scholarly journals Safety Profile of Recommended Vaccinations in Adolescents: Data from Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Immunization in Puglia (Italy), 2016–2020

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1302
Author(s):  
Antonio Di Lorenzo ◽  
Francesco Paolo Bianchi ◽  
Andrea Martinelli ◽  
Sabrina Lattanzio ◽  
Antonella Carbonara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Causality Assessment ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Reporting Rate ◽  
World Health ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Health Organization

Adolescence is a critical period for immunization, in which the adhesion rate to recommended vaccinations is often lower than desired. Since the safety of new vaccines is one of the most important factors determining vaccination hesitancy, post-marketing surveillance of adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to better understand the safety of these drugs. This report describes AEFIs notified in Puglia (Italy) after recommended vaccinations in adolescents aged 12 to 18 years in 2016–2020 to determine the safety profile of these products in a real-life scenario. This is a retrospective observational study. Data were gathered from the list of AEFIs notified in subjects between 12 and 18 years of age following administration of recommended vaccines in Puglia in 2016–2020. AEFIs were classified according to the WHO’s decisional algorithm, and causality assessment was carried out for serious AEFIs. From 2016 to 2020, 323,627 doses of vaccine were administered to adolescents in Puglia and 50 AEFIs were reported (reporting rate: 15.4 × 100,000 doses). Of these, 17 (34.0%) were classified as serious, and causality assessment identified 13 of them (76.5%) as vaccine related. The most common symptoms were local reactions, fever and neurological symptoms. No deaths were notified. The benefits of immunization in adolescents appear to be greater than the risk of AEFIs for all studied vaccines; in fact, AEFIs occur in less than 0.1‰ of patients and are generally mild and self-limiting.

scholarly journals Adverse events following immunisation with a meningococcal serogroup B vaccine: report from post-marketing surveillance, Germany, 2013 to 2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dirk Mentzer ◽  
Doris Oberle ◽  
Brigitte Keller-Stanislawski
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Subcutaneous Tissue ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Proportional Reporting Ratio ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
System Organ Class ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing

Background and aim In January 2013, a novel vaccine against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B, the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB), was approved by the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate the safety profile of this vaccine. Methods: All adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) reported from Germany since the vaccine’s launch in Germany in November 2013 through December 2016 were reviewed and analysed. Results: Through December 2016, a total of 664 individual case safety reports (ICSR) notifying 1,960 AEFI were received. A majority of vaccinees for whom AEFI were reported were children 2 to 11 years of age (n = 280; 42.2%) followed by infants and toddlers aged 28 days to 23 months (n = 170; 25.6%). General disorders and administration site conditions was the System Organ Class (SOC) with the majority of AEFI (n = 977; 49.8%), followed by nervous system disorders (n = 249; 12.7%), and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (n = 191; 9.7%). Screening of patient records for immune-mediated and neurological diseases did not raise any safety signal in terms of an increased proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Conclusions: The safety profile described in the Summary of Product Characteristics, in general, is confirmed by data from spontaneous reporting. No safety concerns were identified.

scholarly journals P647 Post-marketing evaluation of reported adverse events of a multi-strain probiotic product confirms that change in manufacturing site had no impact on safety profile

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S534-S535
Author(s):  
V Panetta ◽  
I Simonelli ◽  
A Bacchieri ◽  
S Papetti ◽  
E De Stefani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
System Organ Class ◽  
Safety Report ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Probiotic Product ◽  
System Organ

