scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis Perilaku Lesbian dari Seorang Isteri sebagai Alasan Perceraian

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 382-398
Author(s):  
Lita Mardani Siregar
Keyword(s):  
Child Custody ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Sexual Disorders ◽  
Human Actions ◽  
Divorce Law ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Joint Property

One of the principles in national marriage law that is in line with religious teachings is to make divorce difficult (divorce), because divorce means the failure of the purpose of marriage to form a happy and eternal family due to human actions. The problem in this reshearch is how is the regulation of the implementation of divorce in the Religious Court, what is the effect of the divorce law on the grounds of lesbian behavior of a wife, how is the consideration of the judge in the Ambon Religious Court decisionNumber 110 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA Ab. As a result of divorce law on the grounds that the lesbian behavior of a wife is related to child custody. The legal effect on marital property is that joint property is divided according to the provisions of the respective laws, laws, religion and customary law, while the inheritance remains controlled by each of the wives and divorced husbands. With regard to debt due to termination of marriage due to divorce borne by both parties with conditions that must be met where the rights and obligations of husband and wife are balanced in their authority to carry out legal actions. Judge's consideration in the decision of the Ambon Religious Court Number 110 / Pdt.G / 2016 / PA Ab in the case of sexual disorders (lesbians) immediately considers that this is in accordance with the provisions in Article 39 paragraph 2 of Law Number 1 of 1974 along with the explanation in letter e and letter f juncto Article 19 letter f Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975, Article 116 letter e and letter f Inpres No. 1 of 1991 concerning the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI).

Keadilan Distributif atas Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan bagi Keluarga Muslim di Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Siah Khosyi’ah
Keyword(s):  
Common Property ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Married Couples ◽  
Dropping Out ◽  
Legal Cases ◽  
Islamic Jurisprudence ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife ◽  
Muslim Scholars

The division of marital joint property after the breakup of marriage, whether dropping out of marriage due to divorce or due to death, is a new thing in Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). This is because the concept of mutual treasure is not known in the books of classical Islamic jurisprudence of Muslim scholars of the schools at their times, in which their work are always made as referral in the legal cases up to the present days. In Indonesia, the distribution of common property is regulated in the Compilation of Islamic Laws Articles 96 and 97, which stipulate the rules of distribution of joint property for married couples whose married are off as a result of divorce or death. Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law actually provides an overview of the flexibility of the distribution of common marital property, including in certain cases because the article is regulating (regelen) rather than forcing (dwigen), so that the division is not absolutely divided equally between husband and wife, and casuistically the provisions of that article may be disregarded.

Akibat Hukum Harta Bersama Perkawinan Dalam Pewarisan Di Indonesia Analisis Komparatif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Adat

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-96
Author(s):  
Muthmainnah Muthmainnah ◽  
Fattah Setiawan Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Muslim Community ◽  
Joint Property

this paper examines the  inheritance relating to joint property in marriage and recipients in the form of a comparison between Islamic law and customary law normatively. Customary law here is related to other customs and customs adopted by the Muslim community. Islamic law and customary law of Indonesian Muslim tribes have in common especially in terms of inheritance barriers. The potential for equality in the distribution of inheritance, including shared and inherited assets, is also very prominent.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Perceraian Terhadap Harta Benda Perkawinan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 151
Author(s):  
Sugih Ayu Pratitis
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Personal Property ◽  
Personal Rights ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Shared Property ◽  
Legal Consequences ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Husband And Wife

<p>The emergence of the problem of joint property in a marriage is usually when there is a divorce between husband and wife, or when the divorce process is taking place in the Religious Court. The purpose of the study is to examine the position of joint property in marriage according to Islamic law and the provisions of the legislation and the legal consequences of divorce on marital property. The research method used is a type of normative research where research is carried out by first researching the materials that are in accordance with the problem to be studied. The result of this research is that the position of husband and wife property obtained in marriage is shared property except personal property which is under the marriage will be the personal rights of each husband or wife. While due to divorce between husband and wife, the assets obtained during marriage are divided in half for the husband and half for the wife. The method for resolving cases of sharing of shared assets at the Religious Court is if the divorce has been approved by a judge, then a husband and wife can submit a request for sharing of shared assets in accordance with applicable law. And if a divorced husband and wife do not want to carry out the distribution of shared assets, then one of the parties can submit a request for execution in the Religious Court to force those who do not want to carry out the decision in accordance with what was decided by the Religious Court.</p>

scholarly journals THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES REGARDING DIVISION OF JOINT PROPERTY AFTER A DIVORCE IN THE CENTRAL ACEH REGENCY

