Faculty Opinions recommendation of Hematopoietic stem cells promote the expansion and function of adoptively transferred antitumor CD8 T cells.

Author(s):  
Jaroslaw Maciejewski
2007 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 492-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Wrzesinski ◽  
Chrystal M. Paulos ◽  
Luca Gattinoni ◽  
Douglas C. Palmer ◽  
Andrew Kaiser ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e13109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Sato ◽  
Hiroshi Takata ◽  
Naoki Kobayashi ◽  
Sayaka Nagata ◽  
Naomi Nakagata ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Génève Awong ◽  
Elaine Herer ◽  
Ross N La Motte-Mohs ◽  
Juan Zúñiga-Pflücker

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3028-3028
Author(s):  
Toshiki Ochi ◽  
Hiroshi Fujiwara ◽  
Kozo Nagai ◽  
Toshiaki Shirakata ◽  
Kiyotaka Kuzushima ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3028 Poster Board II-1004 Purpose The Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) is one of the zinc-finger transcriptional regulators, and its expression level is very low in most tissues of adults. In contrast, various kinds of leukemia and solid tumors express WT1 abundantly, and high expression level of WT1 is correlated with disease aggressiveness and poor prognosis. These findings indicate that WT1 is a promising target antigen for anti-cancer cellular immunotherapy. Following identification of immunogenic epitopes derived from WT1 which are recognized by HLA class I-restricted and HLA class II-restricted T cells, phase I/II WT1 peptide vaccination trials have been conducted. Although the positive correlation between the clinical efficacy and vaccine-induced WT1-specific T-cell response has been reported, the clinical efficacy is not satisfactory. Adoptive transfer of WT1-specific T cells seems to be the promising approach to achieve marked improvement in clinical efficacy of WT1-targeting immunotherapy, however, it still remains difficult to expand WT1-specific T cells sufficiently ex vivo. To overcome these problems, we attempted to establish gene-immunotherapy targeting WT1 using T-cell receptor (TCR) gene isolated from the WT1-specific T-cell clone. We also verified the feasibility of novel stem cell transplantation by transducing WT1-specific TCR gene into hematopoietic stem cells. Methods We cloned the full length TCR-αa and -β genes from a WT1235-243-specific and HLA-A*2402-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clone. The WT1-specific TCR gene-repressing retroviral and lentiviral vectors were constructed. Retroviral vector was transduced to human peripheral T cells in retronectin-coated plate. WT1-specific functions of TCR gene-transduced CD8+ T cells and CD4+ T cells were examined by evaluating WT1 peptide-specific cytotoxicity by 51Cr-release assay and WT1 peptide-specific Th1 cytokine production, respectively. To improve the efficacy of WT1-specific TCR expression, we developed the novel retroviral vector which can inhibit selectively intrinsic TCR expression (si-TCR vector). Finally, we transduced the WT1-specific TCR lentiviral vector into human cord blood CD34+ cells, and transplanted them to NOD/SCID/common-γnull mice. Then, we examined whether WT1-specific human mature T cells can differentiate in mice. The presence of WT1-specific human T cells in mice was determined by tetramer assay and IFN-γ production in response to stimulation with WT1 peptide. Results Following transfer of WT1-specific TCR gene into peripheral blood lymphocytes, WT1 peptide-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells could be expanded easily in vitro. TCR gene-transduced CD8+ T cells exerted cytotoxicity against WT1 peptide-pulsed target cells and human leukemia cells in an HLA-A*2402-restricted manner. Similarly, TCR gene-transduced CD4+ T cells showed WT1-specific Th1 cytokine production in response to stimulation with human leukemia cells in HLA-A*2402-restricted fashion depending on the interaction of CD4 and HLA class II molecules. The newly developed si-TCR vector appeared to inhibit expression of endogenous TCR efficiently and improved the efficacy of WT1-specific TCR expression 3 to 5-fold higher as compared to the conventional vector. Three months after transplantation of WT1-specific TCR gene-transduced human hematopoietic stem cells in NOD/SCID/common-γnull mice, differentiation of WT1-specific human T cells in murine spleen was evaluated. Tetramer assay revealed that human mature T cells expressing WT1-specific TCR on their cell surface were clearly detected. Furthermore, these WT1-specific CD8+ T cells appeared to produce IFN-γ in response to stimulation with WT1 peptide-loaded HLA-A*2402-positive cells. Conclusion The adoptive gene-immunotherpay using WT1-specific TCR gene against leukemia seems to be promising. Moreover, the novel stem cell transplantation using WT1-specific TCR gene-transduced hematopoietic stem cells might open the door to induce long-lasting anti-leukemic cellular immunity in patients with leukemia. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Haematologica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. e230-e233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulima Geerman ◽  
