Faculty Opinions recommendation of Improved outcomes for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis between 2000 and 2014: cracking the glass ceiling of early death.

Author(s):  
Parameswaran Hari
Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (15) ◽  
pp. 2111-2119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
David Dingli ◽  
...  

Key Points Significant improvement in outcome is a reality for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis in the past decade. Six-month mortality among transplant ineligible patients has declined since 2005.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1960-1960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan O Schonland ◽  
Tilmann Bochtler ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
Ute Hegenbart

Abstract Abstract 1960 Purpose: Severe cardiac involvement is known to confer a poor prognosis in patients with light chain (AL-) amyloidosis. These patients do not qualify for high-dose chemotherapy regimens. In a recent analysis we could show that melphalan/dexamethasone therapy was not able to overcome this poor prognosis (Dietrich et al, 2010). Since bortezomib is known to rapidly lower the involved light chain levels (iFLC), it appears a promising alternative regimen. There is only one prospective phase I/II trial in AL amyloidosis using single agent bortezomib (Reece et al., 2009). However, patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis had been excluded. We therefore assessed the feasibility of bortezomib/dexamethasone (Bd) in patients with high-risk cardiac amyloidosis as defined by Mayo Clinic stage III (median overall survival (OS) 3.5 months (mo), Dispenzieri et al, 2004). Patients and Method: We retrospectively evaluated 38 consecutive patients with systemic AL amyloidosis, who were classified as Mayo Clinic stage III cardiac amyloidosis based on their elevated cardiac biomarkers NT-proBNP, TNT and hsTNT values (patient characteristics table 1). 14 patients were untreated. For the sake of tolerability Bd was administered twice weekly with a reduced bortezomib dosage of 4 × 1.0 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 8 × 8 mg in a 3 week schedule. Result: Median observation of living patients is 5 mo after start of Bd. Median OS is 9 mo (Figure 1a). 18 patients died; among them 11 (29%) during ongoing bd. Median OS of the first line therapy group was 7 mo versus 13 mo in the relapsed group (p=0.056, Figure 1b). 21 patients achieved a hematological remission (HR) after a median of 3 cycles (64% out of 33 evaluable patients, 2 CRs and 19 PRs), whereas 3 patients died during the first Bd cycle and further 2 just started with Bd. Hematologic toxicity grade 3 or 4 according to NCI criteria was observed in 9 patients (24%) (toxicities are listed in table 1). Apart from the 11 early deaths we observed non-hematologic toxicity grade 3 in 8 patients and grade 4 in 6 patients. In 3 patients, the bortezomib dose had to be reduced due to toxicity. Therapy was stopped before the planned 6 – 8 cycles in 11 patients, in 4 cases due to toxicity, in 5 cases due to lacking HR and in 2 cases due to patient‘s choice. 9 patients completed their therapy regularly in HR while therapy is still ongoing in 5 patients. It is planned to update these data in November 2010. Discussion: The goal of this study was to assess whether patients with severe cardiac amyloidosis as defined by Mayo Clinic stage III benefit from Bd therapy. As already known from other studies, we observed a fast reduction of iFLC within 3 months from 203 to 81 mg/l (of evaluable patients) in median. Overall, HR rate was 64%, which is comparable to 71% previously reported by Kastritis et al, 2010. However, toxicity and early death rate were considerable. Main problem of the newly diagnosed patients was the severity of cardiac involvement (median NTpro BNP 11.346 ng/l) leading to a high early mortality. Main problem of the pretreated patients was the lower HR rate of 52% versus 83% of the newly diagnosed patients. Though we observed substantial toxicities in spite of the reduced Bd dosages, the rather poor OS does not appear to be largely due to toxicity. Conclusion: Dose-reduced Bd might be an important treatment option for patients with severe cardiac AL amyloidosis Mayo Clinic stage III because of its high efficacy. However, the toxicity is still significant. Inpatient care for the first cycle of Bd might lead to a reduction of the early death rate. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 527-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
F M Uckun ◽  
M G Sensel ◽  
H N Sather ◽  
P S Gaynon ◽  
D C Arthur ◽  
...  

