scholarly journals Efficacy of Feed-Based Formalin-Killed Vaccine of Streptococcus iniae Stimulates the Gut-Associated Lymphoid Tissues and Immune Response of Red Hybrid Tilapia

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hayat ◽  
Md Sabri Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Mohd Jamil Samad ◽  
Intan Shameha Abdul Razak ◽  
Ina Salwany Md Yasin ◽  
...  

Red hybrid tilapia were fed a formalin-killed oral Streptococcus iniae vaccine (FKV) in the present study was assessed. Three hundred Red hybrid tilapia 80 ± 10 g were divided into five groups (1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, and Cx), each consisting of 60 fish. Fish from Groups 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B were fed with FKV over different periods of administration, while Group 2B was the only group of fish to receive an oral booster vaccination on day 14- and 21-days post-vaccination (dpv). Group Cx was fed with normal pellets containing no vaccine as a control group. At four weeks post-vaccination (wpv), all fish were experimentally infected with S. iniae. Groups 2A and 2B had the lowest level of mortalities following vaccination (45% and 30%, respectively) compared to Groups 1A and 1B (80% and 55%, respectively), while the level of mortalities in Group Cx was 100%. All vaccinated groups showed a significant increase in anti-S. iniae IgM levels (p < 0.05) in serum, mucus, and gut-lavage, while Group Cx did not (p > 0.05) and all fish in this group died by five weeks post-infection. In conclusion, fish fed with the S. iniae FKV had a greater level of protection against S. iniae, with increased specific antibody response to the vaccine and there was also evidence of GALT stimulation by the vaccine.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Shirajum Monir ◽  
Md Sabri bin Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Zarirah binti Mohamed Zulperi ◽  
Hasliza binti Abu Hassim ◽  
Aslah Mohamad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Streptococcosis and Motile Aeromonad Septicemia (MAS) are important diseases of tilapia, Oreochromis spp. and causes huge economic losses in aquaculture globally. The feed-based vaccination may be an alternative to minimize major infectious diseases in tilapia. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the haemato-immunological responses and effectiveness of a newly developed feed-based killed bivalent vaccine against Streptococcus iniae and Aeromonas hydrophila in hybrid red tilapia. A total of 495 hybrid red tilapia of 61.23±4.95 g were distributed into 5 groups (each with triplicate). The fish were immunized orally through bivalent (combined S. iniae and A. hydrophila ) spray vaccine (BS group), bivalent formulate vaccine (BF group), monovalent S. iniae vaccine (MS group), monovalent A. hydrophila vaccine (MA group) and unvaccinated as a control group. The vaccine was orally administered on days 0, 14 and 42 applied feed-based bacterin at 5% body weight. The blood and spleen samples were collected from all groups on 7, 21 and 49 days post-vaccination, and also 96 hours post-infection to assess their haemato-immune responses. Results Compared with the unvaccinated group, leukocyte, lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes counts in vaccinated groups were significantly ( P < 0.05) increased on 21, 49 days post-vaccination and also 96 hours post-infection, while erythrocytes, haemoglobin and haematocrit in vaccinated groups were significantly ( P < 0.05) enhanced only 96 hours post-infection. Additionally, the lysozyme and phagocytic activity and, serum antibody (IgM) were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) against S. iniae and A. hydrophila in vaccinated groups compared to the unvaccinated group in the pre- and post-infection. Results from the challenge through co-infection with S. iniae and A. hydrophila showed the relative percent survival (RPS) in BF group was 76.37±5.14%, which had the capacity to induce significant protection ( P < 0.05) compared to others groups. Conclusions This study demonstrates the bivalent formulate (BF) group could elicit significant non-specific and specific immunological responses with higher protection in hybrid red tilapia. In addition, this newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccination can be a promising technique for effective and large scale fish immunization in the aquaculture industry.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5597-5597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Andrick ◽  
Abulrahman Alwhaibi ◽  
David DeRemer ◽  
Sameera Quershi ◽  