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 170
Author(s):  
Hazar Kusmayanti ◽  
Efa Laela Fakhriah ◽  
Bambang Daru Nugroho
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Marriage Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Joint Property

This resarch reviews disputes revolving around the division of joint property after a divorce in the Central Aceh Regency using the methods; discussion with family, discussion by involving the customary institution Sarak Opat, and filing a claim to the Takengon Syar’iyah Tribunal. In general, division of joint property in the Central Aceh Regency is done by discussion through the customary institution Sarak Opat. The division of joint property after a divorce in the Central Aceh Regency that is done through discussion takes into account which household the child grew up in and how much money that household makes. Although this is not in accordance with the provisions of Indonesia’s Marriage Law and the Islamic Law Compilation, it may be in accordance with Article 37 of Indonesia’s Marriage Law and that this would not violate the rules within Islamic Law nor Customary Law, since in its core within Islamic Law and Customary Law there are specific rules regarding percentage of division of joint property following a divorce

scholarly journals PREDISPOSISI KRIMINAL TINDAK PIDANA PERZINAHAN DAN ABORSI DALAM PELAKSANAAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 61 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG KESEHATAN REPRODUKSI.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Siti Fatimah
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Behavior ◽  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Unwanted Pregnancy ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Mutual Agreement

This paper contains a discussion of predisposition or contradiction in laws and regulations governing the crime of adultery with the implementation of abortion. Adultery and abortion are criminal acts that are victimless in nature or crimes with mutual agreement and without victims. In positive Indonesian law, adultery is only considered a criminal act when one or both of the perpetrators are married people or in our society it is known as an affair or gathering. kebo. This is very contrary to Islamic law and laws that live in society or customary law as stated in the Pancasila. As a result, a pregnancy outside of wedlock or an unwanted pregnancy may result from this adulterous relationship. When a pregnancy outside of marriage occurs, the psychological condition of both parties is disturbed and eventually not a few decide to take the path of abortion, especially teenagers, even though at the risk of losing their life. Even though by law abortion is allowed, but even then it must be subject to rules, conditions and supervision. strictly carried out by competent parties as designated by law. The formulation of the article on adultery in Indonesian legislation is still unclear, especially for the act of adultery committed by two men and women who are neither married to any party. However, sexual behavior is risky or between other pre-marital sexual behavior according to Article 11 of Government Regulation no. 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health to prevent and protect adolescents from these acts because it is clear that they have a bad impact both physically and psychologically. This is where there is a conflict between Indonesia's positive law, namely between Article 284 of the Criminal Code and Article 11 of Government Regulation no. 61 of 2014 concerning Reproductive Health. Meanwhile, the adultery article as mentioned above has been clearly stated in Article 240 of the Draft Criminal Code, but so it has not been ratified for certain reasons. Among the efforts to prevent the crime of adultery and abortion is the enforcement of the substance, structure and culture of law in Indonesia.

scholarly journals Implikasi Hukum Terkait Dengan Pelaksanaan Pasal 24 Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 Tentang Wakaf

SASI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Sabri Fataruba
Keyword(s):  
Government Regulation ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
The Will ◽  
Legal Discovery

Article 24 of Law Number 41 Year 2004 on Wakaf states that wakaf with testament both orally and in writing can only be done if witnessed by at least 2 (two) witnesses who meet the requirements. The statement that wakaf with a will, either orally or in writing can only be done if witnessed by at least 2 (two) witnesses fulfilling the requirements as meant in Article 24 of Law Number 41 Year 2004 above means that if the endowers with oral or written testimony is not witnessed by at least 2 (two) witnesses who fulfill the requirements, it will have a legal effect on the validity of the waqf status. However, after the following articles and / or paragraphs of Law Number 41 Year 2004 along with their explanation, as well as Government Regulation Number 42 of 2006 on Implementation of Law Number 41 Year 2004 About Wakaf,  there was not  found any article explains what legal implications would be if the wakaf testament is not witnessed by at least 2 (two) witnesses who meet the requirements. Therefore, in order to overcome the incompleteness resulting in the ineffectiveness of Article 24, if there are any concrete events related to the will of judgment submitted to the court to be resolved, the judge shall be able to use the method of legal discovery, either according to the science of law or according to Islamic law appropriately, so it can provide legal certainty for justice seekers.

