scholarly journals Efficacy of Modified Vrd-Lite for Transplant Ineligible Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4-4
Author(s):  
Mizuki Ogura ◽  
Tadao Ishida ◽  
Moe Nomura ◽  
Hirofumi Irita ◽  
Junichiro Nashimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cardiac Amyloidosis ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Treatment Interruption ◽  
Cardiac Complications ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is an effective treatment for multiple myeloma. However, many patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma are transplant-ineligible because of their age and complications, result in a poorer prognosis than transplant-eligible patients. Furthermore, many of them cannot complete normal chemotherapy because of low tolerability. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of modified bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (mVRD-lite) for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective observational analysis was performed on patients who received mVRd-lite for the first line chemotherapy between Jan. 2016 and Mar. 2020 in our hospital. Patients who received high dose dexamethasone to reduce tumor burden, and patients who received bortezomib with dexamethasone or lenalidomide with dexamethasone as a reduction regimen of mVRd-lite were also included. We evaluated ORR, OS, PFS and adverse effect. mVRD-lite at first was administered over a 28-day cycle. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 weekly was administered subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. Lenalidomide 15 mg was given orally 18 days, omitted on days 1, 8, 15, which are the days of bortezomib administration. Dexamethasone 20 mg was given orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, which are the day of and day after bortezomib. We also reviewed patients background, especially complication of light-chain amyloidosis and considered the impact of cardiac amyloidosis on patient prognosis. This study was conducted with the permission of the Ethics Review Board in our hospital. RESULTS: The subjects analyzed totaled 40 transplant-ineligible patients. 11(27.5%) patients were AL amyloidosis associated with multiple myeloma and 8(20%) patients had cardiac amyloidosis. Median age at diagnosis was 73 (range 48-86) and Male:Female=1:1. Most of them were judged inadequate to transplantation due to their age, general condition, or complication. One patient was ruled unfit to transplantation, because of his refusion. The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) were I in 5 (12.5%), II in 25 (62.5%) and III in 8 (20%). 5(25%) patients switched to maintenance therapy. 17(42.5%) patients discontinued treatment, because of adverse effect (cardiac failure 4 ; two of them combined with cardiac amyloidosis, rash 4, peripheral neuropathy 3, infection 3, etc). 2(5%) patients died during treatment by mVRd-lite, because of Grade 4 adverse effect, such as pneumonia. 11(27.5%) patients died during observation period and causes of death were primary disease and TRM. 1(2.5%) patient was died of heart failure associated with cardiac amyloidosis. The overall response rate(ORR) during treatment period of mVRd-lite was obtained in 34(85%), including sCR in 5 (12.5%), VGPR in 13 (32.5%) and PR in 14(30%). 2(5%) patients achieved MRD negative. SD were observed in 3(7.5%) patients. 3(7.5%) patients were not evaluated efficacy because of treatment interruption by adverse effect. Overall survival rate at two year is 64.3%, median OS was not reached, at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients are associated with poor prognosis. Modified RVD-lite is one of the appropriate therapeutic options, in the transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with cardiac amyloidosis had treatment discontinued due to cardiac complications. Further study is needed for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma complicated with cardiac amyloidosis. Disclosures Ishida: Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Ono pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau; Takeda pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau. Nashimoto:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Tsukada:Takeda pharmaceutical co: Speakers Bureau. Suzuki:Takeda, Amgen, Janssen and Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda, Celgene, ONO, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie and Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene and Amgen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Reversibility of renal failure in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with high dose dexamethasone-containing regimens and the impact of novel agents

Haematologica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kastritis ◽  
A. Anagnostopoulos ◽  
M. Roussou ◽  
D. Gika ◽  
C. Matsouka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Survival and Years of Life Lost in Different Age Cohorts of Patients With Multiple Myeloma

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1599-1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
Vanessa Bolejack ◽  
John Crowley ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Jesus San Miguel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Staging System ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Years Of Life Lost ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Age Cohorts ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact

