АДАМДАГЫ «МҮНӨЗ» ЖАНА «САПАТ» ТҮШҮНҮКТӨРҮ, АЛАРДЫН ФРАЗЕОЛОГИЗМДЕР АРКЫЛУУ ТУЮНТУЛУШ БӨТӨНЧӨЛҮКТӨРҮ

Author(s):  
Г.О. Көчөрова ◽  
З.Д. Долуева

Адамдардагы "мүнөз" жана "сапат" түшүнүктөрү, ички туйгулары анын кыял-жоругунан билинет. Ички сезимдер кандай болсо, ошондой жагдайга жараша сырткы маанай өзгөрөт. Эгер адамдын ички жан дүйнөсүндө кубанычтуу сезим пайда болсо, анда маанайы жарык, кабагы ачык, күлүмсүрөгөн сүйкүмдүү жүздөрүн көрө алабыз, тескерисинче, сарсанаа болуу, бир нерсеге ачуусу келүү, кыжырдануу сезимде болсо, ал да анын жүзүнөн байкалат. Адамдардагы "мүнөз" жана "сапат" категориялары – эки башка кө- рүнүш. Башкача айтканда, мүнөз – адамга гана тиешелүү болгон, анын жүрүм-турумундагы, башка адамдар менен болгон карым-катышындагы, жасаган мамилелериндеги, кыймыл-аракеттериндеги туруктуу психикалык касиеттердин жыйындысы. Кулк мүнөз – адамдын кайталангыс, жеке сапаттарынан жана ички дүйнөдөгү рухий байлыгынан көрүнөт. Макаланын мазмунун мына ушул маселелер түзөт. Понятия «характер» и «качество» в человеке выражаются в его поведении. В зависимости от того какие внутренние ощущения у человека, меняется его настроение. Если у человека внутри появляются радостные ощущения, то и его настроение хорошее, и можно увидеть улыбчивое, милое лицо. Если же наоборот человек беспокоится, злится,раздражается, то это тоже заметно по его лицу. Категории «характер» и «качество» – это два разных явления. Иначе говоря, «характер» и «качество» - набор устойчивых психических свойств, который есть в человеке, в его поведении, в отношениях с другими людьми, в его действиях. Характер личности проявляется в уникальности человека, в индивидуальных качествах и в духовных богатствах внутреннего мира. Данные проблемы составляют содержание статьи. The concepts of character and quality in person, their expression in phraseology. Ideas about the character and qualities of a person are reflected in his actions. The mood changes depending in their inner feelings. We see a happy smile and good mood if there is joy in a person's soul, and if a person has a gloomy face, disappointment, anger, irritability can be seen on his face. In other words, character is a set of permanent psychological qualities that belong to a person only, in his behavior, in his relations with other people, in his actions. Character is an expression of a person's unique personal qualities and spiritual sense. The content of the article is devoted to these issues.

1988 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1003-1003
Author(s):  
Herbert J. Walberg

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Birrer ◽  
David T. Martin ◽  
Mark B. Andersen ◽  
Tamie Ebert ◽  
Brian Stevens

2005 ◽  
Vol 113 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
GJ Kahaly ◽  
UT Egle ◽  
P Bartenstein ◽  
M Dittmar ◽  
S Drecker ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Randi Veiteberg KVELLESTAD ◽  
Ingeborg STANA ◽  
VATN Gunhild

Teamwork involves different types of interactions—specifically cooperation andcollaboration—that are necessary in education and many other professions. The differencesbetween cooperation and collaboration underline the teacher’s role in influencing groupdynamics, which represent both a foundation for professional design education and aprequalification for students’ competences as teachers and for critical evaluation. As a testcase, we focused on the Working Together action-research project in design education forspecialised teacher training in design, arts, and crafts at the Oslo Metropolitan University,which included three student groups in the material areas of drawing, ceramics, and textiles.The project developed the participants’ patience, manual skills, creativity, and abilities,which are important personal qualities for design education and innovation and representcornerstones in almost every design literacy and business environment. The hope is thatstudents will transform these competences to teaching pupils of all ages in their futurecareers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-218
Author(s):  
OKSANA KOCHKINA ◽  
◽  
OLGA MARCHUK ◽  

The article examines the legal and moral and ethical aspects of a misdemeanor that discredits the honor of an employee of the criminal Executive system. The considered reason for dismissal has the main feature associated with the integration of legal and moral norms, which often raises a lot of questions about the attribution of a particular offense to this basis. Using the analysis of normative legal acts, the authors attempt to identify the signs that contribute to the separation of the studied grounds for dismissal from all their diversity. The classification of offenses that discredit the honor of an employee of the criminal Executive system is presented, which allows to systematize and organize the knowledge obtained about the considered grounds for dismissal. The analysis of a misdemeanor that defames the honor of an employee of the penal system from a moral and ethical position gives an understanding, first of all, that it does not have a clear regulation from the point of view of the law, but the consequences of committing such a misdemeanor are clearly legal. The concepts of “honor” and “dignity” are considered as ethical categories and are analyzed as personal qualities that are manifested in an employee of the penal correction system during the period of service. These categories in the behavior of a person or employee are manifested both externally (assessment from the outside) and internally (self-assessment). The article describes the value orientation of an employee of the criminal Executive system to ethical standards in professional activity, which is an integral part of the moral and ethical side of a misdemeanor that discredits the honor of an employee.


2019 ◽  
Vol 66 ◽  
pp. 327-334
Author(s):  
Inga V. Zheltikova ◽  
Elena I. Khokhlova

The article considers the dependence of the images of future on the socio-cultural context of their formation. Comparison of the images of the future found in A.I. Solzhenitsyn’s works of various years reveals his generally pessimistic attitude to the future in the situation of social stability and moderate optimism in times of society destabilization. At the same time, the author's images of the future both in the seventies and the nineties of the last century demonstrate the mismatch of social expectations and reality that was generally typical for the images of the future. According to the authors of the present article, Solzhenitsyn’s ideas that the revival of spirituality could serve as the basis for the development of economy, that the influence of the Church on the process of socio-economic development would grow, and that the political situation strongly depends on the personal qualities of the leader, are unjustified. Nevertheless, such ideas are still present in many images of the future of Russia, including contemporary ones.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document