scholarly journals Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk, Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Analyses Regarding Surgical Approach of Radical Hysterectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3545
Author(s):  
Se Ik Kim ◽  
Tae Hun Kim ◽  
Maria Lee ◽  
Hee Seung Kim ◽  
Hyun Hoon Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

This study aimed to investigate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on survival outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk, early-stage cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy (RH). From the cervical cancer cohorts of two tertiary hospitals, patients with 2009 FIGO stage IB-IIA who underwent primary RH between 2010 and 2018 were identified. Patients with intermediate-risk factors that met the Sedlis criteria were included. Survival outcomes were compared between the patients who received adjuvant RT (study group; n = 53) and those who did not receive adjuvant treatment (control group; n = 30). Compared to the control group, the study group showed significantly better recurrence-free survival (RFS; 5-year survival rate, 85.6% vs. 61.0%; p = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant RT was associated with a significantly lower risk of disease recurrence (adjusted HR, 0.241; 95% CI, 0.082–0.709; p = 0.010). In a subgroup that underwent open RH (n = 33), adjuvant RT showed a trend toward improved RFS with borderline statistical significance (adjusted HR, 0.098; 95% CI, 0.009–1.027; p = 0.053). However, in a subgroup of minimally invasive surgery (n = 50), adjuvant RT did not improve RFS. In conclusion, implementation of adjuvant RT significantly reduced the disease recurrence rate in patients with intermediate-risk, stage IB-IIA cervical cancer treated primarily with surgery. Survival benefit from adjuvant RT differed according to the surgical approach.

An observational longitudinal study to evaluate miction, defecation, and sexual function after radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for early-stage cervical cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1119-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. D. Pieterse ◽  
C. P. Maas ◽  
M. M. Ter Kuile ◽  
M. Lowik ◽  
M. A. Van Eijkeren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Sexual Function ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

The objective of this study was to evaluate the problems with miction, defecation, and sexuality after a radical hysterectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer stage I–IIA. This study included an observational longitudinal study of self-reported bladder, defecation, and sexual problems with a baseline score. Ninety-four women were included in the study. An age-matched control group consisted of 224 women. The patients showed significantly more negative effects on sexual function compared with both the controls and their situation before the treatment throughout 24 months of follow-up. The problems included less lubrication, a narrow and short vagina, senseless areas around the labia, dyspareunia, and sexual dissatisfaction. Up to 12 months after the treatment, the patients complained significantly more of little or no urge to urinate and diarrhea as compared with the controls. Adjuvant radiotherapy did not increase the risk of bladder dysfunction, colorectal motility disorders, and sexual functions. We conclude that a radical hysterectomy for the treatment of early-stage cervical carcinoma is associated with adverse effects mainly on sexual functioning.

Delayed adjuvant radiotherapy in early-stage cervical cancer with intermediate-risk features has a detrimental effect on survival that cannot be corrected by adjuvant chemotherapy.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6037-6037
Author(s):  
Joyson Kodiyan ◽  
Adel Guirguis ◽  
Hani Ashmalla
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Positive Margin ◽  
Pelvic Lymphadenectomy ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

