scholarly journals PRIVATE EQUITY MARKET IN THE ECOSYSTEM OF START-UPS AND SME SECTOR – PART 1

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (49) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadeusz Waściński ◽  
Anna Dudkowska ◽  
Jevgenijs Kurovs
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Eastern European ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Investment Funds ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Investment Companies ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Polish Economy ◽  
Start Ups

Private Equity (PE)/Venture Capital (VE) Funds cover medium and long-term transactions on the private enterprise market. They adopt a legal form of closed-ended investment funds or more and more appreciated alternative investment companies, which contribute to a development of innovativeness in the Polish economy, supporting enterprises on each level of their expansion. Over the last years, there has been an increased value of investment reported among the European PE funds. Poland’s share in the Central and Eastern European (CEE) investments has been the highest in the region and does not fall below 46%. Moreover, more than a double increase of domestic PE investments in 2017 is an opportunity for improving one of the lowest innovation indexes in the European Union. An important role in this matter also belongs to the growing power of start-up ecosystem. It is not without significance that there is a growing awareness of start-ups cooperating with funds, which is defined e.g. by a stronger position of investor or a limited possibility to negotiate the terms of investment agreements. The aim of this article is to present the PE market and its meaning in the development of young companies. Showing in the first part of the article statistics related to management of venture capital in Poland compared to Europe and the CEE will identify tendencies in development of the Polish PE market. It will also allow estimating Poland’s chances for improving its position in the innovative European ranking and increasing Poland’s competitiveness on the international level. Emphasising the importance of startup’s education in dealing with VC funds in the second part of the study will additionally highlight the essence of their cooperation in terms of professionalization of the PE market and a growth of the country’s innovativeness.

scholarly journals Measuring the Spillovers of Venture Capital

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-48
Author(s):  
Monika Schnitzer ◽  
Martin Watzinger
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Knowledge Spillovers ◽  
Fund Raising ◽  
Tax Credits ◽  
Venture Capital Investment ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Established Firms ◽  
Start Ups

This paper shows that venture capital investment in start-ups increases innovation of established companies in technologically related fields due to knowledge spillovers. To address endogeneity issues, we instrument R&D expenditures of established companies with statelevel R&D tax credits (Bloom, Schankerman, and Van Reenen, 2013), and venture capital investment with past fund-raising of private equity buy-out funds (Nanda and Rhodes-Kropf, 2013). Exploring the mechanism, we show that the patents of VC-financed start-ups are on average of higher quality, more novel and less protected by intellectual property rights than those of established firms, leading to significantly larger spillovers. This knowledge transfer between companies is enhanced by mobile start-up inventors.

scholarly journals Innovative start-ups and young entrepreneurs: Definition of venture capital and findings from Switzerland

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Simon Zaby
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Flow Of Funds ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Capital Financing ◽  
Proper Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Start Ups

This paper aims to investigate success factors of innovative start-up firms from the perspective of young start-up managers. Which key factors did they experience before and since the foundation of their company? The experience from the quite young Swiss start-up scene pro-vides important insights to entrepreneurs and policy-makers in emerging countries that cur-rently face the necessity of building up a start-up environment. One part of the data has been collected by the author, the other part originates from the Swiss Venture Capital Database (total sample size: 306). The results show a significant role of venture capital financing for the success of innovative start-ups. Interestingly, this is to some extent because the start-ups see various additional benefits from venture capitalists involved in their firm. Thus, the findings shed new light on a proper definition of venture capital that should not solely focus on the flow of funds.

Start-Ups Are Everywhere! (but the Growth Statistics)

2021 ◽  
pp. 43-50
Author(s):  
Dan Breznitz
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
San Diego ◽  
Gilded Age ◽  
Silicon Valley ◽  
Successful Solution ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Ways Of Thinking ◽  
Finance Innovation ◽  
The Mind ◽  
Start Ups

