scholarly journals Cancellations and Transfers Related to New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of Survey and Patient Safety Reporting Data From Ambulatory Surgical Facilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 28-38
Author(s):  
Lea Anne Gardner ◽  
Rebecca Jones ◽  
Melanie Motts
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Safety Issue ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Safety Reporting ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Rapid Heart Rate ◽  
Patient Safety Issue ◽  
Reporting Data ◽  
New Onset

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a cardiac arrhythmia characterized by an irregular rhythm and often rapid heart rate. People with AF can be symptomatic or asymptomatic and are at increased risk for stroke. In this study, we used two data sources—a survey and Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) reports—to examine new-onset AF in Pennsylvania ambulatory surgical facilities (ASFs). The survey was developed and conducted to learn more about new-onset AF– related cancellations and transfers in Pennsylvania ASFs and to update the Patient Safety Authority ASF Cancellation and Transfer Tracking Tool. The survey response rate was 53.1%, with 50.9% of respondents indicating new-onset AF–related cancellations in the last year. A five-year review of PA-PSRS data revealed an increase in the number of new-onset AF–related cancellation and transfer events that occurred in the last two years. In 70.9% of the reports, patients were 65 years of age and older. A paucity of research on this patient safety issue led us to identify areas for future research.

scholarly journals Slow Down: New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Challenges for Ambulatory Surgical Facilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 39-41
Author(s):  
Melanie Motts ◽  
Lea Anne Gardner
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Safety Reporting ◽  
Cardiac Monitor ◽  
Medical Issues ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Act One ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

As patient safety liaisons (PSLs), we are continually educating and collaborating with our Pennsylvania healthcare facilities. We often are asked questions about reportable events under the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act. One of the most common examples we discuss is cancellations and transfers out of an ambulatory surgical facility (ASF). The top three reasons for cancellations include preop instructions not followed, missed medical issues identified during preop screening, and no shows. The top three reasons for transfers include cardiac arrhythmias, aspiration, and hypertension. Interestingly, between discussions with facilities and review of event reports, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) has come up often as a common reason for cancellations or transfers out of the ASF setting, especially in gastrointestinal (GI) procedures. In fact, as PSLs, when educating ASFs on reportable events we often give the example of placing a patient on the cardiac monitor in preop and the patient is found to be in AF. In 2009, it was estimated that 13.1% of AF cases were undiagnosed,3 which may explain why patients are presenting with new-onset AF. People with AF are at an increased risk of complications (e.g., stroke);3,4 therefore, a cancellation or transfer may be necessary depending on the patient’s condition. These events are considered reportable to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Reporting System (PA-PSRS) under MCARE.

scholarly journals Acute Dental Periapical Abscess and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2927
Author(s):  
Amaar Obaid Hassan ◽  
Gregory Y. H. Lip ◽  
Arnaud Bisson ◽  
Julien Herbert ◽  
Alexandre Bodin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
National Database ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Periapical Abscess ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

There are limited data on the relationship of acute dental infections with hospitalisation and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to assess the relationship between acute periapical abscess and incident AF. This was a retrospective cohort study from a French national database of patients hospitalized in 2013 (3.4 million patients) with at least five years of follow up. In total, 3,056,291 adults (55.1% female) required hospital admission in French hospitals in 2013 while not having a history of AF. Of 4693 patients classified as having dental periapical abscess, 435 (9.27%) developed AF, compared to 326,241 (10.69%) without dental periapical abscess that developed AF over a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 1.7 years. Multivariable analysis indicated that dental periapical abscess acted as an independent predictor for new onset AF (p < 0.01). The CHA2DS2VASc score in patients with acute dental periapical abscess had moderate predictive value for development of AF, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) 0.73 (95% CI, 0.71–0.76). An increased risk of new onset AF was identified for individuals hospitalized with dental periapical abscess. Careful follow up of patients with severe, acute dental periapical infections is needed for incident AF, as well as investigations of possible mechanisms linking these conditions.

scholarly journals Use of Continuous Infusion Pumps During Radiation Treatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Bak ◽  
Eric Gutierrez ◽  
Elizabeth Lockhart ◽  
Michael Sharpe ◽  
Esther Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Safety Issue ◽  
Infusion Pumps ◽  
Additional Testing ◽  
Infusion Devices ◽  
Patient Safety Issue

The varied results of radiation exposure on infusion devices suggest that additional testing should be carried out to determine the limits of dose exposure, and to raise awareness around this patient safety issue.

Abstract P208: Functional Status, Rehospitalization, and Mortality Outcomes Among Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Prior and New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle P Hornsby ◽  
Kensey Gosch ◽  
Amy L Miller ◽  
Jonathan P Piccini ◽  
Renato D Lopes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Functional Status ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
New Onset

Background: Little data are available regarding differences in prognosis and health status between new-onset and prior atrial fibrillation (AF) among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: The TRIUMPH study enrolled 4340 AMI patients who received longitudinal follow-up including SF-12 health status assessments through 1 year post-AMI. We compared 1-year mortality, rehospitalization, and functional status according to AF type (none, prior, new) after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. Results: A total of 212 AMI patients (4.9%) had prior AF and 254 (5.9%) had new-onset AF. Compared with no AF, new AF was associated with older age, male sex, first MI, worse baseline physical function, home atrioventricular nodal blocker use, and worse ventricular function (c-index 0.77). Rates of 1-year mortality were 6.2%, 14.5%, and 13.0%, and 1-year rehospitalization rates were 29.1%, 44.2%, and 36.8% for no, prior, and new AF, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, neither prior nor new AF was associated with increased 1-year mortality, and only prior AF was associated with increased risk of 1-year rehospitalization (Figure). After adjusting for baseline SF-12 physical function scores, patients with prior AF had lower 1-year scores than those with no AF (40.6 vs. 43.7, p <0.003), whereas patients with new AF had similar scores (42.9 vs. 43.7, p=0.36). Conclusion: New-onset AF during AMI is associated with a number of comorbidities but, unlike prior AF, is not associated with adverse outcomes. These results raise the question of whether AF is itself a cause of or simply a marker of comorbidities leading to downstream adverse outcomes after AMI.