Marriage, Divorce, and Inheritance

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Butt ◽  
Tim Lindsey
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Family Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Mixed Marriage ◽  
Comprehensive Overview ◽  
Divorce Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Status ◽  
Marital Property

Indonesia has a highly complex family law system, with different rules for Muslims and non-Muslims. This chapter offers a comprehensive overview of the rules governing marriage for both groups, including registration requirements, the status of unregistered marriages, foreign marriage, mixed marriage, underage marriage, and polygamy. It also explains divorce law (including the grounds for ‘talak’ divorces, custody and maintenance rules, and rujuk or reconciliation), and the different forms of property dealt with when a marriage ends: harta bersama (joint matrimonial property) and harta bawaan (pre-marital property). The last part of the chapter deals with inheritance. It describes the detailed rules that apply to Muslims under the Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Compilation of Islamic Law) and to non-Muslims under the Civil Code, and how courts have interpreted them to allow more equitable divisions of deceased estates between genders.

scholarly journals KRITERIA TANAH TERLANTAR DALAM PERATURAN PERUNDANGAN INDONESIA

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriyanto Supriyanto
Keyword(s):  
Land Tenure ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
The State ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Farm Land ◽  
State Rights ◽  
Legal Consequences

When the State grants the person or legal entity is always accompanied by the obligations set forth in the BAL and the decision letter granting rights. Therefore prohibited from abandoning their land rights holders, and if the rights holders to abandon their land, the BAL has set the legal consequences of the disappearance of the relevant land rights and legal termination and affirmed as the soil directly controlled by the State. Criteria for determining the land has been abandoned, both under Customary Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Government Regulation No 36, 1998 and also No. 11, 2010 is substantially the same which includes wasteland Object land rights, land rights and management that have a basic mastery land; These lands are not cultivated, not utilized or not utilized in accordance with the circumstances, or the nature and purpose of the rights or basic mastery Therefore land should be maintained. To determine whether a field or farm land has been declared abandoned, the only criterion according to customary law used a specific period.Keywords: Wasteland, State, Rights Holders, A Result Of Law, Land Tenure

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI PERCAMPURAN HARTA BERSAMA DAN HARTA BAWAAN DALAM PERKAWINAN (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Agama NOMOR : 0189/PDT.G/2017/PA.SMG)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
Arun Pratama
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Individual Property ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Joint Property

<h1 align="center">ABSTRAK</h1><p>Pada lembaga perkawinan masyarakat dikenal adanya pencampuran harta perkawinan, sehingga tidak menutup kemungkinan adanya percampuran harta bersama dan harta bawaan. Dalam hukum positif hanya mengatur mengenai harta bawaan dan harta bersama secara terpisah, tetapi tidak diatur mengenai percampuran harta bersama dan harta bawaan. Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah ketentuan hukum mengenai percampuran harta bersama dan harta bawaan dalam perkawinan menurut UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) dan implementasinya dalam perkawinan setelah adanya perceraian pada putusan Pengadilan Agama Nomor : 0189/Pdt.G/2017/ PA.Smg.</p><p>Untuk melakukan penelitian menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif, sehingga data yang digunakan data sekunder. Adapun teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif.</p><p>Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan hukum mengenai percampuran harta bersama dan harta bawaan dalam perkawinan diatur dalam Pasal 35 Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan dan Pasal 1 huruf f KHI yang pada intinya menyatakan bahwa bahwa harta benda yang diperoleh selama perkawinan menjadi harta bersama tanpa mempersoalkan terdaftar atas nama siapapun, meskipun di dalamnya terdapat harta bawaan. Implementasi percampuran harta bersama dan harta bawaan dalam perkawinan setelah adanya perceraian pada putusan Pengadilan Agama Nomor : 0189/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smg adalah dalam hal pembagian harta bersama pihak istri mendapatkan bagian lebih besar dari pihak suami yaitu ¾ bagian sedangkan suami ¼ bagian. Hal tersebut mencerminkan keadilan distributif dimana  hakim  memberikan jatah kepada setiap orang berdasarkan jasanya atau memberikan kepada setiap orang apa yang menjadi haknya berdasarkan kepada azas keseimbangan atau memberikan hak kepada setiap orang berdasarkan prestasinya atau memberikan penghargaan kepada pihak yang berprestasi atau melindungi pihak yang berprestasi (pihak yang kuat).</p><p> </p><p align="center"><strong><em>ABSTRACT</em></strong></p><p><em>In marriage institution, the society knows a mixing of marital property, there is possibility of mixing of marital and individual property. Positive law only regulates the possessions and joint property separately, but it is not regulated about the mixing of marital and individual property. The problem discussed in this research is legal provisions concerning the mixing of marital and individual property in marriage according to Law Number 1 Year 1974 and Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) and its implementation in marriage after the divorce on Religious Court decision Number: 0189/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smg.</em></p><p><em>This research used normative juridical approach method, data used were secondary data. The technique of data collection was done through literature study while the data analysis technique was done by using qualitative analysis.</em></p><p><em>The results showed that the legal provisions concerning the mixing of marital and individual property in marriage are regulated in Article 35 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning Marriage and Article 1 letter f KHI which in essence states that the property acquired during marriage becomes joint property without the questioning the name of being registered on behalf of, even if there is individual property. The implementation of mixing of marital and individual property in marriage after divorce on Religious Court's decision Number: 0189/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smg is in the case of division of property together the wife gets bigger part than the husband that is ¾ whereas husband is only ¼. It reflects distributive justice in which the judge gives each person a share according to his or her services, or gives each person her/his rights are based on the principle of equilibrium or entitles each person on the basis of his/her performance or rewards the achievers or protect the achiever (the strong party).</em></p>