Purpose To assess the impact of age on outcome and to analyze the projected years of life lost in patients with multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods Ten thousand five hundred forty-nine patients were evaluated; 6,996 patients were treated with conventional chemotherapy, and 3,553 patients were treated with high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. Results Mean observed and relative overall survival times in the entire cohort were 3.7 and 3.9 years, respectively. Observed survival decreased steadily from 6.4 years in patients younger than age 50 years to 2.5 years in patients ≥ age 80 years. A similar decrease was noted for relative survival. Higher age correlated significantly with higher International Staging System (ISS) stage. Relative excess risk of death differed significantly between 10-year age cohorts beginning from age 40 years (P < .001 for age 50 to 59 v age 40 to 49, P < .001 for age 60 to 69 v age 50 to 59, P < .001 for age 70 to 79 v age 60 to 69, and P = .009 for age ≥ 80 v 70 to 79). The average years of life lost per patient was 16.8 years in the entire patient cohort and decreased steadily from 36.1 years in patients younger than 40 years old to 4.6 years in patients ≥ age 80 years. Conclusion Age is associated with higher ISS stage and is an important risk factor for early mortality. Survival declined continuously by each decade from age 50 to age ≥ 80 from more than 6 to less than 3 years. The average of years of life lost in patients with myeloma is higher than in many other cancers and amounts to more than 30 years in patients younger than 40 years old but decreases to less than 5 years in patients age 80 years or older.

scholarly journals Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Modified Bortezomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasonelite (modified RVD-lite) Therapy for Transplant Eligible Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1961-1961
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi Okazuka ◽  
Tadao Ishida ◽  
Junichiro Nashimoto ◽  
Takao Yogo ◽  
Kanji Miyazaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract [Background] Thecombination therapy consisting of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RVD) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has been one of the standard induction therapies in recent years. However, 9-23 % of patients discontinued treatments because of severe adverse events in the previous reports (SWOG S077, IFM2009). Thus, it has not been clarified ifthe dosing schedule of RVD is appropriate. Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of modified RVD-lite for 45 transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). [Patients and methods] We retrospectively analyzed 45 transplant eligible patients with NDMM who received modified RVD-lite for induction therapy between February 2016 and March 2018. The median age was 58 years old (range 36~66), and 6 (13.3%) patients were AL amyloidosisassociated with multiple myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2once weekly subcutaneous (SC) on days 1, 8, 15, 22, lenalidomide 15 mg/day on days 2-7, 9-14, 16-21 and dexamethasone 40mg on days 1, 8, 15, 22. The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) wereI in 13 (28.9%), II in 30 (66.7%) and III in 2 (4.4%). High-risk cytogenetics, defined as the presence of deletion 17, t(4;14) and t(14;16) by FISH analysis, were identified in 5 (11.1%) patients. After 4 cycles of modifiedVRd-lite, we evaluated the efficacy and adverse events. [Results] The overall response rate (ORR) after four 28-day cycles of modifiedRVD-lite was obtained in 41 (91.1%), including sCR in 6 (13.3%) and CR in 5 (11.1%). SD and PD were observed in 2 patients (4.4%) and 1 patient (2.2%), respectively. One patient was not evaluated efficacy, because a patient changed modifiedRVD-lite to ixazomib, lenalidomideand dexamethasone therapy for grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Thirty-eight of 45 patients (84.4%) received autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after at least 4 courses of modifiedVRd-lite. The median number of CD34+cells/kg collected was 4.83 x 106(range, 1.1-11.9). All patients received melphalan at doses of 200 mg/m2. In these patients, response after ASCT were sCR in 15(41.7%), CR in 2 (5.6%), VGPR in 8 (22.2%) and PR in 8 (22.2%). Three of seven patients who did not received ASCT will receive ASCT ina few months. Among other 4 patients who did not receive ASCT, 2 patients chose other therapies without ASCT, and 2 patients could not receiveASCT because they showed no improvement in cardiac AL amyloidosis. Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were observed in 17 (37.8%). Most frequent grade 3 or higher AE was neutropenia (grade 3:17.8%, grade 4:6.7%). Only one patient (2.2 %) discontinued modifiedRVD-lite because of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. [Conclusions] The ORR after 4 cycles ofmodifiedRVD-lite was high (91.1%). These results might be related to low rate of discontinuation of treatment. Also, the ORR after ASCT was comparable to the results previously published (N Engl J Med .2017 Apr 6:376(14):1311). AEs in modified RVD-lite were feasible and manageable in most patients. Our results suggest that modifiedRVD-lite is very feasible and effective treatment for patients with transplant eligible NDMM. Disclosures Suzuki: Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ono: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; SRL.Inc: Employment.

