scholarly journals Testing Predictions of the Quantum Landscape Multiverse 3: The Hilltop Inflationary Potential

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 520
Author(s):  
Eleonora Di Valentino ◽  
Laura Mersini-Houghton
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Entanglement ◽  
Lower Limit ◽  
Hubble Parameter ◽  
Susy Breaking ◽  
Weak Lensing ◽  
Planck Data ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Breaking Scale ◽  
Inflationary Models ◽  
Origin Of The Universe

Here we test the predictions of the theory of the origin of the universe from the landscape multiverse, against the 2015 Planck data, for the case of the Hilltop class of inflationary models, for p = 4 and p = 6 . By considering the quantum entanglement correction of the multiverse, we can place just a lower limit on the local ’SUSY-breaking’ scale, respectively b > 8.7 × 10 6 G e V at 95 % c.l. and b > 1.3 × 10 8 G e V at 95 % c.l. from Planck TT+lowP, so the case with multiverse correction is statistically indistinguishable from the case with an unmodified inflation. We find that the series of anomalies predicted by the quantum landscape multiverse for the allowed range of b, is consistent with Planck’s tests of the anomalies. In addition, the friction between the two cosmological probes of the Hubble parameter and with the weak lensing experiments goes away for a particular subset, the p = 6 case of Hilltop models.

scholarly journals KINEMATIC REPULSIONS BETWEEN INERTIAL SYSTEMS IN AN EXPANDING INFLATIONARY UNIVERSE

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (30) ◽  
pp. 1330025 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. SAVICKAS
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Hubble Parameter ◽  
Background Radiation ◽  
Inertial System ◽  
Inflationary Universe ◽  
Cosmological Background ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Inertial Systems ◽  
Origin Of The Universe

The cosmological background radiation is observed to be isotropic only within a coordinate system that is at rest relative to its local Hubble drift. This indicates that the Hubble motion describes the recessional motion of an inertial system that is at rest relative to its local Hubble drift. It is shown that when the Hubble parameter is kinematically defined directly in terms of the positions and velocities of mass particles in the universe, it then also defines inertial systems themselves in terms of the distribution and motion of mass particles. It is independent of the velocity of photons because photons always have a speed c relative to the inertial system in which they are located. Therefore the definition of their velocity depends on the definition of the Hubble parameter itself and cannot be used to define H. The derivative of the kinematically defined Hubble parameter with respect to time is shown to always be positive and highly repulsive at the time of the origin of the universe. A model is used which describes a universe that is balanced at the time of its origin so that H approaches zero as the universe expands to infinity.

scholarly journals Winding uplifts and the challenges of weak and strong SUSY breaking in AdS

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Hebecker ◽  
Sascha Leonhardt
Keyword(s):  
Complex Structure ◽  
Susy Breaking ◽  
Technical Level ◽  
De Sitter ◽  
Large Complex ◽  
Breaking Scale ◽  
Large Complex Structure

Abstract We discuss the problem of metastable SUSY breaking in the landscape. While this is clearly crucial for the various de Sitter proposals, it is also interesting to consider the SUSY breaking challenge in the AdS context. For example, it could be that a stronger form of the non-SUSY AdS conjecture holds: it would forbid even metastable non-SUSY AdS in cases where the SUSY-breaking scale is parametrically above/below the AdS scale. At the technical level, the present paper proposes to break SUSY using the multi-cosine-shaped axion potentials which arise if a long winding trajectory of a ‘complex-structure axion’ appears in the large-complex-structure limit of a Calabi-Yau orientifold. This has been studied in the context of ‘Winding Inflation’, but the potential for SUSY breaking has not been fully explored. We discuss the application to uplifting LVS vacua, point out the challenges which one faces in the KKLT context, and consider the possibility of violating the non-SUSY AdS conjecture in the type-IIA setting of DGKT.

Origin (?) of the universe

Resonance ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Jayant V. Narlikar
Keyword(s):  
The Universe ◽  
Origin Of The Universe

scholarly journals ULTRAHIGH ENERGY NEUTRINO PHYSICS

2004 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 317-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANNA M. STAŚTO
Keyword(s):  
Neutrino Physics ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Ultrahigh Energy ◽  
Production Rates ◽  
Precise Knowledge ◽  
Detection Probabilities ◽  
Interaction Cross Sections ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Origin Of The Universe

Ultrahigh energy neutrinos can provide important information about the distant astronomical objects and the origin of the Universe. Precise knowledge about neutrino interactions and production rates is essential for estimating background, expected fluxes and detection probabilities. In this paper we review the applications of the high energy QCD to the calculations of the interaction cross-sections of the neutrinos. We also study the production of the ultrahigh energy neutrinos in the atmosphere due to the charm and beauty decays.

Naming the Big Bang

2012 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helge Kragh
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Community ◽  
Big Bang ◽  
Consensus Model ◽  
Initial State ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Modern Cosmology ◽  
Fred Hoyle ◽  
The Big Bang ◽  
The Universe ◽  
Origin Of The Universe

The standard model of modern cosmology is known as the hot big bang, a name that refers to the initial state of the universe some fourteen billion years ago. The name Big Bang introduced by Fred Hoyle in 1949 is one of the most successful scientific neologisms ever. How did the name originate and how was it received by physicists and astronomers in the period leading up to the hot big bang consensus model in the late 1960s? How did it reflect the meanings of the origin of the universe, a concept that predates the name by nearly two decades? Contrary to what is often assumed, the name was not an instant success—it took more than twenty years before Big Bang became a household word in the scientific community. When it happened, it was used with different connotations, as is still the case. Moreover, it was used earlier and more frequently in popular than in scientific contexts, and not always relating to cosmology. It turns out that Hoyle’s celebrated name has a richer and more surprising history than commonly assumed and also that the literature on modern cosmology and its history includes many common mistakes and errors. An etymological approach centering on the name Big Bang provides supplementary insight to the historical understanding of the emergence of modern cosmology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document