Giso Brasser ◽  
Sudeep Bhushal ◽  
Fiamma Salerno ◽  
Natasja A. Kragten ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4107-4107
Author(s):  
Max Jan ◽  
Florian Scherer ◽  
David M. Kurtz ◽  
Aaron M Newman ◽  
Henning Stehr ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Pre-leukemic hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) have been implicated in AML (Jan et al STM 2012) and also for several lymphoid leukemias including ALL, HCL, and CLL. Separately, relapse of ALL following CD19 CAR-T cell therapy has been associated with lymphomyeloid lineage switch. Finally, healthy persons with clonally expanded HSCs are at increased risk of hematologic malignancies including lymphomas, and in mouse DLBCL models we previously demonstrated the oncogenic sufficiency of BCL6 overexpression in HSC (Green et al 2014 Nat Comm). Nevertheless, the cellular origin of DLBCL in the majority of patients is not definitively known. We sought to investigate the presence of mutations found in DLBCL within matched HSCs. Methods: We deeply genotyped somatic mutations in diagnostic biopsy tissues of 16 patients with DLBCL using CAPP-Seq to a median sequencing depth of 1100x (Newman et al 2014 Nat Med; Scherer et al 2015 ASH). We then profiled each patient for evidence implicating HSCs using somatic mutation lineage tracing, in either direct or indirect fashion. For direct evaluation, we used highly purified, serially FACS-sorted HSCs from grossly uninvolved bone marrow (BM) (n=5; Fig 1a-b). For indirect assessment, we either profiled serial tumor biopsies (n=13), or interrogated sorted cells from terminally differentiated blood lineages (n=7), including peripheral CD3+ T cells, CD14+ Monocytes, and B cells expressing a light-chain discordant to that of tumor isotype. HSCs and differentiated lineages were then interrogated by direct genotyping, using 3 highly sensitive orthogonal quantitative methods, including Myd88 L265P droplet digital PCR (n=6), BCL6 translocation breakpoint qPCR (n=4), and DLBCL CAPP-Seq profiling of 268 genes (n=5). We used the theoretical limit of detection (LOD) genotyping performance for CAPP-Seq (0.001%, Newman et al 2016 Nat Biotech), and established analytical sensitivity of our custom MYD88 ddPCR via limiting dilution (~1%). These LODs met or exceeded the expected limit of sorting impurity by FACS (~1%). For 6 patients experiencing one or more DLBCL relapse, we deeply profiled 13 serial tumor biopsies by CAPP-Seq, and then assessed overlap in somatic mutations and VDJ sequences in biopsy pairs as additional indirect evidence implicating HSCs. Results: We obtained a median of ~2000 sorted HSCs and ~1700 sorted cells from differentiated lineages, and genotyped each population using one or more of the 3 direct genotyping methods described above. Three patients with sufficient cell numbers were profiled both by CAPP-Seq and either ddPCR (n=2) or qPCR (n=1). Surprisingly, we found no evidence implicating HSCs either directly or indirectly in any of the 16 patients, regardless of the assay employed or the cell types/lineages genotyped (e.g., Fig 1b). In 2 patients with MYD88 L265P mutations, we found evidence for MYD88+ B-cells with discordant light chains by ddPCR (~0.1%) potentially implicating common lymphoid precursors (CLPs), but found no evidence for similar involvement of T-cells or monocytes. In 6 DLBCL patients experiencing relapse, tumor pairs profiled by CAPP-Seq (median depth 957) shared 93% of somatic mutations (75-100%, Fig 1c). Such pairs invariably shared clonal IgH VDJ rearrangements (4/4, 100%), thus implicating a common progenitor arising in later stages of B-cell development, not HSCs. Conclusions: We find no evidence to implicate HSCs in the derivation of DLBCL. While formal demonstration of absence of pre-malignant HSCs in DLBCL would require overcoming practical and technical limitations (including number of available HSCs, sorting purity, and genotyping sensitivity), the pattern of shared somatic alterations at relapse makes this highly unlikely. We speculate that unlike lymphoid leukemias, the cell-of-origin for most DLBCLs reside later in B-lymphopoiesis, beyond CLPs. Figure. (a) HSC sorting from BM by FACS (b) Allele frequencies of mutations found by CAPP-Seq in an examplary DLBCL case (x-axis) compared to the same variants in HSCs (y-axis). (c) Phylogenetic trees of DLBCL patients experiencing