Faculty Opinions recommendation of Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in Great Britain, 1976-2005: age-period-cohort analysis.

Author(s):  
Iain Nixon
2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A31-A31
Author(s):  
R. J. Q. McNally ◽  
K. Blakey ◽  
P. W. James ◽  
B. G. Pozo ◽  
N. O. Basta ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Q. McNally ◽  
Karen Blakey ◽  
Peter W. James ◽  
Basilio Gomez Pozo ◽  
Nermine O. Basta ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard McNally ◽  
Karen Blakey ◽  
Peter James ◽  
Basilio Gómez Pozo ◽  
Nermine Basta ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Usman Khan ◽  
Ayham Al Afif ◽  
Abdullah Aldaihani ◽  
Colin MacKay ◽  
Matthew H. Rigby ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Distant metastasis in thyroid cancer significantly reduces survival in patients with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC). There is limited information available to clinicians regarding pathological features that confer a higher risk of distant metastasis (DM). This study aimed to identify patient and tumor factors that were associated with the development of DM over time in patients with WDTC. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis of patients with WDTC (n = 584) at our institution was performed between 2007 and 2017. A total of 39 patients with DM and 529 patients with no DM (NDM) were included. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics and patient survival were compared between the DM and NDM groups using a univariate analysis. Multivariate Cox-proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the risk of developing distant metastasis over time. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare survival between the DM and NDM groups. Results Distant metastasis had a substantial impact on disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5 and 10-years in the DM group; 71.0% (SE 8.4%) and 46.9% (SE 11.6%) respectively, compared to 100% survival in the NDM group (p < 0.001). The DM group had significantly higher proportions of males, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), nodal metastasis (NM), large tumor size (TS), extrathyroidal extension (ETE), positive resection margins, multifocality, follicular thyroid cancer (FTC), tall cell variant of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), and Hurthle cell carcinoma (HCC), when compared to the NDM group (p < 0.05). A TS ≥ 2 cm (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.370), NM (HR 3.806) and FTC (HR 7.068) were associated with a significantly increased hazard of developing distant metastasis in patients with WDTC. Conclusions TS ≥ 2 cm, NM and FTC are associated with a significantly increased propensity for developing DM in our cohort of WDTC patients. Graphical abstract


Thyroid ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mengmeng Li ◽  
Juan P. Brito ◽  
Salvatore Vaccarella

2004 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2185-2191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Munther S. Momani ◽  
Eileen Shore-Freedman ◽  
Barbara J. Collins ◽  
Jay Lubin ◽  
Elaine Ron ◽  
...  

Relatively little is known about variations in susceptibility to the effects of radiation in the general population. We have been studying 4296 individuals exposed as children to head and neck radiation. The present study was designed to evaluate the pattern of thyroid, parathyroid, salivary, and neural tumors in irradiated siblings for evidence of heritable susceptibility factors. We also wanted to determine whether the characteristics of thyroid cancers were influenced by familial factors. The following criteria were met by 251 sibling pairs: both irradiated, both with follow-up (average, 44.3 ± 9.4 yr; range, 9.4–59.5 yr), and both with organ-dose estimates. For each sibling pair we derived a quantitative score, taking into account the length of follow-up and known risk factors, for their concordance and used the sum of these scores to characterize the population. Whether we used thyroid cancer or all thyroid nodules as an end point, the degree of concordance did not exceed what could be explained by the length of follow-up and known risk factors. For thyroid cancer, neither the presenting characteristics nor their rates of recurrence were influenced by their concordance status. In summary, we were unable to identify familial factors that modify the strong effects of radiation exposure. There is no reason to alter the evaluation or treatment of thyroid cancer in an irradiated patient based on whether another member of the family has radiation-related tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document