Faculty Opinions recommendation of Evaluation of statin prescribing for secondary prevention in primary care following new guideline recommendations.

Author(s):  
Juan-Carlos Kaski ◽  
Amelia Carro
2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 422-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Filippi ◽  
Diego Vanuzzo ◽  
Angelo A Bignamini ◽  
Gianpiero Mazzaglia ◽  
Ovidio Brignoli ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Shi Ying Tan ◽  
Heather Cronin ◽  
Stephen Byrne ◽  
Adrian O’Donovan ◽  
Antoinette Tuthill

Abstract Background Type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. Use of aspirin has been shown to be of benefit for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes; benefits in primary prevention have not been clearly proven. Aims This study aims to (a) determine if aspirin is prescribed appropriately in type 2 diabetes for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and (b) evaluate whether there are differences in aspirin prescribing according to where people receive their care. Design Cross-sectional study Methods The medical records of individuals with type 2 diabetes aged over 18 years and attending Elmwood Primary Care Centre and Cork University Hospital Diabetes outpatient clinics (n = 400) between February and August 2017 were reviewed. Results There were 90 individuals exclusively attending primary care and 310 persons attending shared care. Overall, 49.0% (n = 196) of those were prescribed aspirin, of whom 42.3% were using it for secondary prevention. Aspirin was used significantly more in people attending shared care (p < 0.001). About 10.8% of individuals with diabetes and CVD attending shared care met guidelines for, but were not prescribed aspirin. Conclusion A significant number of people with type 2 diabetes who should have been prescribed aspirin for secondary prevention were not receiving it at the time of study assessment. In contrast, a substantial proportion who did not meet criteria for aspirin use was prescribed it for primary prevention.


BMJ ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 330 (7495) ◽  
pp. 821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wei ◽  
Shah Ebrahim ◽  
Christopher Bartlett ◽  
Peter D Davey ◽  
Frank M Sullivan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Odesjo ◽  
S Bjorck ◽  
P Hjerpe ◽  
K Manhem ◽  
A Rosengren ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The preventive effect of lipid lowering treatment in secondary prevention after coronary heart disease (CHD) is well documented. In 2015, regional guidelines recommend an LDL cholesterol of ≤1.8 mmol/L for patients with established CHD but the adherence to these guidelines is low. Purpose Our aim was to predict potential reductions in cardiovascular disease (CVD) events defined as acute myocardial infarction or stroke if patients: 1) with low-dose/less potent or no statin were treated with Atorvastatin 80 mg, or 2) all reached LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L. Methods In total, 37 120 patients with established CHD in a primary care regional register 2015 were studied. Predicted number of CVD events were calculated with actual treatment, with improved treatment and with lowered LDL. For risk estimation we used data from a Cox Proportional Hazards risk estimation model based on patients from 2010 (n=52 042) in combination with data from the literature on effect of statin treatment and LDL reduction. A risk reduction of 22% for CVD events per 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL was used in our model. The risk prediction model included age, sex, diabetes mellitus, a history of heart failure and/or atrial fibrillations, treatment with acetylic salicylic acid and stroke or AMI past year. Smoking and BMI were excluded due to missing data but sensitivity analysis has shown only small differences in results. Results In total, 18% of included patients reached LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L and 32% had no statin treatment. Based on actual LDL levels and treatments, the predicted number of CVD events over 5 years was 9209/37120. If all patients with no statin or less potent statin treatment had been given atorvastatin 80 mg this would lead to a reduction of CVD events by 14% (7901 vs 9209). The largest gain, 33% reduction, occurred when adding statins to patients without previous treatment (1970 vs 2937). Furthermore, if all patients were to reach LDL ≤1.8 mmol/L the predicted number of events would be reduced by 18% (7577 vs 9209). Conclusion There is a substantial potential to reduce the number of CVD events in the large population of patients with established CHD in primary care by improved adherence to lipid treatment guidelines. Acknowledgement/Funding Närhälsan R&D Health Care, R&D Centre Gothenburg and Södra Bohuslän. the Swedish state under the Agreement concerning research and education of doctor


BMJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. e008678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiten Dodhia ◽  
Liu Kun ◽  
Hugh Logan Ellis ◽  
James Crompton ◽  
Anthony S Wierzbicki ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunnar Nilsson ◽  
Eva Samuelsson ◽  
Lars Söderström ◽  
Thomas Mooe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document