Rahil Khan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Due to immune dysregulation and subsequent increased risk of infection associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), both the CDC and ACIP recommend patients with CLL receive the 13- valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccination (PCV13). The effect of ibrutinib, a selective inhibitor ofBruton'styrosine kinase (BTK) which effects B-antigen receptor (BCR) signaling, on IgG antibody responses to pneumococcal vaccination in patients with CLL has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune response to PCV13 in patients receiving in ibrutinib and CLL control patients (no active treatment). Methods Study patients were enrolled on an IRB approved protocol at Georgia Cancer Center. Specific inclusion criteria a) histological confirmed CLL as defined by WHO classification b) no current therapy (CLL control) c) ibrutinib 420 mg/day (active) d) ECOG ≤ 2. Exclusion criteria a) Previous vaccination with PCV13 within 2 years b) anti-CD20 therapy within last 6 months c) IVIG therapy within 6 weeks. Serum pneumococcal antibody assessment was performed by microsphere photometry on subjects at Day 0 and Day 30 days following vaccination. Antibody specific serotypes (1, 3, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23) were determined by ELISA. Pre- and post- vaccination expression of BTK and HACS1 (hematopoietic adapter containing SH3 and SAM protein) of CD19+ lymphocytes was determined by Western Blot analysis. The primary objective was to determine whether concurrent administration of PCV13 in patients receiving ibrutinib generates a ≥ 2 fold increase in ≥ 3 of pneumococcal serotypes as compared to the control group. Secondary objectives were to evaluate expression BTK and HACS in both study groups. Results At interim analysis, 9 patients have been enrolled to date, with 8 patients (n=4 ibrutinib, n=4 CLL control) having completed pre and post-vaccination assessments. The median patient age was 69 yo(range: 53-77 yo) with 75% ≥ 65 yo. All CLL control patients (4/4) generated a ≥ 2 fold increase in ≥ 3 of pneumococcal serotypes, whereas (0/4) of ibrutinib patients generated an adequate immune response to PCV13 (p=0.029; Fisher exact). See Table 1 for mean serotype changes in both patient cohorts. Conclusions Preliminary data suggests that patients who are receiving ibrutinib group do not generate an effective immune response to PCV13 vaccination compared to untreated CLL controls. This may have an impact on susceptibility and response to infection with pneumococcal infection as well. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
MT Hossain ◽  
MA Islam ◽  
S Akter ◽  
M Sadekuzzaman ◽  
MA Islam ◽  
...  

Effect of dose and time of vaccination on immune response of duck plague vaccine in 90 (45 of 18-day-old and 45 of 35-day-old) Jinding ducklings was studied during the period from October 2002 to March 2003. Each of both age group (18-day-old and 35-day-old) was divided into three groups as A, B, C and D, E, F respectively, consisting of 15 ducklings in each. Each duckling of groups A and B was primarily vaccinated with 0.25 ml and 0.5 ml of duck plague vaccine (LRI, Mohakhali) intramuscularly at 18 days old respectively and could not be boosted due to the death of all the ducklings of both groups within 20 days of primary vaccination. Each duckling of group D and E received 0.5 ml and 1.0 ml of duck plague vaccine (LRI, Mohakhali) intramuscularly at 35 days old respectively and ducks of both the groups boosted with 1.0 ml of vaccine 5 months after primary vaccination. Groups C and F served as unvaccinated control. 14 days after booster vaccination ducks of group D, E and F were challenged with the virulent field isolate of duck plague virus @ 1.0 ml / duck IM (104 EID50 / dose). The ducklings of group D that were vaccinated primarily at 35 days old with 0.5 ml and boosted after 5 months with 1.0 ml of duck plague vaccine had significantly (p< 0.01) higher PHA titres after 2 weeks of primary vaccination (38.4 ± 6.4), booster vaccination (153.6 ± 25.6) and challenge infection (281.6 ± 62.71) in comparison to control group (≤4, ≤4 and 20.0 ± 2.3 respectively) and all the ducks survived (100%) after challenge. The ducklings of group E that were vaccinated primarily at 35 days old and boosted after 5 months of primary vaccination with 1.0 ml of duck plague vaccine had also significantly (p< 0.01) higher PHA titres after two weeks of booster vaccination (76.8 ± 12.8) and challenge infection (153.6 ± 25.6) in comparison to control group, but only 8 (53.3%) ducks could protect the challenge infection with virulent duck plague virus. It may be concluded that ducklings below 30 days of age should not be vaccinated with duck plague vaccine. It also may be proposed that primary vaccination at 35 days old with duck plague vaccine (LRI, Mohakhali) @ 0.5 ml / duckling and booster vaccination after 5 months of primary vaccination @ 1.0 ml could be practiced for better immune response against duck plague.Key words: effect; dose; age; immune response; duck plague vaccine; ducksdoi: 10.3329/bjvm.v2i2.2542Bangl. J. Vet. Med. (2004). 2 (2): 117-119