Effect of Venous Thrombotic Events on Overall Survival in Multiple Myeloma: Analysis of Thrombotic Events Occurring in E4A03A Randomized Trial of Lenalidomide Plus High-Dose Dexamethasone (RD) Versus Lenalidomide Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Rd) in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, a Trial Coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1740-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Jacobus ◽  
Shaji Kumar ◽  
Natalie Scott Callander ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Rafael Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Venous thrombotic events (VTE) are a common complication of therapy with the lenalidomide plus dexamethasone regimen. The incidence of VTE with RD is approximately 20%, and can be lowered with the use of effective thromboprophylaxis, avoidance of erythropoietin, and the use of lower doses of dexamethasone. The goal of this study was to determine the impact of VTE on overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma by studying events occurring in ECOG E4A03 phase III trial of lenalidomide plus high (standard) dose dex (RD) versus lenalidomide plus low dose dex (Rd) in newly diagnosed myeloma (MM). Methods: Pts with untreated, symptomatic MM were eligible. Pts in the RD arm (Arm A) received lenalidomide 25 mg/day PO days 1–21 every 28 days plus dex 40 mg days 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 PO every 28 days; pts in the Rd arm (Arm B) received lenalidomide at the same dose plus dex 40 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 PO every 28 days. The trial initially did not mandate routine thromboprophylaxis, but recommended that such treatment be considered. After the first 264 patients were enrolled the trial was amended to require mandatory thromboprophylaxis of aspirin for all patients, with a recommendation to use stronger thromboprophylaxis with either warfarin (target INR 2–3) or low molecular weight heparin among patients in the RD arm. Results: 445 pts (median age, 65 yrs) were accrued; 223 randomized to RD, 222 to Rd. Median follow-up time is 30 months. Overall VTE including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in 18.5% of patients; 25.6% in Arm A and 11.4% in Arm B. Rates for the first 4 cycles of treatment were 20.2% in Arm A and 8.2% in Arm B, P&lt;0.01. Rates did not change substantially before and after the prophylaxis amendment. A partial response (PR) or higher was seen in 82.1% of pts who experienced VTE compared with 74.6% of pts who did not experience VTE, P=0.19. Overall VGPR rates also were not inferior. Pts who had VTE, however, had significantly higher other grade 3–5 toxicities such as hyperglycemia (14.6% vs 7.5%, P=0.051), cardiac ischemia (4.9% vs 0.8%, P=0.002), non-neuropathic weakness (13.4% vs 6.4%, P=0.039), infection/pneumonia (17.1% vs 11.1%, P=0.138) and fatigue (18.3% vs 10.5%, P=0.060). In a Cox PH model, VTE status as a time-varying covariate was marginally significant: HR 1.54 95%CI (0.96–2.47), P=0.074, suggesting patients that develop VTE have a higher hazard of death. Conclusions: The occurrence of VTE may adversely affect the survival of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma receiving Rev-Dex. VTE was associated with a higher frequency of other serious adverse events. Prevention of VTE events is a priority. Besides lowering the dose of dexamethasone, studies investigating optimum thromboprophylaxis are needed.

