Faculty Opinions recommendation of Dynamics of carbon, biomass, and structure in two Amazonian forests.

Author(s):  
Richard Houghton
2008 ◽  
Vol 113 (G1) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hammond Pyle ◽  
Gregory W. Santoni ◽  
Henrique E. M. Nascimento ◽  
Lucy R. Hutyra ◽  
Simone Vieira ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 101326
Author(s):  
Matheus Pinheiro Ferreira ◽  
Rodolfo Georjute Lotte ◽  
Francisco V. D’Elia ◽  
Christos Stamatopoulos ◽  
Do-Hyung Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tassiana Maylla Fontoura Caron ◽  
Victor Juan Ulises Rodriguez Chuma ◽  
Alexander Arévalo Sandi ◽  
Darren Norris

AbstractDegraded Amazonian forests can take decades to recover and the ecological results of natural regeneration are still uncertain. Here we use field data collected across 15 lowland Amazon smallholder properties to examine the relationships between forest structure, mammal diversity, regrowth type, regrowth age, topography and hydrology. Forest structure was quantified together with mammal diversity in 30 paired regrowth-control plots. Forest regrowth stage was classified into three groups: late second-regrowth, early second-regrowth and abandoned pasture. Basal area in regrowth plots remained less than half that recorded in control plots even after 20–25 years. Although basal area did increase in sequence from pasture, early to late-regrowth plots, there was a significant decline in basal area of late-regrowth control plots associated with a decline in the proportion of large trees. Variation in different forest structure responses was explained by contrasting variables, with the proportion of small trees (DBH < 20 cm) most strongly explained by topography (altitude and slope) whereas the proportion of large trees (DBH > 60 cm) was explained by plot type (control vs. regrowth) and regrowth class. These findings support calls for increased efforts to actively conserve large trees to avoid retrogressive succession around edges of degraded Amazon forests.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (10) ◽  
pp. 5874-5885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiyan Xu ◽  
Gensuo Jia ◽  
Xiaoyan Zhang ◽  
William J. Riley ◽  
Ying Xue

Ecography ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Terborgh ◽  
L. C. Davenport ◽  
R. Niangadouma ◽  
E. Dimoto ◽  
J. C. Mouandza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Terborgh ◽  
Ellen Andresen

An analysis was conducted of floristic patterns contained in 48 1-ha tree plots distributed at 29 sites in seven neotropical countries, with a primary emphasis on the Amazonian region. Analyses were made with family level data, using detrended correspondence analysis and multidimensional scaling to generate two-dimensional ordinations. Dissimilarity values for all pairs of plots were then used to compare forest composition at both local (flooded vs unflooded forests) and regional scales (e.g., western vs central vs eastern Amazonia). The predominate family of trees in a large majority of Amazonian and Guianan forests (by number of stems) is either Palmae or Leguminosae (sensu latu), followed by Moraceae and Euphorbiaceae. The forests of western Amazonia are particularly rich in palms, Moraceae, and Myristicaceae, whereas those of eastern Amazonia and the Guianas are rich in Lecythidaceae and Chrysobalanaceae. Dissimilarity between sites increases with distance for both flooded and unflooded forests. The tree communities of flooded and unflooded forests within a region tended to resemble one another more closely than forests of either type resembled the homologous forests of the adjoining regions. Within Amazonia the edaphic properties of each region and its geological history are tightly interrelated. It is therefore difficult to distinguish between evolutionary and ecological interpretations of the results.


Author(s):  
Gabriel de Oliveira ◽  
Nathaniel A. Brunsell ◽  
Jing M. Chen ◽  
Yosio E. Shimabukuro ◽  
Guilherme A. V. Mataveli ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lassi SUOMINEN ◽  
Kalle RUOKOLAINEN ◽  
Timo PITKÄNEN ◽  
Hanna TUOMISTO

Forest structure determines light availability for understorey plants. The structure of lowland Amazonian forests is known to vary over long edaphic gradients, but whether more subtle edaphic variation also affects forest structure has not beenresolved. In western Amazonia, the majority of non-flooded forests grow on soils derived either from relatively fertile sediments of the Pebas Formation or from poorer sediments of the Nauta Formation. The objective of this study was to compare structure and light availability in the understorey of forests growing on these two geological formations. We measured canopy openness and tree stem densities in three size classes in northeastern Peru in a total of 275 study points in old-growth terra firme forests representing the two geological formations. We also documented variation in floristic composition (ferns, lycophytes and the palm Iriartea deltoidea) and used Landsat TM satellite image information to model the forest structural and floristic features over a larger area. The floristic compositions of forests on the two formations were clearly different, and this could also be modelled with the satellite imagery. In contrast, the field observations of forest structure gave only a weak indication that forests on the Nauta Formation might be denser than those on the Pebas Formation. The modelling of forest structural features with satellite imagery did not support this result. Our results indicate that the structure of forest understorey varies much less than floristic composition does over the studied edaphic difference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document