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Shirajum Monir ◽  
Md Sabri bin Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Zarirah binti Mohamed Zulperi ◽  
Hasliza binti Abu Hassim ◽  
Aslah Mohamad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Streptococcosis and Motile Aeromonad Septicemia (MAS) are important diseases of tilapia, Oreochromis spp. and causes huge economic losses in aquaculture globally. The feed-based vaccination may be an alternative to minimize major infectious diseases in tilapia. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the haemato-immunological responses and effectiveness of a newly developed feed-based killed bivalent vaccine against Streptococcus iniae and Aeromonas hydrophila in hybrid red tilapia. A total of 495 hybrid red tilapia of 61.23±4.95 g were distributed into 5 groups (each with triplicate). The fish were immunized orally through bivalent (combined S. iniae and A. hydrophila ) spray vaccine (BS group), bivalent formulate vaccine (BF group), monovalent S. iniae vaccine (MS group), monovalent A. hydrophila vaccine (MA group) and unvaccinated as a control group. The vaccine was orally administered on days 0, 14 and 42 applied feed-based bacterin at 5% body weight. The blood and spleen samples were collected from all groups on 7, 21 and 49 days post-vaccination, and also 96 hours post-infection to assess their haemato-immune responses. Results Compared with the unvaccinated group, leukocyte, lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes counts in vaccinated groups were significantly ( P < 0.05) increased on 21, 49 days post-vaccination and also 96 hours post-infection, while erythrocytes, haemoglobin and haematocrit in vaccinated groups were significantly ( P < 0.05) enhanced only 96 hours post-infection. Additionally, the lysozyme and phagocytic activity and, serum antibody (IgM) were significantly higher ( P < 0.05) against S. iniae and A. hydrophila in vaccinated groups compared to the unvaccinated group in the pre- and post-infection. Results from the challenge through co-infection with S. iniae and A. hydrophila showed the relative percent survival (RPS) in BF group was 76.37±5.14%, which had the capacity to induce significant protection ( P < 0.05) compared to others groups. Conclusions This study demonstrates the bivalent formulate (BF) group could elicit significant non-specific and specific immunological responses with higher protection in hybrid red tilapia. In addition, this newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccination can be a promising technique for effective and large scale fish immunization in the aquaculture industry.


2018 ◽  
pp. 106-110
Author(s):  
D. V. Bukhanova ◽  
B. S. Belov ◽  
G. M. Tarasova ◽  
Sh. Erdes ◽  
T. V. Dubinina ◽  
...  

The aim of the study was to study the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of trivalent split influenza vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), systemic scleroderma (SSD). Material and methods. Ninety three patients were enrolled in the study, including 52 patients with RA, 34 with AS, 7 with SSD, and also 40 persons without rheumatic diseases (RD) (control group). At the time of enrolment, all patients received RD drug therapy. The duration of RD was from 2 months up to 46 years. Vaxigrip vaccine, which included the actual strains of influenza virus for the 2016-2017 or 2017-2018 seasons was administered subcutaneously in the amount of 1 dose (0.5 ml) against the backdrop of continuing RD therapy. The main stages of control were visits at 1-, 3- and 6-month intervals after vaccination. Standard clinical and laboratory tests, a clinical examination of the patient and assessment of disease activity were performed during the visits. Immunogenicity of the vaccine was evaluated at each stage of the control procedure using the commercial ELISA kits manufactured by PPDP LLC (St. Petersburg). Results. No cases of influenza or influenza-like illness were recorded during the entire period of observation. 81% of patients had no post-vaccination reactions in the RD group. Pain, swelling and hyperaemia of the skin with a diameter of up to 2 cm at the injection site were reported in 14% of cases and subfebrility, myalgia, malaise, headache in 5% of cases. The frequency of postvaccinal reactions among patients was not significantly different from that in the control group. There were no cases of exacerbation of RD or the occurrence of any new autoimmune disorders. The parameters of the humoral immune response in patients with RD did not significantly differ from those in the control group. Conclusion. The obtained data testify about good clinical efficacy and tolerability of trivalent split influenza vaccine in patients with RD. 