Lenalidomide/Melphalan / Dexamethasone Chemotherapy In 50 Patients With Newly Diagnosed Amyloid Light Chain Amyloidosis: First Results Of a Prospective Single Center Phase 2 Study (Leomex)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1993-1993
Author(s):  
Stefan O Schonland ◽  
Tilmann Bochtler ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Marianne Gawlik ◽  
Christoph Kimmich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Cardiac Amyloidosis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Plasma Cell Disorder ◽  
Amyloid Light Chain ◽  
Cell Disorder

Abstract Introduction Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare and life-threatening protein-misfolding disorder that is causedin most cases by a monoclonal plasma cell disorder. The goal of chemotherapy is to normalize the involved free light chain in serum which leads to an improvement or at least stabilization of organ function in most of these patients. A major challenge is the high treatment-related mortalityand toxicity in patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis. Study design We performed a prospective single centerphase 2 trial with50 patients not eligible for high-dose treatment.Main inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed and biopsy proven AL amyloidosis, significant organ involvement, age < 75 yrs and creatinine clearance > 40 ml/min. Treatment schedule was 6 cycles of an oral treatment with lenalidomide 10 mg day 1-21, melphalan 0.15 mg/kg day 1-4 and dexamethasone 20 mg day 1-4 every 4 weeks (L-M-dex). Primary endpoint was the rate of complete remissions (CR) of the underlying plasma cell disorder after 6 treatment cycles. Patients who received at least 3 cycles were eligible for hematologic remission (HR=CR+PR) analysis (At the time of study initiation “very good partial remission”in AL amyloidosis was not yet defined). The study was financially supported by Celgene. Patients and Methods Fiftypatients were included between 2009 and 2012. The median age was 67 years. 74% of patients had cardiac involvement. Outcome was compared with a historical group of 53 AL patients who received M-dex between 2004 and 2009 and fulfilled the same in- and exclusion criteria (patient characteristics see table). Results Forty-five patients (90%) completed 3 cycles and 35 patients (70%) completed 6 treatment cycles; overall 253 cycles could be administered. Reasons of discontinuation were toxicity in 6 patients (including one treatment-related death in the first cycle) or AL progression (9 patients). Ninety adverse events (AE) ≥ CTC grade 3 were recorded including 16 severe AEs. Seventeen hematologic AEs were observed (neutropenia 76%, CTC grade 4 in 2 patients). Most common non-hematologic AE was worsening of cardiac function or symptoms of autonomic neuropathy (14 patients). Furthermore 8 patients suffered from an infection, one patient developed acute renal failure and one patient a deep vein thrombosis. HR was achieved in 78% of patients: CR in 9 (20%)and PR in 26 (58%) of45 evaluable patients, respectively. Organ response was observed in 5 patients at the end of the study (6 months after the end of treatment). In the historical M-dex group HR rate was lower (58%, p=0.06): CR in 6 (15%)andPR in 17(43%) of 40 evaluable patients. OS was significantly improved using L-M-dex (see figure 1, median OS not reached vs. 26 mo., p=0.03). There was also a trend for a better EFS in the L-M-dex group (see figure 2, median EFS 23 vs. 16 mo., p=0.06). Of note, 3 L-M-dex patients (6%) died within 3 months after start of chemotherapy compared to 10 patients (19%) in the M-dex-group. Conclusion This is the largest phase II trial usinglenalidomide, melphalan and dexamethason in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients. Treatment was effective and feasible in this cohort of mostly elderlypatients. 78% of evaluable patients achieved a hematologic remission. The early death rate was low with 6% despite of inclusion of a high number of patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis. Overall, toxicity was manageable in most patients. Further improvement of these results might be achieved by prolongation of therapy in patients who have responded to and tolerate this combination therapy well. Disclosures: Schonland: Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: lenalidomide in amyloidosis. Hegenbart:Janssen: Honoraria.