Abstract Background In 2016, the manufacturing site of the multi-strain probiotic product VSL#3 changed. The present work is aimed at verifying if this change had an impact on the safety profile of the product. Methods The safety reports from post-marketing surveillance in the USA received by Alfasigma in the years 2014–2015 were compared with those received in the years 2017–2018. 2016 was not considered, because the product on the market during this year could likely come from both manufacturing sites. VSL#3 is sold in the US market as a medical food. Most of the reports were from consumers and were not medically confirmed. However, this happened in both periods, so no bias is introduced in the comparison. Each single safety report contained one or more adverse events (AEs), coded with MedDRA. The comparison between the two periods concerned primarily the number of safety reports in relation to the number of units sold. Given the similarity of trends between the total number of safety reports and sales in the two periods, the frequencies of the AEs and serious AEs were also compared at the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) level. Results More than 70% of subjects reporting an AE were women in both periods under comparison; mean age was 58; phone was the most frequent means (overall 76%). Table 1 summarises the main results. Sales and number of safety reports were higher in the second than in the first period. However, the ratio between number of reports and sales was higher in the 2014–2015 period compared with the 2017–2018 period: 3.5 vs. 2.9 reports per 10,000 units sold, respectively. Similar results were obtained when stratifying the described ratios by formulation. The percentages of reports with at least one serious AE were respectively 3.2% in the first period and 2.5% in the second. The two periods appeared to be similar even with respect to the percentages of AEs and serious AEs by SOC and PT, being the AEs under the Gastrointestinal SOC the most frequently reported, as expected. Conclusion The analyzed data show that the manufacturing site change had no impact on the safety profile of VSL#3.

scholarly journals Long-term effectiveness of Gliadel ® implant for malignant glioma and prognostic factors for survival: 3-year results of a post-marketing surveillance in Japan

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Iuchi ◽  
Akihiro Inoue ◽  
Yuichi Hirose ◽  
Motohiro Morioka ◽  
Keishi Horiguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Malignant Glioma ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
World Health ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Reported Data

Abstract Background Adjuvant treatment with Gliadel wafers may prolong overall survival (OS) for malignant glioma patients without increasing toxicity. In Japan, the long-term OS of these patients treated with Gliadel 7.7 mg implants has not been studied. We evaluated OS and prognostic factors that might affect OS in Japanese patients with malignant glioma who received the Gliadel 7.7 mg implant. Methods This observational, long-term, post-marketing surveillance was an extension of a previous surveillance. Data were collected through case report forms at 2 and 3 years after Gliadel implant. Up to 8 Gliadel wafers (61.6 mg of carmustine) were placed over the tumor resection site. Primary endpoints were OS and prognostic factors that may influence OS. Results Among the 506 patients analyzed, 62.6% had newly diagnosed disease, and 37.4% had recurrent disease; 79.1% had glioblastoma histological type and 79.6% had World Health Organization Grade IV disease. Patients received a median of 8 wafers. The median OS was 18.0 months; OS rates were 39.8% and 31.5% at 2 and 3 years, respectively. Age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.456; P = 0.002), lower resection rate (HR: 1.206; P < 0.001), recurrence (HR: 2.418; P < 0.001), and concomitant radiotherapy (HR: 0.588; P < 0.001) were identified as significant prognostic factors. Conclusions This study confirmed the 2- and 3-year OS of Japanese malignant glioma patients with varied backgrounds after Gliadel implant. With a careful interpretation of indirect comparisons with previously reported data, the results suggest that prognosis could be improved with Gliadel implants.

scholarly journals Adverse Events Following Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella Vaccination and the Case of Seizures: A Post Marketing Active Surveillance in Puglia Italian Region, 2017–2018

Vaccines ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanizzi ◽  
Stella ◽  
Ancona ◽  
Malcangi ◽  
Bianchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Causality Assessment ◽  
Reporting Rate ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Second Year Of Life ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Active Surveillance Program

Since 2012, the Italian Ministry of Health has recommended to improve the surveillance of adverse events following the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) tetravalent vaccine that was provided in the official immunization schedule of some Italian regions for children during the second year of life. This recommendation was based on data from some surveys that showed an additional risk of seizure following the administration of this vaccine. Responding to the Ministry commitment, the Puglia Region launched, from May 2017 to November 2018, a post-marketing active surveillance program of adverse events following MMRV immunization (AEFIs). Immunized children (second year of life) were enrolled on a voluntary basis, AEFIs diaries were used, and their parents were interviewed 25 days after the immunization. There were 2540 children enrolled; 2149/2540 (84.6%) completed the post-vaccination follow-up. Of these, 992 AEFIs were registered with a reporting rate of 46.2 × 100 doses: 883/992 (89.0%) AEFIs were not serious, while 109/992 (11.0%) were serious. For serious AEFIs, the evaluation of causality assessment was performed using the algorithm proposed by the World Health Organisation (WHO): 82/109 consistent causal associations to MMRV immunization were detected (reporting rate of consistent AEFIs: 3.8 × 100 follow-up). All serious AEFIs consistently associated with immunization resulted completely resolved at the follow-up. The reporting rate of seizure consistently associated with immunization was 0.05 × 100, lower than data previous published in the literature that did not report the causality assessment. Because no emerging signals were detected, our data from the active surveillance program confirmed the safety profile of the MMRV vaccine.

