Reform of control and supervisory activities. Changes in the regulatory framework for disinfection activities

2021 ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
Pavel Aleksandrovich Deminov ◽  
◽  
Pavel Alexandrovich Mochalkin ◽  

The reform of control and supervisory activities intended to exclude old and irrelevant acts and outdated norms, fix accurate and understandable rules, as well as exclude unreasonable and redundant norms in various areas. It was called the “regulatory guillotine" and involves a complete revision of the mandatory requirements for business. Comparison the SanPiN 3.3686-21 “Sanitary and epidemiologic requirements for prevention of infectious diseases" with earlier existing health regulations in the field of disinfection, disinsection, deratization was made. Changes in the regulatory framework in the field of disinfection activities are a necessity and a fait accompli. SanPiNs contain requirements, and their compliance can be verified by the relevant supervisory authorities. Reducing the number of requirements corresponds to the goals set by the reform - this will reduce the administrative burden on business and supervisory authorities. Keywords: reform of control and supervision activities, regulatory guillotine, changes in legislation, disinfection activities, legal acts in the field of disinfectology.

Author(s):  
Petr Ilyin

Especially dangerous infections (EDIs) belong to the conditionally labelled group of infectious diseases that pose an exceptional epidemic threat. They are highly contagious, rapidly spreading and capable of affecting wide sections of the population in the shortest possible time, they are characterized by the severity of clinical symptoms and high mortality rates. At the present stage, the term "especially dangerous infections" is used only in the territory of the countries of the former USSR, all over the world this concept is defined as "infectious diseases that pose an extreme threat to public health on an international scale." Over the entire history of human development, more people have died as a result of epidemics and pandemics than in all wars combined. The list of especially dangerous infections and measures to prevent their spread were fixed in the International Health Regulations (IHR), adopted at the 22nd session of the WHO's World Health Assembly on July 26, 1969. In 1970, at the 23rd session of the WHO's Assembly, typhus and relapsing fever were excluded from the list of quarantine infections. As amended in 1981, the list included only three diseases represented by plague, cholera and anthrax. However, now annual additions of new infections endemic to different parts of the earth to this list take place. To date, the World Health Organization (WHO) has already included more than 100 diseases in the list of especially dangerous infections.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 59-70
Author(s):  
Dalinama Telaumbanua

Covid-19 is a contagious disease that has the potential to cause a public health emergency. Therefore, preventive measures against these types of infectious diseases are mandatory as soon as possible. Indonesia as a nation of law, the prevention of infectious diseases is mandatory to be formed in a rule or regulation. The urgency of forming rules related to the prevention of Covid-19 is obliged to be formed in government regulation and regulation of the Minister of Health because both regulations are the implementation rules of Law No. 6 of 2018 concerning Health. Based on the author's analysis, there are 5 government regulations that must be established in order to perform countermeasures and prevention of infectious disease threats such as Covid-19 and there are 11 mandatory ministerial health regulations that are required to be established In anticipation of the Covid19 threat. Both types of regulations are very useful in anticipating health emergency that ultimately leads to the health of Indonesian people. It is expected that both of rules can be made immediately in order to give legal certainty in preventing the spread of Covid-19 widely. Keyword: Forming Rules, Management, Covid-19   Abstrak Covid-19 merupakan penyakit menular yang berpotensi menimbulkan kedaruratan kesehatan masyarakat. Oleh sebab itu, tindakan pencegahan terhadap jenis penyakit menular tersebut wajib dilakukan secepat mungkin. Indonesia sebagai negara hukum, maka pencegahan terhadap jenis penyakit menular tersebut wajib dibentuk dalam sebuah aturan atau regulasi. Urgensi pembentukan aturan terkait dengan pencegahan Covid-19 ini wajib dibentuk dalam Peraturan Pemerintah dan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan karena kedua peraturan tersebut merupakan peraturan pelaksanaan daripada Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Berdasarkan analisis penulis, ada 5 Peraturan Pemerintah yang wajib dibentuk dalam rangka melakukan tindakan penanggulangan dan pencegahan ancaman penyakit yang mudah menular seperti Covid-19 dan ada 11 Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan terkait yang wajib dibentuk dalam rangka mengantisipasi ancaman Covid-19. Kedua jenis peraturan tersebut sangat berguna dalam hal mengantisipasi kedaruratan kesehatan yang pada akhirnya menjurus pada kekarantinaan kesehatan masyarakat Indonesia. Kiranya kedua jenis peraturan ini segera dibuat dalam rangka memberi kepastian hukum dalam mencegah menularnya Covid-19 secara meluas. Kata Kunci: Pembentukan Aturan, Penanggulangan, Covid-19


Significance The regulatory framework has been clarified and simplified, particularly for hobbyist and light commercial operators, and it sets the scene for how the UK government intends to increase accountability and airspace safety through further regulation. Impacts Hobbyists will oppose these new changes as they will increase the operating cost and administrative burden of using a drone. Commercial drone users will benefit from new regulations as safety is critical for building public trust. Safer operations will help increase the use of drones for transport and delivery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (S6) ◽  
pp. S466-S469
Author(s):  
Marcos Espinal ◽  
Sylvain Aldighieri ◽  
Ronald St. John ◽  
Francisco Becerra-Posada ◽  
Carissa Etienne

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos Espinal ◽  
Sylvain Aldighieri ◽  
Ronald St. John ◽  
Francisco Becerra-Posada ◽  
Carissa Etienne

2007 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Sturtevant ◽  
Aranka Anema ◽  
John S. Brownstein

ABSTRACTGlobal public health surveillance is critical for the identification and prevention of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases. The World Health Organization recently released revised International Health Regulations (IHR) that serve as global legislation and provide guidelines for surveillance systems. The IHR aim to identify and prevent spread of these infectious diseases; however, there are some practical challenges that limit the usability of these regulations. IHR requires Member States to build necessary infrastructure for global surveillance, which may not be possible in underdeveloped countries. A large degree of freedom is given to each individual government and therefore different levels of reporting are common, with substantial emphasis on passive reporting. The IHR need to be enforceable and enforced without impinging on government autonomy or human rights. Unstable governments and developing countries require increased assistance in setting up and maintaining surveillance systems. This article addresses some challenges and potential solutions to the ability of national governments to adhere to the global health surveillance requirements detailed in the IHR. The authors review some practical challenges such as inadequate surveillance and reporting infrastructure, and legal enforcement and maintenance of individual human rights. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2007;1:117–121)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document