Reversibility of Renal Failure in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma Treated with High-Dose Dexamethasone Containing Regimens and the Impact of Novel Agents.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3586-3586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efstathios Kastritis ◽  
Athanasios Anagnostopoulos ◽  
Aristotle Bamias ◽  
Maria Roussou ◽  
Dimitra Gika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Dose Dexamethasone ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Bence Jones Proteinuria

Abstract Introduction: Approximately 20% of patients with multiple myeloma present with renal failure (RF). It has been reported that with supportive measures and with antimyeloma treatment RF is reversible in 25 to 58% of patients. However, the impact of specific antimyeloma therapies on RF reversibility has not been clarified. Because high dose dexamethasone containing regimens are associated with a rapid myeloma control we performed a study to assess the impact of such regimens on RF reversibility. Patients and methods: Over the last decade 41 patients with RF, defined as a serum creatinine ≥2 mg/dL at the time of diagnosis, received primary treatment with high dose dexamethasone-based regimens in our Department. All patients were eligible fore assessment of reversibility of RF which was defined as a sustained decrease of serum creatinine to <1.5 mg/dl. Patients were separated into two groups. Group A: 26 patients who received VAD, VAD like regimens, Melphalan-high dose Dexamethasone or high-dose Dexamethasone alone and Group B: 15 patients who received high-dose Dexamethasone with thalidomide, with bortezomib or both. Results: Patients characteristics included: median age of 65 years, creatinine ≥4 mg/dL in 44%, Bence-Jones proteinuria ≥2 gr/day in 34%, ISS stage III in 76%, light chain only myeloma in 37%. Dialysis was required at presentation in 24% of patients. Response to treatment (EBMT criteria) was documented in 46% of patients of Group A and in 64% of patients of group B. The toxicity profile of novel agents-Dexamethasone combinations was similar to that seen in patients without RF. RF was reversed in 73% of all patients, in 69% of patients in group A and in 80% of patients in group B. After treatment only two patients initially requiring dialysis remained on renal replacement therapy. Multiple variables were assessed for their impact in RF reversibility: serum Creatinine ≥4 mg/dL and Bence-Jones proteinuria≥2 gr/day were associated with significantly lower probability of RF reversal (56% and 54% respectively). RF reversibility rate was 85% in patients who responded to treatment versus 56% in those who did not respond (p=0.046). The median time to RF reversal was 1.9 months for all patients, 2 months for patients of group A and 0.8 months for patients of group B (p=0.005). Conclusions: RF can be reversed in the majority of patients with newly diagnosed MM when they are treated with high-dose dexamethasone based regimens. Furthermore, normalization of serum creatinine occurs in one half of patients who do not meet criteria for objective response. Novel agents such as thalidomide and bortezomib or both can be safely combined with high dose dexamethasone for the treatment of Myeloma patients who present with RF and are associated with rapid rate of RF reversal.

scholarly journals Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Drug Induction: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela B. Thoennissen ◽  
Dennis Görlich ◽  
Ulrike Bacher ◽  
Thomas Aufenberg ◽  
Anne-Christin Hüsken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staging System ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Single Center ◽  
The Impact

Within this retrospective single-center study, we analyzed the survival of 320 multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving melphalan high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and either single (n = 286) or tandem (n = 34) autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) from 1996 to 2012. Additionally, the impact of novel induction regimens was assessed. Median follow-up was 67 months, median overall survival (OS) 62 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) 33 months (95% CI 27-39), and treatment-related death (TRD) 3%. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≥60 years (p = 0.03) and stage 3 according to the International Staging System (p = 0.006) as adverse risk factors regarding PFS. Median OS was significantly better in newly diagnosed MM patients receiving induction therapy with novel agents, e.g., bortezomib, thalidomide, or lenalidomide, compared with a traditional regimen (69 vs. 58 months; p = 0.01). More patients achieved at least a very good partial remission in the period from 2005 to 2012 than from 1996 to 2004 (65 vs. 30%; p < 0.001), with a longer median OS in the later period (71 vs. 52 months, p = 0.027). In conclusion, our analysis confirms HDCT-ASCT as an effective therapeutic strategy in an unselected large myeloma patient cohort with a low TRD rate and improved prognosis due to novel induction strategies.