PURPOSE The nonrandom translocation t(1;19) has been associated with poor outcome in pediatric B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because most patients treated by contemporary therapies now achieve improved outcomes, we have reassessed the prognostic significance of t(1;19). PATIENTS AND METHODS Cytogenetic data were accepted for 1,322 children (<21 years old) with newly diagnosed ALL enrolled between 1988 and 1994 on risk-adjusted studies of the Children's Cancer Group (CCG). Forty-seven patients (3.6%) were t(1;19) positive (+); 1,275 (96.4%) were t(1;19) negative (-). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome were compared using standard methods. RESULTS Translocation (1;19)+ patients were more likely than t(1;19)- patients to be 10 years of age or greater (P < .001) or CD10+ CD19+ CD34- (P < .0001), or nonwhite (P = .02). Patients with a balanced t(1;19) were less likely to be hyperdiploid than patients with an unbalanced der(19)t(1;19). Event-free survival (EFS) was similar for the overall group of t(1;19)+ and t(1;19)- patients, with 4-year estimates of 69.5% (SD, 6.8%) and 74.8% (SD, 1.3%; P = .48), respectively. However, patients with unbalanced der(19)t(1;19) had significantly better outcomes than patients with balanced t(1;19): 4-year EFS were 80.6% (SD, 7.1%) and 41.7% (SD, 13.5%), respectively (P = .003). These differences were maintained within the individual studies analyses and after exclusion of t(1;19)+ patients whose cells were hyperdiploid with more than 50 chromosomes. CONCLUSION The overall group of t(1;19)+ patients, as well as the subgroup with an unbalanced der(19)+ (1;19) had outcomes similar to that of t(1;19)- patients, whereas patients with balanced t(1;19) had poorer outcomes. Thus, although the overall prognostic significance of t(1;19) has been obviated by contemporary risk-adjusted protocols, the balanced t(1;19) translocation remains an adverse prognostic factor.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Ashutosh D. Wechalekar ◽  
Giovanni Palladini ◽  
Giampaolo Merlini ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo ◽  
Arnaud Jaccard ◽  
...  