scholarly journals Associations between osteoporosis and drug exposure: a post-marketing study of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®)

Bone ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 116137
Author(s):  
Benjamin Batteux ◽  
Youssef Bennis ◽  
Sandra Bodeau ◽  
Kamel Masmoudi ◽  
Anne-Sophie Hurtel-Lemaire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
World Health Organization ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
World Health ◽  
The World ◽  
Pharmacovigilance Database ◽  
Post Marketing ◽  
Health Organization

scholarly journals AB0249 SAFETY OF BARICITINIB IN JAPANESE PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA): THE 2020 INTERIM REPORT FROM ALL-CASE POST MARKETING SURVEILLANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1150.1-1150
Author(s):  
T. Fujii ◽  
T. Atsumi ◽  
N. Okamoto ◽  
N. Takahashi ◽  
N. Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Chugai Pharmaceutical ◽  
Post Marketing Surveillance ◽  
Otsuka Pharmaceutical ◽  
Post Marketing

Background:An all-case post marketing surveillance (PMS) of baricitinib (Bari), that started in Sep 2017, collects safety and effectiveness for the first 24 wks of treatment and continues to collect serious adverse events (SAEs) for 3 yrs.Objectives:To evaluate Bari safety in RA patients (pt) in clinical practice.Methods:We report pt baseline demographics and adverse events (AEs) up to 24 wks for pts whose case report files for 24-wk data were completed as of Jun 2020.Results:Data from 3445 pts were analyzed (females=80%, mean age=64yr, mean RA duration 12yr). Bari dose regimen was as follows: 4mg, 60%, 2mg, 27%, 4mg→2mg, 5%, 2mg→4mg, 5%, and others, 2%. Concomitant use of MTX and glucocorticoid was 65% and 48%, respectively. 74% continued treatment for 24 wks. AE and SAE were recognized in 887 (26%) and 122 pts (4%), respectively. 6 pts died of pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia, cerebral infarction/ILD/aspiration pneumonia, adenocarcinoma, and colorectal cancer. Major AEs were as follows: herpes zoster=3%, liver dysfunction=3%, serious infection=1%, anemia=1%, hyperlipidemia=1%, malignancy=0.3%, interstitial pneumonia=0.2%, MACE=0.1%, and VTE=0.1%.Conclusion:Data do not show new safety concerns and encourage guideline-compliant use of Bari.Disclosure of Interests:Takao Fujii Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Consultant of: Asahikasei Pharma Corp, Grant/research support from: Asahikasei Pharma Corp; AbbVie Japan GK; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co. Ltd; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tatsuya Atsumi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie Japan GK; AstraZeneca plc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd.; Medical & Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd.; Novartis Pharma K.K.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., Alexion Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Pfizer Japan Inc.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nami Okamoto Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Asahikasei Pharma Co.; AYUMI Pharmaceutical Co.Eisai Co. Ltd; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.Sanofi K.K.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Novartis Pharma Co.; Teijin Pharma Ltd.; Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nobunori Takahashi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; UCB Japan Co. Ltd.; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Naoto Tamura Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Ltd.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; Eisai Co. Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Glaxo Smith Kline K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Novartis Pharma Co., Atsuo Nakajima: None declared, Ayako Nakajima Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK; Actelion Pharmaceuticals Japan Ltd., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd.,Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Glaxo Smith Kline K.K., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Grant/research support from: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Pfizer Japan Inc., Hiroaki Matsuno Speakers bureau: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Consultant of: Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Astellas Pharma Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K, Naoto Tsujimoto Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Atsushi Nishikawa Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Taeko Ishii Shareholder of: Eli Lilly, Employee of: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Tsutomu Takeuchi Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Ayumi Pharmaceutical Co., Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. Eisai Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Co.; Novartis Pharma Co.; Pfizer Japan Inc.; Sanofi K.K.; UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Consultant of: AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma, Inc.; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Eisai Co., Ltd.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., Pfizer Japan Inc., Grant/research support from: AbbVie Japan GK, Asahikasei Pharma Corp., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd., DNA Chip Research Inc.; Eisai Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma Corp., UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: AbbVie Japan GK, Astellas Pharma Inc., Asahi Kasei Pharma Co., Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co.; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.; Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Pfizer Japan Inc., Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Corbus Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.; Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd.; Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., Medical &Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Michiaki Takagi Speakers bureau: Yes, but sponsored lectures without COI in the academic meetings, only.