scholarly journals Bortezomib Induction and Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Randomized Phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (24) ◽  
pp. 2946-2955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Ingo G.H. Schmidt-Wolf ◽  
Bronno van der Holt ◽  
Laila el Jarari ◽  
Uta Bertsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
High Dose Melphalan

Purpose We investigated whether bortezomib during induction and maintenance improves survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods In all, 827 eligible patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM were randomly assigned to receive induction therapy with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) or bortezomib, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (PAD) followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous stem-cell transplantation. Maintenance consisted of thalidomide 50 mg (VAD) once per day or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 (PAD) once every 2 weeks for 2 years. The primary analysis was progression-free survival (PFS) adjusted for International Staging System (ISS) stage. Results Complete response (CR), including near CR, was superior after PAD induction (15% v 31%; P < .001) and bortezomib maintenance (34% v 49%; P < .001). After a median follow-up of 41 months, PFS was superior in the PAD arm (median of 28 months v 35 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.90; P = .002). In multivariate analysis, overall survival (OS) was better in the PAD arm (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.00; P = .049). In high-risk patients presenting with increased creatinine more than 2 mg/dL, bortezomib significantly improved PFS from a median of 13 months to 30 months (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.78; P = .004) and OS from a median of 21 months to 54 months (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.65; P < .001). A benefit was also observed in patients with deletion 17p13 (median PFS, 12 v 22 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .01; median OS, 24 months v not reached at 54 months; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.74; P = .003). Conclusion Bortezomib during induction and maintenance improves CR and achieves superior PFS and OS.

scholarly journals MUKnine OPTIMUM protocol: a screening study to identify high-risk patients with multiple myeloma suitable for novel treatment approaches combined with a phase II study evaluating optimised combination of biological therapy in newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukaemia

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e046225
Author(s):  
Sarah Brown ◽  
Debbie Sherratt ◽  
Samantha Hinsley ◽  
Louise Flanagan ◽  
Sadie Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Plasma Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Cell Leukaemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Genetic Changes ◽  
Novel Treatment

IntroductionMultiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell tumour with over 5800 new cases each year in the UK. The introduction of biological therapies has improved outcomes for the majority of patients with MM, but in approximately 20% of patients the tumour is characterised by genetic changes which confer a significantly poorer prognosis, generally termed high-risk (HR) MM. It is important to diagnose these genetic changes early and identify more effective first-line treatment options for these patients.Methods and analysisThe Myeloma UK nine OPTIMUM trial (MUKnine) evaluates novel treatment strategies for patients with HRMM. Patients with suspected or newly diagnosed MM, fit for intensive therapy, are offered participation in a tumour genetic screening protocol (MUKnine a), with primary endpoint proportion of patients with molecular screening performed within 8 weeks. Patients identified as molecularly HR are invited into the phase II, single-arm, multicentre trial (MUKnine b) investigating an intensive treatment schedule comprising bortezomib, lenalidomide, daratumumab, low-dose cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, with single high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) followed by combination consolidation and maintenance therapy. MUKnine b primary endpoints are minimal residual disease (MRD) at day 100 post-ASCT and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include response, safety and quality of life. The trial uses a Bayesian decision rule to determine if this treatment strategy is sufficiently active for further study. Patients identified as not having HR disease receive standard treatment and are followed up in a cohort study. Exploratory studies include longitudinal whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging MRD testing.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval London South East Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 17/LO/0022, 17/LO/0023). Results of studies will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberISRCTN16847817, May 2017; Pre-results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document