scholarly journals Hybrid Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Analysis for Selecting Discrete Preferable Groundwater Recharge Sites

Water ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 107
Author(s):  
Christopher Papadopoulos ◽  
Mike Spiliotis ◽  
Fotios Pliakas ◽  
Ioannis Gkiougkis ◽  
Nerantzis Kazakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Inference ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Aquifer Recharge ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Aquifer System ◽  
Priority Vector ◽  
Individual Criterion ◽  
Inference Systems ◽  
Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison Matrix

This study proposes a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria methodology for the selection of the most preferable site for applying managed aquifer recharge (MAR) systems by utilizing floodwaters. The use of MAR can increase water resources for later water utilization in case of drought. In this multi-criteria problem, seven recharge sites are under consideration, based on nine criteria, aiming to make a final list of their relative ranking. A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) based on the logarithmic fuzzy preference programming (LFFP) method is used to determine the weights of criteria. LFFP is an optimization-based method that produces a priority vector from a fuzzy pairwise comparison matrix. Furthermore, fuzzy inference systems (FIS) based on the Mamdani approach are used to estimate the rating of each alternative with respect to the criterion examined, and then the final evaluation of the alternatives is obtained. A FIS is a fuzzy if–then rule-based system where the experts’ qualitative knowledge is translated into numerical reasoning for each individual criterion. The proposed methodology is applied in the aquifer system of the agricultural plain located to the southeast of the city of Xanthi in the Prefecture of Xanthi, NE Greece.

JUDGMENT NUMBER REDUCTION: AN ISSUE IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

2010 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 175-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
LONG-TING WU ◽  
XIA CUI ◽  
RU-WEI DAI
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Random Variable ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Priority Vector ◽  
Judgment Error ◽  
Scale Error ◽  
The Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) uses pairwise comparison to evaluate alternatives' advantages to a certain criterion. For decision-making problem with many different criteria and alternatives, pairwise comparison causes a prolonged decision-making period and rises fatigue in decision-makers' mentality. A question of practical value is if there exists a way to reduce judgment number and what influence the reduction will have on the overall evaluation of alternative ratings. To answer this question, we introduce scale error and judgment error into AHP judgment matrix. By expanding the scales defined in the AHP, scale error is eliminated. Taking judgment error as random variable, a new estimator to calculate priority vector is presented. In the end, an example is proved to show lowering judgment number will increase the probability of larger errors appearing in priority vector computation.

scholarly journals An Approach for Generating Weights Using the Pairwise Comparison Matrix

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Zaher Sepehrian ◽  
Sahar Khoshfetrat ◽  
Said Ebadi
Keyword(s):  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Decision Criterion ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Decision Criteria ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Assurance Region ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been used for obtaining weights for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), an approach known as DEAHP. This method sometimes identifies more than one decision criterion or alternative as DEAHP-efficient. To overcome this problem, this paper proposes a new approach that not only generates appropriate weights for the decision criteria or alternatives, but also differentiates between DEAHP-efficient decision criteria or alternatives. To this end, we propose a DEA model with an assurance region and a cross-weight model that prioritizes decision criteria or alternatives by considering their most unfavorable weights. Two numerical examples are also provided to illustrate the advantages and potential applications of the proposed model.

scholarly journals AHP PRIORITIES AND MARKOV-CHAPMAN-KOLMOGOROV STEADY-STATES PROBABILITIES

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stan Lipovetsky
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
General Solution ◽  
Stochastic Modeling ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
System Of Equations ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Pair Comparison ◽  
Priority Vector ◽  
Discrete States ◽  
Steady State Probabilities

<div class="MsoTitle" style="margin: 12pt 0in 15pt;"><p>An AHP matrix of the quotients of the pair comparison priorities is transformed to a matrix of shares of the preferences which can be used in Markov stochastic modeling via the Chapman-Kolmogorov system of equations for the discrete states. It yields a general solution and the steady-state probabilities. The AHP priority vector can be interpreted as these probabilities belonging to the discrete states corresponding to the compared items. The results of stochastic modeling correspond to robust estimations of priority vectors not prone to influence of possible errors among the elements of a pairwise comparison matrix.</p></div><div class="MsoTitle" style="margin: 12pt 0in 15pt;"> </div>

scholarly journals Application of the AHP-BWM Model for Evaluating Driver Behavior Factors Related to Road Safety: A Case Study for Budapest

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarbast Moslem ◽  
Danish Farooq ◽  
Omid Ghorbanzadeh ◽  
Thomas Blaschke
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Road Safety ◽  
Driver Behavior ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Scientific Data ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Complex Decision Making

The use of driver behavior has been considered a complex way to solve road safety complications. Car drivers are usually involved in various risky driving factors which lead to accidents where people are fatally or seriously injured. The present study aims to dissect and rank the significant driver behavior factors related to road safety by applying an integrated multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model, which is structured as a hierarchy with at least one 5 × 5 (or bigger) pairwise comparison matrix (PCM). A real-world, complex decision-making problem was selected to evaluate the possible application of the proposed model (driver behavior preferences related to road safety problems). The application of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) alone, by precluding layman participants, might cause a loss of reliable information in the case of the decision-making systems with big PCMs. Evading this tricky issue, we used the Best Worst Method (BWM) to make the layman’s evaluator task easier and timesaving. Therefore, the AHP-BWM model was found to be a suitable integration to evaluate risky driver behavior factors within a designed three-level hierarchical structure. The model results found the most significant driver behavior factors that influence road safety for each level, based on evaluator responses on the driver behavior questionnaire (DBQ). Moreover, the output vector of weights in the integrated model is more consistent, with results for 5 × 5 PCMs or bigger. The proposed AHP-BWM model can be used for PCMs with scientific data organized by traditional means.