Background: As immunoglobulin light chains present in AL amyloidosis are considered to be toxic to involved organs, especially the heart, rapid and deep hematologic remission with reduction of these light chains with frontline therapy may be crucial to improving long-term clinical outcomes. ANDROMEDA (NCT03201965) is the first phase 3 study in this patient population to evaluate major organ deterioration progression-free survival (MOD-PFS), a composite endpoint of time to end-stage cardiac disease (requiring cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); end-stage renal disease (requiring hemodialysis or renal transplant); hematologic progression per consensus guidelines1; and death. Here, we report the impact of early and deep hematologic responses on MOD-PFS. Methods: ANDROMEDA is a randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase 3 study of patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis who received cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (VCd) ± daratumumab subcutaneous (DARA SC; DARA 1800 mg coformulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 in 15 mL). Key eligibility criteria were newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis with measurable hematologic disease, ≥1 involved organ, cardiac stage I-IIIA, eGFR ≥20 mL/min, and absence of symptomatic multiple myeloma. Disease evaluations occurred every 4 weeks during Cycles 1-6. Hematologic responses were adjudicated by an Independent Review Committee. Landmark analyses for response were performed at 1 and 3 months (± 7 days). Analyses of hematologic responses and MOD-PFS were performed on the intent-to-treat analysis set. Patients without a baseline or post-baseline assessment were censored at randomization for the MOD-PFS analysis. Hazard ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were estimated based on Cox proportional hazard model. Results: A total of 388 patients were randomized to DARA-VCd (n=195) or VCd alone (n=193). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. The proportions of patients with heart and kidney involvement were 71% and 59%, respectively. Median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 0.03-21.3+). For the 1- and 3-month landmark analysis, hematologic response was available for 356 and 289 patients, respectively. Hematologic response rates by treatment group at 1 and 3 months are shown in the Table. MOD-PFS was longer in patients with complete response (CR)/very good partial response (VGPR) at 1 and 3 months vs patients with lower levels of response (Figure). CR/VGPR at 1 and 3 months was associated with reduced risk of death or major organ deterioration in a multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains and cardiac stage, (HR: 0.399, P=0.0006 and HR: 0.262, P=0.0003, respectively). At 1 and 3 months, cardiac and renal response rates were higher in those who achieved early and deep hematologic responses (CR and VGPR). Conclusions: CR/VGPR at 1 and 3 months was associated with a reduced risk of major organ deterioration and death in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. These data confirm that initial therapy that achieves rapid and deep hematological responses is essential to improving long-term outcomes in AL amyloidosis. Reference 1. Comenzo RL, et al. Leukemia. 2012;26(11):2317-25 Disclosures Wechalekar: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory; Caelum: Other: Advisory; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel. Palladini:Celgene: Other: Travel support; Jannsen Cilag: Honoraria, Other. Comenzo:Caleum: Consultancy; Unum: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jaccard:Celgene: Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Celgene., Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: A.J. has served in a consulting or advisory role for Janssen and has received honoraria from, received research funding from, and had travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid for or reimbursed by Janssen., Research Funding. Tran:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Pei:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vasey:Janssen Research & Development: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tromp:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Weiss:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vermeulen:Janssen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kastritis:Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Mizuki Ogura ◽  
Tadao Ishida ◽  
Moe Nomura ◽  
Hirofumi Irita ◽  
Junichiro Nashimoto ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is an effective treatment for multiple myeloma. However, many patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma are transplant-ineligible because of their age and complications, result in a poorer prognosis than transplant-eligible patients. Furthermore, many of them cannot complete normal chemotherapy because of low tolerability. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of modified bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (mVRD-lite) for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational analysis was performed on patients who received mVRd-lite for the first line chemotherapy between Jan. 2016 and Mar. 2020 in our hospital. Patients who received high dose dexamethasone to reduce tumor burden, and patients who received bortezomib with dexamethasone or lenalidomide with dexamethasone as a reduction regimen of mVRd-lite were also included. We evaluated ORR, OS, PFS and adverse effect. mVRD-lite at first was administered over a 28-day cycle. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 weekly was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally 18 days, omitted on days 1, 8, 15, which are the days of bortezomib administration. Dexamethasone 20 mg was given orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, which are the day of and day after bortezomib. We also reviewed patients background, especially complication of light-chain amyloidosis and considered the impact of cardiac amyloidosis on patient prognosis. This study was conducted with the permission of the Ethics Review Board in our hospital. RESULTS: The subjects analyzed totaled 40 transplant-ineligible patients. 11(27.5%) patients were AL amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma and 8(20%) patients had cardiac amyloidosis. Median age at diagnosis was 73 (range 48-86) and Male:Female=1:1. Most of them were judged inadequate to transplantation due to their age, general condition, or complication. One patient was ruled unfit to transplantation, because of his refusion. The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) were I in 5 (12.5%), II in 25 (62.5%) and III in 8 (20%). 5(25%) patients switched to maintenance therapy. 17(42.5%) patients discontinued treatment, because of adverse effect (cardiac failure 4 ; two of them combined with cardiac amyloidosis, rash 4, peripheral neuropathy 3, infection 3, etc). 2(5%) patients died during treatment by mVRd-lite, because of Grade 4 adverse effect, such as pneumonia. 11(27.5%) patients died during observation period and causes of death were primary disease and TRM. 1(2.5%) patient was died of heart failure associated with cardiac amyloidosis. The overall response rate(ORR) during treatment period of mVRd-lite was obtained in 34(85%), including sCR in 5 (12.5%), VGPR in 13 (32.5%) and PR in 14(30%). 2(5%) patients achieved MRD negative. SD were observed in 3(7.5%) patients. 3(7.5%) patients were not evaluated efficacy because of treatment interruption by adverse effect. Overall survival rate at two year is 64.3%, median OS was not reached, at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients are associated with poor prognosis. Modified RVD-lite is one of the appropriate therapeutic options, in the transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with cardiac amyloidosis had treatment discontinued due to cardiac complications. Further study is needed for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma complicated with cardiac amyloidosis. Disclosures Ishida: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Ono pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau; Takeda pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau. Nashimoto:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Tsukada:Takeda pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau. Suzuki:Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, ONO, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie and Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene and Amgen: Research Funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (4) ◽  
pp. 352-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foteini Theodorakakou ◽  
Despina Fotiou ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Efstathios Kastritis

Amyloidosis comprises a diverse group of diseases characterized by misfolding of precursor proteins which eventually form amyloid aggregates and preceding intermediaries, which are deposited in target tissues causing progressive organ damage. In all forms of amyloidosis, vital organs may fail; depending on the specific amyloidosis type, this may occur rapidly or progress slowly. Beyond therapies to reduce the precursor protein (chemotherapy for light chain [AL] amyloidosis, anti-inflammatory therapy in serum A amyloid­osis [AA], and antisense RNA therapy in transthyretin amyloidosis [ATTR]), organ transplantation may also be a means to reduce amyloidogenic protein, e.g., in types of amyloid­osis in which the variant precursor is produced by the liver. Heart transplantation is a life-saving approach to the treatment of patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis; however, amyloidosis may still be considered a contraindication to the procedure despite data supporting improved outcomes, similar to patients with other indications. Kidney transplantation is associated with particularly favorable outcomes in patients with amyloidosis, especially if the precursor protein has been eliminated. Overall, outcomes of solid organ transplantation are improving, but more data are needed to refine the selection criteria and the timing for organ transplantation, which should be performed in highly experienced centers involving multidisciplinary teams with close patient follow-up to detect amyloid recurrence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 56-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Hila Magen ◽  
Gilad Itchaki ◽  
Amos Cohen ◽  
Ra’ama Rosenfeld ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document