scholarly journals Low-dose amikacin in the treatment of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha F. Sabur ◽  
Mantaj S. Brar ◽  
Lisa Wu ◽  
Sarah K. Brode
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Significant Rise ◽  
World Health ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Successful Treatment Outcome ◽  
Mdr Tb ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Background The World Health Organization recommends intravenous amikacin for the treatment of MDR-TB at a dose of 15 mg/kg. However, higher doses are associated with significant toxicity. Methods Patients with MDR-TB treated at our institution receive amikacin at 8–10 mg/kg, with dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with MDR-TB who received amikacin between 2010 and 2016. Results Forty-nine patients were included in the study. The median starting dose of amikacin was 8.9 mg/kg (IQR 8, 10), and target therapeutic drug levels were achieved at a median of 12 days (IQR 5, 26). The median duration of amikacin treatment was 7.2 months (IQR 5.7, 8), and median time to sputum culture conversion was 1 month (IQR 1,2). Six patients (12.2%) experienced hearing loss based on formal audiometry testing (95% CI 4.6–24.8%); 22.2% had subjective hearing loss (95% CI 11.2–37.1%) and 31.9% subjective tinnitus (95% CI 19.1–47.1%). Ten patients (23%) had a significant rise in serum creatinine (95% CI 11.8–38.6%), but only 5 patients had a GFR < 60 at treatment completion. 84% of patients had a successful treatment outcome (95% CI 84–99%). Conclusions Low dose amikacin is associated with relatively low rates of aminoglycoside-related adverse events. We hypothesize that low-dose amikacin can be used as a safe and effective treatment for MDR-TB in situations where an adequate regimen cannot be constructed with Group A and B drugs, and where careful monitoring for adverse events is feasible.

scholarly journals Comparison of tolerability between quetiapine and haloperidol in schizophrenia

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Naba Raj Koirala ◽  
Manisha Chapagain ◽  
Pratikchya Tulachan ◽  
Siquafa Zafreen
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
New Drugs ◽  
World Health ◽  
Typical Antipsychotic ◽  
Mental Health Systems ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Health Organization

Schizophrenia is a serious, disabling, often lifetime condition, which can produce severe functional impairment in patients. The life time morbidity risk for schizophrenia is estimated to be 1% and account for 2.8% of the total global YLDs. The World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems report of 2006 done in Nepal states in Nepal states that 12% of the patients are diagnosed as schizophrenia in out-patient mental facilities, 14% in community based psychiatry inpatient units and 34% in mental hospital. Atypical antipsychotics are the first line agents recommended for the treatment of schizophrenia considering better efficacy at least in the negative symptoms and better side-effect profile compared with typical antipsychotic. Haloperidol has been used as a standard comparator in numerous trials and new drugs have been compared to it to establish their efficacy, and safety profile. As the authors could not find out any such study which had compared the safety profile of quetipine against conventional antipsychotic, hence this present study is purposed to carry as an attempt to address this issue among Nepalese population.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jonmc.v1i1.7289 Journal of Nobel Medical College Vol.1(1) 2011 59-64

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document