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2811-2811
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Prince ◽  
Chris Thoburn ◽  
Erica D. Warlick ◽  
Allan D. Hess ◽  
B. Douglas Smith

Abstract Background Myelodysplatic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell malignancies, characterized by the ineffective hematopoiesis, and risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) remains the only potentially curative therapy, but toxicities limit its application in older adults. Vaccination strategies have been developed to modulate the immune system, ideally with less toxicity. We present results from a pilot study of single agent K562/GM-CSF whole cell vaccination in MDS patients (pts). Methods Poor-risk or transfusion-dependent MDS pts (n=5) were enrolled and received K562/GM-CSF whole cell vaccine (1 X 108 cells) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by a booster vaccination 8 weeks later. Eligible pts could receive supportive care only for the 2 months preceding study entry, have no history of SCT, and not be on immunosuppressants. Blood, bone marrow, and skin biopsies were taken prior to vaccination, day 4 following first vaccine, and at 4 weeks after the booster vaccination. Diversity of the T cell compartment was assessed in the blood, marrow and skin using the TCRExpress Quantitative Analysis Kit (Biomed Immunotech, Tampa FL). Fragment length analysis was performed by the DNA Analysis Facility. In vitro stimulation studies for proliferation and cytokine production were performed using peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) for the pt with the best clinical response (>4 years). Proliferation of banked PBMCs, collected prior to every vaccination and stimulated with the vaccine, was assessed using 3H-Thymidine. The cytokines generated were measured using a multiplexed bead based immunoassay (Human 17-plex bioplex pro-panel) (Biorad, Hercules CA). Results All pts tolerated the vaccinations well with localized skin reactions being common. Clinically, 2 pts normalized their blood counts and became transfusion independent following the immunotherapy. One responding pt (CMML) remained stable without need for medical intervention for 4 yrs and only recently showed progression. T cell spectratyping indicated oligocolonal populations of T cells in post-vaccination skin, blood and marrow samples. T cells infiltrating the skin were tracked to the marrow. Interestingly, the best clinical responder demonstrated the most restricted skewed repertoire with a significant number of oligoclonal T cells tracking from skin to marrow (n=5). The marrow also had infiltrates of oligoclonal T cells not detected in the post-vaccination skin. Further, this skewed repertoire was absent when the pt relapsed. Proliferation assays measuring this pt’s T cell cytokine production in response to the vaccine cells in vitro, showed increased levels of IL-2, IL-13 and IL-5 that were suppressed or not produced by the time of the 4th vaccination. Inversely, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, IL-1beta, MIP-1beta and TNF alpha levels increased throughout. The expected proliferative “boost” was seen with the initiation of the booster vaccine series at the time of progression, and co-culture of the pt’s lymphocytes with the vaccine cells suppressed the ability of the vaccine cells to produce GM-CSF in vitro. The ability to suppress GM-CSF production decreased during therapy and the pt’s lymphocytes had no effect on GM-CSF production by the vaccine at the end of the immunotherapy. Conclusions All pts showed T cell skewing by spectratyping analysis, suggesting that each had a change in T cell proliferation patterns in response to the vaccine. One pt had a significant clinical response and the most specific T cell response by spectratyping to the original vaccine, followed by the absence of these cells in the marrow at the time of progression. This suggests that an immune response may have stabilized his disease and progression was associated with loss of this T cell population. Proliferation studies suggest that the lymphocytes recognized the vaccine. Lastly, GM-CSF levels produced by the vaccine were decreased during the vaccination cycles suggesting that the pt’s lymphocytes and/or tumor had a suppressive effect on the vaccine cells. It is unclear if the GM-CSF suppression was essential, detrimental, or unrelated to the pt’s clinical response. Further study of the T cells patterns in these pts may elucidate details of the immune response that are integral to clinical responses. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Nasrin ◽  
M. S. R. Khan ◽  
M. A. Islam