scholarly journals PEMBAGIAN HARTA BERSAMA DITINJAU DARI BESARAN KONTRIBUSI SUAMI ISTRI DALAM PERKAWINAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Muhamad Beni Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Fair Share ◽  
Double Burden ◽  
Marital Property ◽  
Joint Property ◽  
Taking Care

ABSTRAKPembagian harta bersama diatur dalam Pasal 97 Kompilasi Hukum Islam, di mana janda maupun duda berhak separuh dari harta bersama. Pembagian tersebut adil apabila suami dan istri memberikan besaran kontribusi yang sama selama perkawinan. Tidak sedikit dalam rumah tangga, salah satu pihak tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya, seperti suami tidak memberikan nafkah maupun istri yang tidak mengurus rumah tangga. Rumusan masalah yang muncul adalah bagaimana pembagian harta bersama berdasarkan kontribusi suami istri dalam perkawinan dari perspektif keadilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan mengkaji peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan harta bersama dan studi kasus terhadap Putusan Nomor 618/PDT.G/2012/PA.BKT. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembagian harta bersama berdasarkan kontribusi suami istri dalam perkawinan dari perspektif keadilan adalah pembagian harta bersama dengan menilai besaran kontribusi para pihak, di mana pembagian yang adil tidak harus dibagi 50 persen bagi duda dan 50 persen bagi istri. Akan tetapi duda bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih kecil dari janda apabila kontribusinya kurang selama perkawinan dan tidak menjalankan kewajibannya sebagai pencari nafkah. Janda bisa mendapatkan bagian yang lebih besar dari duda, jika ia mendapatkan beban ganda (double burden) sebagai pencari nafkah dan mengurus rumah tangga.Kata kunci: harta bersama, kontribusi, keadilan.ABSTRACTDistribution of assets is set out in Article 97 of Islamic Law Compilation, in which a widow or widower is entitled to get half of their marital property. The distribution is fair when each spouse give the same amount of contribution during the course of marriage. Not least in the household, one party does not carry out the obligations, such as the husband who does not provide a living, nor the wife who does not take care of the household. The formulation of the problem is how equitable the distribution of matrimonial property based on the acquirement of the spouse during their course of marriage from the perspective of justice. This analysis uses normative juridical research method by studying the legislation related to the issue of matrimonial property and examining Court Decision Number 618/ PDT.G/2012/PA.BKT. The results resolve that from the perspective of justice, the distribution of this joint property measured from both spouses’ contribution in marriage is that a fair share does not necessarily have to be half split of 50 percent for the widower and half rest for the widowed wife. However, a widower could earn a smaller share of the widow if his acquirement is less during the course of marriage, and fail to fulfill his obligation to earn a living. A widow can get a greater share of a widower, if she gets a double burden of earning a living and taking care of the household.Keywords: matrimonial property, contribution, justice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document