Faculty Opinions recommendation of Effect of liberal blood transfusion on clinical outcomes and cost in spine surgery patients.

Author(s):  
Neil Blumberg
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1255-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor E. Purvis ◽  
C. Rory Goodwin ◽  
Rafael De la Garza-Ramos ◽  
A. Karim Ahmed ◽  
Virginie Lafage ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110266
Author(s):  
Ram K. Alluri ◽  
Fedan Avrumova ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Avani S. Vaishnav ◽  
Darren R. Lebl ◽  
...  

As robotics in spine surgery has progressed over the past 2 decades, studies have shown mixed results on its clinical outcomes and economic impact. In this review, we highlight the evolution of robotic technology over the past 30 years, discussing early limitations and failures. We provide an overview of the history and evolution of currently available spinal robotic platforms and compare and contrast the available features of each. We conclude by summarizing the literature on robotic instrumentation accuracy in pedicle screw placement and clinical outcomes such as complication rates and briefly discuss the future of robotic spine surgery.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishal Kumar ◽  
Vishnu Baburaj ◽  
Prasoon Kumar ◽  
Sarvdeep Singh Dhatt

AbstractBackgroundPedicle screw insertion is routinely carried out in spine surgery that has traditionally been performed under fluoroscopy guidance. Robotic guidance has recently gained popularity in order to improve the accuracy of screw placement. However, it is unclear whether the use of robotics alters the accuracy of screw placement or clinical outcomes.ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to compare the results of pedicle screws inserted under fluoroscopy guidance, with those inserted under robotic guidance, in terms of both short-term radiographic outcomes, as well as long-term clinical outcomes.MethodsThis systematic review will be conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A literature search will be conducted on the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Ovid with a pre-determined search strategy. A manual bibliography search of included studies will also be done. Original articles in English that directly compare pedicle screw insertion under robotic guidance to those inserted under fluoroscopy guidance will be included. Data on outcomes will be extracted from included studies and analysis carried out with the help of appropriate software.


2007 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Dionigi ◽  
F. Rovera ◽  
L. Boni ◽  
G. Carrafiello ◽  
C. Recaldini ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ulysses Ribeiro Jr. ◽  
Daiane O. Tayar ◽  
Rodrigo A. Ribeiro ◽  
Priscila Andrade ◽  
Silvio M. Junqueira Jr.

Purpose. Anastomotic leaks (AL) present a significant source of clinical and economic burden on patients undergoing colorectal surgeries. This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical and economic consequences of AL and its risk factors. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2012 and 2013 based on the billing information of 337 patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR). The outcomes evaluated were the development of AL, use of antibiotics, 30-day readmission and mortality, and total hospital costs, including readmissions and length of stay (LOS). The risk factors for AL, as well as the relationship between AL and clinical outcomes, were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression. Generalized linear models (GLM) were employed to evaluate the association between AL and continuous outcomes (LOS and costs). Results. AL was detected in 6.8% of the patients. Emergency surgery (aRR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.15–5.71, p=0.021), blood transfusion (aRR 4.44; 95% CI: 1.86–10.64, p=0.001), and cancer diagnosis (aRR 2.51; 95% CI: 1.27–4.98, p=0.008) were found to be independent predictors of AL. Patients with AL showed higher antibiotic usage (aRR 1.69; 95% CI: 1.37–2.09, p<0.001), 30-day readmission (aRR 3.34; 95% CI: 1.53–7.32, p=0.003) and mortality (aRR 13.49; 95% CI: 4.10–44.35, p<0.001), and longer LOS (39.6 days, as opposed to 7.5 days for patients without AL, p<0.001). Total hospital costs amounted to R$210,105 for patients with AL in comparison with R$34,270 for patients without AL (p<0.001). In multivariable GLM, the total hospital costs for AL patients were 4.66 (95% CI: 3.38–6.23, p<0.001) times higher than those for patients without AL. Conclusions. AL leads to worse clinical outcomes and increases hospital costs by 4.66 times. The risk factors for AL were found to be emergency surgery, blood transfusion, and cancer diagnosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document