“But,” some readers might say, “look at Israel, look at San Diego—it is still feasible to become a Silicon-Hyphen.” To which this chapter answers: “And would it be a good idea if it is?” The chapter opens the mind of the reader to new ways of thinking about innovation and growth. Providing a frontal attack on the start-up religion and its most important commandment: using venture capital (VC) as a basis for growth. VCs have attained the paradigmatic status of a “must-have,” institution, when in fact they are just one, not very successful, solution to solving the question of how to finance innovation. The chapter does it by explaining how VCs really work and make money (and for whom), where and when they are successful (rarely and only in ICT and biotech), what does that means to the companies they finance, who is allowed to be part of this party, and what are the impacts on communities in places where the VCs are successful (inequality levels last seen in the Gilded Age). It utilizes research on Israel and Silicon Valley to drive those points home. At the end of the chapter the reader should realize that, YES, they want innovation-based growth, but NO, even if they could make it happen, the last thing they want for their community is to become a Silicon-Valley/Israel look-alike.

scholarly journals Private equity and venture capital in South Africa: A comparison of project financing decisions

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Portmann ◽  
Chipo Mlambo
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Venture Capital ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Project Financing ◽  
Financing Decisions ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Risk Appetite ◽  
Investment Opportunities ◽  
Venture Capital Firms

This paper investigates the manner in which private equity and venture capital firms in South Africa assess investment opportunities. The analysis was facilitated using a survey containing both Likert-scale and open-ended questions. The key findings show that both private equity and venture capital firms rate the entrepreneur or management team higher than any other criterion or consideration. Private equity firms, however, emphasise financial criteria more than venture capitalists do. There is also an observable shift in the investment activities away from start-up funding, towards later-stage deals. Risk appetite has also declined post the financial crisis.

Syndication in Venture Capital Investment in India: An Empirical Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Mishra ◽  
Dinabandhu Bag
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Venture Capital Investment ◽  
The Past ◽  
Efficient Management ◽  
Common Trend ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Start Ups

Indian economy witnessed high inflow of capital for start-ups in current fiscal year through venture capital (VC) investment. From different Indian VC deals, it is evident that VC investors prefer to invest jointly. In other words, joint investment or co-investment or syndication is a common trend in Indian VC industry. VCs adopt this strategy to minimise their future uncertainties as a part of the control mechanism. In this study, an attempt is made to find out different determinants of this syndication strategy. The samples taken in this study are retrieved from Venture Intelligence database for the period 2005–2014. The data are analysed through linear regression and binomial logistic regression. Two empirical models have been developed. The derived models validate different control variables and deal with specific characteristics to comprehend the rationale of syndication mechanism. The findings of the study indicate that the past experience and the number of industry exposure of a VC in IT and ITES industry are the major predictors for a syndication decision. Subsequently, the precautionary investment attributes like number of investment round, stage funding, etc. draw the interest of potential co-investors in a syndicated deal. Syndication mechanism benefits the VC investors through sharing of risk of investment in a start-up and preparing them for a successful exit. Extant literature supports the results as Indian VC investors prefer to share the risk profile of a start-up business and adopt different risk diversion mechanisms to attract co-investors in the deal. Furthermore, the joint investment by investors drag more funding amount and also create more human capital for efficient management of the investment in VC-backed portfolio.

Venture capital and private equity industry in Hungary

2013 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judit Karsai
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Private Equity ◽  
Western Europe ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Debt Crisis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Government Interventions ◽  
Business Plans ◽  
Start Up

Hungary represents the second most developed venture capital and private equity (VC&PE) market in Central and Eastern Europe. This article is based on a detailed survey of the entire VC industry between 1989–2010. It demonstrates that while there was a relatively strong correlation between the allocation of capital to VC&PE funds and the capital flow into the Budapest Stock Exchange, the changes in investment activities were closely related to election years. Investments had been hampered primarily not by the shortage of capital, but by a lack of demand and attractive business plans. The article illustrates the different roles and approaches of global, regional and country VC&PE funds in Hungary. It points out that VC investments hardly satisfied their principal function or mission, namely to support innovative start-up and small businesses. Government interventions in the VC market proved to be ineffective as well. Similarly to the whole region, the Hungarian market profited from a transitory situation in the case of high-value PE transactions between 2007 and 2008, at the beginning of the crisis, when the investment problems in Western Europe had yet not extended to the CEE region. From 2009 onward, however, the crisis has resulted in a drop in investments despite the significant amount of uninvested capital accumulated in recent years. As to the prospects for 2013, the early-stage VC segment in Hungary is expected to flourish owing to the Jeremie funds, while the high-value buyout segment of the market will suffer from both the euro zone debt crisis and the loss of transparency in economic policy.