Background: The aged birds are known to induce good immunity against Salmonella enteritidisas compared to young. To judge this hypothesis layer birds at 42 and 49 days old were vaccinated with AVI Pro®109SE4 vaccine and immune response in terms of antibody titers was measured. Methods: A composition of antibody production in vaccinated chicken was performed following a usual vaccination schedule with a newly suggested vaccination schedule. To study the immunogenicity of vaccine a total of 15 chickenswere divided into three groups. Each group comprised of 5 layer chicken. Chicken in group A and B were vaccinated with AVI Pro®109SE4 vaccine with a dose of 0.5ml/bird through SC route. Primary vaccination was performed at 42 days and 49 days of age respectively and booster vaccination was given at 72 days and 79 days of age respectively. Blood samples were collected to obtain sera from each chicken at every 7 days interval up to 93 days post vaccination for the determination of antibody titer using microplate agglutination test. Results: Highest mean antibody titers were recorded as179.20±70.11and 307.20±114.49 in birds of group A and B respectively. The highest mean antibody titer was recorded as 307.20±114.49 in chicken at 21 days post vaccination with AVI Pro®109SE4 vaccine using newly suggested schedule as compared to usual schedule of vaccination. Conclusions: Primary vaccination at birds at 49 days (newly planned vaccination schedule) of age induced better immune response as compared to birds vaccinated at 42 days of age.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3696-3696
Author(s):  
Jennifer Vidler ◽  
Thanussuyah Alaguthurai ◽  
Sultan Abdul-Jawad ◽  
Sivalekha Viramuthu ◽  
Richard Beatson ◽  
...  

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) represent a spectrum of clonal bone marrow neoplasms from low risk disease through to those transforming into acute myeloid leukaemia. The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a great risk to those with hematological malignancies who are at higher risk of severe disease and death than the general population. Previous studies looking at the immune response to influenza vaccination in those with MDS had shown promising results, with immune responses not differing from those of healthy family members. Whilst some data exist to reassure the MDS community that majority of patients show seroconversion following Covid-19 vaccination, little data exists on their neutralizing capacity or post vaccination T-cell responses in this cohort. In addition, the majority of patients in these studies received BNT162b2 and there is little published data on vaccine response to the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. We have investigated the humoral and T-cell response of 39 patients with MDS two to four weeks following Covid-19 booster vaccination with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 through the SOAP study (Sars-cov-2 fOr cAncer Patients, IRAS project ID:282337). Plasma and PBMCs from MDS cases and healthy controls have been collected, and are being assessed for both humoral and cellular responses to SARS_CoV_2, the alpha (B.1.1.7) and delta (B.1.617.2) variants. Humoral responses will be assessed using ELISA (peptide binding) and functional viral neutralization assays. Cellular responses will be assessed using IFNy ELISPOT and flow cytometry (CD25 and CD69 expression) after 24h peptide stimulation. All data at time point 1 (2 - 4 weeks following booster vaccination) have been collected and will subsequently be collected at 6 months and 12 months post-vaccination. We also report on the safety data for these vaccines within this patient population. Of this cohort 64% were male with a median age of 65 years (range 21-84). 54% received vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and 44% received BNT162b2 (2% unrecorded). The vaccines were well tolerated with no serious adverse events to date. The mean interval between doses was 70.7 days (range 50 - 90 days). 71% of the cohort were receiving no disease modifying therapy at the time of vaccination, half of whom were receiving supportive therapy and the other half no intervention for their MDS. Of those receiving disease modifying therapy; 5 were receiving azacitidine, (1 in conjunction with low-dose cytarabine) and 3 ciclosporin. We will report the largest study of the humoral and T-cell mediated response to the Covid-19 vaccine in MDS patients to date. This will include cellular response to the delta variant and immunogenicity of both the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. Given the vulnerability of these patients to severe disease, investigating the immune response to the vaccines begins to build an evidence base for advising MDS patients on their ongoing risk of infection during the pandemic and going forward. The SOAP study will reassess the immune response at 6 and 12 months post-vaccination to continue to investigate post-vaccine immunity in this cohort. Disclosures Kulasekararaj: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Consultancy; Akari: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biocryst: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Achilleon: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Patten: JANSSEN: Honoraria; NOVARTIS: Honoraria; GILEAD SCIENCES: Honoraria, Research Funding; ROCHE: Research Funding; ASTRA ZENECA: Honoraria; ABBVIE: Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Shirajum Monir ◽  
Md Sabri bin Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Zarirah binti Mohamed Zulperi ◽  
Hasliza binti Abu Hassim ◽  
