scholarly journals Surface Texturing-Plasma Nitriding Duplex Treatment for Improving Tribological Performance of AISI 316 Stainless Steel

Materials ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naiming Lin ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
Jiaojuan Zou ◽  
Junwen Guo ◽  
Dali Li ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 1450006 ◽  
Author(s):  
JIAOJUAN ZOU ◽  
MAOLIN LI ◽  
NAIMING LIN ◽  
XIANGYU ZHANG ◽  
LIN QIN ◽  
...  

In order to improve the tribological performance of AISI 316 stainless steel (316 SS) under grease lubrication, electrochemical processing was conducted on it to obtain a rough (surface texturing-like) surface by making use of the high sensitivity of austenitic stainless steel to pitting corrosion in Cl --rich environment. Numerous corrosion pits or micro-ditches acted as micro-reservoirs on the obtained surface. While the grease could offer consistent lubrication, and then improve the tribological performance of 316 SS. Tribological behaviors of raw 316 SS and the treated sample were measured using a reciprocating type tribometer sliding against GCr 15 steel counterpart under dry and grease lubrication conditions. The results showed that the mass losses of the two samples were in the same order of magnitude, and the raw sample exhibited lower friction coefficient in dry sliding. When the tests were conducted under grease lubrication condition, the friction coefficients and mass losses of the treated sample were far lower than those of the raw 316 SS. The tribological performance of 316 SS under grease lubrication was drastically improved after electrochemical processing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1950226
Author(s):  
ZHIQI LIU ◽  
HUANHUAN WANG ◽  
NAIMING LIN ◽  
RENHUI DUAN

Combined plasma nitriding and surface texturing approach were conducted on 316 stainless steel to enhance the tribological performance. Five different surfaces (316 substrates, plasma-nitrided 316, surface-textured 316, plasma-nitrided surface-textured 316, and surface-textured plasma-nitrided 316) were investigated. The tribological behaviors were studied using a ball-on-disk rotary tribometer against counterparts of Si3N4 balls in the air and under oil lubrication conditions. The results were analyzed from the aspects of friction coefficient, mass loss, and surface morphology about the tested specimens. The results presented that the frictional properties of the surface of plasma-nitrided surface-textured 316 were optimal under both friction conditions. Under dry friction conditions, the influence of plasma nitriding on mass loss was greater than that of surface texturing. Under oil lubrication conditions, the influence of surface texturing on mass loss was greater than that of plasma nitriding, and the processing sequence of surface texturing and plasma nitriding had little effect on the mass loss. The better wear resistance of plasma-nitrided surface-textured 316 resulted from the following aspects: first, the nitriding layer improved the surface hardness of the material. Secondly, the surface texture can capture the debris under dry friction conditions and provide continuous lubrication under oil lubrication condition.


2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reynier Suárez-Martínez ◽  
Teoxahual Ocampo-Macias ◽  
Javier Lara-Romero ◽  
José Lemus-Ruiz ◽  
Omar Jiménez-Alemán ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Habib ◽  
M. S. Damra ◽  
J. J. Saura ◽  
I. Cervera ◽  
J. Bellés

The failure of the protective oxide scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 stainless steels has been studied and compared at 1,000°C in synthetic air. First, the isothermal thermogravimetric curves of both stainless steels were plotted to determine the time needed to reach the breakdown point. The different resistance of each stainless steel was interpreted on the basis of the nature of the crystalline phases formed, the morphology, and the surface structure as well as the cross-section structure of the oxidation products. The weight gain of AISI 304 stainless steel was about 8 times greater than that of AISI 316 stainless steel, and AISI 316 stainless steel reached the breakdown point about 40 times more slowly than AISI 304 stainless steel. In both stainless steels, reaching the breakdown point meant the loss of the protective oxide scale of Cr2O3, but whereas in AISI 304 stainless steel the Cr2O3scale totally disappeared and exclusively Fe2O3was formed, in AISI 316 stainless steel some Cr2O3persisted and Fe3O4was mainly formed, which means that AISI 316 stainless steel is more resistant to oxidation after the breakdown.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document