Abstract 302: Echocardiographic Parameters in Perioperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Surgery Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaspreet Arora ◽  
Arjun Nair ◽  
Leigh Cagino ◽  
Le Du ◽  
Mikhail Torosoff
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Stenosis ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Post Operative Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Social Security Death Index ◽  
New Onset

Background: We hypothesized that patients with new onset atrial fibrillation (AFib) following cardiac or non-cardiac surgery have similar echocardiographic features, regardless of the type of surgery. Methods: Study cohort included 4562 consecutive patients without history of atrial fibrillation undergoing general, thoracic or cardiovascular surgeries at a single tertiary academic medical center. Retrospective chart and echocardiogram review was performed. Chi-square, logistic regression, and analysis of variance were performed. Long-term all cause mortality was determined through Social Security Death Index. The study was approved by the institutional IRB. Results: Post-operative AFib was noted in 24% (275/1141) after cardiac surgery, 1.2 % (10/804) after thoracic non-cardiac surgery, and 0.7% (18/2617) after general non-cardiac non-thoracic surgery (p<0.0001). On available echocardiograms, 18% (48/264) had LV dilatation and 38% (98/261) had moderate or severe LV dysfunction. The left atrium was dilated in 53% (139/260). Moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation was noted in 11% (15/128), mitral regurgitation in 28% (45/16), mitral stenosis in 13% (11/82), aortic insufficiency in 27% (37/135), and aortic stenosis in 63% (19/135). When adjusted for the presence of coronary artery disease, valvular disease, age, and gender, only aortic valve stenosis remained an important independent predictor of post-operative atrial fibrillation in non-cardiac surgery patients, HR=13.9 (95%CI 1.5-132.3, p<0.022). Conclusion: Despite significantly increased prevalence of new onset AFib after cardiac surgery, pre-existing cardiovascular conditions, specifically aortic valve stenosis, confer an increased risk of post-operative atrial fibrillation rather than the procedure itself. Improved resource utilization can be expected if post-operative ECG monitoring is limited to the high risk patients, identifiable during peri-operative screening. Prospective studies of this important subject are needed.

New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation" as an Outcome Predictor in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis: A Systemic Review

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed W Mohamed ◽  
Mostafa K Riyad ◽  
Ahmed M Khamis ◽  
Heba F Toulan
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Cardiac Arrhythmias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Common Occurrence ◽  
Severity Of Disease ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Evidence of various cardiac arrhythmias in septic patients has been demonstrated by multiple clinical reports and observations .Most cardiac arrhythmias in sepsis are new-onset and may be related to sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction, autonomic dysfunction and, most likely also, by impairment and involvement of the cardiac conduction system. Aim of the Work to describe the incidence of NOAF and to determine the risk factors associated with its development, as well as its clinical course and its effect on the outcome of patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU. Patients and Methods A systematic search was conducted to retrieve articles that investigated the association of NOAF in patients diagnosed with sepsis. We identified potential Englishlanguage sources from the PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE databases. Keywords used were “atrial fibrillation” and (“sepsis” or “septic shock”). In addition, reference lists of any studies meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed manually to identify additional relevant publications. Results In our meta-analysis, we found that NOAF is a common occurrence in critically ill patients with sepsis, and its incidence rises with increasing severity of disease. Also, we found that NOAF in sepsis patients is significantly associated with increased risk of ICU. In hospital, and After hospital discharge mortality, as well as, increased risk of developing ischemic stroke. Conclusion NOAF is a common occurrence in critically ill patients with sepsis, and its incidence rises with increasing severity of disease. Our Meta-analysis suggests that it is independently associated with poor outcome. In view of these findings there is a need for better quality observational studies, because reliable identification of patients with sepsis who are prone for the development of AF may allow for early pharmacological interventions to prevent this complication.

scholarly journals The Association of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Mengxia Zhang ◽  
Lin-ling Li ◽  
Qian-qian Zhao ◽  
Xiao-dong Peng ◽  
Kui Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Incident Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Onset Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
New Onset

Background. There are distinct results for the relationship between new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) and subsequent incident cancer. To date, no systematic analysis has been conducted on this issue. This study aims to explore the relationship between NOAF and the risk of developing cancer through a meta-analysis with a large sample size. Methods. Electronic databases, such as PubMed and EMBASE, were searched for published relevant studies on NOAF patients diagnosed with cancer after and during follow-ups, including reported records of baseline information and the statistical result of morbidity. Two investigators independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data using uniform standards and definitions. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Cochrane Program Review Manager. Results. This meta-analysis consisted of five cohort studies and one case-control study, which comprised 533,514 participants. The pooled relative risk (RR) for incident cancer was 1.24 (95% CI: 1.10–1.39, P=0.0003). The temporal trend analysis demonstrated that an increased risk of cancer was observed during the initial 90 days (RR: 3.44, 95% CI: 2.29–5.57, P<0.00001), but not after that. Lung cancer (RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.47–1.55, P<0.00001) was associated with NOAF, but not colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Conclusion. This meta-analysis provides evidence that NOAF is associated with increased risk of cancer. The risk of incident cancer particularly increases within 90 days after NOAF diagnosis, but not after that.

Use of first names among medical staff… a patient safety issue?

Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 107 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-169
Author(s):  
Jonathan Hinton ◽  
Mark Signy
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Safety Issue ◽  
Patient Safety Issue
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document