Improved Consistency Ratio for Pairwise Comparison Matrix in Analytic Hierarchy Processes

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650020
Author(s):  
L. N. Pradeep Kumar Rallabandi ◽  
Ravindranath Vandrangi ◽  
Subba Rao Rachakonda
Keyword(s):  
Error Function ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Large Set ◽  
Simulation Experiments ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Comparison Matrix ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Original Information

The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) uses pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) to rank a known set of alternatives. Sometimes the comparisons made by the experts may be inconsistent which results in incorrect weights and rankings for the AHP. In this paper, a method is proposed which identifies inconsistent elements in a PCM and revises them iteratively until the inconsistency is reduced to an acceptable level. An error function similar to chi-square is used to identify the inconsistent elements which are revised with suitable values. The method is illustrated with some numerical examples mentioned in the literature and a comparative study of the results in terms of deviation from the PCM and preservation of original information is taken up. Monte Carlo simulation experiments over a large set of random matrices indicate that the proposed method converges for the moderately inconsistent matrices.

scholarly journals On the Statistical Discrepancy and Affinity of Priority Vector Heuristics in Pairwise-Comparison-Based Methods

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1150
Author(s):  
Pawel Tadeusz Kazibudzki
Keyword(s):  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Priority Vector ◽  
Approximation Quality ◽  
Statistical Measures ◽  
Eigenvalue Method ◽  
Mathematica Software ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Alternative Solutions

There are numerous priority deriving methods (PDMs) for pairwise-comparison-based (PCB) problems. They are often examined within the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which applies the Principal Right Eigenvalue Method (PREV) in the process of prioritizing alternatives. It is known that when decision makers (DMs) are consistent with their preferences when making evaluations concerning various decision options, all available PDMs result in the same priority vector (PV). However, when the evaluations of DMs are inconsistent and their preferences concerning alternative solutions to a particular problem are not transitive (cardinally), the outcomes are often different. This research study examines selected PDMs in relation to their ranking credibility, which is assessed by relevant statistical measures. These measures determine the approximation quality of the selected PDMs. The examined estimates refer to the inconsistency of various Pairwise Comparison Matrices (PCMs)—i.e., W = (wij), wij > 0, where i, j = 1,…, n—which are obtained during the pairwise comparison simulation process examined with the application of Wolfram’s Mathematica Software. Thus, theoretical considerations are accompanied by Monte Carlo simulations that apply various scenarios for the PCM perturbation process and are designed for hypothetical three-level AHP frameworks. The examination results show the similarities and discrepancies among the examined PDMs from the perspective of their quality, which enriches the state of knowledge about the examined PCB prioritization methodology and provides further prospective opportunities.

scholarly journals COVID-19 Susceptibility Mapping Using Multicriteria Evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 521-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Showmitra Kumar Sarkar
Keyword(s):  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Government Organizations ◽  
Multicriteria Evaluation ◽  
Susceptibility Index ◽  
Effective Decision ◽  
Effective Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchy Process

ABSTRACTObjective: The purpose of this research was to investigate coronavirus disease (COVID-19) susceptibility in districts of Bangladesh using multicriteria evaluation techniques.Methods: Secondary data were collected from different government organizations, 120 primary surveys were conducted for calculating weights, and results were validated through 12 key people’s interviews. Pairwise comparison matrixes were calculated for 9 factors and subfactors. The analytic hierarchy process used for calculating the susceptibility index and map was prepared based on the results.Results: According to the results, multiple causal factors might be responsible for COVID-19 spreading in Bangladesh. Dhaka might be vulnerable to COVID-19 due to a higher population, population density, and international collaboration. According to the pairwise comparison matrix, the consistency ratio for subfactors and factors was in the permissible limit (ie, less than 0.10). The highest factor weight of 0.2907 was found for the factors type of port. The maximum value for the susceptibility index was 0.435219362 for Chittagong, and the minimum value was 0.076174 for Naogaon.Conclusions: The findings of this research might help the communities and government agencies with effective decision-making.

scholarly journals Matrix of pairwise comparison: decision making with the analytic network process

2019 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 02042
Author(s):  
Aliya Akhmadullina ◽  
Svetlana Vasilyeva ◽  
Tatyana Yakovleva ◽  
Svetlana Vopiyashina ◽  
Raisa Kraineva
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Environmental Planning ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Qualitative Factors ◽  
The Right

This article describes a method for analyzing hierarchies; identifies the problems with inconsistent judgments. The proof is given that the most effective tool allowing one to make the right decisions with inconsistencies is the introduction of the eigenvector on environmental planning and management. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a method for decision making, which includes qualitative factors. In this method, ratio scales are obtained from ordinal scales, which are derived from individual judgments for qualitative factors using the pairwise comparison matrix. This paper describes the applicability of a multicriteria decision-making method, specifically, the analytic network process.

scholarly journals Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariush Akbarian
Keyword(s):  
Analytic Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pairwise Comparison ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Pairwise Comparison Matrix ◽  
Dea Models ◽  
Dea Efficiency ◽  
One Step ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The One ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The aim of this paper is to present an original approach for ranking of DEA-efficient DMUs based on the cross efficiency and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods. The approach includes two basic stages. In the first stage using DEA models the cross efficiency value of each DEA-efficiency DMU is specified. In the second stage, the pairwise comparison matrix generated in the first stage is utilized to rank scale of the units via the one-step process of AHP. The advantage of this proposed method is its capability of ranking extreme and nonextreme DEA-efficient DMUs. The numerical examples are presented in this paper and we compare our approach with some other approaches.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document