scholarly journals Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kebijakan hutang perusahaan non keuangan publik

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-116
Author(s):  
SORAYA SORAYA ◽  
MEIRYANANDA PERMANASARI

The purpose of this research is to get an empirical evidence about influence of non-debt tax shield, tangibility, profitability, growth, size, manajerial ownership, institutional ownership, dividend policy, business risk, and investment opportunity set on debt policy. The population of this research are allnon financial companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) from the period of 2010 to 2013. Sample selection procedure carried out by implementing purposive sampling method with total sample 33 non financial companies. Data are analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The result indicates that non-debt tax shield, tangibility, profitability, growth, size, institutional ownership, and dividend policy have influence toward debt policy. Other independent variables such as manajerial ownership, business risk, and investment opportunity set do not have influence toward debt policy.  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-59
Author(s):  
Luh Nik Oktarini ◽  
Putu Atim Purwaningrat

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of free cash flow to debt policy to determine the influence of investment opportunity set against debt policy to determine the effect of managerial ownership on debt policy  to determine the effect of free cash flow to the dividend policy to determine the effect of managerial ownership to dividend policy. This research was conducted on manufaktur companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange 2011-2015 period. Methods of data collection is done by using the method of documentation. Data analysis with path analysis with AMOS program version 20. The results showed  the effect of variable free cash flow to debt policy is significant, effect of variable investment opportunity set against debt policy is significant, the effect of managerial ownership variable against debt policy is not significantly, the effect of variable free cash flow toward dividend policy is not significant,  the effect of managerial ownership variable to dividend policy is a significant and indirect influence of the variable investment opportunity set against the dividend policy through debt policy is significant.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Vivi Apriliyanti ◽  
Hermi Hermi ◽  
Vinola Herawaty

<p class="Default" align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong><em></em></p><p class="Default"><em>The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of debt policy, dividend policy,profitability, sales growth and investment opportunity set on firm value with firm size as moderating variable in the manufacturing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The population used in this study is a company that is listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample used in this study 128 companies with an observation period of 3 (three) years from 2016 to 2018. The method of determining the sample used in this study was the purposive sampling method. The data processing method used in this study is the causality test with multiple regression analysis using SPSS version 23. The independent variables in this study are Debt Policy, Dividend Policy, Profitability, Sales Growth and Investment Opportunity. The moderating variable in this study is Company Size. The dependent variable in this study is firm value. The results of this study indicate that Debt Policy has a positive effect on Firm’s Value, Dividend Policy does not effect on Firm Value, Profitability does not have a positive effect on Firm’s Value, Sales Growth does not effect on Firm’s Value, Investment Opportunity Set does not effect on Firm’s Value, Firm Size does not have a positive effect on Firm’s Value, Firm Size does not strengthen the realtionship between Debt Policy with Firm’s Value, Firm Size does not strengthen the realtionship between Dividend Policy with Firm’s Value, Firm Size does not strengthen the realtionship between Profitability with Firm’s Value, Firm Size does not strengthen the realtionship between Sales Growth with Firm’s Value, Firm Size does not strengthen the realtionship between Investment Opportunity Set with Firm’s Value.</em></p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-49
Author(s):  
Abrianita Vika Nur Maharsi ◽  
Siti Puryandani ◽  
Rudi Suryo Kristanto

  Dividend policy is a decision to define the part received by shareholders according to the funds they invest as well as the part that will be retained by the company. Dividend payout ratio has been discussed in the financial sector by several researchers since 1961 when Miller and Modigliani proposed the theory of “Signalling Hypothesis”. There are many variables that affect dividend policy including profitability, debt policy, liquidity, growth, investment opportunity set,etc. In this research, Investment Opportunity Set (IOS) is choosen according to the hardness of this observation, the main purpose of this research is to study the proxy of IOS exactly. This research aimed to empirically test the effect of set investment opportunity to the dividend policy. The tested variable in this study was investment opportunity set measured by market-to-book value of equity while the moderating variable was firm size. The sample was 16 companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (I.S.E) 2011-2013 selected through purposive sampling technique. The analytical statistic was a simple linear regression to test the absolute difference value of moderation. The results showed that the investment opportunity set has significant effect on dividend policy because the value of significance IOS less than rate of significance (0,045<0,05), it means that firm size moderation can be used as moderator between investment opportunity set and dividend policy because the value of significance firm size less than rate of significance (0,041<0,05).


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-112
Author(s):  
Rahmi Zilla Aulia ◽  
Rina Asmeri ◽  
Meri Yani

               The aim of the study is to determine the effect of Dividend Policy, Debt Policy and Market Value on the Investment Opportunity Set. The research was carried out at the textile and garment sub-sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population in this study was all textile and garment sub-sector manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. The total population of companies listed in this study were 17 companies. Sampling of this study using purposive sampling technique, thus the final sample obtained was 9 companies incorporated in the textile and garment sector on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period of 2014-2017. The data analysis technique used in this study is descriptive analysis, classic assumption test, multiple linear regression and hypothesis testing using the coefficient of determination, t-statistics to examine the partial regression coefficient and f-statistics to examine the regression coefficient simultaneously with the help of SPSS 21 for windows. The results show that dividend policy has a significant effect on the investment opportunity set, debt policy has a partial effect on the investment opportunity set, market value partially influences the investment opportunity set and dividend policy, debt policy and market value simultaneously influence the investment opportunity set .