Aslah Mohamad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Streptococcosis and Motile Aeromonad Septicemia (MAS) are important diseases of tilapia, Oreochromis spp. and causes huge economic losses in aquaculture globally. The feed-based vaccination may be an alternative to minimize major infectious diseases in tilapia. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the haemato-immunological responses and effectiveness of a newly developed feed-based killed bivalent vaccine against Streptococcus iniae and Aeromonas hydrophila in hybrid red tilapia. A total of 495 hybrid red tilapia of 61.23±4.95 g were distributed into 5 groups (each with triplicate). The fish were immunized orally through bivalent (combined S. iniae and A. hydrophila) spray vaccine (BS group), bivalent formulate vaccine (BF group), monovalent S. iniae vaccine (MS group), monovalent A. hydrophila vaccine (MA group) and unvaccinated as a control group. The vaccine was orally administered on days 0, 14 and 42 applied feed-based bacterin at 5% body weight. The blood and spleen samples were collected from all groups on 7, 21 and 49 days post-vaccination, and also 96 hours post-infection to assess their haemato-immune responses. Results: Compared with the unvaccinated group, leukocyte, lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes counts in vaccinated groups were significantly (P < 0.05) increased on 21, 49 days post-vaccination and also 96 hours post-infection, while erythrocytes, haemoglobin and haematocrit in vaccinated groups were significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced only 96 hours post-infection. Additionally, the lysozyme and phagocytic activity and, serum antibody (IgM) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) against S. iniae and A. hydrophila in vaccinated groups compared to the unvaccinated group in the pre- and post-infection. Results from the challenge through co-infection with S. iniae and A. hydrophila showed the relative percent survival (RPS) in BF group was 76.67±4.71%, which had the capacity to induce significant protection (P < 0.05) compared to others groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the bivalent formulate (BF) group could elicit significant non-specific and specific immunological responses with higher protection in hybrid red tilapia. In addition, this newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccination can be a promising technique for effective and large scale fish immunization in the aquaculture industry.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Shirajum Monir ◽  
Md Sabri bin Mohd Yusoff ◽  
Zarirah binti Mohamed Zulperi ◽  
Hasliza binti Abu Hassim ◽  
Aslah Mohamad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Streptococcosis and Motile Aeromonad Septicemia (MAS) are important diseases of tilapia, Oreochromis spp. and causes huge economic losses in aquaculture globally. The feed-based vaccination may be an alternative to minimize major infectious diseases in tilapia. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the haemato-immunological responses and effectiveness of a newly developed feed-based killed bivalent vaccine against Streptococcus iniae and Aeromonas hydrophila in hybrid red tilapia. A total of 495 hybrid red tilapia of 61.23±4.95 g were distributed into 5 groups (each with triplicate). The fish were immunized orally through bivalent (combined S. iniae and A. hydrophila) spray vaccine (BS group), bivalent formulate vaccine (BF group), monovalent S. iniae vaccine (MS group), monovalent A. hydrophila vaccine (MA group) and unvaccinated as a control group. The vaccine was orally administered on days 0, 14 and 42 applied feed-based bacterin at 5% body weight. The blood and spleen samples were collected from all groups on 7, 21 and 49 days post-vaccination, and also 96 hours post-infection to assess their haemato-immune responses. Results: Compared with the unvaccinated group, leukocyte, lymphocytes, monocytes, granulocytes counts in vaccinated groups were significantly (P < 0.05) increased on 21, 49 days post-vaccination and also 96 hours post-infection, while erythrocytes, haemoglobin and haematocrit in vaccinated groups were significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced only 96 hours post-infection. Additionally, the lysozyme and phagocytic activity and, serum antibody (IgM) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) against S. iniae and A. hydrophila in vaccinated groups compared to the unvaccinated group in the pre- and post-infection. Results from the challenge through co-infection with S. iniae and A. hydrophila showed the relative percent survival (RPS) in BF group was 76.67±4.71%, which had the capacity to induce significant protection (P < 0.05) compared to others groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the bivalent formulate (BF) group could elicit significant non-specific and specific immunological responses with higher protection in hybrid red tilapia. In addition, this newly developed feed-based bivalent vaccination can be a promising technique for effective and large scale fish immunization in the aquaculture industry.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document