relapse (n=6) with tumor pairs sequenced by CAPP-Seq. Shown are the evolutionary distances between (i) germline and common inferrable progenitor (CIP) illustrating the fraction of shared mutations between tumor pairs, and (ii) CIP and both diagnostic (tumor 1) and relapse tumors (tumor 2) indicating unique mutations to each tumor. Figure. (a) HSC sorting from BM by FACS (b) Allele frequencies of mutations found by CAPP-Seq in an examplary DLBCL case (x-axis) compared to the same variants in HSCs (y-axis). (c) Phylogenetic trees of DLBCL patients experiencing relapse (n=6) with tumor pairs sequenced by CAPP-Seq. Shown are the evolutionary distances between (i) germline and common inferrable progenitor (CIP) illustrating the fraction of shared mutations between tumor pairs, and (ii) CIP and both diagnostic (tumor 1) and relapse tumors (tumor 2) indicating unique mutations to each tumor. Disclosures Newman: Roche: Consultancy. Levy:Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Five Prime Therapeutics: Consultancy; Innate Pharma: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; Corvus: Consultancy; Dynavax: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Diehn:Novartis: Consultancy; Quanticel Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Varian Medical Systems: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4640-4640
Author(s):  
Heng-Yi Liu ◽  
Nezia Rahman ◽  
Tzu-Ting Chiou ◽  
Satiro N. De Oliveira

Background: Chemotherapy-refractory or recurrent B-lineage leukemias and lymphomas yield less than 50% of chance of cure. Therapy with autologous T-cells expressing chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) have led to complete remissions, but the effector cells may not persist, limiting clinical efficacy. Our hypothesis is the modification of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with anti-CD19 CAR will lead to persistent generation of multilineage target-specific immune cells, enhancing graft-versus-cancer activity and leading to development of immunological memory. Design/Methods: We generated second-generation CD28- and 4-1BB-costimulated CD19-specific CAR constructs using third-generation lentiviral vectors for modification of human HSC for assessment in vivo in NSG mice engrafted neonatally with human CD34-positive cells. Cells were harvested from bone marrows, spleens, thymus and peripheral blood at different time points for evaluation by flow cytometry and ddPCR for vector copy numbers. Cohorts of mice received tumor challenge with subcutaneous injection of lymphoma cell lines. Results: Gene modification of HSC with CD19-specific CAR did not impair differentiation or proliferation in humanized mice, leading to CAR-expressing cell progeny in myeloid, NK and T-cells. Humanized NSG engrafted with CAR-modified HSC presented similar humanization rates to non-modified HSC, with multilineage CAR-expressing cells present in all tissues with stable levels up to 44 weeks post-transplant. No animals engrafted with CAR-modified HSC presented autoimmunity or inflammation. T-cell populations were identified at higher rates in humanized mice with CAR-modified HSC in comparison to mice engrafted with non-modified HSC. CAR-modified HSC led to development of T-cell effector memory and T-cell central memory phenotypes, confirming the development of long-lasting phenotypes due to directed antigen specificity. Mice engrafted with CAR-modified HSC successfully presented tumor growth inhibition and survival advantage at tumor challenge with lymphoma cell lines, with no difference between both constructs (62.5% survival for CD28-costimulated CAR and 66.6% for 41BB-costimulated CAR). In mice sacrificed due to tumor development, survival post-tumor injection was directly correlated with tumor infiltration by CAR T-cells. Conclusions: CAR modification of human HSC for cancer immunotherapy is feasible and continuously generates CAR-bearing cells in multiple lineages of immune cells. Targeting of different malignancies can be achieved by adjusting target specificity, and this approach can augment the anti-lymphoma activity in autologous HSC recipients. It bears decreased morbidity and mortality and offers alternative therapeutic approach for patients with no available sources for allogeneic transplantation, benefiting ethnic minorities. Disclosures De Oliveira: National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust and University College London: Research Funding; NIAID, NHI: Research Funding; Medical Research Council: Research Funding; CIRM: Research Funding; National Gene Vector Repository: Research Funding.


Cytotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. S78
Author(s):  
N. Lombion ◽  
C. Gouat ◽  
D. Tramalloni ◽  
V. Lapierre ◽  
B.S. Marteyn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document