6037 Background: GOG-0263 is currently investigating the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) concurrently with radiotherapy (RT) in patients with early stage cervical cancer that underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy harboring intermediate risk features. We used a retrospective database to investigate whether adjuvant chemotherapy significantly influenced overall survival (OS), and whether its effectiveness is influenced by delays in radiotherapy. Methods: All data was obtained from the NCDB (National Cancer Database) and initially contained 115,747 cases of cervical cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Analyzed patients had early stage disease, received radical hysterectomy with pathologic stage I to IIA, and had intermediate risk features including size greater than 4 cm or lymphovascular invasion. All patients received adjuvant RT with or without CT. Cases with positive margin or nodes, with parametrial extension, or metastasis were excluded. Cases were weighted by inverse probability of treatment (CT) using clinical and socioeconomic variables, and analyzed for OS using multivariate models. Predictors of receiving CT were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Results: The final cohort was 557 patients with median follow-up of 43 months (range, 1.54-143.7). Median survival without CT (n = 244) versus with CT (n = 313) was 42.2 versus 43.9 months (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.661-0.995, p = 0.045). Median time from diagnosis to RT was 91 days (range, 21-691), and predicted for inferior OS (p = 0.007). No significant interaction existed between RT delay and receipt of CT (p = 0.997). Cases with squamous histology were less likely to receive CT than adenocarcinoma histology (OR 0.345, 95%CI 0.159-0.725, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Poor survival outcomes are observed in patients with early stage cervical cancer harboring intermediate risk features when adjuvant radiotherapy is delayed. This outcome was not corrected by addition of chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Survival outcomes of low-risk and intermediate-risk stage IB1 cervical cancer patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
Asama Vanichtantikul ◽  
Patou Tantbirojn ◽  
Tarinee Manchana
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Survival for patients with early stage cervical cancer without any high-risk factors treated with radical hysterectomy is excellent. However, there are few data on the survival outcomes for low-risk and intermediate-risk early stage cervical cancer patients. Objective To determine survival outcomes and prognostic factors of low-risk and intermediate-risk stage IB1 cervical cancer patients. Methods Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with positive pelvic nodes, parametrial involvement, and positive margin who are classified as high-risk patients were excluded. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma or grade 1–2 adenocarcinoma, tumor size less than 2 cm, no lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and depth of stromal invasion (DSI) less than 10 mm were defined as low-risk patients. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional-hazards regression. Results There were 82 (42.3%) low-risk patients and 112 (57.7%) intermediate-risk patients. More patients in intermediate risk received adjuvant treatment (3.6% and 14.3%, P = 0.07). Three (3.6%) low-risk patients and 18 (16.1%) intermediate-risk patients had recurrent disease (P = 0.004). At median follow-up of 86 months, 1.2% of low-risk patients and 8.9% of intermediate-risk had cancer-related deaths (P = 0.02). Low-risk patients had significantly better 5-year disease-free survival (98.2% vs 91.1%, P = 0.01) and estimated 5-year overall survival (98.5% vs 91.1%, P = 0.01). DSI more than 10 mm and presence of LVSI were significantly associated with recurrence. However, LVSI was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion Stage IB1 cervical cancer patients had excellent survival. Low-risk patients had significantly better survival. Presence of LVSI was an independent prognostic factor.

scholarly journals Efficacy of different surgical approaches on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study in China

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e038020
Author(s):  
Xiaopei Chao ◽  
Ming Wu ◽  
Shuiqing Ma ◽  
Xianjie Tan ◽  
Sen Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Learning Curves ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

IntroductionRecent studies have revealed that the oncological survival outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MIRH) are inferior to those of abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in early-stage cervical cancer, but the potential reasons are unclear.Methods and analysisEach expert from 28 study centres participating in a previously reported randomised controlled trial (NCT03739944) will provide successive eligible records of at least 100 patients who accepted radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2015. Inclusion criteria consist of a definite pathological evaluation of stages IA1 (with positive lymphovascular space invasion), IA2 and IB1 according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system and a histological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma. The primary endpoint is 5-year disease-free survival between the MIRH and ARH groups. The secondary endpoints include the MIRH learning curves of participating surgeons, 5-year overall survival between the MIRH and ARH groups, survival outcomes according to surgical chronology, surgical outcomes and sites of recurrence and potential risk factors that affect survival outcomes. A subgroup analysis in patients with tumour diameter less than 2 cm will follow the similar flow diagram.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (registration no. JS-1711), and is also filed on record by all other 27 centres. The results will be disseminated through community events and peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03738969

scholarly journals Survival impact of additional chemotherapy after adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation in patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Se Ik Kim ◽  
Jeong Yun Kim ◽  
Chan Woo Wee ◽  
Maria Lee ◽  
Hee Seung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiation ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Additional Chemotherapy ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Early Cervical Cancer

Abstract Background To determine whether additional chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) improves survival outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer who undergo radical hysterectomy (RH). Methods We included high- or intermediate-risk patients from two institutions, with 2009 FIGO stage IB–IIA, who underwent primary RH and pelvic lymphadenectomy between January 2007 and June 2020, and had completed adjuvant CCRT. Survival outcomes were compared between patients who received additional chemotherapy (study group) and those who did not (control group). Results A total of 198 patients were included in this analysis. The study (n = 61) and control groups (n = 137) had similar patient age, histologic cancer type, 2009 FIGO stage, and tumor size. However, minimally invasive surgery was performed less frequently in the study group than in the control group (19.7% vs. 46.0%, P < 0.001). The presence of pathologic risk factors was similar, except for lymph node metastasis, which was more frequent in the study group (72.1% vs. 46.0%; P = 0.001). In survival analyses, no differences in the disease-free survival (DFS; P = 0.539) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.121) were observed between the groups. Multivariate analyses adjusting for surgical approach and other factors revealed that additional chemotherapy was not associated with DFS (adjusted HR, 1.149; 95% CI, 0.552–2.391; P = 0.710) and OS (adjusted HR, 1.877; 95% CI, 0.621–5.673; P = 0.264). The recurrence patterns did not differ with additional chemotherapy. Consistent results were observed in a subset of high-risk patients (n = 139). Conclusions Additional chemotherapy after CCRT might not improve survival outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer who undergo RH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document