scholarly journals Legal Framework for Establishing and Functioning of Start–Ups in the Conditions of Slovak Legislation

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
Zuzana Ilková
Keyword(s):  
Slovak Republic ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Joint Stock Company ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Commercial Company ◽  
New Form ◽  
Start Ups

Abstract The existing legal regulation of the Slovak Republic allowed small and medium–sized enterprises, which form a basis for the business environment, not only in Slovakia but also in economically advanced countries, to have a legal form of any of the four types of commercial companies or cooperatives. According to the Concept for Supporting Start–ups and Start–up Ecosystem in the Slovak Republic, for the optimal engagement of investors and start–up development in the Slovak Republic, it is most effective to introduce a new form of capital commercial company that will allow for a flexible set–up of property relationships, investors’ entry and exit from the investment. The paper deals with the issue of special regulation of private law, company law. It points out some of the changes introduced to the regulation of commercial companies by introducing a new type of capital company, a simple joint–stock company and highlights possible problems in application. The new form of a capital commercial company was established by an amendment to the Commercial Code, Act no. 389/2015 Coll., which entered into force on January 1st, 2017. The purpose of the new form of a commercial company, as stated in the explanatory memorandum, is to ensure the legal form of a legal entity, which would be a complex and, at the same time, simple solution for risky investment in the form of commercial companies, especially investments to start–ups. To what extent the new form of a commercial company will meet the expectations of investors, will only be proved after its practical implementation and after the expression of the investors' interest in engaging in such form of company.

scholarly journals Venture Capital and Valuation of Innovative Start-ups: the Business Case of Mosaicoon

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 01-15
Author(s):  
Antonio Del Pozzo ◽  
◽  
Salvatore Loprevite ◽  
Domenico Nicolò ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Business Case ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Venture Capitalists ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Continuous Growth ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Start Ups

This article analyzes the decline of one of the best well-known and promising European start-ups: Mosaic on L. t. d. The business case is emblematic of many bankruptcies caused by strategies focusing on the expectations of continuous growth of economic capital and based on unconventional performance indicators, without considering the economic-financial results and self-financing. The expectations of return on capital are extremely high and this forces one to undertake risky growth paths with very high expected return rates. This also happens in the absence of an advanced and effective capital market. Venture capitalists, even when they are public, cannot compensate for these excesses. The analysis of the case contributes to the debate on the complex topic of assessing the potentiality of start-ups and it provides useful suggestions to operators (venture capitalists, business angels, start uppers, investors, etc.) for greater prudence in considering the non-financial performance indicators. Start-ups do not produce economic results in the early stage, so they may also be valued by using non-financial metrics. However, unconventional indicators cannot be the only parameters for evaluating. When the firm is a start-up without meaningful financial information, it is more appropriate to refer to a reliable business plan drawn up on rigorous estimates of expected incomes and cash flows. Keywords: Venture capital, Start-up, Default, Performance indicators, Business case.

scholarly journals Corporate venture capital: global trends and evaluation of russia’s prospects

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-128
Author(s):  
О. A. Yeremchenko
Keyword(s):  
Venture Capital ◽  
Mobile Communications ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Corporate Venture Capital ◽  
Global Trends ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Corporate Venture ◽  
Total Investment ◽  
Start Ups

The article analyzes the global trends of corporate venture financing (CFE) as a whole and for individual sectors of the economy. It is shown that the industries in which KFW is most actively and dynamically used are the Internet, mobile communications and healthcare. The maximum attention of corporate venture funds is attracted by start-ups in the early stages of raising capital, more than half of all venture capital deals are made at the Seed / Angel (seed stage) and Early Stage stages (the second stage of attracting start-up capital). The most common exit from venture capital deals during 2014–2018. For most industries, the redemption share of the FAC is a management startup (Management Buyout). It was concluded that Russia is poorly included in the use of corporate venture capital as a tool for building technological capacity: the country’s share in the number of corporate venture capital transactions in 2018 is 1.9% of the global total, and the total investment of Russian enterprises estimated at only 0.45% of the global total. It was suggested that it would be expedient to increase the activity of Russian corporations in the field of creating and using the capabilities of the FSC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document