Faculty Opinions recommendation of Is pain intensity a predictor of the complexity of cancer pain management?

Author(s):  
Florian Strasser
2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (23) ◽  
pp. 4275-4279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Marylin J. Dodd ◽  
Claudia West ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
Debu Tripathy ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To evaluate oncology outpatients’ level of adherence to their analgesic regimen during a 5-week period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A random sample of 65 adult oncology outpatients with a Karnofsky performance status score of ≥ 50, an average pain intensity score of ≥ 2.5, and radiographic evidence of bone metastasis were recruited for this longitudinal study from seven outpatient settings. On a daily basis, patients rated their level of pain intensity and recorded pain medication intake. Adherence rates for opioid analgesics prescribed on an around-the-clock (ATC) and on an as-needed (PRN) basis were calculated on a weekly basis. RESULTS: Overall adherence rates for ATC opioid analgesics ranged from 84.5% to 90.8% and, for PRN analgesics, from 22.2% to 26.6%. No significant differences over time were found in either of these adherence rates. CONCLUSION: One factor that seems to contribute to ineffective cancer pain management is poor adherence to the analgesic regimen.


Pain Practice ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. E1-E8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Giampiero Porzio ◽  
Claudio Adile ◽  
Federica Aielli ◽  
Andrea Cortegiani ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1713-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Miaskowski ◽  
Marylin Dodd ◽  
Claudia West ◽  
Karen Schumacher ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
...  

Purpose This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of the PRO-SELF Pain Control Program compared with standard care in decreasing pain intensity scores, increasing appropriate analgesic prescriptions, and increasing analgesic intake in oncology outpatients with pain from bone metastasis. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to the PRO-SELF intervention (n = 93) or standard care (n = 81). Patients in the standard care arm were seen by a research nurse three times and were called three times by phone between the home visits. PRO-SELF group patients were seen by specially trained intervention nurses and received a psychoeducational intervention, were taught how to use a pillbox, and were given written instructions on how to communicate with their physician about unrelieved pain and the need for changes in their analgesic prescriptions. Patients were coached during two follow-up home visits and three phone calls on how to improve their cancer pain management. Results Pain intensity scores decreased significantly from baseline (all P < .0001) in the PRO-SELF group (ie, least pain, 28.4%; average pain, 32.5%; and worst pain, 27.0%) compared with the standard care group (ie, least increased by 14.6%, average increased by 1.9%, and worst decreased by 1.2%). The percentage of patients in the PRO-SELF group with the most appropriate type of analgesic prescription increased significantly from 28.3% to 37.0% (P = .008) compared with a change from 29.6% to 32.5% in the standard care group. Conclusion The use of a psychoeducational intervention that incorporates nurse coaching within the framework of self-care can improve the management of cancer pain.


2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-99
Author(s):  
Péter Heigl

Pain is a significant and alarming symptom of cancer seriously affecting the activity and quality of life of patients. Recent research proved that inadequate analgesia shortens life expectancy. Therefore, pain relief is not only a possibility but a professional, ethical and moral commitment to relieve patients from suffering, as well as ensure their adequate quality of life and human dignity. Proper pain relief can be achieved with medical therapy in most of the cases and the pharmacological alternatives are available in Hungary. Yet medical activity regarding pain relief is far from the desired. This paper gives a short summary of the guidelines on medical pain management focusing particularly on the use of opioids. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(3), 93–99.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document