Author(s):  
Azalia Bonita ◽  
Hotman T Pohan

<p class="Style1"><em>The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of insider ownership, </em><em>institutional ownership, dividend policy, asset structure, profitability, firm growth, </em><em>business risk and firm size to debt policy. Population in this research is non financial </em><em>companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the study period of years 2011- </em><em>2013. The samples of this research are 61 nonfinancial companies. The multiple </em><em>regression is statistic method which is used to test the research hypothesis. The results </em><em>of this research show that profitability and firm size have significantly influence the </em><em>debt policy. While insider ownership, institutional ownership, dividend policy, asset </em><em>structure, firm growth, and business risk have not influence the debt policy.</em></p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Apit Susanti ◽  
Sekar Mayangsari

The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of insider ownership, institutional ownership, dividend policy, asset structure, profitability, firm growth, and business risk to debt policy. This research is developed based on the previous research carried out by Murni and Andriana (2007). Data were taken from all companies are listed at Indonesian Stock Exchange for three years (2009-2011) except financial, insurance, and other financial industries. Sample selection were based on purposive sampling. Only 45 companies meet the criteria and taken as sample. For this study SPSS 11.5 program is used to find out the effect from all independent variable above to dependent variable. The statistical used in this research was multiple regression. The research showed that institutional ownership, asset structure, profitability, and firm growth had effect to debt policy but insider ownership, dividend policy, and business risk had no effect to debt policy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-210
Author(s):  
Yulius Kurnia Susanto

The purpose of the research was to obtain empirical evidence that managerial and institutional ownership, divide nd policy, firm growth, profitability, firm size, systematic risk, investment opportunity set and asset structure affect debt policy. The population in this research are all companies that listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange with the observation period 2005 to 2008. The sample selection was done by using purposive sampling method. Data used in this research was obtained from financial statement and Fact Book, performance summary of listed companies and BAPEPAM - LK . Data analysis used a multiple regression analysis. The results of this research are managerial ownership, cash dividend policy, profitability, firm size, investment opportunity set and asset structure affect debt policy. While the institutional ownership, firm growth and systematic risk not affect debt policy. Manager who owns shares in his company tends to use funds from retained earnings and share capital. They will distribute cash dividends to attract in - vestors to buy shares. Source of funds from obligation providing a risk to the company.  


Author(s):  
Mateus Xavier Da Costa Cabral ◽  
Arsono Laksamana ◽  
Mudjilah Rahayu

Companies that go public, in general, have been managed professionally that can be tailored to the consumers’ needs under applicable regulations. Management within a company's business entity involves an agency relationship. The purpose of this study is to examine: a) a reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership, debt policy, dividend policy and company performance of manufacturing companies of the Indonesian Stock Exchange, b) the influence of institutional ownership, debt policy, dividend policy on the company performance of the manufacturing companies of the Indonesian Stock Exchange. This type of research includes associative research with a quantitative approach. The samples of this research as many as 98 manufacturing companies listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange of the period of 2006-2015 with the technique of determining purposive samplings. Data analysis technique used in this research is Granger Causality test. The results of this study are: a) there is no reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership and debt policy, b) there is no reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership with dividend policy, c) no reciprocal relationship between debt policy and dividend policy, d) there is no reciprocal relationship between institutional ownership and company performance; e) there is no reciprocal relationship between debt policy and company performance; f) there is no reciprocal relationship between dividend policy and company performance; g) institutional ownership has a positive and partially significant influence on company performance, h) debt policy has a positive and partially significant influence on company performance, and i) dividend policy has positive and partially significant influence to companies performance on manufacturing company listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange


Jurnal Ecogen ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 298
Author(s):  
Puteri Prihatini ◽  
Dessi Susanti

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of profitability, investment opportunity set, and managerial ownership on dividend policy. The population of this study consists of whole manufacturing companies that listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2013 to 2016 by using secondary data. The data have been collected from financial report of companies from Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) website and Indonesian Capital Market Directory (ICMD). In this study, the samples are obtained 21 companies out of 145 companies. Analytical method that is used is multiple regression analysis. The hypothesis is measured by using statistical t-test with α level of 5%. The results indicate that profitability gives negative effect but does not significant on dividend  policy of manufacturing companies that listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). Meanwhile, investment opportunity set and managerial ownership give positive effect and also significant on dividend policy of manufacturing companies that listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX).Keyword: profitability, investment opportunity set, managerial ownership, and dividend policy


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document