comorbidities such as diabetes. Abstract Figure. All-cause mortality in CRT, DM patients

Strong risk factors for depression and anxiety in heart failure patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naila Niaz ◽  
Syed Muhammad Faraz Ali ◽  
Attaullah Younas ◽  
Tallat Anwar Faridi ◽  
Asif Hanif
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Depression And Anxiety ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients

Despite advancing medical technology, Heart Failure (HF) is still a prevalent disease with high mortality and high health expenditure. To improve patient outcome and prognosis, it is important to identify the association of risk factors which leads to the co-morbid depression and anxiety in heart failure patients. Objectives: To determine the association of depression and/or anxiety with age, gender and ejection fraction in heart failure patients. Methods: It is an analytical cross sectional study including 323 CHF patients who visited the to the Faisalabad Institute of Cardiology hospital Out-Patient Department, 250 were males and 73 were females, mean age was 54.1 ± 9.2 years having 70 years as maximum and 25 years as minimum.  Data collection was done using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire to assess depression and anxiety. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24. For quantitative data, mean and standard deviation was calculated and for qualitative data frequency and percentages was calculated. To measure the association of anxiety and depression with age categories, ejection fraction and gender, chi square test was used. P values less than and equal to 0.05 were taken as significant. Results: No association of depression and anxiety with gender and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) was observed. However, depression and anxiety were found to be significantly associated with age Conclusions: The study concluded that age is a strong risk factor of depression and anxiety in congestive heart failure patients. Multidisciplinary health care team approach and interventions are required to cater chronic heart failure (CHF) patients to address the psychological burden.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic versus Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy after Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4989
Author(s):  
Mohammad Abumayyaleh ◽  
Christina Pilsinger ◽  
Ibrahim El-Battrawy ◽  
Marvin Kummer ◽  
Jürgen Kuschyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Background: The angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) decreases cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data regarding the impact of ARNI on the outcome in HFrEF patients according to heart failure etiology are limited. Methods and results: One hundred twenty-one consecutive patients with HFrEF from the years 2016 to 2017 were included at the Medical Centre Mannheim Heidelberg University and treated with ARNI according to the current guidelines. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was numerically improved during the treatment with ARNI in both patient groups, that with ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 61) (ICMP), and that with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 60) (NICMP); p = 0.25. Consistent with this data, the NT-proBNP decreased in both groups, more commonly in the NICMP patient group. In addition, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine changed before and after the treatment with ARNI in both groups. In a one-year follow-up, the rate of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation) tended to be higher in the ICMP group compared with the NICMP group (ICMP 38.71% vs. NICMP 17.24%; p = 0.07). The rate of one-year all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (ICMP 6.5% vs. NICMP 6.6%; log-rank = 0.9947). Conclusions: This study shows that, although the treatment with ARNI improves the LVEF in ICMP and NICMP patients, the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains higher in ICMP patients in comparison with NICMP patients. Renal function is improved in the NICMP group after the treatment. Long-term mortality is similar over a one-year follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document